Abstract
Defining and balancing redox reaction requires both chemical knowledge and mathematical skills. The prevalent approach is to use the concept of oxidation number to determine the number of transferred electrons. However, the task of calculating oxidation numbers is often challenging. In this article, the H-atom method and O-atom method are developed for balancing redox equations. These two methods are based on the definition of redox reaction, which is the gain and loss of hydrogen or oxygen atoms. They complement current practices and provide an alternate path to balance redox equations. The advantage of these methods is that calculation of oxidation number is not required. Atoms are balanced instead. By following standard operating procedures, H-atom, O-atom, and H2O molecule act as artificial devices to balance both inorganic and organic equations in molecular forms. By using the H-atom and O-atom methods, the number of transferred electrons can be determined by the number of transferred H-atoms or O-atoms, which are demonstrated as electron-counting concepts for balancing redox reactions. In addition, the relationships among the number of transferred H-atom, the number of transferred O-atom, the number of transferred electrons, and the change of oxidation numbers are established.
Introduction
Chemical equation is the language of chemistry. It is important for students to acquire competence in balancing chemical equations (Herndon, 1997; Porter, 1985; Kolb, 1981, 1979) because by doing so their chemistry knowledge, mathematical skills, and logical thinking can be consolidated. There are different approaches to balancing chemical equations. Arithmetic methods and inspection methods are applied for balancing simple reactions. Algebraic methods, such as linear simultaneous equations method (Dukov, 2017; Olson, 1997) and matrix method (Blakley, 1982) are used for balancing all types of chemical reactions.
In chemistry curriculum, the redox concept is taught “as an organizing structure for chemical knowledge, as a guide to the prediction of reactions, and as a mathematical device to enable the balancing of certain complex reactions” (Goodstein, 1970). According to IUPAC definitions, the terms of redox reactions can be understood in four different models: electron transfer, oxidation number, H-atom transfer, and O-atom transfer, shown in Table 1. Silverstein (2011) comments that a redox reaction has “too many definitions”. Sisler & VanderWerf (1980) argue that a redox reaction is “an example of chemical sophistry”. Paik, Kim & Kim (2017) discuss limitations of the four redox models and suggest a process-based model to define redox reactions.
Terms of redox reactions.
Redox terms | Oxidation number | Electron transfer | H-atom transfer | O-atom transfer |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oxidation | Increase | Loss e− | Loss H | Gain O |
Reduction | Decrease | Gain e− | Gain H | Loss O |
Reducing agent | Increase | Loss e− | Loss H | Gain O |
Oxidizing agent | Decrease | Gain e− | Gain H | Loss O |
The notion of redox reaction is commonly understood as the gain and loss of electrons in a reaction. Oxidation number (or oxidation state) acts as an electron-counting concept (Karen, 2015). To balance redox reactions, the commonly used methods are the oxidation number method (Kolb, 1979; Generalic & Vladislavic, 2018) and the inspection method (Guo, 1997). The oxidation number method includes the overall reaction method (Dukov, 2017; Kolb, 1979) and the half reactions ion-electron method (Fishtik & Berka, 2005; Generalic & Vladislavic, 2018). General chemistry textbooks tend to use the ion-electron method as a primary procedure for balancing redox equations (Chang & Goldsby, 2013; Tro, 2014). This method must assign all oxidation numbers of atoms; determine the transferred electrons; and use H+, OH−, and H2O as balancing tools. The task of calculating oxidation numbers (ON), however, is challenging (Jurowski, Krzeczkowska & Jurowska, 2015). The oxidation number method is restricted in cases where oxidation numbers are uncertain (see Example 1), and where there are multiple sets of redox couples in the complex redox reaction (see Examples 2 and 3).
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2 | (Example 1) |
P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4 | (Example 2) |
Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2 | (Example 3) |
H-atom and O-atom are present in the cosmos (Williams, 1999). The H-atom transfer reaction (Capaldo & Ravelli, 2017; Chuang, Fedoseev, Ioppolo, van Dishoeck & Linnartz, 2016; Rosado-Reyes, Manion & Tsang, 2011) and O-atom transfer reaction (Holm, 1987; Kovacs, Lee, Olson & Jackson, 1996; Moriarty, Gupta, Hu, Berenschot & White, 1981) are widely used in synthetic chemistry. The H-atom and O-atom function as intermediates in chemical processes (Cole-Filipiak, Shapero, Negru & Neumark, 2014; Dougherty & Rabitz, 1980; Gerasimov & Shatalov, 2013; Lucci et al., 2016; Simmie, 2003). They can act as reactants and/or products in chemical conversions (Bergner, Öberg & Rajappan, 2019; Casavecchia, Leonori & Balucani, 2015; Paulson, Mutunga, Shelby & Anderson, 2014; Ran, Yang, Lee, Lu, She, Wang & Yang, 2005; Sun, Lucas, Song, Zhang, Brazier, Houston & Bowman, 2019; Walker & Light, 1980; Wang, Masunov, Allison, Chang, Lim, Jin & Vasu, 2019; Xu, Jirasek & Petr, 2020). Although redox reaction can also be defined as the gain and loss of H-atoms or O-atoms (IUPAC, 2019) the H-atom and O-atom have rarely been introduced as redox balancing devices (Yuen & Lau, 2021). Based on these concepts, the new H-atom method and O-atom method for balancing redox reaction are explored. Consequently, the relationships among the number of transferred H-atom, the number of transferred O-atom, the number of transferred electrons, and the change of oxidation numbers are studied.
Dividing an overall redox reaction into two half reactions
“Any redox reaction may be decomposed into a sum of two half-reactions” (Fishtik & Berka, 2005). The critical step of the H-atom and O-atom methods is the division of the overall molecular redox reaction into two half reactions. An inspection method, termed “ping-pong method”, is employed here. The ping-pong procedures and examples are as follows:
Identify all elements, with the exception of H- and O-elements, on both reactant’s side (left) and product’s side (right).
Choose a reactant on the left and identify all its non-H and non-O element(s).
Link the reactant’s element(s) on the left to product’s element(s) on the right.
Keep linking right-left-right…, until two half reactions are attained.
Dividing an overall reaction, Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2, into two half reactions. | |
The first half reaction (1st): | |
(1st i) | Choose the first reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s): |
Fe3C: Fe and C elements | |
(1st ii) | Link Fe and C on the left to Fe(NO3)3 and CO2 on the right |
Fe3C → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 | |
(1st iii) | Link N element on the right to HNO3 on the left |
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 | |
The second half reaction (2nd): | |
(2nd i) | Choose the second reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s): |
HNO3: N element | |
(2nd ii) | Link N on the left to NO2 on the right |
HNO3 → NO2 |
an overall reaction: | Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2 |
the first divided half reaction: | Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 |
the second divided half reaction: | HNO3 → NO2 |
Dividing an overall reaction, P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4, into two half reactions. | |
The first half reaction (1st): | |
(1st i) | Choose the first reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s): |
P2I4: P and I elements | |
(1st ii) | Link P and I on the left to PH4I on the right |
P2I4 → PH4I | |
(1st iii) | The P2I4 → PH4I half reaction cannot be balanced, then link to left side |
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I | |
The second half reaction (2nd): | |
(2nd i) | Choose the second reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s): |
P4: P element | |
(2nd ii) | Link P on the left to H3PO4 on the right |
P4 → H3PO4 |
an overall reaction: | P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4 |
the first divided half reaction: | P2I4 + P4 → PH4I |
the first divided half reaction: | P4 → H3PO4 |
Dividing an overall reaction, Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2, into two half reactions. | |
The first half reaction (1st): | |
(1st i) | Choose the first reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s): |
Pb(N3)2: Pb and N elements | |
(1st ii) | Link Pb and N on the left to Pb3O4 and NO on the right |
Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO | |
The second half reaction (2nd): | |
(2nd i) | Choose the second reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s): |
Cr(MnO4)2: Cr and Mn elements | |
(2nd ii) | Link Cr and Mn on the left to Cr2O3 and MnO2 on the right |
Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2 |
an overall reaction: | Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2 |
the first divided half reaction: | Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO |
the first divided half reaction: | Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2 |
H-atom method: procedures
When using the H-atom method, H, O, and H2O are used as balancing devices. This method requires the use of a molecular chemical equation. If an ionic chemical equation is provided, it must be converted to a molecular chemical equation by adding proper spectator ions. H2O can be omitted in the process optionally. When both half and overall chemical equations are balanced, H2O will appear consequently through the working procedures to fulfill the conservational law of matter, which is one of the advantages of using the H-atom and O-atom methods. It is important to emphasize that these two methods are mathematically balancing methods. The H-atom and O-atom may not necessarily act as intermediates, and the H-atom and O-atom methods do not represent any reaction mechanisms.
Divide into two half reactions
Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
Balance all other atoms except H and O
Balance the oxygen atoms with O
Balance the hydrogen atoms with H
Add two H atoms for each O atom
Convert two H atoms and one O atom to one H2O molecule
Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent
Combine the two half reactions
Simplify the overall chemical equation
Given the following molecular chemical equation: | |
C6H5CH3 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C6H5COOH + K2SO4 + MnSO4 | |
Convert to | C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4 |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
C7H8 → C7H6O2 | |
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
C7H8 → C7H6O2 | |
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2 | |
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2 + 2H | |
C7H8 + 2O + 4H → C7H6O2 + 2H + 4H | |
C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H | |
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4 | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 6H + 8O | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 16H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 6H + 8O + 16H | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O | |
Step 3. | Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 30) |
(C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H) × 5 | |
(2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O) × 3 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions |
5C7H8 + 10H2O → 5C7H6O2 + 30H | |
6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 + 30H → 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 24H2O | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
5C7H8 + 6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 → 5C7H6O2 + 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 14H2O |
In this process, each H-atom is equivalent to the gain/loss of one electron. In example 4, C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4, one half of the equation “C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H” releasing six H-atoms represents the loss of six electrons, and the other half equation “2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O” obtaining ten H-atoms represents the gain of 10 electrons. KMnO4 and C7H8 function as oxidizing agent and reducing agent respectively.
Given the following ionic chemical equation: | |
CH3CH2OH + Cr2O7 2− + H+ → CH3COOH + Cr3+ | |
Convert to | CH3CH2OH + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → CH3COOH + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 |
C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
C2H6O → C2H4O2 | |
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
C2H6O → C2H4O2 | |
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2 | |
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2 + 2H | |
C2H6O + O + 2H → C2H4O2 + 2H + 2H | |
C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H | |
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 8H + 7O | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 14H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 8H + 7O + 14H | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O | |
Step 3. | Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 12) |
(C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H) × 3 | |
(K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O) × 2 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions |
3C2H6O + 3H2O → 3C2H4O2 + 12H | |
2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 + 12H → 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 14H2O | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
3C2H6O + 2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 → 3C2H4O2 + 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 11H2O |
In example 5, C2H6O + Cr2O7 2− + H+ → C2H4O2 + Cr3+, the ionic equation is converted to a molecular chemical equation, C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4, by adding spectator ions K+ and SO4 2−. One half of the oxidation reaction “C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H” releasing four H-atoms represents the loss of four electrons, and the other half reduction reaction “K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O” obtaining six H-atoms represents the gain of six electrons. K2Cr2O7 and C2H6O act as oxidizing agent and reducing agent respectively.
Given the following inorganic equation: | |
P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4 | |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I | |
P4 → H3PO4 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I | |
2P2I4 + P4 → 8PH4I | |
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I | |
P4 → H3PO4 | |
P4 → 4H3PO4 | |
P4 + 16O → 4H3PO4 | |
P4 + 12H + 16O → 4H3PO4 | |
P4 + 12H + 16O + 32H → 4H3PO4 + 32H | |
P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H | |
Step 3. | Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 160) |
(2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I) × 5 | |
(P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H) × 8 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions |
10P2I4 + 5P4 + 160H → 40PH4I | |
8P4 + 128H2O → 32H3PO4 + 160H | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
10P2I4 + 13P4 + 128H2O → 40PH4I + 32H3PO4 |
In example 6, P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4, one half of the reduction reaction “2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I” gaining thirty-two H-atoms represents the gain of 32 electrons, and the other half oxidation reaction of “P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H” releasing twenty H-atoms represents the loss of 20 electrons.
Given the following inorganic equation: | |
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2 | |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 | |
HNO3 → NO2 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 | |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 | |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 | |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 9H | |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2O + 4H → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 9H + 4H | |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H | |
HNO3 → NO2 | |
HNO3 → NO2 + O | |
HNO3 → NO2 + O + H | |
HNO3 + H → NO2 + O + H + H | |
HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O | |
Step 3. | Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 13) |
(Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H) × 1 | |
(HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O) × 13 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H | |
13HNO3 + 13H → 13NO2 + 13H2O | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
Fe3C + 22HNO3 → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13NO2 + 11H2O |
In example 7, Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2, one half of the oxidation reaction “Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H” releasing 13 H-atoms represents the loss of 13 electrons, and the other half reduction reaction of “HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O” gaining one H-atom represents the gain of one electron. Although example 7 contains uncertain oxidation numbers of a reactant Fe3C, it can still be balanced by the H-atom method.
Stoichiometric number of transferred H-atoms in half redox reactions
For examples 4 through 7, the half redox reactions and their stoichiometric number of transferred H-atoms are presented and defined in Table 2.
Stoichiometric number of transferred H-atoms in half redox reactions.
Half reaction | TH | Half redox reaction |
---|---|---|
C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H | Loss of 6H | Oxidation |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O | Gain of 10H | Reduction |
C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H | Loss of 4H | Oxidation |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O | Gain of 6H | Reduction |
P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H | Loss of 20H | Oxidation |
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I | Gain of 32H | Reduction |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H | Loss of 13H | Oxidation |
HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O | Gain of 1H | Reduction |
According to the H-atom method, the gain/loss of one H is identical to the gain/loss of one electron (H → H+ + e−). The number of transferred H-atoms (TH) is equal to the number of transferred electrons (Te−) as shown in Table 3. TH can function as an electron-counting concept, Te− = 1 × TH.
Stoichiometric TH and Te− in half redox reactions.
Half reaction: TH | Half reaction: Te– |
---|---|
C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H | C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H+ + 6e− |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O | 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H+ + 10e− → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O |
C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H | C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H+ + 4e− |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O | K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H+ + 6e− → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O |
P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H | P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H+ + 20e− |
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I | 2P2I4 + P4 + 32H+ + 32e− → 8PH4I |
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H | Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H+ + 13e− |
HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O | HNO3 + H+ + e− → NO2 + H2O |
The O-atom method: procedures
The procedures of the O-atom method are similar to that of the H-atom method. The O-atom, rather than the H-atom, acts as the dominant balancing device. The differences in their procedures are illustrated in Step 2d, Step 2e, and Step 3.
Divide into two half reactions
Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
Balance all other atoms except H and O
Balance the oxygen atoms with O
Balance the hydrogen atoms with H
Add one O atom for two H atoms
Convert one O atom and two H atoms to one H2O molecule
Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent
Combine the two half reactions
Simplify the overall chemical equation
The O-atom method: examples
Given the following molecular chemical equation: | |
C6H5CH3 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C6H5COOH + K2SO4 + MnSO4 | |
Convert to | C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4 |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
C7H8 → C7H6O2 | |
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
C7H8 → C7H6O2 | |
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2 | |
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2 + 2H | |
C7H8 + 2O + O → C7H6O2 + 2H + O | |
C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O | |
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4 | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O + 6H | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 3O → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O + 6H + 3O | |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 5O + 3H2O | |
Step 3. | Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 15) |
(C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O) × 5 | |
(2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 5O + 3H2O) × 3 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions |
5C7H8 + 15O → 5C7H6O2 + 5H2O | |
6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 → 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 15O + 9H2O | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
5C7H8 + 6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 → 5C7H6O2 + 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 14H2O |
In this process, each O-atom is equivalent to the gain/loss of two electrons. By using example 8, C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4, as a demonstration, in the half oxidation reaction of “C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O”, the gain of three O-atoms represents the loss of six electrons. In the other half reduction reaction of “2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O + 5O”, the loss of five O-atoms represents the gain of 10 electrons.
Given the following ionic chemical equation: | |
CH3CH2OH + Cr2O7 2− + H+ → CH3COOH + Cr3+ | |
Convert to | CH3CH2OH + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → CH3COOH + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 |
C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
C2H6O → C2H4O2 | |
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
C2H6O → C2H4O2 | |
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2 | |
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2 + 2H | |
C2H6O + O + O → C2H4O2 + 2H + O | |
C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O | |
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O + 8H | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 4O → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O + 8H + 4O | |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O | |
Step 3. | Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 6) |
(C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O) × 3 | |
(K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O) × 2 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions |
3C2H6O + 6O → 3C2H4O2 + 3H2O | |
2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 → 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 8H2O + 6O | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
3C2H6O + 2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 → 3C2H4O2 + 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 11H2O |
By using example 9, C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4, as a demonstration, in the half reaction of “C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O”, the gain of two O-atoms represents the loss of four electrons. In the other half reaction of “K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O”, the release of three O-atoms represents the gain of six electrons.
Given the following inorganic equation: | |
P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4 | |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I | |
P4 → H3PO4 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I | |
2P2I4 + P4 → 8PH4I | |
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I | |
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H + 16O → 8PH4I + 16O | |
2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O | |
P4 → H3PO4 | |
P4 → 4H3PO4 | |
P4 + 16O → 4H3PO4 | |
P4 + 12H + 16O → 4H3PO4 | |
P4 + 12H + 16O + 6O → 4H3PO4 + 6O | |
P4 + 6H2O + 10O → 4H3PO4 | |
Step 3. | Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 80) |
(2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O) × 5 | |
(P4 + 6H2O + 10O → 4H3PO4) × 8 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions and simplify the overall chemical equation |
10P2I4 + 5P4 + 80H2O → 40PH4I + 80O | |
8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4 | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
10P2I4 + 13P4 + 128H2O → 40PH4I + 32H3PO4 |
By using example 10, P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4, as a demonstration, in the half reduction reaction of “2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O”, the loss of sixteen O-atoms represents the gain of 32 electrons. In the other half reduction reaction of “8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4”, the gain of 80 O-atoms represents the loss of 160 electrons.
Given the following inorganic equation: | |
Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2 | |
Step 1. | Divide into two half reactions |
Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO | |
Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2 | |
Step 2. | Balance all atoms in the two half reactions |
Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO | |
3Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + 18NO | |
3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO | |
Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2 | |
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 | |
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O | |
Step 3. | Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 110) |
(3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO) × 5 | |
(2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O) × 22 | |
Step 4. | Combine the two half reactions and simplify the overall chemical equation |
15Pb(N3)2 + 110O → 5Pb3O4 + 90NO | |
44Cr(MnO4)2 → 22Cr2O3 + 88MnO2 + 110O | |
Step 5. | Simplify the overall chemical equation |
15Pb(N3)2 + 44Cr(MnO4)2 → 5Pb3O4 + 90NO + 22Cr2O3 + 88MnO2 |
By using example 11, Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2, as a demonstration, in the half oxidation reaction of “3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO”, the gain of 22 O-atoms represents the loss of 44 electrons. In the other half reduction reaction of “2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O”, the loss of five O-atoms represents the gain of 10 electrons. Although example 11 contains multiple redox couples, it can still be balanced by the O-atom method.
Stoichiometric number of transferred O-atoms in half redox reactions
For examples 8 through 11, the half redox reactions and their stoichiometric number of transferred O-atoms are summarized and defined in Table 4.
Stoichiometric number of transferred O-atoms in half redox reactions.
Half reaction | TO | Half redox reaction |
---|---|---|
C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O | Gain of 3O | Oxidation |
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O | Loss of 5O | Reduction |
C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O | Gain of 2O | Oxidation |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O | Loss of 3O | Reduction |
8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4 | Gain of 80O | Oxidation |
2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O | Loss of 16O | Reduction |
3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO | Gain of 22O | Oxidation |
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O | Loss of 5O | Reduction |
According to the O-atom method, the gain/loss of one O is identical to the loss/gain of two electrons (O + 2e− → O2−). The number of transferred O-atoms (TO) can be represented by Te− as shown in Table 5. TO acts as an electron-counting concept, Te− = −2 × TO.
Stoichiometric TO and Te− in half redox reactions.
Half reaction: TO | Half reactions: Te– |
---|---|
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O | 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10e− → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O−2 |
C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O | C7H8 + 3O−2 → C7H6O2 + H2O + 6e– |
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O | K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6e− → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O−2 |
C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O | C2H6O + 2O−2 → C2H4O2 + H2O + 4e– |
8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4 | 8P4 + 48H2O + 80O−2 → 32H3PO4 + 160e– |
2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O | 2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O + 32e− → 8PH4I + 16O−2 |
3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO | 3Pb(N3)2 + 22O−2 → Pb3O4 + 18NO + 44e– |
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O | 2Cr(MnO4)2 + 10e− → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O−2 |
Electron-counting concepts: ΔON, TH, and TO
The notion of electron transfer is the core of redox reactions. The mathematical relationship of Te− = n × ΔON has been established and ΔON acts as an electron-counting concept in a half redox reaction (Yuen & Lau, 2022). TH and TO are demonstrated as electron-counting concepts by the H-atom and O-atom methods. The relationships among TH, TO, and ΔON are centered around Te− as shown in Figure 1. The nature of the electron-counting concepts of TH, TO, and ΔON are summarized in Table 6.

Mathematical relationships among Te−, ΔON, TH, and TO.
Nature of electron-counting concepts.
e– counting concept | Te– = 1 × TH | Te– = –2 × TO | Te– = n × ΔON |
---|---|---|---|
Te− > 0 (positive); Loss of electron | TH > 0 (positive); Loss of H-atom | TO < 0 (negative); Gain of O-atom | ΔON > 0 (positive); Increase in ON |
Loss: + or positive Gain: − or negative |
Loss of 1 H-atom = Loss of 1 electron | Gain of 1 O-atom = Loss of 2 electrons | Increase in ON; Loss of n × ΔON electrons |
Te− < 0 (negative); Gain of electron | TH < 0 (negative); Gain of 1 H-atom | TO > 0 (positive); Loss of O-atom | ΔON < 0 (negative); Decrease in ON |
Gain: − or negative Loss: + or positive |
Gain of 1 H-atom = Gain of 1 electron | Loss of 1 O-atom = Gain of 2 electrons | Decrease in ON; Gain of n × ΔON electrons |
TH, TO, Te−, and ΔON in molecular and ionic chemical equations
The balanced half reduction reaction in molecular chemical equation (from example 4, H-atom method) is converted to ionic chemical equation as follows:
The balanced half reduction reaction in molecular chemical equation (from example 8, O-atom method) is converted to ionic chemical equation as follows:
The reduction reaction of “KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4” can be balanced by having a gain of ten H-atoms, a loss of five O-atoms, or a gain of 10 electrons. In Table 7, the half reduction molecular chemical equations are demonstrated by using either TH or TO as an electron-counting concept, and then Te− can be calculated; the converted ionic chemical equation are exhibited by using Te−, and then ΔON can be calculated.
Comparison of TH, TO and ΔON in half reduction chemical equations.
Equation | Balanced half reduction reaction | Nature | e– counting concept |
---|---|---|---|
Molecular chemical equation | 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O | Gain of 10 H (TH < 0) | TH = −10 Te− = 1 × TH Te− = −10 |
Molecular chemical equation | 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O | Loss of 5 O (TO > 0) | TO = +5 Te− = −2 × TO Te− = −10 |
Ionic chemical equation | 2MnO4 − + 16H+ + 10e− → 2Mn2+ + 8H2O | Gain of 10 e−(Te− < 0) | Te− = −10 |
Ionic chemical equation | 2MnO4 − + 16H+ + 10e− → 2Mn2+ + 8H2O | Decrease in ON (ΔON < 0) | Te− = −10; n
(Mn) = 2 Te− = n × ΔON ΔON(Mn) = −5 |
Conclusion
Redox reactions can be defined by four different models: electron transfer, oxidation number, H-atom transfer, and O-atom transfer. Currently, the determination of oxidation number is a prevalent tool for calculating the number of transferred electrons, defining redox terms, and balancing redox equations. Nevertheless, it is not always easy to assign oxidation number. Without the assignment of oxidation number of atoms, the use of the ON method for balancing redox reactions is restricted. To overcome this problem, this article explores the H-atom and O-atom methods, When compared to the conventional ON method, these two methods work in a reversed direction. They operate by balancing atoms first, then counting TH or TO, and finally determining Te−. Triangular relationships among TH, TO, and Te− are established in the balanced redox reaction. Consequently, TH and TO are demonstrated as electron-counting concepts for balancing redox reactions. In addition, the electron transfer, oxidation number, H-atom transfer, and O-atom transfer models are integrated through the establishment of mathematical relationships among Te−, TH, TO, and ΔON.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
Bergner, J. B., Öberg, K. I., & Rajappan, M. (2019). Oxygen atom reactions with C2H6, C2H4, and C2H2 in ices. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 123(50), 10772–10781.10.3847/1538-4357/ab07b2Search in Google Scholar
Blakley, G. R. (1982). Chemical equation balancing – a general method which is quick, simple and has expected applications. Journal of Chemical Education, 59(9), 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed059p728.Search in Google Scholar
Capaldo, L., & Ravelli, D. (2017). Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT): A versatile strategy for substrate activation in photocatalyzed organic synthesis. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 15, 2056–2071. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201601485.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Casavecchia, P., Leonori, F., & Balucani, N. (2015). Reaction dynamics of oxygen atoms with unsaturated hydrocarbons from crossed molecular beam studies: Primary products, branching ratios and role of intersystem crossing. International Reviews in Physical Chemistry, 34(2), 161–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235x.2015.1039293.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. A. (2013). Chemistry (11th ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill International Edition.Search in Google Scholar
Chuang, K.-J., Fedoseev, G., Ioppolo, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Linnartz, H. (2016). H-atom addition and abstraction reactions in mixed CO, H2CO and CH3OH ices – An extended view on complex organic molecule formation. MNRAS, 455, 1702–1712. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2288.Search in Google Scholar
Cole-Filipiak, N. C., Shapero, M., Negru, B., & Neumark, D. M. (2014). Revisiting the photodissociation dynamics of the phenyl radical. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 141(10), 104307. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894398.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Dougherty, E. P., & Rabitz, H. (1980). Computational kinetics and sensitivity analysis of hydrogen–oxygen combustion. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 72, 6571. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.439114.Search in Google Scholar
Dukov, I. L. (2017). Balancing of oxidation-reduction (Redox) reactions with higher boranes participation: Oxidation number method or material balance method? Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 874–880.Search in Google Scholar
Fishtik, I., & Berka, L. H. (2005). Procedure for decomposing a redox reaction into half-reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(4), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p553.Search in Google Scholar
Generalic, E., & Vladislavic, N. (2018). Aggregate redox species method – An improved oxidation number change method for balancing redox equations. Chemistry Journal, 4(3), 43–49.Search in Google Scholar
Gerasimov, G. Y., & Shatalov, O. (2013). Kinetic mechanism of combustion of hydrogen–oxygen mixtures. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 86(5), 987–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-013-0919-7.Search in Google Scholar
Goodstein, M. P. (1970). Interpretation of oxidation-reduction. Journal of Chemical Education, 47(6), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed047p452.Search in Google Scholar
Guo, C. (1997). A new inspection method for balancing redox equations. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(11), 1365–1366. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p1365.Search in Google Scholar
Herndon, W. C. (1997). On balancing chemical equations: Past and present – A critical review and annotated bibliography. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(11), 1139–1362. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p1359.Search in Google Scholar
Holm, R. H. (1987). Metal-centered oxygen atom transfer reactions. Chemical Reviews, 87, 1401–1449. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00082a005.Search in Google Scholar
IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology (2nd ed.) (the “Gold Book”). Compiled by A. D. McNaught, & A. Wilkinson. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Online version (2019-) created by S. J. Chalk.Search in Google Scholar
Jurowski, K., Krzeczkowska, M. K., & Jurowska, A. (2015). Approaches to determining the oxidation state of nitrogen and carbon atoms in organic compounds for high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500645v.Search in Google Scholar
Karen, P. (2015). Oxidation State, a long-standing issue! Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 54, 4716–4726. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201407561.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Kolb, D. (1979). More on balancing equations. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(3), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed056p181.Search in Google Scholar
Kolb, D. (1981). Balancing complex redox equations by inspection. Journal of Chemical Education, 58(8), 642–645. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed058p642.Search in Google Scholar
Kovacs, D., Lee, M.-S., Olson, D., & Jackson, J. E. (1996). Carbene-to-carbene oxygen atom transfer. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(34), 814–815. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja961324j.Search in Google Scholar
Lucci, F. R., Darby, M. T., Mattera, M. F. G., Ivimey, C. J., Therrien, A. J., Michaelides, A., … Sykes, E. C. H. (2016). Controlling hydrogen activation, spillover, and desorption with Pd-Au single-atom alloys. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 7(3), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02400.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Moriarty, R. M., Gupta, S. C., Hu, H., Berenschot, D. R., & White, K. B. (1981). Oxygen-atom transfer from iodosobenzene to ketenes, .alpha.-keto carboxylic acids, and ketones. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 103(3), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00393a040.Search in Google Scholar
Olson, J. A. (1997). An analysis of the algebraic method for balancing chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p538.Search in Google Scholar
Paik, S.-H., Kim, S., & Kim, K. (2017). Suggestion of a viewpoint change for the classification criteria of redox reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00593.Search in Google Scholar
Paulson, L. S., Mutunga, F., Shelby, F. S., & Anderson, D. T. (2014). Reactions of atomic hydrogen with formic acid and carbon monoxide in solid parahydrogen I: Anomalous effect of temperature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 118(36), 7640–7652. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502470j.Search in Google Scholar
Porter, S. K. (1985). How should equation balancing be taught? Journal of Chemical Education, 62(6), 507–508. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed062p507.Search in Google Scholar
Ran, Q., Yang, C. H., Lee, Y. T., Lu, I-C., She, G., Wang, L., Yang, X. (2005). Molecular beam studies of the F atom reaction with propyne: Site specific reactivity. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 122(4), 44307. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839865.Search in Google Scholar
Rosado-Reyes, C. M., Manion, J. A., & Tsang, W. (2011). H atom attack on propene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 115, 2727–2734. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp111476q.Search in Google Scholar
Silverstein, T. P. (2011). Oxidation and reduction: Too many definitions? Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100777q.Search in Google Scholar
Simmie, J. M. (2003). Detailed chemical kinetic models for the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 29, 599–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1285(03)00060-1.Search in Google Scholar
Sisler, H. H., & VanderWerf, C. A. (1980). Oxidation-Reduction – an example of chemical sophistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 57(1), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed057p42.Search in Google Scholar
Sun, G., Lucas, M., Song, Y., Zhang, J., Brazier, C., Houston, P. L., & Bowman, J. M. (2019). H atom product channels in the ultraviolet photodissociation of the 2-propenyl radical. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 123(46), 9957–9965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07797.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Tro, N. J. (2014). Chemistry—A molecular approach (3rd ed.). USA: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar
Walker, R. B., & Light, J. C. (1980). Reactive molecular collisions. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 31, 401–433. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.31.100180.002153.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, C.-H., Masunov, A. E., Allison, T. C., Chang, S., Lim, C., … Vasu, S. S. (2019). Molecular dynamics of combustion reactions in supercritical carbon dioxide. 6. Computational kinetics of reactions between hydrogen atom and oxygen molecule H + O2 ⇌ HO + O and H + O2 ⇌ HO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 123(50), 10772–10781. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08789.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Williams, D. A. (1999). Hydrogen molecules in the cosmos. Astronomy & Geophysics, 40(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/astrog/40.2.2.10.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, S., Jirasek, V., & Lukes, P. (2020). Molecular dynamics simulations of singlet oxygen atoms reactions with water leading to hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 53, 275204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab8321.Search in Google Scholar
Yuen, P. K., & Lau, C. M. D. (2021). Application of stoichiometric hydrogen atoms for balancing organic combustion reactions. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0034.Search in Google Scholar
Yuen, P. K., & Lau, C. M. D. (2022). From balancing redox reactions to determining change of oxidation numbers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 51(3), 22–26.10.1080/0047231X.2022.12290556Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Pong Kau Yuen and Cheng Man Diana Lau, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Understanding Le Châtelier’s principle fundamentals: five key questions
- H-atom and O-atom methods: from balancing redox reactions to determining the number of transferred electrons
- Good Practice Report
- Students’ and teachers’ perceptions for composition of ionic compounds
- Research Article
- Decision-making factors of female A-level chemistry students when choosing to study a degree in chemistry
- Good Practice Report
- Developing a skills-based practical chemistry programme: an integrated, spiral curriculum approach
- Research Articles
- Mechanism comics as a task in a written exam in organic chemistry for pre-service chemistry teachers
- Efficiency of reversible reaction: a graphical approach
- Chemistry students’ conceptual difficulties and problem solving behavior in chemical kinetics, as a component of an introductory physical chemistry course
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Understanding Le Châtelier’s principle fundamentals: five key questions
- H-atom and O-atom methods: from balancing redox reactions to determining the number of transferred electrons
- Good Practice Report
- Students’ and teachers’ perceptions for composition of ionic compounds
- Research Article
- Decision-making factors of female A-level chemistry students when choosing to study a degree in chemistry
- Good Practice Report
- Developing a skills-based practical chemistry programme: an integrated, spiral curriculum approach
- Research Articles
- Mechanism comics as a task in a written exam in organic chemistry for pre-service chemistry teachers
- Efficiency of reversible reaction: a graphical approach
- Chemistry students’ conceptual difficulties and problem solving behavior in chemical kinetics, as a component of an introductory physical chemistry course