Home H-atom and O-atom methods: from balancing redox reactions to determining the number of transferred electrons
Article Open Access

H-atom and O-atom methods: from balancing redox reactions to determining the number of transferred electrons

  • Pong Kau Yuen ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Cheng Man Diana Lau
Published/Copyright: April 18, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Defining and balancing redox reaction requires both chemical knowledge and mathematical skills. The prevalent approach is to use the concept of oxidation number to determine the number of transferred electrons. However, the task of calculating oxidation numbers is often challenging. In this article, the H-atom method and O-atom method are developed for balancing redox equations. These two methods are based on the definition of redox reaction, which is the gain and loss of hydrogen or oxygen atoms. They complement current practices and provide an alternate path to balance redox equations. The advantage of these methods is that calculation of oxidation number is not required. Atoms are balanced instead. By following standard operating procedures, H-atom, O-atom, and H2O molecule act as artificial devices to balance both inorganic and organic equations in molecular forms. By using the H-atom and O-atom methods, the number of transferred electrons can be determined by the number of transferred H-atoms or O-atoms, which are demonstrated as electron-counting concepts for balancing redox reactions. In addition, the relationships among the number of transferred H-atom, the number of transferred O-atom, the number of transferred electrons, and the change of oxidation numbers are established.

Introduction

Chemical equation is the language of chemistry. It is important for students to acquire competence in balancing chemical equations (Herndon, 1997; Porter, 1985; Kolb, 1981, 1979) because by doing so their chemistry knowledge, mathematical skills, and logical thinking can be consolidated. There are different approaches to balancing chemical equations. Arithmetic methods and inspection methods are applied for balancing simple reactions. Algebraic methods, such as linear simultaneous equations method (Dukov, 2017; Olson, 1997) and matrix method (Blakley, 1982) are used for balancing all types of chemical reactions.

In chemistry curriculum, the redox concept is taught “as an organizing structure for chemical knowledge, as a guide to the prediction of reactions, and as a mathematical device to enable the balancing of certain complex reactions” (Goodstein, 1970). According to IUPAC definitions, the terms of redox reactions can be understood in four different models: electron transfer, oxidation number, H-atom transfer, and O-atom transfer, shown in Table 1. Silverstein (2011) comments that a redox reaction has “too many definitions”. Sisler & VanderWerf (1980) argue that a redox reaction is “an example of chemical sophistry”. Paik, Kim & Kim (2017) discuss limitations of the four redox models and suggest a process-based model to define redox reactions.

Table 1:

Terms of redox reactions.

Redox terms Oxidation number Electron transfer H-atom transfer O-atom transfer
Oxidation Increase Loss e Loss H Gain O
Reduction Decrease Gain e Gain H Loss O
Reducing agent Increase Loss e Loss H Gain O
Oxidizing agent Decrease Gain e Gain H Loss O

The notion of redox reaction is commonly understood as the gain and loss of electrons in a reaction. Oxidation number (or oxidation state) acts as an electron-counting concept (Karen, 2015). To balance redox reactions, the commonly used methods are the oxidation number method (Kolb, 1979; Generalic & Vladislavic, 2018) and the inspection method (Guo, 1997). The oxidation number method includes the overall reaction method (Dukov, 2017; Kolb, 1979) and the half reactions ion-electron method (Fishtik & Berka, 2005; Generalic & Vladislavic, 2018). General chemistry textbooks tend to use the ion-electron method as a primary procedure for balancing redox equations (Chang & Goldsby, 2013; Tro, 2014). This method must assign all oxidation numbers of atoms; determine the transferred electrons; and use H+, OH, and H2O as balancing tools. The task of calculating oxidation numbers (ON), however, is challenging (Jurowski, Krzeczkowska & Jurowska, 2015). The oxidation number method is restricted in cases where oxidation numbers are uncertain (see Example 1), and where there are multiple sets of redox couples in the complex redox reaction (see Examples 2 and 3).

Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2 (Example 1)
P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4 (Example 2)
Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2 (Example 3)

H-atom and O-atom are present in the cosmos (Williams, 1999). The H-atom transfer reaction (Capaldo & Ravelli, 2017; Chuang, Fedoseev, Ioppolo, van Dishoeck & Linnartz, 2016; Rosado-Reyes, Manion & Tsang, 2011) and O-atom transfer reaction (Holm, 1987; Kovacs, Lee, Olson & Jackson, 1996; Moriarty, Gupta, Hu, Berenschot & White, 1981) are widely used in synthetic chemistry. The H-atom and O-atom function as intermediates in chemical processes (Cole-Filipiak, Shapero, Negru & Neumark, 2014; Dougherty & Rabitz, 1980; Gerasimov & Shatalov, 2013; Lucci et al., 2016; Simmie, 2003). They can act as reactants and/or products in chemical conversions (Bergner, Öberg & Rajappan, 2019; Casavecchia, Leonori & Balucani, 2015; Paulson, Mutunga, Shelby & Anderson, 2014; Ran, Yang, Lee, Lu, She, Wang & Yang, 2005; Sun, Lucas, Song, Zhang, Brazier, Houston & Bowman, 2019; Walker & Light, 1980; Wang, Masunov, Allison, Chang, Lim, Jin & Vasu, 2019; Xu, Jirasek & Petr, 2020). Although redox reaction can also be defined as the gain and loss of H-atoms or O-atoms (IUPAC, 2019) the H-atom and O-atom have rarely been introduced as redox balancing devices (Yuen & Lau, 2021). Based on these concepts, the new H-atom method and O-atom method for balancing redox reaction are explored. Consequently, the relationships among the number of transferred H-atom, the number of transferred O-atom, the number of transferred electrons, and the change of oxidation numbers are studied.

Dividing an overall redox reaction into two half reactions

“Any redox reaction may be decomposed into a sum of two half-reactions” (Fishtik & Berka, 2005). The critical step of the H-atom and O-atom methods is the division of the overall molecular redox reaction into two half reactions. An inspection method, termed “ping-pong method”, is employed here. The ping-pong procedures and examples are as follows:

  1. Identify all elements, with the exception of H- and O-elements, on both reactant’s side (left) and product’s side (right).

  2. Choose a reactant on the left and identify all its non-H and non-O element(s).

  3. Link the reactant’s element(s) on the left to product’s element(s) on the right.

  4. Keep linking right-left-right…, until two half reactions are attained.

Example 1.
Dividing an overall reaction, Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2, into two half reactions.
The first half reaction (1st):
(1st i) Choose the first reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s):
Fe3C: Fe and C elements
(1st ii) Link Fe and C on the left to Fe(NO3)3 and CO2 on the right
Fe3C → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2
(1st iii) Link N element on the right to HNO3 on the left
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2
The second half reaction (2nd):
(2nd i) Choose the second reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s):
HNO3: N element
(2nd ii) Link N on the left to NO2 on the right
HNO3 → NO2
an overall reaction: Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2
the first divided half reaction: Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2
the second divided half reaction: HNO3 → NO2
Example 2.
Dividing an overall reaction, P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4, into two half reactions.
The first half reaction (1st):
(1st i) Choose the first reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s):
P2I4: P and I elements
(1st ii) Link P and I on the left to PH4I on the right
P2I4 → PH4I
(1st iii) The P2I4 → PH4I half reaction cannot be balanced, then link to left side
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I
The second half reaction (2nd):
(2nd i) Choose the second reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s):
P4: P element
(2nd ii) Link P on the left to H3PO4 on the right
P4 → H3PO4
an overall reaction: P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4
the first divided half reaction: P2I4 + P4 → PH4I
the first divided half reaction: P4 → H3PO4
Example 3.
Dividing an overall reaction, Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2, into two half reactions.
The first half reaction (1st):
(1st i) Choose the first reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s):
Pb(N3)2: Pb and N elements
(1st ii) Link Pb and N on the left to Pb3O4 and NO on the right
Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO
The second half reaction (2nd):
(2nd i) Choose the second reactant on the left and identify all its non-H, non-O element(s):
Cr(MnO4)2: Cr and Mn elements
(2nd ii) Link Cr and Mn on the left to Cr2O3 and MnO2 on the right
Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2
an overall reaction: Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2
the first divided half reaction: Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO
the first divided half reaction: Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2

H-atom method: procedures

When using the H-atom method, H, O, and H2O are used as balancing devices. This method requires the use of a molecular chemical equation. If an ionic chemical equation is provided, it must be converted to a molecular chemical equation by adding proper spectator ions. H2O can be omitted in the process optionally. When both half and overall chemical equations are balanced, H2O will appear consequently through the working procedures to fulfill the conservational law of matter, which is one of the advantages of using the H-atom and O-atom methods. It is important to emphasize that these two methods are mathematically balancing methods. The H-atom and O-atom may not necessarily act as intermediates, and the H-atom and O-atom methods do not represent any reaction mechanisms.

  1. Divide into two half reactions

  2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions

    1. Balance all other atoms except H and O

    2. Balance the oxygen atoms with O

    3. Balance the hydrogen atoms with H

    4. Add two H atoms for each O atom

    5. Convert two H atoms and one O atom to one H2O molecule

  3. Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent

  4. Combine the two half reactions

  5. Simplify the overall chemical equation

Example 4.
Given the following molecular chemical equation:
C6H5CH3 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C6H5COOH + K2SO4 + MnSO4
Convert to C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
C7H8 → C7H6O2
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
C7H8 → C7H6O2
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2 + 2H
C7H8 + 2O + 4H → C7H6O2 + 2H + 4H
C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 6H + 8O
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 16H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 6H + 8O + 16H
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O
Step 3. Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 30)
(C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H) × 5
(2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O) × 3
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions
5C7H8 + 10H2O → 5C7H6O2 + 30H
6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 + 30H → 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 24H2O
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
5C7H8 + 6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 → 5C7H6O2 + 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 14H2O

In this process, each H-atom is equivalent to the gain/loss of one electron. In example 4, C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4, one half of the equation “C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H” releasing six H-atoms represents the loss of six electrons, and the other half equation “2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O” obtaining ten H-atoms represents the gain of 10 electrons. KMnO4 and C7H8 function as oxidizing agent and reducing agent respectively.

Example 5.
Given the following ionic chemical equation:
CH3CH2OH + Cr2O7 2− + H+ → CH3COOH + Cr3+
Convert to CH3CH2OH + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → CH3COOH + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
C2H6O → C2H4O2
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
C2H6O → C2H4O2
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2 + 2H
C2H6O + O + 2H → C2H4O2 + 2H + 2H
C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 8H + 7O
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 14H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 8H + 7O + 14H
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O
Step 3. Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 12)
(C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H) × 3
(K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O) × 2
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions
3C2H6O + 3H2O → 3C2H4O2 + 12H
2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 + 12H → 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 14H2O
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
3C2H6O + 2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 → 3C2H4O2 + 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 11H2O

In example 5, C2H6O + Cr2O7 2− + H+ → C2H4O2 + Cr3+, the ionic equation is converted to a molecular chemical equation, C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4, by adding spectator ions K+ and SO4 2−. One half of the oxidation reaction “C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H” releasing four H-atoms represents the loss of four electrons, and the other half reduction reaction “K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O” obtaining six H-atoms represents the gain of six electrons. K2Cr2O7 and C2H6O act as oxidizing agent and reducing agent respectively.

Example 6.
Given the following inorganic equation:
P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I
P4 → H3PO4
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I
2P2I4 + P4 → 8PH4I
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I
P4 → H3PO4
P4 → 4H3PO4
P4 + 16O → 4H3PO4
P4 + 12H + 16O → 4H3PO4
P4 + 12H + 16O + 32H → 4H3PO4 + 32H
P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H
Step 3. Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 160)
(2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I) × 5
(P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H) × 8
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions
10P2I4 + 5P4 + 160H → 40PH4I
8P4 + 128H2O → 32H3PO4 + 160H
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
10P2I4 + 13P4 + 128H2O → 40PH4I + 32H3PO4

In example 6, P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4, one half of the reduction reaction “2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I” gaining thirty-two H-atoms represents the gain of 32 electrons, and the other half oxidation reaction of “P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H” releasing twenty H-atoms represents the loss of 20 electrons.

Example 7.
Given the following inorganic equation:
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2
HNO3 → NO2
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2
Fe3C + 9HNO3 → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 9H
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2O + 4H → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 9H + 4H
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H
HNO3 → NO2
HNO3 → NO2 + O
HNO3 → NO2 + O + H
HNO3 + H → NO2 + O + H + H
HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O
Step 3. Make the H-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 13)
(Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H) × 1
(HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O) × 13
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H
13HNO3 + 13H → 13NO2 + 13H2O
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
Fe3C + 22HNO3 → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13NO2 + 11H2O

In example 7, Fe3C + HNO3 → Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + NO2, one half of the oxidation reaction “Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H” releasing 13 H-atoms represents the loss of 13 electrons, and the other half reduction reaction of “HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O” gaining one H-atom represents the gain of one electron. Although example 7 contains uncertain oxidation numbers of a reactant Fe3C, it can still be balanced by the H-atom method.

Stoichiometric number of transferred H-atoms in half redox reactions

For examples 4 through 7, the half redox reactions and their stoichiometric number of transferred H-atoms are presented and defined in Table 2.

Table 2:

Stoichiometric number of transferred H-atoms in half redox reactions.

Half reaction TH Half redox reaction
C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H Loss of 6H Oxidation
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O Gain of 10H Reduction
C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H Loss of 4H Oxidation
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O Gain of 6H Reduction
P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H Loss of 20H Oxidation
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I Gain of 32H Reduction
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H Loss of 13H Oxidation
HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O Gain of 1H Reduction

According to the H-atom method, the gain/loss of one H is identical to the gain/loss of one electron (H → H+ + e). The number of transferred H-atoms (TH) is equal to the number of transferred electrons (Te) as shown in Table 3. TH can function as an electron-counting concept, Te = 1 × TH.

Table 3:

Stoichiometric TH and Te in half redox reactions.

Half reaction: TH Half reaction: Te
C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H C7H8 + 2H2O → C7H6O2 + 6H+ + 6e
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H+ + 10e → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O
C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H C2H6O + H2O → C2H4O2 + 4H+ + 4e
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6H+ + 6e → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7H2O
P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H P4 + 16H2O → 4H3PO4 + 20H+ + 20e
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I 2P2I4 + P4 + 32H+ + 32e → 8PH4I
Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H Fe3C + 9HNO3 + 2H2O → 3Fe(NO3)3 + CO2 + 13H+ + 13e
HNO3 + H → NO2 + H2O HNO3 + H+ + e → NO2 + H2O

The O-atom method: procedures

The procedures of the O-atom method are similar to that of the H-atom method. The O-atom, rather than the H-atom, acts as the dominant balancing device. The differences in their procedures are illustrated in Step 2d, Step 2e, and Step 3.

  1. Divide into two half reactions

  2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions

    1. Balance all other atoms except H and O

    2. Balance the oxygen atoms with O

    3. Balance the hydrogen atoms with H

    4. Add one O atom for two H atoms

    5. Convert one O atom and two H atoms to one H2O molecule

  3. Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent

  4. Combine the two half reactions

  5. Simplify the overall chemical equation

The O-atom method: examples

Example 8.
Given the following molecular chemical equation:
C6H5CH3 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C6H5COOH + K2SO4 + MnSO4
Convert to C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
C7H8 → C7H6O2
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
C7H8 → C7H6O2
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2
C7H8 + 2O → C7H6O2 + 2H
C7H8 + 2O + O → C7H6O2 + 2H + O
C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O
KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O + 6H
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 3O → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8O + 6H + 3O
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 5O + 3H2O
Step 3. Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 15)
(C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O) × 5
(2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 5O + 3H2O) × 3
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions
5C7H8 + 15O → 5C7H6O2 + 5H2O
6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 → 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 15O + 9H2O
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
5C7H8 + 6KMnO4 + 9H2SO4 → 5C7H6O2 + 3K2SO4 + 6MnSO4 + 14H2O

In this process, each O-atom is equivalent to the gain/loss of two electrons. By using example 8, C7H8 + KMnO4 + H2SO4 → C7H6O2 + K2SO4 + MnSO4, as a demonstration, in the half oxidation reaction of “C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O”, the gain of three O-atoms represents the loss of six electrons. In the other half reduction reaction of “2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O + 5O”, the loss of five O-atoms represents the gain of 10 electrons.

Example 9.
Given the following ionic chemical equation:
CH3CH2OH + Cr2O7 2− + H+ → CH3COOH + Cr3+
Convert to CH3CH2OH + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → CH3COOH + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
C2H6O → C2H4O2
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
C2H6O → C2H4O2
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2
C2H6O + O → C2H4O2 + 2H
C2H6O + O + O → C2H4O2 + 2H + O
C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O
K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O + 8H
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 4O → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 7O + 8H + 4O
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O
Step 3. Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 6)
(C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O) × 3
(K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O) × 2
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions
3C2H6O + 6O → 3C2H4O2 + 3H2O
2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 → 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 8H2O + 6O
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
3C2H6O + 2K2Cr2O7 + 8H2SO4 → 3C2H4O2 + 2Cr2(SO4)3 + 2K2SO4 + 11H2O

By using example 9, C2H6O + K2Cr2O7 + H2SO4 → C2H4O2 + Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4, as a demonstration, in the half reaction of “C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O”, the gain of two O-atoms represents the loss of four electrons. In the other half reaction of “K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O”, the release of three O-atoms represents the gain of six electrons.

Example 10.
Given the following inorganic equation:
P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I
P4 → H3PO4
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
P2I4 + P4 → PH4I
2P2I4 + P4 → 8PH4I
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H → 8PH4I
2P2I4 + P4 + 32H + 16O  → 8PH4I + 16O
2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O
P4 → H3PO4
P4 → 4H3PO4
P4 + 16O → 4H3PO4
P4 + 12H + 16O → 4H3PO4
P4 + 12H + 16O + 6O → 4H3PO4 + 6O
P4 + 6H2O + 10O → 4H3PO4
Step 3. Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 80)
(2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O) × 5
(P4 + 6H2O + 10O → 4H3PO4) × 8
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions and simplify the overall chemical equation
10P2I4 + 5P4 + 80H2O → 40PH4I + 80O
8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
10P2I4 + 13P4 + 128H2O → 40PH4I + 32H3PO4

By using example 10, P2I4 + P4 + H2O → PH4I + H3PO4, as a demonstration, in the half reduction reaction of “2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O”, the loss of sixteen O-atoms represents the gain of 32 electrons. In the other half reduction reaction of “8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4”, the gain of 80 O-atoms represents the loss of 160 electrons.

Example 11.
Given the following inorganic equation:
Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2
Step 1. Divide into two half reactions
Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO
Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2
Step 2. Balance all atoms in the two half reactions
Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + NO
3Pb(N3)2 → Pb3O4 + 18NO
3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO
Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + MnO2
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O
Step 3. Make the O-atom of the two half reactions equivalent (LCM = 110)
(3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO) × 5
(2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O) × 22
Step 4. Combine the two half reactions and simplify the overall chemical equation
15Pb(N3)2 + 110O → 5Pb3O4 + 90NO
44Cr(MnO4)2 → 22Cr2O3 + 88MnO2 + 110O
Step 5. Simplify the overall chemical equation
15Pb(N3)2 + 44Cr(MnO4)2 → 5Pb3O4 + 90NO + 22Cr2O3 + 88MnO2

By using example 11, Pb(N3)2 + Cr(MnO4)2 → Pb3O4 + NO + Cr2O3 + MnO2, as a demonstration, in the half oxidation reaction of “3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO”, the gain of 22 O-atoms represents the loss of 44 electrons. In the other half reduction reaction of “2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O”, the loss of five O-atoms represents the gain of 10 electrons. Although example 11 contains multiple redox couples, it can still be balanced by the O-atom method.

Stoichiometric number of transferred O-atoms in half redox reactions

For examples 8 through 11, the half redox reactions and their stoichiometric number of transferred O-atoms are summarized and defined in Table 4.

Table 4:

Stoichiometric number of transferred O-atoms in half redox reactions.

Half reaction TO Half redox reaction
C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O Gain of 3O Oxidation
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O Loss of 5O Reduction
C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O Gain of 2O Oxidation
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O Loss of 3O Reduction
8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4 Gain of 80O Oxidation
2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O Loss of 16O Reduction
3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO Gain of 22O Oxidation
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O Loss of 5O Reduction

According to the O-atom method, the gain/loss of one O is identical to the loss/gain of two electrons (O + 2e → O2−). The number of transferred O-atoms (TO) can be represented by Te as shown in Table 5. TO acts as an electron-counting concept, Te = −2 × TO.

Table 5:

Stoichiometric TO and Te in half redox reactions.

Half reaction: TO Half reactions: Te
2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10e → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O−2
C7H8 + 3O → C7H6O2 + H2O C7H8 + 3O−2 → C7H6O2 + H2O + 6e
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 + 6e → Cr2(SO4)3 + K2SO4 + 4H2O + 3O−2
C2H6O + 2O → C2H4O2 + H2O C2H6O + 2O−2 → C2H4O2 + H2O + 4e
8P4 + 48H2O + 80O → 32H3PO4 8P4 + 48H2O + 80O−2 → 32H3PO4 + 160e
2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O → 8PH4I + 16O 2P2I4 + P4 + 16H2O + 32e → 8PH4I + 16O−2
3Pb(N3)2 + 22O → Pb3O4 + 18NO 3Pb(N3)2 + 22O−2 → Pb3O4 + 18NO + 44e
2Cr(MnO4)2 → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O 2Cr(MnO4)2 + 10e → Cr2O3 + 4MnO2 + 5O−2

Electron-counting concepts: ΔON, TH, and TO

The notion of electron transfer is the core of redox reactions. The mathematical relationship of Te = n × ΔON has been established and ΔON acts as an electron-counting concept in a half redox reaction (Yuen & Lau, 2022). TH and TO are demonstrated as electron-counting concepts by the H-atom and O-atom methods. The relationships among TH, TO, and ΔON are centered around Te as shown in Figure 1. The nature of the electron-counting concepts of TH, TO, and ΔON are summarized in Table 6.

Figure 1: 
Mathematical relationships among Te−, ΔON, TH, and TO.
Figure 1:

Mathematical relationships among Te, ΔON, TH, and TO.

Table 6:

Nature of electron-counting concepts.

e counting concept Te = 1 × TH Te = –2 × TO Te = n × ΔON
Te > 0 (positive); Loss of electron TH > 0 (positive); Loss of H-atom TO < 0 (negative); Gain of O-atom ΔON > 0 (positive); Increase in ON
Loss: + or positive Gain:

− or negative
Loss of 1 H-atom = Loss of 1 electron Gain of 1 O-atom = Loss of 2 electrons Increase in ON;

Loss of n × ΔON electrons
Te < 0 (negative); Gain of electron TH < 0 (negative); Gain of 1 H-atom TO > 0 (positive); Loss of O-atom ΔON < 0 (negative); Decrease in ON
Gain: − or negative Loss:

 +  or positive
Gain of 1 H-atom = Gain of 1 electron Loss of 1 O-atom = Gain of 2 electrons Decrease in ON; Gain

of n × ΔON electrons

TH, TO, Te, and ΔON in molecular and ionic chemical equations

The balanced half reduction reaction in molecular chemical equation (from example 4, H-atom method) is converted to ionic chemical equation as follows:

2 KMnO 4 + 3 H 2 SO 4 + 10 H K 2 SO 4 + 2 MnSO 4 + 8 H 2 O 2 K + + 2 MnO 4 - + 6 H + + 3 SO 4 2 + 10 H + + 10 e 2 K + + SO 4 2 + 2 Mn 2 + + 2 SO 4 2 + 8 H 2 O 2 MnO 4 - + 16 H + + 10 e 2 Mn 2 + + 8 H 2 O

The balanced half reduction reaction in molecular chemical equation (from example 8, O-atom method) is converted to ionic chemical equation as follows:

2 KMnO 4 + 3 H 2 SO 4 K 2 SO 4 + 2 MnSO 4 + 3 H 2 O + 5 O 2 K + + 2 MnO 4 - + 6 H + + 3 SO 4 2 + 10 e 2 K + + SO 4 2 + 2 Mn 2 + + 2 SO 4 2 + 3 H 2 O + 5 O 2 2 K + + 2 MnO 4 - + 6 H + + 3 SO 4 2 + 10 e + 10 H + 2 K + + SO 4 2 + 2 Mn 2 + + 2 SO 4 2 + 3 H 2 O + 5 O 2 + 10 H + 2 K + + 2 MnO 4 - + 6 H + + 3 SO 4 2 + 10 e + 10 H + 2 K + + SO 4 2 + 2 Mn 2 + + 2 SO 4 2 + 3 H 2 O + 5 H 2 O 2 MnO 4 - + 16 H + + 10 e 2 Mn 2 + + 8 H 2 O

The reduction reaction of “KMnO4 + H2SO4 → K2SO4 + MnSO4” can be balanced by having a gain of ten H-atoms, a loss of five O-atoms, or a gain of 10 electrons. In Table 7, the half reduction molecular chemical equations are demonstrated by using either TH or TO as an electron-counting concept, and then Te can be calculated; the converted ionic chemical equation are exhibited by using Te, and then ΔON can be calculated.

Table 7:

Comparison of TH, TO and ΔON in half reduction chemical equations.

Equation Balanced half reduction reaction Nature e counting concept
Molecular chemical equation 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 + 10H → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 8H2O Gain of 10 H (TH < 0) TH = −10

Te = 1 × TH

Te = −10
Molecular chemical equation 2KMnO4 + 3H2SO4 → K2SO4 + 2MnSO4 + 3H2O + 5O Loss of 5 O (TO > 0) TO = +5

Te = −2 × TO

Te = −10
Ionic chemical equation 2MnO4  + 16H+ + 10e → 2Mn2+ + 8H2O Gain of 10 e(Te < 0) Te = −10
Ionic chemical equation 2MnO4  + 16H+ + 10e → 2Mn2+ + 8H2O Decrease in ON (ΔON < 0) Te = −10; n (Mn) = 2

Te = n × ΔON

ΔON(Mn) = −5

Conclusion

Redox reactions can be defined by four different models: electron transfer, oxidation number, H-atom transfer, and O-atom transfer. Currently, the determination of oxidation number is a prevalent tool for calculating the number of transferred electrons, defining redox terms, and balancing redox equations. Nevertheless, it is not always easy to assign oxidation number. Without the assignment of oxidation number of atoms, the use of the ON method for balancing redox reactions is restricted. To overcome this problem, this article explores the H-atom and O-atom methods, When compared to the conventional ON method, these two methods work in a reversed direction. They operate by balancing atoms first, then counting TH or TO, and finally determining Te. Triangular relationships among TH, TO, and Te are established in the balanced redox reaction. Consequently, TH and TO are demonstrated as electron-counting concepts for balancing redox reactions. In addition, the electron transfer, oxidation number, H-atom transfer, and O-atom transfer models are integrated through the establishment of mathematical relationships among Te, TH, TO, and ΔON.


Corresponding author: Pong Kau Yuen, Department of Chemistry, Texas Southern University, 3100 Cleburne Street, Houston, TX 77004, USA, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Bergner, J. B., Öberg, K. I., & Rajappan, M. (2019). Oxygen atom reactions with C2H6, C2H4, and C2H2 in ices. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 123(50), 10772–10781.10.3847/1538-4357/ab07b2Search in Google Scholar

Blakley, G. R. (1982). Chemical equation balancing – a general method which is quick, simple and has expected applications. Journal of Chemical Education, 59(9), 728–734. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed059p728.Search in Google Scholar

Capaldo, L., & Ravelli, D. (2017). Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT): A versatile strategy for substrate activation in photocatalyzed organic synthesis. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 15, 2056–2071. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201601485.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Casavecchia, P., Leonori, F., & Balucani, N. (2015). Reaction dynamics of oxygen atoms with unsaturated hydrocarbons from crossed molecular beam studies: Primary products, branching ratios and role of intersystem crossing. International Reviews in Physical Chemistry, 34(2), 161–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144235x.2015.1039293.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. A. (2013). Chemistry (11th ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill International Edition.Search in Google Scholar

Chuang, K.-J., Fedoseev, G., Ioppolo, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Linnartz, H. (2016). H-atom addition and abstraction reactions in mixed CO, H2CO and CH3OH ices – An extended view on complex organic molecule formation. MNRAS, 455, 1702–1712. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2288.Search in Google Scholar

Cole-Filipiak, N. C., Shapero, M., Negru, B., & Neumark, D. M. (2014). Revisiting the photodissociation dynamics of the phenyl radical. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 141(10), 104307. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894398.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Dougherty, E. P., & Rabitz, H. (1980). Computational kinetics and sensitivity analysis of hydrogen–oxygen combustion. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 72, 6571. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.439114.Search in Google Scholar

Dukov, I. L. (2017). Balancing of oxidation-reduction (Redox) reactions with higher boranes participation: Oxidation number method or material balance method? Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 874–880.Search in Google Scholar

Fishtik, I., & Berka, L. H. (2005). Procedure for decomposing a redox reaction into half-reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(4), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p553.Search in Google Scholar

Generalic, E., & Vladislavic, N. (2018). Aggregate redox species method – An improved oxidation number change method for balancing redox equations. Chemistry Journal, 4(3), 43–49.Search in Google Scholar

Gerasimov, G. Y., & Shatalov, O. (2013). Kinetic mechanism of combustion of hydrogen–oxygen mixtures. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 86(5), 987–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-013-0919-7.Search in Google Scholar

Goodstein, M. P. (1970). Interpretation of oxidation-reduction. Journal of Chemical Education, 47(6), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed047p452.Search in Google Scholar

Guo, C. (1997). A new inspection method for balancing redox equations. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(11), 1365–1366. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p1365.Search in Google Scholar

Herndon, W. C. (1997). On balancing chemical equations: Past and present – A critical review and annotated bibliography. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(11), 1139–1362. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p1359.Search in Google Scholar

Holm, R. H. (1987). Metal-centered oxygen atom transfer reactions. Chemical Reviews, 87, 1401–1449. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00082a005.Search in Google Scholar

IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology (2nd ed.) (the “Gold Book”). Compiled by A. D. McNaught, & A. Wilkinson. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Online version (2019-) created by S. J. Chalk.Search in Google Scholar

Jurowski, K., Krzeczkowska, M. K., & Jurowska, A. (2015). Approaches to determining the oxidation state of nitrogen and carbon atoms in organic compounds for high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500645v.Search in Google Scholar

Karen, P. (2015). Oxidation State, a long-standing issue! Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 54, 4716–4726. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201407561.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kolb, D. (1979). More on balancing equations. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(3), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed056p181.Search in Google Scholar

Kolb, D. (1981). Balancing complex redox equations by inspection. Journal of Chemical Education, 58(8), 642–645. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed058p642.Search in Google Scholar

Kovacs, D., Lee, M.-S., Olson, D., & Jackson, J. E. (1996). Carbene-to-carbene oxygen atom transfer. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 118(34), 814–815. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja961324j.Search in Google Scholar

Lucci, F. R., Darby, M. T., Mattera, M. F. G., Ivimey, C. J., Therrien, A. J., Michaelides, A., … Sykes, E. C. H. (2016). Controlling hydrogen activation, spillover, and desorption with Pd-Au single-atom alloys. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 7(3), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02400.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Moriarty, R. M., Gupta, S. C., Hu, H., Berenschot, D. R., & White, K. B. (1981). Oxygen-atom transfer from iodosobenzene to ketenes, .alpha.-keto carboxylic acids, and ketones. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 103(3), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00393a040.Search in Google Scholar

Olson, J. A. (1997). An analysis of the algebraic method for balancing chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed074p538.Search in Google Scholar

Paik, S.-H., Kim, S., & Kim, K. (2017). Suggestion of a viewpoint change for the classification criteria of redox reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 563–568. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00593.Search in Google Scholar

Paulson, L. S., Mutunga, F., Shelby, F. S., & Anderson, D. T. (2014). Reactions of atomic hydrogen with formic acid and carbon monoxide in solid parahydrogen I: Anomalous effect of temperature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 118(36), 7640–7652. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502470j.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, S. K. (1985). How should equation balancing be taught? Journal of Chemical Education, 62(6), 507–508. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed062p507.Search in Google Scholar

Ran, Q., Yang, C. H., Lee, Y. T., Lu, I-C., She, G., Wang, L., Yang, X. (2005). Molecular beam studies of the F atom reaction with propyne: Site specific reactivity. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 122(4), 44307. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1839865.Search in Google Scholar

Rosado-Reyes, C. M., Manion, J. A., & Tsang, W. (2011). H atom attack on propene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 115, 2727–2734. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp111476q.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, T. P. (2011). Oxidation and reduction: Too many definitions? Journal of Chemical Education, 88(3), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100777q.Search in Google Scholar

Simmie, J. M. (2003). Detailed chemical kinetic models for the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 29, 599–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1285(03)00060-1.Search in Google Scholar

Sisler, H. H., & VanderWerf, C. A. (1980). Oxidation-Reduction – an example of chemical sophistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 57(1), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed057p42.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, G., Lucas, M., Song, Y., Zhang, J., Brazier, C., Houston, P. L., & Bowman, J. M. (2019). H atom product channels in the ultraviolet photodissociation of the 2-propenyl radical. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 123(46), 9957–9965. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07797.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Tro, N. J. (2014). Chemistry—A molecular approach (3rd ed.). USA: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, R. B., & Light, J. C. (1980). Reactive molecular collisions. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 31, 401–433. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.31.100180.002153.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, C.-H., Masunov, A. E., Allison, T. C., Chang, S., Lim, C., … Vasu, S. S. (2019). Molecular dynamics of combustion reactions in supercritical carbon dioxide. 6. Computational kinetics of reactions between hydrogen atom and oxygen molecule H + O2 ⇌ HO + O and H + O2 ⇌ HO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 123(50), 10772–10781. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08789.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Williams, D. A. (1999). Hydrogen molecules in the cosmos. Astronomy & Geophysics, 40(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/astrog/40.2.2.10.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, S., Jirasek, V., & Lukes, P. (2020). Molecular dynamics simulations of singlet oxygen atoms reactions with water leading to hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 53, 275204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab8321.Search in Google Scholar

Yuen, P. K., & Lau, C. M. D. (2021). Application of stoichiometric hydrogen atoms for balancing organic combustion reactions. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0034.Search in Google Scholar

Yuen, P. K., & Lau, C. M. D. (2022). From balancing redox reactions to determining change of oxidation numbers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 51(3), 22–26.10.1080/0047231X.2022.12290556Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-07
Accepted: 2022-03-14
Published Online: 2022-04-18

© 2022 Pong Kau Yuen and Cheng Man Diana Lau, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cti-2021-0028/html
Scroll to top button