Home Mathematics Asymptotic directions in the moduli space of curves
Article Open Access

Asymptotic directions in the moduli space of curves

  • Elisabetta Colombo , Paola Frediani EMAIL logo and Gian Pietro Pirola
Published/Copyright: May 29, 2025

Abstract

In this paper, we study asymptotic directions in the tangent bundle of the moduli space M g of curves of genus 𝑔, namely those tangent directions that are annihilated by the second fundamental form of the Torelli map. We give examples of asymptotic directions for any g ≄ 4 . We prove that if the rank 𝑑 of a tangent direction ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) (with respect to the infinitesimal deformation map) is less than the Clifford index of the curve đ¶, then 𝜁 is not asymptotic. If the rank of 𝜁 is equal to the Clifford index of the curve, we give sufficient conditions ensuring that the infinitesimal deformation 𝜁 is not asymptotic. Then we determine all asymptotic directions of rank 1 and we give an almost complete description of asymptotic directions of rank 2.

1 Introduction

In this paper, we study the local geometry of the Torelli locus in A g . Following the philosophy of Griffiths, the local geometry of the period map often contains information about the global geometry (see [6, 21, 22, 34]). We consider A g endowed with the Siegel metric, that is, the orbifold metric induced by the symmetric metric on the Siegel space H g = Sp ⁥ ( 2 ⁹ g , R ) / U ⁹ ( g ) of which A g is a quotient by the action of Sp ⁥ ( 2 ⁹ g , Z ) . Denote by j : M g → A g the Torelli map. The Torelli locus is the closure of the image of 𝑗. The local geometry of the map 𝑗 is governed by the second fundamental form, which at a non-hyperelliptic curve đ¶ of genus 𝑔 is a linear map II : I 2 → Sym 2 ⁥ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 2 ) , where I 2 is the vector space of quadrics containing the canonical curve.

One of the leading problems in the area is to study totally geodesic subvarieties of A g generically contained in the Torelli locus.

This problem is related to the Coleman–Oort conjecture according to which, for 𝑔 sufficiently high, there should not exist special (or Shimura) subvarieties of A g generically contained in the Torelli locus. We recall that special subvarieties of A g are totally geodesic; hence, in the last years, the study of the second fundamental form has been used to attack this problem. In particular, estimates on the maximal dimension of a totally geodesic subvariety of A g generically contained in the Torelli locus have been given in [9, 17, 16].

In this paper, we take a different point of view. The image of II in Sym 2 ⁥ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) √ is a linear system of quadrics in P ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ≅ P 3 ⁹ g − 4 . This paper is devoted to the study of the base locus of this linear system of quadrics. Following the terminology of differential geometry, we call asymptotic direction a nonzero tangent direction ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) such that II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = 0 for all Q ∈ I 2 . So asymptotic directions correspond to points in the base locus.

Clearly, a tangent direction to a totally geodesic subvariety is asymptotic. But the locus of asymptotic directions in the projective tangent bundle of the moduli space of curves M g is a natural locus, that is worthwhile investigating. For example, we believe that asymptotic directions could also be useful in the study of fibred surfaces in relation with the Xiao conjecture [35, 18] (see Remark 4.3).

Since II is injective [8, Corollary 3.4], its image in Sym 2 ⁥ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) √ is a linear system of quadrics in P ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ≅ P 3 ⁹ g − 4 of dimension 1 2 ⁹ ( g − 2 ) ⁹ ( g − 3 ) . Hence, for every curve đ¶ of genus g ≀ 9 , dim ⁥ ( II ⁹ ( I 2 ) ) < 3 ⁹ g − 4 , so the intersections of the quadrics in II ⁹ ( I 2 ) is non-empty; thus there exist asymptotic directions. In fact, for g ≀ 7 , there are examples of special subvarieties of A g generically contained in the Torelli locus (see [12, 13, 14, 15, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33]).

On the other hand, for high values of 𝑔, one would expect that the intersection of a space of quadrics of dimension 1 2 ⁱ ( g − 2 ) ⁱ ( g − 3 ) in P 3 ⁱ g − 4 would be empty.

One main result of this paper is to show that this is not always the case. Indeed, for all 𝑔, there are examples of asymptotic directions given by the Schiffer variations at the ramifications points of the g 3 1 for trigonal curves and by linear combinations of two Schiffer variations on bielliptic curves (see Lemma 8.2 and Theorem 9.2).

This is rather unexpected and intriguing and indicates that understanding the geometry of the locus of asymptotic directions is important. Especially, finding new examples of curves admitting asymptotic directions would be very interesting.

In this paper, using the Hodge Gaussian maps introduced in [10], we develop a new technique to calculate the second fundamental form II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) on certain tangent directions 𝜁 different from Schiffer variations, computing some residues of meromorphic forms (see Proposition 4.4).

This technique works for those tangent directions 𝜁 whose rank is less than 𝑔, where the rank of an infinitesimal deformation 𝜁 is the rank of the linear map âˆȘ ζ : H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) → H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) given by the cup product.

One of the main results we obtain by application of these ideas is the following

Theorem 1.1

Theorem 1.1 (Theorem 5.5, Theorem 5.1)

Let đ¶ be a smooth curve of genus g ≄ 4 ; take an integer d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) and an infinitesimal deformation ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) of rank 𝑑. Then

  1. 𝜁 is a linear combination of (possibly higher) Schiffer variations supported on an effective divisor đ· of degree 𝑑.

  2. 𝜁 is not asymptotic.

For a definition of 𝑛-th Schiffer variations, see Section 2.

Notice that the first part of the above result can be seen as a generalisation of the generic Torelli theorem of Griffiths. In fact, denoting by C d the symmetric product of đ¶, under the assumption Cliff ⁥ ( C ) > d , we characterise the image of the natural map P ⁹ T C d → P ⁹ ( H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ) as the locus of deformations of rank at most 𝑑. When d = 1 , it is the bicanonical curve.

In particular, if a curve đ¶ of genus 𝑔 has maximal Clifford index, equal to ⌊ g − 1 2 ⌋ , this gives a characterisation of the image of the natural map P ⁹ T C d → P ⁹ ( H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ) as the locus of deformations of rank at most 𝑑, for all d < ⌊ g − 1 2 ⌋ . We recall that this applies to the general curve in moduli space, which has maximal Clifford index. Moreover, for such values of 𝑑, Theorem 1.1 (2), for curves of maximal Clifford index, says that the base locus of the linear system of quadrics II ⁹ ( I 2 ) in P ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) does not contain any point [ ζ ] with rank ⁥ ( ζ ) ≀ d .

In the case where the rank of 𝜁 is equal to the Clifford index of the curve, we give sufficient conditions ensuring that the infinitesimal deformation 𝜁 is not asymptotic (see Theorem 7.2).

This result allows us to determine all asymptotic directions of rank 1. Notice that, by Theorem 1.1, there can be asymptotic directions of rank 1 only for curves with Clifford index 1, namely trigonal curves or plane quintics. We have the following.

Theorem 1.2

Theorem 1.2 (Theorem 8.4 and Theorem 8.5)

The following statements hold.

  1. If đ¶ is trigonal (non-hyperelliptic) of genus g ≄ 8 , or of genus g = 6 , 7 and Maroni degree 2, then rank one asymptotic directions are exactly the Schiffer variations in the ramification points of the g 3 1 .

  2. On a smooth plane quintic, there are no rank one asymptotic directions.

We recall that the general trigonal curve of genus g ≄ 6 has Maroni degree 2. For trigonal curves of genus g = 5 or g = 6 , 7 and Maroni degree 1, we show that there can exist asymptotic directions that are not Schiffer variations in the ramification points of the g 3 1 . We describe these asymptotic directions and we give the explicit equations of the trigonal curves admitting such asymptotic directions (see Section 10).

Finally, we consider infinitesimal deformations of rank 2 and we prove the following.

Theorem 1.3

Theorem 1.3 (Theorem 9.1, Theorem 9.6)

The following statements hold.

  1. Assume đ¶ is tetragonal, of genus at least 16, and đ¶ is not a double cover of a curve of genus 1 or 2. If a deformation 𝜁 of rank 2 is not a linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on an effective degree 2 divisor, then 𝜁 is not asymptotic.

  2. On a smooth plane sextic, there are no asymptotic directions of rank 2.

For bielliptic curves, we show the following.

Theorem 1.4

Theorem 1.4 (see Theorem 9.2)

On any bielliptic curve of genus at least 5, there exist linear combinations of two Schiffer variations that are asymptotic of rank 2.

More precisely, the linear combinations of Schiffer variations which are asymptotic in the above theorem are Ο p ± i ⁹ Ο σ ⁹ ( p ) , where 𝜎 is the bielliptic involution and ( p , σ ⁹ ( p ) ) ∈ C × C is in the zero locus of the meromorphic form η ̂ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C × C ⁹ ( 2 ⁹ Δ ) ) which determines the second fundamental form II (see [9, Theorem 3.7]).

The structure of the paper is as follows.

In Section 2, we describe in Dolbeault cohomology those infinitesimal deformations 𝜁 whose kernel contains a given nonzero form ω ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) . We define a split deformation 𝜁 as an infinitesimal deformation such that the rank 2 vector bundle of the extension corresponding to 𝜁 splits as the sum of two line bundles, and we give a Dolbeault cohomology description of it. We also recall the definition of (higher order) Schiffer variations.

Section 3 contains some technical results that will be useful to make explicit computations on the second fundamental form of the Torelli map.

In Section 4, we recall the definition of the second fundamental form, we define asymptotic directions and we use the results in Section 3 to give a formula that computes the second fundamental form II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) on some 𝜁 with nontrivial kernel, in terms of residues of meromorphic forms (see Proposition 4.4).

In Section 5, we consider infinitesimal deformations of rank 𝑑 less than the Clifford index of the curve, and we analyse the extension corresponding to 𝜁 and the rank 2 vector bundle 𝐾 of the extension. First we show that if either d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) , or d = Cliff ⁥ ( C ) < g − 1 2 and 𝐾 is not globally generated, then 𝜁 is a linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on a divisor đ· of degree 𝑑 (see Theorem 5.1). One of the main technical tools is a theorem of Segre–Nagata and Ghione (see [24, p. 84]) on the existence of a subline bundle 𝐮 of 𝐾 such that deg ⁥ ( A ) ≄ g − 1 2 . Then we show that if d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) , no linear combinations of Schiffer variations of rank 𝑑 is asymptotic (see Theorem 5.4). Here we use a result of Green and Lazarsfeld [20, Theorem 1] that allows us to find some quadrics where our technique to compute the second fundamental form works well. Finally, we prove Theorem 5.5.

In Section 6, we define some special split deformations that we call double split, where we can compute explicitly the second fundamental form, showing that they are not asymptotic.

In Section 7, we treat the case where the rank of 𝜁 is equal to the Clifford index of the curve and we give sufficient conditions ensuring that 𝜁 is not asymptotic (see Theorem 7.2).

In Section 8, we determine all asymptotic directions of rank 1 and we show Theorem 1.2 (Theorem 8.4 and Theorem 8.5).

In Section 9, we concentrate on deformations of rank 2. We show Theorem 1.3 (Theorem 9.1, Theorem 9.6) and we give the example of asymptotic directions on bielliptic curves proving Theorem 1.4 (Theorem 9.2).

In Section 10, we consider trigonal curves of genus g = 6 , 7 and Maroni degree 1 and trigonal curves of genus g = 5 , showing that there can exist asymptotic directions that are not Schiffer variations in the ramification points of the g 3 1 . We also describe these asymptotic directions and we give the equation of the trigonal curves admitting such asymptotic directions.

2 Preliminaries on deformations

Recall that an infinitesimal deformation ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) corresponds to a class of an extension

(2.1) 0 → O C → E → K C → 0 .

Taking global sections, we have

0 → H 0 ⁹ ( C , O C ) → H 0 ⁹ ( C , E ) → H 0 ⁹ ( C , K C ) → âˆȘ ζ H 1 ⁹ ( C , O C ) → ⋯ .

Definition 2.1

We define the rank of 𝜁 as the rank of the map âˆȘ ζ .

We shall now describe in Dolbeault cohomology those deformations 𝜁 having a given form ω ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) in the kernel of âˆȘ ζ . Let ω ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) , ω ≠ 0 , be a holomorphic 1-form, Z = ∑ n i ⁹ p i its divisor; consider the sequence

0 → T C ⁹ → ω ⁹ O C → O Z → 0

and the corresponding exact sequence in cohomology

(2.2) 0 → H 0 ⁹ ( O C ) ⁹ → i ⁹ H 0 ⁹ ( O Z ) ⁹ → ÎŽ ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ⁹ → ω ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) → 0 .

By the above exact sequence, the elements in ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) such that ω ∈ ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ ζ ) are exactly those belonging to the image of 𝛿.

We want now to give an explicit description in Dolbeault cohomology of the image of 𝛿. Suppose that { U i , z i } are open pairwise disjoint coordinate neighbourhoods centred on p i and p i ∈ D i ⊂ Δ i ⊂ U i and D i and Δ i are two closed discs, where D i is in the interior of Δ i .

Let s ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O Z ) be a holomorphic section and assume that

f i ⁹ ( z i ) = ∑ j = 0 n i − 1 ÎČ j , i ⁹ z i j

is its polynomial expression in U i . Let ρ ̃ be a C ∞ function on đ¶ which is equal to 1 on ⋃ i D i and equal to 0 on C ∖ ⋃ i Δ i .

Denote by 𝜌 the C ∞ function on đ¶ given by ∑ i ρ ̃ ⁹ f i . Let us introduce the following notation: writing in a local coordinate 𝑧, ω : = g ( z ) d z , we set 1 ω = 1 g ⁹ ( z ) ⁹ ∂ ∂ z . Hence 1 ω defines a meromorphic section of T C .

Then, in Dolbeault cohomology, we have ÎŽ ⁹ ( s ) = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ω ) ] . Setting ζ : = [ ∂ ̄ ( ρ ω ) ] , we clearly have ω âˆȘ ζ = 0 . Conversely, by the exact sequence (2.2), any 𝜁 such that ω âˆȘ ζ = 0 is in the image of 𝛿; hence it has a Dolbeault representative as above.

Definition 2.2

We say that a nonzero infinitesimal deformation ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) is split if the vector bundle 𝐾 in (2.1) splits as a direct sum of line bundles E = ( K C ⊗ L √ ) ⊕ L .

We will now give a description in Dolbeault cohomology of split deformations. Take a form ω ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) and choose a decomposition of its zero divisor Z = D + F , where the supports of đ· and đč are disjoint. Set [ σ D ] ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O Z ) , where σ D ≡ 1 on ⋃ p i ∈ Supp ⁥ ( D ) Δ i and σ D ≡ 0 on ⋃ p i ∈ Supp ⁥ ( F ) Δ i .

With the above notation, set ρ D : = ρ ̃ σ D . Setting Θ = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) , we have in the exact sequence (2.2), in Dolbeault cohomology,

ÎŽ ⁹ ( σ D ) = ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( C , T C ) .

One has Θ ⁹ ω = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ D , which is ∂ ̄ -exact; hence ω âˆȘ ζ = 0 in H 1 ⁹ ( C , O C ) .

Proposition 2.3

An infinitesimal deformation ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) is split if and only if

ζ = ÎŽ ⁹ ( σ D ) = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ]

for some form ω = s ⁹ τ , with zero divisor Z = D + F , where

D = div ⁥ ( s ) , F = div ⁥ ( τ ) , L = O C ⁹ ( D )

and đ· and đč have disjoint supports. In particular, if đ· has degree 𝑑 and h 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( D ) ) = r + 1 , then rank ⁥ ( ζ ) = d − 2 ⁹ r .

Proof

Notice that if 𝜁 is split, there exist τ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) , s ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) nonzero sections with disjoint zero loci such that extension (2.1) is given by

(2.3) 0 → O C → ( − τ , s ) ( K C ⊗ L √ ) ⊕ L → s + τ K C → 0 ;

hence ω : = s τ ∈ ker ( âˆȘ ζ ) . More precisely, ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ ζ ) = s ⋅ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) + τ ⋅ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) . So if h 0 ⁹ ( L ) = r + 1 and deg ⁥ ( L ) = d , then

dim ⁥ ( ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ ζ ) ) = h 0 ⁹ ( L ) + h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) − 1 = 2 ⁹ r + g − d ;

hence 𝜁 has rank equal to d − 2 ⁱ r .

Setting D = div ⁥ ( s ) , F = div ⁥ ( τ ) , we have Z = D + F , where the supports of đ· and đč are disjoint. Setting [ σ D ] ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O Z ) as above, then ÎŽ ⁹ ( σ D ) = ζ â€Č = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( C , T C ) . One has ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ⁹ ω = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ D , which is ∂ ̄ -exact; hence ζ â€Č ⁹ ω = 0 in H 1 ⁹ ( C , O C ) .

We claim that ζ â€Č = ζ . In fact, consider extension (2.3) given by 𝜁 and tensor it by T C . We get

0 → T C → ( − τ , s ) L √ ⊕ ( T C ⊗ L ) → s + τ O C → 0 .

Then ζ = ÎŽ ⁹ ( 1 ) , where ÎŽ : H 0 ⁹ ( O C ) → H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) is the coboundary morphism. We have

s ⁹ ( 1 − ρ D ) s + τ ⁹ ρ D τ = 1 ;

hence the element

Y : = ( 1 − ρ D s , ρ D τ ) ∈ C ∞ ( L √ ⊕ ( T C ⊗ L ) )

is mapped to 1 under the map ( s + τ ) . Then ( s + τ ) ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( Y ) = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ( s + τ ) ⁹ ( Y ) ) = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( 1 ) = 0 ∈ A C 0 , 1 , so there exists an element X ∈ A C 0 , 1 ⁹ ( T C ) such that

( − τ ⁹ X , s ⁹ X ) = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( Y ) = ( ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( 1 − ρ D s ) , ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D τ ) ) ∈ A C 0 , 1 ⁹ ( L √ ) ⊕ A C 0 , 1 ⁹ ( T C ⊗ L )

and ζ = [ X ] ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) . Thus if we take X = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) , we get

( − τ ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) , s ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ) = ( − ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D s ) , ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D τ ) ) = ( ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( 1 − ρ D s ) , ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D τ ) ) ,

since ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( 1 s ) = 0 , as 𝑠 is holomorphic. So we have shown that ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] = ζ â€Č .

Vice versa, assume that, in the exact sequence (2.2), the divisor 𝑍 of 𝜔 has a splitting Z = D + F , where đ· and đč have disjoint support. Then ω = s ⁹ τ , where s ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( D ) ) , τ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( F ) ) , with div ⁥ ( s ) = D and div ⁥ ( τ ) = F . Define ρ D as above and ζ : = [ ∂ ̄ ( ρ D ω ) ] ; then clearly ω ∈ ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ ζ ) .

We claim that the deformation 𝜁 is split. In fact, taking L = O C ⁱ ( D ) , extension (2.3) has a class given by 𝜁. ∎

Let đ¶ be a smooth complex projective curve of genus g ≄ 2 . Let 𝑝 be a point in đ¶ and 𝑧 a local coordinate centred in 𝑝. We define the 𝑛-th Schiffer variation at 𝑝 to be the element Ο p n ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( C , T C ) ≅ H ∂ ̄ 0 , 1 ⁹ ( T C ) whose Dolbeault representative is ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ p z n ) ⁹ ∂ ∂ z , where ρ p is a bump function in 𝑝 which is equal to one in a small neighbourhood 𝑈 containing 𝑝, Ο p n = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ p z n ) ⁹ ∂ ∂ z ] . Clearly, Ο p n depends on the choice of the local coordinate 𝑧. Take the exact sequence

0 → T C → T C ⁱ ( n ⁱ p ) → T C ⁱ ( n ⁱ p ) | n p → 0

and the induced exact sequence in cohomology

0 → H 0 ⁱ ( T C ⁱ ( n ⁱ p ) ) → H 0 ⁱ ( T C ⁱ ( n ⁱ p ) | n p ) ⁱ → ή p n ⁱ H 1 ⁱ ( T C ) .

By Riemann–Roch, if n < 2 ⁱ g − 2 , we have h 0 ⁱ ( T C ⁱ ( n ⁱ p ) ) = 0 ; hence we have an inclusion

ÎŽ p n : H 0 ⁹ ( T C ⁹ ( n ⁹ p ) | n p ) ≅ C n â†Ș H 1 ⁹ ( T C )

and the image of ÎŽ p n in H 1 ⁹ ( C , T C ) is the 𝑛-dimensional subspace ⟹ Ο p 1 , 
 , Ο p n ⟩ .

Clearly, H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − n ⁹ p ) ) ⊂ ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ Ο p n ) for n ≀ g ; hence Ο p n has rank at most 𝑛. For n = 1 , the first Schiffer variations Ο p 1 are the usual Schiffer variations, that we denote simply by Ο p , and they have rank 1 (see Section 7).

More generally, any linear combination

ζ = ∑ i = 1 k ∑ j = 1 m i b j , i ⁹ Ο p i j , with ⁹ ∑ i = 1 k m i ≀ g ,

has rank at most ∑ i = 1 k m i , since H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − ∑ i = 1 k m i ⁹ p i ) ) ⊂ ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ ζ ) .

3 Some computations

We will now show some technical results that will be useful in the sequel to make explicit computations on the second fundamental form of the Torelli map.

Consider two holomorphic one forms ω 1 and ω 2 . With the notation introduced in Section 2, take an infinitesimal deformation 𝜁 having a form ω ≠ 0 in its kernel and denote by Z = ∑ n i ⁹ p i its zero divisor. Then ζ = [ Θ ] ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) with Θ : = ∂ ̄ ( ρ ω ) , and ρ = ∑ i ρ ̃ ⁹ f i . We have Θ ⁹ ω i = Îł i + ∂ ̄ ⁹ h i , where Îł i is harmonic and h i is a C ∞ function on đ¶, so

ζ âˆȘ ω i = [ Îł i ] ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) .

Consider the two meromorphic functions g 1 = ω 1 / ω and g 2 = ω 2 / ω . Then, clearly, by the above construction, we have

Θ ⁹ ω i = Îł i + ∂ ̄ ⁹ h i = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g i ) .

Note that if ρ ⁹ g 1 is C ∞ , then ω 1 ∈ ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ ζ ) and Îł 1 = 0 . Moreover, up to a constant, we have h 1 = ρ ⁹ g 1 .

Set

(3.1) w ( ζ , ω 1 , ω 2 ) : = 2 π i ∑ p i ∈ Supp ⁥ ( Z ) Res p i ( f i g 1 d ( f i g 2 ) ) .

In the next section, we will show that this expression will be very useful in the computation of the second fundamental form of the Torelli map.

Remark 3.1

For any C ∞ functions h 1 , h 2 , we have

∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 = ∫ C ∂ h 2 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 1 .

Proof

By the Stokes theorem, we have

∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 = ∫ C d ⁹ ( h 1 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ) − ∫ C h 1 ⁹ ∂ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 = ∫ C h 1 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ∂ h 2 = ∫ C d ⁹ ( h 1 ⁹ ∂ h 2 ) − ∫ C ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 1 ∧ ∂ h 2 = ∫ C ∂ h 2 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 1 . ∎

Lemma 3.2

Assume that ρ ⁹ g 1 is C ∞ ; then we have

∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 = ∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = ∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) + w ⁹ ( ζ , ω 1 , ω 2 ) = ∫ C ∂ h 2 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 1 .

In particular, if both ρ ⁹ g 1 and ρ ⁹ g 2 are C ∞ , we have w ⁹ ( ζ , ω 1 , ω 2 ) = 0 .

Proof

Since ∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ Îł 2 = ∫ C d ⁹ ( h 1 ⁹ Îł 2 ) = 0 and Θ ⁹ ω 2 = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) , we get

∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 = ∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ ( Θ ⁹ ω 2 − Îł 2 ) = ∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ Θ ⁹ ω 2 = ∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ;

hence the first equality is proven. Moreover,

∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = ∫ C d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = ∫ C d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ) − ∫ C ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ( ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ) .

Using the Stokes theorem and recalling that ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = Θ ⁹ ω 2 is a C ∞ ( 0 , 1 ) -form on đ¶, we have

∫ C d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ) = 0 .

Then we get

∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 = − ∫ C ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = ∫ C ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = ∫ C d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ) − ∫ C ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) ∧ ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = ∫ C d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ) + ∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) .

Now, taking D i , ϔ a small disc around p i where ρ = f i , and by the Stokes theorem, we have

∫ C d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ) = ∑ lim Ï” → 0 ∫ ∂ D i , Ï” ρ ⁹ g 1 ⁹ d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ p i ∈ Z Res p i ⁥ ( f i ⁹ g 1 ⁹ d ⁹ ( f i ⁹ g 2 ) ) = w ⁹ ( ζ , ω 1 , ω 2 ) .

So we have shown that

∫ C ∂ h 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 = ∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 1 ) + w ⁹ ( ζ , ω 1 , ω 2 ) ,

and by Remark 3.1, the first term is equal to ∫ C ∂ h 2 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 1 .

Finally, if ρ ⁹ g 1 and ρ ⁹ g 2 are both C ∞ , clearly, f i ⁹ g 1 ⁹ d ⁹ ( f i ⁹ g 2 ) has no poles on 𝑍; hence the last sentence follows. ∎

Remark 3.3

Notice that if ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] is split, in formula (3.1), we have

w ⁹ ( ζ , ω 1 , ω 2 ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ p i ∈ Supp ⁥ ( D ) Res p i ⁥ ( g 1 ⁹ d ⁹ ( g 2 ) ) .

4 Second fundamental form and Hodge Gaussian map

Denote by M g the moduli space of smooth complex projective curves of genus 𝑔 and let A g be the moduli space of principally polarised abelian varieties of dimension 𝑔. The space A g is a quotient of the Siegel space H g = Sp ⁡ ( 2 ⁱ g , R ) / U ⁱ ( g ) by the action of the symplectic group Sp ⁡ ( 2 ⁱ g , Z ) . The space H g is a Hermitian symmetric domain and it is endowed with a canonical symmetric metric. We consider the induced orbifold metric (called the Siegel metric) on the quotient A g .

Denote by j : M g → A g , [ C ] ↩ [ j ⁹ ( C ) , Θ C ] the Torelli map, where j ⁹ ( C ) is the Jacobian of đ¶ and Θ C is the principal polarisation induced by cup product. If g ≄ 3 , it is an orbifold embedding outside the hyperelliptic locus [29].

Consider the complement M g 0 of the hyperelliptic locus in M g and the cotangent exact sequence of the Torelli map,

0 → N M g 0 / A g ∗ → Ω A g | M g 0 1 ⁹ → q ⁹ Ω M g 0 1 → 0 ,

where q = d ⁹ j ∗ is the dual of the differential of the Torelli map. Call ∇ the Chern connection on Ω A g | M g 0 1 with respect to the Siegel metric and let

II : N M g 0 / A g ∗ → Sym 2 ⁥ Ω M g 0 1 , II = ( q ⊗ Id Ω M g 0 1 ) ∘ ∇ | N M g 0 / A g ∗

be the second fundamental form of the above exact sequence. From now on, we will assume g ≄ 4 , so N M g 0 / A g ∗ is nontrivial.

If we take a point [ C ] ∈ M g 0 , we have

N M g 0 / A g , [ C ] ∗ = I 2 , Ω A g | M g 0 , [ C ] 1 = Sym 2 ⁥ H 0 ⁹ ( C , K C ) , Ω M g 0 , [ C ] 1 = H 0 ⁹ ( C , K C ⊗ 2 ) ,

where I 2 : = I 2 ( K C ) is the vector space of quadrics containing the canonical curve and the dual of the differential of the Torelli map 𝑞 is the multiplication map of global sections. Then, at the point [ C ] , the second fundamental form is a linear map II : I 2 → Sym 2 ⁡ H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ 2 ) .

Definition 4.1

A nonzero element ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) is an asymptotic direction if

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = 0

for every Q ∈ I 2 .

In [10, Theorem 2.1], it is proven that II is equal (up to a constant) to the Hodge Gaussian map 𝜌 of [10, Proposition-Definition 1.3]. We briefly recall its definition.

Let

Q = ∑ i , j a i , j ⁹ ω i ⊗ ω j ∈ I 2 ,

with a i , j = a j , i , ω i ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) and Θ ∈ A 0 , 1 ⁹ ( T C ) , [ Θ ] = : ζ . We write Θ ⁹ ω i = Îł i + ∂ ̄ ⁹ h i , where Îł i is a harmonic ( 0 , 1 ) -form. Now, identifying Sym 2 ⁥ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 2 ) with the symmetric homomorphisms H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) → H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 2 ) , we have (see [10])

(4.1) II ⁹ ( ∑ i , j a i ⁹ j ⁹ ω i ⊗ ω j ) ⁹ ( ζ ) = ∑ i , j a i ⁹ j ⁹ ω i ⁹ ∂ h j .

In [10, Theorem 3.1] (see also [9, Theorem 2.2]), it is proven that if đ¶ is a non-hyperelliptic curve of genus g ≄ 4 and p , q are two distinct points in đ¶, we have

(4.2) II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⋅ ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) ,

where ÎŒ 2 : I 2 → H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 4 ) is the second Gaussian map of the canonical bundle (see [10], or [9] for more details).

Remark 4.2

Since II is injective (see [8, Corollary 3.4]), II ⁹ ( I 2 ) ⊂ Sym 2 ⁥ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) √ is a linear system of quadrics in P ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ≅ P 3 ⁹ g − 4 of dimension 1 2 ⁹ ( g − 2 ) ⁹ ( g − 3 ) . Hence, for every curve đ¶ of genus g ≀ 9 , dim ⁥ ( II ⁹ ( I 2 ) ) < 3 ⁹ g − 4 , so the intersection of the quadrics in II ⁹ ( I 2 ) is non-empty; thus there exist asymptotic directions.

Examples of asymptotic directions

(1) Using equation (4.2), one can see that Schiffer variations Ο p at ramification points of a g 3 1 on any trigonal curve of genus g ≄ 4 are asymptotic directions (see Lemma 8.2). Moving a branch point in P 1 , one can see that there exist algebraic curves in the trigonal locus having these Schiffer variations as tangent directions (see [18]).

(2) Other examples of asymptotic directions of rank 1 different from Schiffer variations at ramification points of a g 3 1 on trigonal curves of genus 5, or of genus 6, 7 with Maroni degree k = 1 are given in the last sections. We will give an explicit description of these loci of trigonal curves admitting such asymptotic directions.

(3) In Theorem 9.2, we prove that, on any bielliptic curve of genus at least 5, there exist linear combinations of two Schiffer variations that are asymptotic directions of rank 2.

(4) Other examples of asymptotic directions are given by tangent vectors to special (hence totally geodesic) subvarieties of A g generically contained in the Torelli locus (see [12, 13, 14, 15, 27, 28, 31, 32, 33]). In all these examples, g ≀ 7 .

Remark 4.3

We recall that the original Xiao conjecture for non-isotrivial fibred surfaces S → B with general fibre đč of genus 𝑔 says that the relative irregularity q f satisfies the inequality q f ≀ g + 1 2 . In [30, 2], counterexamples to this conjecture have been given, and a modified version q f ≀ ⌈ g + 1 2 ⌉ is stated in [4]. In two of the four counterexamples, the associated modular map p : B → M g gives rise to curves contained in a totally geodesic subvariety [15, 23, 33]. Moreover, this always happens when q f = g − 1 . In fact, in that case, there is a fixed part A × B → B of the Jacobian fibration J → B , where 𝐮 is an abelian variety of dimension g − 1 . Then the period variation of the Jacobian fibration is only given by the elliptic fibration given by the quotient J / A . So the image of the period map B → A g is a totally geodesic curve. Since the tangent vectors to a totally geodesic curve are asymptotic directions, these fibrations give rise to asymptotic directions whose rank is at most g − q f . So the vanishing of the second fundamental form on tangent directions gives new infinitesimal constraints that could help to classify fibred surfaces with q f > g + 1 2 .

Now consider a quadric Q ∈ I 2 . Notice that we can always assume that 𝑄 has the following expression:

Q = ∑ i = 1 s ω 2 ⁹ i − 1 ⊙ ω 2 ⁹ i .

Fix a holomorphic form ω ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) , ω ≠ 0 , with zero locus 𝑍. With the notation of Section 2, we set ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ω ) ] . So we have ζ ⁹ ω = 0 and Θ ⁹ ω j = Îł j + ∂ ̄ ⁹ h j , Îł j harmonic. Let g i be the meromorphic function given by ω i ω . We would like to compute II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) .

Proposition 4.4

Assume ρ ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 is C ∞ for all i = 1 , 
 , s . Using the notation of (3.1), we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − ∑ i = 1 s w ⁹ ( ζ , ω 2 ⁹ i − 1 , ω 2 ⁹ i ) .

Proof

From the Hodge Gaussian computation (4.1), we get

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ) = ∑ i = 1 s ( ω 2 ⁹ i − 1 ⁹ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i + ω 2 ⁹ i ⁹ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) .

We have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = ζ ⁹ ( II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ) ) = ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ω ) ⁹ ( ∑ i = 1 s ( ω 2 ⁹ i − 1 ⁹ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i + ω 2 ⁹ i ⁹ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ) = ∑ i = 1 s ∫ C ( ( Îł 2 ⁹ i − 1 + ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ∧ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i + ( Îł 2 ⁹ i + ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i ) ∧ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) = ∑ i = 1 s ∫ C ( ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ∧ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i + ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i ∧ ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) = − ∑ i = 1 s ∫ C ( ∂ h 2 ⁹ i ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 + ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i ) ,

since γ k ∧ ∂ h l is exact for any k , l .

By Remark 3.1, we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − ∑ i = 1 s ∫ C ( ∂ h 2 ⁹ i ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 + ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i ) = − 2 ⁹ ∑ i = 1 s ∫ C ( ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i ) .

Using Lemma 3.2, we have

∫ C ( ∂ h 2 ⁹ i − 1 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ h 2 ⁹ i ) = ∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i ) = w ⁹ ( ζ , ω 2 ⁹ i − 1 , ω 2 ⁹ i ) + ∫ C ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) .

So we obtain

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − ∑ i = 1 s [ ( w ( ζ , ω 2 ⁹ i − 1 , ω 2 ⁹ i ) + ∫ C ∂ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ) + ∫ C ∂ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i ) ] .

Now the result follows since

Ω : = ∑ ( ∂ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) + ∂ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ( ρ g 2 ⁹ i ) ) = 0 .

In fact, we have ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ g j ) = g j ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ so that

Ω = ∑ ( ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i ) ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 + ∂ ( ρ ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ = ∑ ( g 2 ⁹ i ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 + g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i ) ⁹ ∂ ρ ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ + ∑ ( ( ∂ g 2 ⁹ i ) ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 + ( ∂ g 2 ⁹ i − 1 ) ⁹ g 2 ⁹ i ) ∧ ρ ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ = 0 ,

since Q ∈ I 2 ; hence ∑ ( g 2 ⁱ i − 1 ⁱ g 2 ⁱ i + g 2 ⁱ i − 1 ⁱ g 2 ⁱ i ) = 0 , and hence also its derivative

∑ ( ( ∂ g 2 ⁱ i ) ⁱ g 2 ⁱ i − 1 + ( ∂ g 2 ⁱ i − 1 ) ⁱ g 2 ⁱ i ) = 0 . ∎

5 Deformations of rank d < Cliff ⁥ ( C )

Recall that if đ¶ is a smooth projective curve of genus 𝑔 and 𝐿 is a line bundle on đ¶, then the Clifford index of 𝐿 is

Cliff ⁡ ( L ) = deg ⁡ ( L ) − 2 ⁱ h 0 ⁱ ( L ) + 2 ,

and the Clifford index of đ¶ is

Cliff ⁥ ( C ) = min L ∈ Pic ⁥ ( C ) { deg ⁥ ( L ) − 2 ⁹ h 0 ⁹ ( L ) + 2 ∣ h 0 ⁹ ( L ) ≄ 2 , h 1 ⁹ ( L ) ≄ 2 } .

We say that a line bundle 𝐿 contributes to the Clifford index if h 0 ⁹ ( L ) ≄ 2 , h 1 ⁹ ( L ) ≄ 2 .

One always has Cliff ⁥ ( C ) ≄ 0 , and

  • Cliff ⁥ ( C ) = 0 if and only if đ¶ is hyperelliptic,

  • Cliff ⁥ ( C ) = 1 if and only if đ¶ is trigonal or isomorphic to a plane quintic,

  • Cliff ⁥ ( C ) = 2 if and only if đ¶ is tetragonal or isomorphic to a plane sextic (see [26]).

We have the following relation between the Clifford index and the gonality gon ⁥ ( C ) of a curve đ¶ (see [11]):

Cliff ⁥ ( C ) + 2 ≀ gon ⁥ ( C ) ≀ Cliff ⁥ ( C ) + 3 .

Consider an infinitesimal deformation ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) and a corresponding extension

(5.1) 0 → O C → E → K C → 0 .

Theorem 5.1

Let đ¶ be a smooth algebraic curve of genus g ≄ 4 and ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) a deformation of rank d > 0 . Suppose one of the following assumptions is satisfied:

  1. d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) ,

  2. d = Cliff ⁡ ( C ) < g − 1 2 and 𝐾 not globally generated.

Then 𝜁 is a linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on an effective divisor đ· of degree 𝑑.

Proof

Taking global sections in extension (5.1) corresponding to the rank 𝑑 deformation 𝜁, we have

0 → H 0 ⁹ ( C , O C ) → H 0 ⁹ ( C , E ) → H 0 ⁹ ( C , K C ) → âˆȘ ζ H 1 ⁹ ( C , O C ) → ⋯ .

Since 𝜁 has rank 𝑑, we get h 0 ⁹ ( E ) = g − d + 1 . By a theorem of Segre–Nagata and Ghione (see [24, p. 84]), there exists a subline bundle 𝐮 of 𝐾 such that deg ⁥ ( A ) ≄ g − 1 2 . So, up to saturation, we have a diagram

Both the maps 𝑓 and ℎ are nonzero, since deg ⁡ ( A ) > 0 . In fact, if 𝑓 were zero, then 𝜄 would factor through O C . So 𝑓 is nonzero and hence also ℎ is nonzero.

Hence we have h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) ≄ 1 . We claim that h 0 ⁹ ( A ) ≄ 2 . In fact, if h 0 ⁹ ( A ) ≀ 1 , we would have h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) ≄ h 0 ⁹ ( E ) − 1 = g − d , and by Riemann–Roch, we would get deg ⁥ ( A ) ≀ d < g − 1 2 , a contradiction. So h 0 ⁹ ( A ) ≄ 2 , and if h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) ≄ 2 , 𝐮 contributes to the Clifford index and we have

h 0 ⁹ ( A ) − h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) = deg ⁥ ( A ) − g + 1 , h 0 ⁹ ( A ) + h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) ≄ g − d + 1 .

So, summing up, we get

2 ⁹ h 0 ⁹ ( A ) ≄ deg ⁥ ( A ) − d + 2 ;

hence Cliff ⁥ ( A ) ≀ d . If d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) , this is a contradiction. If d = Cliff ⁥ ( C ) , then Cliff ⁥ ( A ) = d , h 0 ⁹ ( A ) + h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) = g − d + 1 and we have an exact sequence

0 → H 0 ⁱ ( A ) → H 0 ⁱ ( E ) → H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ A ∹ ) → 0 .

Moreover, 𝐮 and K C ⊗ A ∹ are both base point free (since they compute the Clifford index). Thus 𝐾 is globally generated, a contradiction.

So h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) = 1 ; hence there exists an effective divisor đ· such that

K C ⊗ A ∹ = O C ⁱ ( D ) and h 0 ⁱ ( O C ⁱ ( D ) ) = 1 .

So we have h 0 ⁱ ( A ) = h 0 ⁱ ( K C ⁱ ( − D ) ) = g − d ; hence, by Riemann–Roch,

deg ⁡ ( A ) = deg ⁡ ( K C ⁱ ( − D ) ) = 2 ⁱ g − 2 − d .

Thus the image of the map H 0 ⁱ ( E ) → H 0 ⁱ ( K C ) is H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⁱ ( − D ) ) and we get a commutative diagram of extensions

where the upper extension splits, since the image of 𝜄 is contained in E â€Č by construction. Hence it corresponds to 0 ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ⁹ ( D ) ) and the element ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) belongs to the kernel of the map H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) → H 1 ⁹ ( T C ⁹ ( D ) ) which is the image of the injective map

H 0 ⁱ ( T C ⁱ ( D ) | D ) → H 1 ⁱ ( T C ) ,

that is, the space of Schiffer variations supported on đ·. ∎

Remark 5.2

Notice that Theorem 5.1 is a generalisation of the generic Torelli theorem of Griffiths. In fact, denote by C d the symmetric product of đ¶. Then, under the assumption Cliff ⁥ ( C ) > d , we characterise the image of the natural map

P ⁱ T C d → P ⁱ ( H 1 ⁱ ( T C ) )

as the locus of deformations of rank at most 𝑑. When d = 1 , it is the bicanonical curve.

We will now consider linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on a divisor of degree less than the Clifford index of đ¶. First recall the following.

Lemma 5.3

Let đ¶ be a smooth curve of genus 𝑔; take a positive integer d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) and an effective divisor đ· of degree 𝑑. Then K C ⁹ ( − D ) is projectively normal, so the multiplication map

m : Sym 2 ⁡ H 0 ⁱ ( C , K C ⁱ ( − D ) ) → H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ 2 ⁱ ( − 2 ⁱ D ) )

is surjective.

Proof

Notice that h 0 ⁱ ( D ) = 1 since Cliff ⁡ ( C ) > d . Moreover, K C ⁱ ( − D ) is very ample by Riemann–Roch and by the assumption Cliff ⁡ ( C ) > d . So, by [20, Theorem 1], K C ⁱ ( − D ) is projectively normal. ∎

We have the following.

Theorem 5.4

Let đ¶ be a smooth curve of genus 𝑔; take a positive integer d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) , an effective divisor D = ∑ i = 1 k m i ⁹ p i of degree 𝑑. Then any linear combination of all Schiffer variations Ο p i n i , with n i ≀ m i , is not an asymptotic direction.

Proof

We will prove the statement by induction on 𝑑. The case d = 1 is already known. In fact, in [10] (see also [9, Theorem 2.2]), it is proven that, for any Q ∈ I 2 ⁱ ( K C ) , we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) ,

and by [7, Theorem 6.1], we know that if đ¶ is not hyperelliptic and not trigonal of genus g ≄ 5 , for any p ∈ C , there exists a quadric Q ∈ I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) such that ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 .

By induction, assume that no linear combinations of all

{ Ο p i l i ∣ l i ≀ m i , i < k , l k ≀ m k − 1 } i = 1 , 
 , k

are asymptotic. So take a linear combination

ζ : = ∑ i = 1 k ∑ j = 1 m i b j , i Ο p i j .

To prove the result, we will show that there exists a quadric Q ∈ I 2 such that II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = 0 if and only if b m k , k = 0 . Then if 𝜁 were asymptotic, b m k , k = 0 , and by induction, we get a contradiction.

Notice that h 0 ⁱ ( D ) = 1 since Cliff ⁡ ( C ) > d . Set F d : = D , F d − 1 : = F d − p k . By Lemma 5.3, the multiplication maps

ÎŒ F d − 1 : Sym 2 ⁥ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d − 1 ) ) → H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 2 ⁹ ( − 2 ⁹ F d − 1 ) ) , ÎŒ F d : Sym 2 ⁥ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d ) ) → H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 2 ⁹ ( − 2 ⁹ F d ) )

are surjective.

Set I d − 1 = ker ⁥ ÎŒ F d − 1 and I d = ker ⁥ ÎŒ F d . We have and inclusion I d ⊂ I d − 1 and

dim ( I d − 1 / I d ) = g − d − 1 .

We would like to fix a basis of H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⁱ ( − F d − 1 ) ) . Recall that, by Riemann–Roch and the assumption Cliff ⁡ ( C ) > d , both K C ⁱ ( − F d ) and K C ⁱ ( − F d − 1 ) are very ample. We first take a form

ω 1 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d − 1 ) ) ∖ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d ) ) , ω 2 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d ) ) ⁹ such that ⁹ ord p i ⁥ ω 2 = m i ⁹ for all ⁹ i = 1 , 
 , k , ω 3 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d ) ) ⁹ such that ⁹ ord p k ⁥ ω 3 = m k + 1 .

Finally,

ω 4 , 
 , ω g − d + 1 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d ) )

such that ord p k ⁥ ω i > m k + 1 for all i = 4 , 
 , g − d + 1 .

Then any Q ∈ I d − 1 can be written as follows:

Q = ∑ j = 1 g − d + 1 α j ⁹ ω 1 ⊙ ω j + K ,

where K ∈ Sym 2 ⁡ ( H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⁱ ( − F d ) ) ) .

Note that ÎŒ F d − 1 ⁹ ( Q ) = 0 , α 1 ⁹ ω 1 2 is the only term whose vanishing order in p k is 2 ⁹ m k − 2 , and α 2 ⁹ ω 1 ⁹ ω 2 is the only term whose vanishing order in p k is 2 ⁹ m k − 1 . So we must have α 1 = α 2 = 0 . Since dim ( I d − 1 / I d ) = g − d − 1 , there exists a quadric Q ∈ I d − 1 such that α 3 ≠ 0 . But then, since ord p k ⁥ ( ω 1 ⁹ ω 3 ) = 2 ⁹ m k = ord p k ⁥ ( ω 2 2 ) and all the other terms have higher vanishing order in p k , the quadric 𝑄 has the form

Q = α 3 ⁹ ω 1 ⊙ ω 3 + ÎČ âą ω 2 ⊙ ω 2 + K â€Č ,

where K â€Č = ∑ j ≄ 4 α j ⁹ ω 1 ⊙ ω j + K â€Čâ€Č , with K â€Čâ€Č ∈ Sym 2 ⁥ ( H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − F d ) ) ) and α 3 ≠ 0 , ÎČ â‰  0 .

Observe now that we have

ζ = ∑ i = 1 k ∑ j = 1 m i b j , i ⁹ Ο p i j = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ∑ i = 1 k ∑ j = 1 m i b j , i ⁹ z i m i − j ⁹ ρ p i ω 2 ) ] ,

where ρ p i are bump functions which are equal to 1 in a neighbourhood of p i and z i is a local coordinate around p i . In the notation of Section 2,

ρ = ∑ i = 1 k ∑ j = 1 m i b j , i ⁹ z i m i − j ⁹ ρ p i .

Using the formula in Proposition 4.4, we get

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = α 3 ⁹ b m k , k ⁹ Res p k ⁥ ω 3 ω 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( ω 1 ω 2 ) = c ⋅ b m k , k ⁹ Res 0 ⁥ ( z k ⁹ d ⁹ ( 1 z k ) ) = − c ⁹ b m k , k ,

where c ≠ 0 is a nonzero constant. Then II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = 0 if and only if b m k , k = 0 , and this concludes the proof. ∎

Theorem 5.5

Let đ¶ be a smooth curve of genus 𝑔; take a positive integer d < Cliff ⁥ ( C ) . Then there are no asymptotic directions ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) of rank 𝑑.

Proof

Take an element ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) of rank 𝑑. By Theorem 5.1, 𝜁 is a linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on a divisor đ· of degree 𝑑, so we conclude by Theorem 5.4. ∎

Notice that, since the Clifford index of the general curve of genus 𝑔 is ⌊ g − 1 2 ⌋ , Theorem 5.1 (1) and Theorem 5.5 imply the following.

Corollary 5.6

Let đ¶ be a general curve in M g . Then

  1. all tangent directions 𝜁 of rank 𝑑, with 0 < d < ⌊ g − 1 2 ⌋ , are linear combinations of Schiffer variations supported on an effective divisor of degree 𝑑.

  2. There are no asymptotic directions of rank 𝑑, with 0 < d < ⌊ g − 1 2 ⌋ .

Remark 5.7

For the general curve of genus 𝑔, we characterise the image of the natural map

P ⁱ T C d → P ⁱ ( H 1 ⁱ ( T C ) )

as the locus of deformations of rank at most 𝑑, for all 0 < d < ⌊ g − 1 2 ⌋ . Moreover, for such values of 𝑑, the base locus of the linear system of quadrics II ⁹ ( I 2 ) in P ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) does not contain any point [ ζ ] with rank ⁥ ( ζ ) = d .

6 Double-split deformations

We will give some computation of the second fundamental form along some tangent directions. Let đ¶ be a curve of genus 𝑔; we assume that đ¶ is non-hyperelliptic. Let 𝐿 be a line bundle on đ¶ and M = K C ⊗ L √ . We assume that h 0 ⁹ ( L ) > 1 and h 0 ⁹ ( M ) > 1 . We consider the map

ϕ : ⋀ 2 H 0 ⁹ ( L ) ⊗ ⋀ 2 H 0 ⁹ ( M ) → I 2 ,
(6.1) ϕ ⁹ ( ( s 1 ∧ s 2 ) ⊗ ( τ 1 ∧ τ 2 ) ) = ( s 1 ⁹ τ 1 ) ⊙ ( s 2 ⁹ τ 2 ) − ( s 1 ⁹ τ 2 ) ⊙ ( s 2 ⁹ τ 1 ) .

Remark 6.1

Remark 6.1 (see [3])

If đ¶ is a trigonal curve of genus g ≄ 4 and 𝐿 is a g 3 1 , the map 𝜙 is an isomorphism.

Set N : = K C ⊗ L − 2 and assume | L | is base point free, that h 0 ⁹ ( L ) ≄ 2 , and h 0 ⁹ ( N ) ≄ 1 . Fix a nonzero section t ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( N ) , a base point free pencil ⟹ s 1 , s 2 ⟩ in H 0 ⁹ ( L ) , such that s 1 and s 2 have zeros disjoint from the zeros of 𝑡. Consider the quadric

Q = ( s 1 2 ⁱ t ) ⊙ ( s 2 2 ⁱ t ) − ( s 1 ⁱ s 2 ⁱ t ) ⊙ ( s 1 ⁱ s 2 ⁱ t ) ∈ I 2 ,

set ω : = s 1 s 2 t , denote by đ· the zero locus of s 1 , and take ζ : = [ ∂ ̄ ( ρ D ω ) ] ∈ H 1 ( T C ) .

Definition 6.2

A nonzero deformation ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) is said to be double split if it is split with ω = s 1 ⁹ τ , s 1 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) , τ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) and τ = s 2 ⁹ t with s 2 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) and t ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L − 2 ) .

Proposition 6.3

With the above notation, if 𝜁 is double split and

Q = ( s 1 2 ⁱ t ) ⊙ ( s 2 2 ⁱ t ) − ( s 1 ⁱ s 2 ⁱ t ) ⊙ ( s 1 ⁱ s 2 ⁱ t ) ,

we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ( deg ⁥ ( L ) ) ≠ 0 .

So 𝜁 is not an asymptotic direction.

Proof

We set ω 1 : = s 1 2 t , ω 2 : = s 2 2 t , ω 3 = ω 4 : = ω = s 1 s 2 t , x : = s 1 / s 2 . Then, with the notation of Proposition 4.4, we have g 3 = g 4 = 1 , ρ D ⁹ g 1 = ρ D ⁹ s 1 s 2 = ρ D ⁹ x is C ∞ , since ρ D is identically zero on the zeros of s 2 . Then we can apply Proposition 4.4 and we get

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ p ∈ Supp ⁥ ( D ) Res p ⁥ ( g 1 ⁹ d ⁹ g 2 − g 3 ⁹ d ⁹ g 4 ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ p ∈ Supp ⁥ ( D ) Res p ⁥ ( g 1 ⁹ d ⁹ g 2 ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ p ∈ Supp ⁥ ( D ) Res p ⁥ ( x ⁹ d ⁹ ( 1 x ) ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ p ∈ Supp ⁥ ( D ) Res p ⁥ ( d ⁹ x x ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ( deg ⁥ ( D ) ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ( deg ⁥ ( L ) ) . ∎

7 Rank d = Cliff ⁥ ( C ) deformations

In this section, we will consider infinitesimal deformations of rank d = Cliff ⁡ ( C ) and we will give sufficient conditions under which 𝜁 is not asymptotic.

Take a smooth non-hyperelliptic curve đ¶ of genus g ≄ 4 and an element ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) , corresponding to the class of an extension as in (2.1). Taking global sections in (2.1), if 𝜁 has rank 𝑑, we get h 0 ⁹ ( E ) = g − d + 1 .

Remark 7.1

Assume đ¶ is not hyperelliptic. Recall that if ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) is a nontrivial deformation of rank d = Cliff ⁥ ( C ) < g − 1 2 and 𝐾 is not globally generated, then by Theorem 5.1, 𝜁 is a linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on a degree 𝑑 effective divisor.

Theorem 7.2

Assume ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) is an infinitesimal deformation of positive rank 𝑑 on a curve đ¶ of Clifford index d ≠ g − 1 2 and g ≄ 5 . Assume moreover that

Cliff ⁡ ( C ) = Cliff ⁡ ( L ) = gon ⁡ ( C ) − 2 ,

where 𝐿 is a g d + 2 1 on đ¶. Assume that 𝜁 is not a linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on a degree 𝑑 effective divisor.

  • If, for every such 𝐿, h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 , then 𝜁 is split.

  • If, for every such 𝐿, h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 and h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = 4 , then 𝜁 is double split and it is not an asymptotic direction.

Proof

By the assumptions and by Remark 7.1, we know that 𝐾 is globally generated. Take two generic points p , q ∈ C ; then, since g ≄ 5 , there exists a nontrivial holomorphic section σ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( E ⁹ ( − p − q ) ) .

Tensoring (2.1) by O C ⁱ ( − p − q ) , we obtain an extension

0 → O C ⁹ ( − p − q ) → E â€Č → K C ⁹ ( − p − q ) → 0 ,

where E â€Č = E ⊗ O C ⁹ ( − p − q ) , so h 0 ⁹ ( E â€Č ) ≄ g − d − 3 > 0 . By the theorem of Segre–Nagata and Ghione [24, p. 84], there exists a subline bundle 𝐮 of E â€Č such that deg ⁥ ( A ) ≄ g − 5 2 . We claim that h 0 ⁹ ( A ) ≄ 1 . In fact, if h 0 ⁹ ( A ) = 0 , by Riemann–Roch, we would have

h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ) = g − 1 − deg ⁥ ( A ) ≀ g + 3 2 .

So, since p , q are generic points, h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − 2 ⁹ p − 2 ⁹ q ) ) ≀ g − 5 2 . On the other hand, up to saturation of 𝐮, so that the quotient E â€Č / A is torsion free, we have the exact sequence

0 → A → E â€Č → K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − 2 ⁹ p − 2 ⁹ q ) → 0 ,

and h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − 2 ⁹ p − 2 ⁹ q ) ) ≄ h 0 ⁹ ( E â€Č ) ≄ g − d − 3 . So we get d ≄ g − 1 2 , which contradicts our assumption. So h 0 ⁹ ( A ) ≄ 1 . We have the following diagram:

We have h 0 ⁹ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) ≄ 1 and deg ⁥ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) ≄ g − 1 2 . If h 0 ⁹ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) = 1 , then

h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − p − q ) ) = g − 2 − deg ⁥ ( A ) ≀ g + 1 2 ,

but h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − p − q ) ) ≄ h 0 ⁹ ( E ) − 1 = g − d , so we get d ≄ g − 1 2 , a contradiction. So h 0 ⁹ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) ≄ 2 and h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − p − q ) ) ≄ 2 , since 𝐾 is globally generated, hence also K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − p − q ) is globally generated and nontrivial.

So A ⁹ ( p + q ) contributes to the Clifford index and we have

h 0 ⁹ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) − h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − p − q ) ) = deg ⁥ ( A ) − g + 3 , h 0 ⁹ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) + h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ A √ ⁹ ( − p − q ) ) ≄ g − d + 1 .

So, summing up, we get

2 ⁹ h 0 ⁹ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) ≄ deg ⁥ ( A ) − d + 4 ;

hence d ≀ Cliff ⁥ ( A ⁹ ( p + q ) ) ≀ d , and either A ⁹ ( p + q ) = L , or A ⁹ ( p + q ) = K C ⊗ L √ , where 𝐿 is any line bundle as in the statement. But A ⁹ ( p + q ) ≠ L , since p , q are general and 𝐮 is effective. So A ⁹ ( p + q ) = K C ⊗ L √ , and the vertical exact sequence induces an exact sequence on global sections. So it corresponds to a class of an extension Ï” ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L − 2 ) that induces the zero map H 0 ⁹ ( L ) → H 1 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) . The map

H 1 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L − 2 ) ≅ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) √ → Hom ⁥ ( H 0 ⁹ ( L ) , H 1 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) ) ≅ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) √ ⊗ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) √ , v ↩ âˆȘ v

is the dual of the multiplication map H 0 ⁱ ( L ) ⊗ H 0 ⁱ ( L ) → H 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 2 ) and 𝜖 is in the kernel of this map. If h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 , by the base point free pencil trick, the multiplication map

Sym 2 ⁡ H 0 ⁱ ( L ) → H 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 2 )

is surjective, so 𝜖 must be zero. Hence E = ( K C ⊗ L ∹ ) ⊕ L and 𝜁 is split.

By Proposition 2.3, the diagram becomes

where s ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) and τ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) have disjoint zero loci. Then

ker ⁥ ( âˆȘ ζ ) = s ⋅ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) + τ ⋅ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) ,

which has dimension g − d .

Assume now h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = 4 ; then the multiplication map

m : H 0 ⁱ ( L ) ⊗ H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L − 2 ) → H 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L ∹ )

is surjective, since ker ⁥ ( m ) = H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L − 3 ) by the base point free pencil trick. So we have τ = s ⁹ t + s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č , with s â€Č ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) , t , t â€Č ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L − 2 ) . We claim that if we take ω â€Č = s ⁹ τ â€Č , with τ â€Č = s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č , then [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω â€Č ) ] = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] = ζ , where đ· is the zero divisor of 𝑠 and ω = s ⁹ τ .

In fact,

[ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) − ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω â€Č ) ] = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ⁹ ( − t s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č ⁹ ( s ⁹ t + s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č ) ) ) ] = 0 ,

since

ρ D ⁹ ( − t s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č ⁹ ( s ⁹ t + s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č ) )

is a C ∞ vector field, as

− t s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č ⁹ ( s ⁹ t + s â€Č ⁹ t â€Č )

has no poles on đ· by construction. So 𝜁 is double split and we apply Proposition 6.3 to conclude. ∎

8 Rank one deformations

In this section, we consider infinitesimal deformations 𝜁 of rank 1 on a non-hyperelliptic curve đ¶ of genus g ≄ 4 , and we ask whether these can be asymptotic. In Theorem 5.5, we proved that if Cliff ⁥ ( C ) > 1 , there are no asymptotic directions of rank 1. So we will assume Cliff ⁥ ( C ) = 1 ; hence đ¶ is either trigonal or isomorphic to a smooth plane quintic.

We will show that if đ¶ is trigonal of genus g ≄ 8 , or g = 6 , 7 with Maroni degree 2, then there do not exist asymptotic directions of rank 1, except for the Schiffer variations at a ramification point of the g 3 1 , which are asymptotic. We will also prove that, on a smooth plane quintic, there are no rank one asymptotic directions.

In Section 10, we will show that if g = 5 , or g = 6 , 7 and Maroni degree 1, there are examples of curves admitting asymptotic directions different from Schiffer variations at ramification points, and we will describe these loci.

Take a smooth non-hyperelliptic curve đ¶ of genus g ≄ 4 and an element ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) . The cup product âˆȘ ζ : H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) → H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) corresponds to an element Îł ζ in S 2 ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) . We have the following exact sequence given by the differential of the period map (dual to the multiplication map):

0 → H 1 ⁱ ( T C ) ⁱ → γ ⁱ S 2 ⁱ H 1 ⁱ ( O C ) → I 2 ∹ → 0 ,

where γ ⁹ ( ζ ) = γ ζ .

Remark 8.1

The rank of 𝜁 is equal to the rank of the quadric Îł ζ .

So an element ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) has rank one if and only if [ Îł ζ ] ∈ P ⁹ ( S 2 ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) ) lies in the image the Veronese map P ⁹ ( H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) ) → P ⁹ ( S 2 ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) ) .

Recall that, by [22], if đ¶ is non-hyperelliptic, non-trigonal and not isomorphic to a smooth plane quintic, the only rank one elements [ ζ ] ∈ P ⁹ ( H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ) are given by the classes of the Schiffer variations [ Ο p ] , that are the points of the bicanonical curve. If đ¶ is trigonal, the rank one elements correspond to the Veronese image of the ruled surface containing the canonical curve, and if đ¶ is a smooth plane quintic, they correspond to the points of the Veronese image of the Veronese surface in P ⁹ ( H 1 ⁹ ( O C ) ) ≅ P 5 .

Since 𝜁 has rank 1, in extension (2.1) corresponding to 𝜁, we get h 0 ⁱ ( E ) = g .

Lemma 8.2

Assume đ¶ is not hyperelliptic, ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) a rank one deformation. If 𝐾 is not globally generated, then ζ = Ο p is a Schiffer at a point 𝑝. If đ¶ is non-trigonal, then for all p ∈ C , Ο p is not an asymptotic direction. If đ¶ is trigonal and g ≄ 6 , then Ο p is an asymptotic direction if and only if 𝑝 is a ramification point of the g 3 1 .

Proof

Assume 𝐾 is not globally generated; we conclude by Theorem 5.1 that ζ = Ο p is a Schiffer variation at a point 𝑝.

If g ≄ 5 , đ¶ is not hyperelliptic and not trigonal, then for any point p ∈ C , Ο p is not an asymptotic direction. In fact, in [10] (see also [9, Theorem 2.2]), it is proven that, for any Q ∈ I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) , we have II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) , and by [7, Theorem 6.1], we know that if đ¶ is not hyperelliptic, and not trigonal of genus g ≄ 5 , for any p ∈ C , there exists a quadric Q ∈ I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) such that ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 .

Assume that đ¶ is trigonal, non-hyperelliptic and g ≄ 5 ; then a basis for I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) is given by the quadrics of rank at most 4 defined as in (6.1) where 𝐿 is the g 3 1 (see Remark 6.1).

For such quadrics, we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ÎŒ 1 , L ⁹ ( s 1 ∧ s 2 ) ⁹ ( p ) ⁹ ÎŒ 1 , K C ⁹ ( − L ) ⁹ ( τ 1 ∧ τ 2 ) ⁹ ( p )

(see [10] for the first equality, and [7, Lemma 2.2] for the second one).

If đ¶ is trigonal and 𝑝 is a ramification point of the g 3 1 , then we have ρ ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) = 0 , since ÎŒ 1 , L ⁹ ( s 1 ∧ s 2 ) ⁹ ( p ) = 0 .

Assume đ¶ is trigonal and 𝑝 is not a ramification point of the g 3 1 ; then

h 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L ∹ ⁱ ( − p ) ) = h 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L ∹ ) − 1 ;

otherwise, | L ⁹ ( p ) | is a g 4 2 and đ¶ would be hyperelliptic. We claim that if g ≄ 6 ,

h 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L ∹ ⁱ ( − 2 ⁱ p ) ) = h 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L ∹ ⁱ ( − p ) ) − 1 .

In fact, otherwise, | L ⁹ ( 2 ⁹ p ) | would be a g 5 2 , so it would give a map C → P 2 of degree 1; hence g ≀ 6 . So g = 6 and đ¶ would be a smooth plane quintic, hence not trigonal. So if we take a pencil ⟹ τ 1 , τ 2 ⟩ ⊂ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) such that ⟹ τ 1 , τ 2 ⟩ ∩ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ⁹ ( − 2 ⁹ p ) ) = { 0 } , we get

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ÎŒ 1 , L ⁹ ( s 1 ∧ s 2 ) ⁹ ( p ) ⁹ ÎŒ 1 , K C ⁹ ( − L ) ⁹ ( τ 1 ∧ τ 2 ) ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 ,

since 𝑝 is neither a ramification point for | L | , nor for the pencil | ⟹ τ 1 , τ 2 ⟩ | . ∎

Definition 8.3

Let đ¶ be a trigonal (non-hyperelliptic) curve of genus g ≄ 5 and let 𝐿 be the line bundle of degree 3 computing the unique trigonal series. The Maroni degree k ∈ N of đ¶ can be characterised as the unique number such that

h 0 ⁱ ( C , L ⊗ k + 1 ) = k + 2 , h 0 ⁱ ( C , L ⊗ k + 2 ) > k + 3 .

The following bounds on 𝑘 have been established by Maroni (see [25]):

g − 4 3 ≀ k ≀ g − 2 2 .

Hence if g ≄ 5 , we can have trigonal curves with k = 1 only if g = 5 , 6 , 7 . This means that h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 and h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = 5 . For g = 5 , we have k = 1 , while for g = 6 , 7 , the general curve has k = 2 . We will say that a trigonal curve of genus g = 6 , 7 is Maroni special if k = 1 .

Notice that if g ≄ 8 , we always have k ≄ 2 .

Theorem 8.4

If đ¶ is trigonal (non-hyperelliptic) of genus g ≄ 8 , or đ¶ is trigonal (non-hyperelliptic) of genus g = 6 , 7 and k = 2 , then the rank one asymptotic directions are exactly the Schiffer variations in the ramification points of the g 3 1 .

Proof

Take 𝜁 a rank 1 infinitesimal deformation and 𝐾 the rank 2 vector bundle in the corresponding extension (2.1). If 𝐾 is not globally generated, then by Lemma 8.2, ζ = Ο p is a Schiffer at a point 𝑝, and it is an asymptotic direction if and only if 𝑝 is a ramification point of the g 3 1 . So assume 𝐾 is globally generated and take 𝐿 the g 3 1 . Then, since đ¶ is not hyperelliptic, h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 , and by assumption, h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = 4 . So, by the proof of Theorem 7.2, 𝜁 is not asymptotic. ∎

Let us now assume that đ¶ is a smooth plane quintic and take L = O C ⁹ ( 1 ) the g 5 2 ; then L ⊗ 2 = K C .

Theorem 8.5

On a smooth plane quintic, there are no rank one asymptotic directions.

Proof

By the discussion following Remark 8.1, the deformations of rank one correspond to the points of P 2 ; hence they are the intersections of two lines. Since the Schiffer variations are not asymptotic directions (see Lemma 8.2), we consider only rank one deformations corresponding to points p ∈ P 2 ∖ C .

Choose two lines l 1 , l 2 in P 2 passing through 𝑝 that intersect đ¶ transversally. Denote by s 1 , s 2 the corresponding sections in H 0 ⁹ ( L ) .

As L ⊗ 2 = K C , we have H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L − 2 ) = H 0 ⁹ ( O C ) , and we choose t = 1 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O C ) . Choose ω = s 1 ⁹ s 2 ; set D = div ⁥ ( s 1 ) . Then the element ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] is double split of rank one, by Proposition 2.3. Hence, by Proposition 6.3, we have ρ ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = ( 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ) ⁹ deg ⁥ ( L ) = 10 ⁹ π ⁹ i , so 𝜁 is not asymptotic. ∎

9 Rank 2 deformations

In this section, we will study rank 2 deformations and the condition to be asymptotic. Let ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) be a rank 2 deformation. If Cliff ⁥ ( C ) > 2 , by Theorem 5.5, we know that 𝜁 is not asymptotic. So assume Cliff ⁥ ( C ) = 2 ; hence either đ¶ is tetragonal, or it is a smooth plane sextic.

Theorem 9.1

Assume đ¶ is a tetragonal curve of genus at least 16 and not a double cover of a curve of genus 1 or 2. If a deformation 𝜁 of rank 2 is not a linear combination of Schiffer variations supported on a degree 2 effective divisor, then 𝜁 is not asymptotic.

Proof

Under our assumptions, the rank 2 bundle 𝐾 in extension (2.1) associated with the rank 2 deformation 𝜁 is globally generated (see Remark 7.1). We claim that, for every g 4 1 , 𝐿, we have h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 , h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = 4 ; hence we conclude applying the proof of Theorem 7.2.

In fact, if h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) ≄ 4 , đ¶ has a g 8 3 . This cannot give a birational map, by the Castelnuovo bound. The map cannot have degree 4; otherwise, the image would be a conic, hence contained in a plane. So the map has degree 2 and the image has degree 4, so it is either rational or a genus 1 curve. Since it is neither hyperelliptic, nor bielliptic by assumption, we have h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 .

If h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 3 ) ≄ 5 , đ¶ has a g 12 4 . Again, the induced map cannot be birational by the Castelnuovo bound. If it has degree 3, since it is non-degenerate, the image is a rational normal curve of degree 4; hence the curve đ¶ is trigonal, which contradicts our assumption on Cliff ⁥ ( C ) . If the map has degree 2, the image is non-degenerate of degree 6; hence, by Clifford’s theorem, it is non-special; hence, by Riemann–Roch, it is a curve of genus 1 or 2, a contradiction. ∎

We will now consider the case where 𝜁 is a linear combination of two Schiffer variations. We have the following.

Theorem 9.2

On any bielliptic curve of genus at least 5, there exist linear combinations of two Schiffer variations that are asymptotic of rank 2.

Proof

Assume the curve đ¶ is bielliptic of genus at least 5, and let π : C → E be the 2 : 1 map to a genus 1 curve 𝐾. By the Castelnuovo–Severi inequality (see e.g. [1, Theorem 3.5]), a bielliptic curve of genus at least 5 is neither hyperelliptic nor trigonal.

Denote by 𝜎 the bielliptic involution. Consider the curve Γ in the surface S = C × C given by the graph of 𝜎, Γ : = { ( p , σ ( p ) ) ∣ p ∈ C } . Consider the form η ̂ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K S ⁹ ( 2 ⁹ Δ ) ) introduced in [9]. Denote by Z ⁹ ( η ̂ ) its zero locus. Clearly, Z ⁹ ( η ̂ ) intersects the curve Γ outside the diagonal. Take a point ( p , σ ⁹ ( p ) ) ∈ Z ⁹ ( η ̂ ) ∩ Γ , p ≠ σ ⁹ ( p ) . Thus, for any quadric Q ∈ I 2 , by [9], we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο σ ⁹ ( p ) ) = − 4 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ Q ⁹ ( p , σ ⁹ ( p ) ) ⁹ η ̂ ⁹ ( p , σ ⁹ ( p ) ) = 0 .

Take ζ = a ⁹ Ο p + b ⁹ Ο σ ⁹ ( p ) ; then, by [9], we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = a 2 ⁹ II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) + b 2 ⁹ II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο σ ⁹ ( p ) ⊙ Ο σ ⁹ ( p ) ) .

Notice that any quadric Q ∈ I 2 is 𝜎-invariant. In fact,

H 0 ⁱ ( C , K C ) ≅ H 0 ⁱ ( E , K E ) ⊕ H 0 ⁱ ( C , K C ) − ,

where H 0 ⁱ ( C , K C ) − denotes the anti-invariant subspace by the action of 𝜎 and

H 0 ⁱ ( E , K E ) ≅ H 0 ⁱ ( C , K C ) +

is the invariant subspace. Hence it follows that dim ( Sym 2 H 0 ( C , K C ) ) − = g − 1 . Moreover, we have dim ⁡ H 0 ⁱ ( C , K C ⊗ 2 ) + = 2 ⁱ g − 2 ; thus dim ⁡ H 0 ⁱ ( C , K C ⊗ 2 ) − = g − 1 . Since the multiplication map is 𝜎-equivariant, I 2 ⁱ ( K C ) − = ( 0 ) , so I 2 ⁱ ( K C ) = I 2 ⁱ ( K C ) + . Then we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = ( a 2 + b 2 ) ⁹ II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) ,

since 𝑄 is 𝜎-invariant, II is 𝜎-equivariant and σ ∗ ⁹ ( Ο p ) = Ο σ ⁹ ( p ) . Hence, if a 2 + b 2 = 0 , 𝜁 is asymptotic. On the other hand, notice that if a 2 + b 2 ≠ 0 , there exists a quadric 𝑄 such that II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( Ο p ⊙ Ο p ) ≠ 0 , so 𝜁 is not asymptotic (see Lemma 8.2). ∎

Remark 9.3

The asymptotic directions found in Theorem 9.2 are linear combinations of Schiffer variations supported on a divisor D = 2 ⁹ p + 2 ⁹ q of a g 4 1 on the bielliptic curve đ¶.

Proof

For any point ( p , σ ⁹ ( p ) ) of the curve Γ in the proof of Theorem 9.2, the line bundle O C ⁹ ( 2 ⁹ p + 2 ⁹ σ ⁹ ( p ) ) is a g 4 1 on đ¶. In fact, for p ∈ C , set y = π ⁹ ( p ) = π ⁹ ( σ ⁹ ( p ) ) ∈ E , and take a 2 : 1 cover ϕ : E → P 1 such that 𝑩 is a ramification point of 𝜙. Then ϕ ⁹ ( y ) is a critical value for the degree 4 map ψ : = ϕ ∘ π such that ψ ∗ ⁹ ( ϕ ⁹ ( y ) ) = 2 ⁹ p + 2 ⁹ σ ⁹ ( p ) . ∎

Assume now that đ¶ is a smooth plane sextic. We will describe the rank 2 deformations on đ¶. Set V : = H 0 ( O P 2 ( 3 ) ) ≅ H 0 ( C , K C ) and consider the Grassmannian G ⁹ ( 8 , V ) of linear subspaces of 𝑉 of codimension 2. Set Y k = { [ ζ ] ∈ P ⁹ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ∣ rank ⁥ ( ζ ) ≀ k } and consider the map χ : Y 2 ∖ Y 1 → G ⁹ ( 8 , V ) , [ ζ ] ↩ ker ⁥ ( ζ ) . Denote by Sec ⁥ ( C ) ⊂ Y 2 the linear combination of Schiffer variations at two points in đ¶.

Let Z ∈ Hilb 2 ⁥ ( P 2 ) be a length 2 scheme and denote by I Z the ideal sheaf of 𝑍. Then W Z : = H 0 ( I Z ( 3 ) ) ⊂ V has codimension 2. If Z = p + q , p ≠ q , then W Z is the space of cubics passing through 𝑝 and 𝑞, while if Z = ( p , v ) , where v ≠ 0 is a tangent vector at 𝑝, the elements in W Z are the cubics passing through 𝑝 and tangent at 𝑣. Consider the injective map Îł : Hilb 2 ⁥ ( P 2 ) → G ⁹ ( 8 , V ) , Z ↩ W Z . Denote by Hilb 2 ⁥ ( P 2 ) ⁹ ( C ) the divisor of schemes having support intersecting đ¶ and U C : = Hilb 2 ( P 2 ) ∖ Hilb 2 ( P 2 ) ( C ) . We have the following.

Proposition 9.4

We have

  1. χ ⁹ ( Y 2 ∖ Y 1 ) ⊂ Îł ⁹ ( Hilb 2 ⁥ ( P 2 ) ) ,

  2. 𝜒 induces a bijection between Y 2 ∖ Sec ⁡ ( C ) and U C .

Proof

Take [ ζ ] ∈ Y 2 ∖ Y 1 and W = χ ⁹ ( [ ζ ] ) = ker ⁥ ( ζ ) ⊂ V . Denote by

ev : W ⊗ O P 2 → O P 2 ⁱ ( 3 )

the evaluation map and tensor it by O P 2 ⁱ ( − 3 ) . Then the cokernel of this map is a sheaf O Z and we claim that it has length 2.

In fact, denote by m i : W ⊗ H 0 ⁹ ( O P 2 ⁹ ( i ) ) → H 0 ⁹ ( O P 2 ⁹ ( 3 + i ) ) the multiplication map and define c i : = codim ( Im ( m i ) ) , H 0 ( O P 2 ( 3 + i ) ) . Then, by a theorem of Macaulay (see [19, Theorem 2]), we have c 1 ≀ 2 . Gotzmann’s Persistence Theorem (see [19]) says that if c 1 = 2 , then c i = 2 for all i ≄ 1 . From this, one easily proves that O Z has length 2.

This shows that χ ⁹ ( [ ζ ] ) = Îł ⁹ ( Z ) and ( 1 ) is proven. Since đ›Ÿ is injective, we can consider the composition

ÎČ : = Îł − 1 ∘ χ : Y 2 ∖ Y 1 → Hilb 2 ( P 2 ) .

We claim that ÎČ âˆ’ 1 ⁹ ( Hilb 2 ⁥ ( P 2 ) ⁹ ( C ) ) ⊂ Sec ⁥ ( C ) .

Assume by contradiction that there exists [ ζ ] ∉ Sec ⁥ ( C ) such that ÎČ âą ( [ ζ ] ) ∈ Hilb 2 ⁥ ( P 2 ) ⁹ ( C ) . Then ÎČ âą ( [ ζ ] ) = p + q , where p ∈ C and q ∉ C and

χ ⁹ ( [ ζ ] ) = ker ⁥ ( ζ ) ≅ { s ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O P 2 ⁹ ( 3 ) ) ∣ s ⁹ ( p ) = s ⁹ ( q ) = 0 } .

The image of m 3 is given by the sextics vanishing at 𝑝 and 𝑞. So, restricting to đ¶, we obtain that the image of the map ÎŒ : W ⊗ H 0 ⁹ ( C , K C ) → H 0 ⁹ ( C , K C ⊗ 2 ) is H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 2 ⁹ ( − p ) ) . Hence we get ζ = Ο p ∈ Y 1 .

So we can consider the restriction ÎČ â€Č of đ›œ to Y 2 ∖ Sec ⁥ ( C ) . This gives a map

ÎČ â€Č : Y 2 ∖ Sec ⁥ ( C ) → U C .

We want to show that ÎČ â€Č is bijective. Assume ÎČ â€Č ⁹ ( [ η ] ) = ÎČ â€Č ⁹ ( [ ζ ] ) = Z . So W = ker ⁥ ( η ) = ker ⁥ ( ζ ) ; hence W ⊂ ker ⁥ ( a ⁹ η + b ⁹ ζ ) for every linear combination. Note that the rank of a ⁹ η + b ⁹ ζ cannot be 1; otherwise, W ⊂ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⁹ ( − p ) ) for some p ∈ C , and so p ∈ Supp ⁥ ( Z ) , a contradiction since Z ∈ U C . On the other hand, letting L = H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) / W , then a ⁹ η + b ⁹ ζ define symmetric forms on 𝐿, which has dimension 2, so there exists a linear combination a ⁹ η + b ⁹ ζ for which the rank of the corresponding quadric drops. Hence it is zero and [ ζ ] = [ η ] ∈ Y 2 ; thus ÎČ â€Č is injective.

To prove that ÎČ â€Č is surjective, fix Z ∈ U C and realise 𝑍 as a complete intersection of a line 𝑙 and a conic Γ (tangent if 𝑍 is not reduced). Using the equations of 𝑙 and Γ, we obtain the exact sequence

0 → O P 2 ⁱ ( − 3 ) → O P 2 ⁱ ( − 1 ) ⊕ O P 2 ⁱ ( − 2 ) → I Z → 0 ,

and tensoring by O P 2 ⁹ ( 3 ) , we have

0 → O P 2 → O P 2 ⁱ ( 2 ) ⊕ O P 2 ⁱ ( 1 ) → I Z ⁱ ( 3 ) → 0 .

Restricting to đ¶ and using the fact that Z ∩ C = ∅ , we get the exact sequence

0 → O C → O C ⁱ ( 2 ) ⊕ O C ⁱ ( 1 ) → K C → 0 ,

and its extension class gives a nontrivial class 𝜁 such that ker ⁥ ( ζ ) = H 0 ⁹ ( I Z ⁹ ( 3 ) | C ) . So we get ÎČ â€Č ⁹ ( [ ζ ] ) = Z . ∎

Remark 9.5

Notice that, from Proposition 9.4 (2), it follows that the restriction of 𝜒 to Y 2 ∖ Sec ⁥ ( C ) is injective. Hence, for these infinitesimal deformations 𝜁, ker ⁥ ( ζ ) determines 𝜁.

We show the following.

Theorem 9.6

On a smooth plane sextic, there are no asymptotic directions of rank 2.

Proof

By Proposition 9.4, we have shown that a rank 2 deformation 𝜁 that is not a linear combination of Schiffer variations corresponds to a point Z ∈ Hilb 2 ⁥ ( P 2 ) whose support does not intersect đ¶. We have ker ⁥ ( ζ ) ≅ H 0 ⁹ ( O P 2 ⁹ ( 3 ) ⊗ I Z ) and 𝜁 is determined by its kernel.

The deformation 𝜁 corresponds to such a length 2 scheme 𝑍, that is the intersection of a line l 1 and a conic Γ, which are tangent in a point if 𝑍 is not reduced. So

ker ⁥ ( ζ ) ≅ H 0 ⁹ ( O P 2 ⁹ ( 3 ) ⊗ I Z ) = l ⋅ H 0 ⁹ ( O P 2 ⁹ ( 2 ) ) + Γ ⋅ H 0 ⁹ ( O P 2 ⁹ ( 1 ) ) .

The scheme 𝑍 is either supported in two distinct points 𝑝, 𝑞, or it is given by 𝑝 and a tangent direction 𝑣. So the line l 1 is uniquely determined by 𝑍, while we can choose Γ as the union of two lines l 2 , l 3 passing through 𝑝 and 𝑞, or passing through 𝑝 if 𝑍 is not reduced. Set l i | C = : s i ∈ H 0 ( O C ( 1 ) ) , ω = s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ s 3 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) and D : = div ( s 1 ) . Then a Dolbeault representative for 𝜁 is ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) , where ρ D is as in Proposition 2.3. This can be easily seen, observing that ker ⁥ ( [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] ) is equal to ker ⁥ ( ζ ) . In fact, ker ⁥ ( [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] ) is equal to

s 1 ⋅ H 0 ⁱ ( O C ⁱ ( 2 ) ) + s 1 ⁱ s 2 ⋅ H 0 ⁱ ( O C ⁱ ( 1 ) ) ,

as is easily seen using Proposition 2.3. So 𝜁 is double split; hence it is not asymptotic by Proposition 6.3.

Assume 𝜁 is a linear combination of two Schiffer variations, ζ = a ⁹ Ο p + b ⁹ Ο q , with p , q two distinct points in đ¶ and not lying on a bitangent of đ¶.

Consider s 1 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( 1 ) ⁹ ( − p − q ) ) , s 2 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( 1 ) ) such that ⟹ s 1 , s 2 ⟩ is base point free and such that 𝑝 is not a ramification point of this pencil. Let s 3 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( 1 ) ) , with s 3 ⁹ ( q ) = 0 , s 3 ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 . Set Q = s 1 2 ⁹ s 3 ⊙ s 2 2 ⁹ s 3 − s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ s 3 ⊙ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ s 3 ∈ I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) . Then, by [7, Lemma 2.2], we have

ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) = s 3 2 ⁹ ( ÎŒ 1 , O C ⁹ ( 1 ) ⁹ ( s 1 ∧ s 2 ) ) 2 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 4 ) ,

so ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 , while ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( q ) = 0 and Q ⁹ ( p , q ) = 0 . So, by [9, Theorem 2.2], we have II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = π ⁹ i ⁹ a 2 ⁹ ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) = 0 if and only if a = 0 and 𝜁 is a Schiffer variation at 𝑞, so it is not asymptotic.

If the line through 𝑝 and 𝑞 is bitangent, take s 2 the section of H 0 ⁱ ( O C ⁱ ( 1 ) ) given by a line passing through 𝑝 and not through 𝑞, and s 3 , s 4 the sections given by distinct lines passing through 𝑞 and not through 𝑝. Then the quadric Q = s 2 2 ⁱ s 4 ⊙ s 3 2 ⁱ s 4 − s 2 ⁱ s 3 ⁱ s 4 ⊙ s 2 ⁱ s 3 ⁱ s 4 ∈ I 2 ⁱ ( K C ) is such that Q ⁱ ( p , q ) = 0 , since s 2 ⁱ s 4 ⁱ ( p ) = s 2 ⁱ s 4 ⁱ ( q ) = 0 . By [7, Lemma 2.2], we have

ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) = s 4 2 ⁹ ( ÎŒ 1 , O C ⁹ ( 1 ) ⁹ ( s 2 ∧ s 3 ) ) 2 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 4 ) .

Hence ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 , while ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( q ) = 0 . So, by [9, Theorem 2.2], we have

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ a 2 ⁹ ÎŒ 2 ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( p ) = 0

if and only if a = 0 and 𝜁 is a Schiffer variation at 𝑞, so it is not asymptotic.

If p = q , ζ = a ⁹ Ο p + b ⁹ Ο p 2 , take the tangent line of đ¶ at 𝑝 and denote by s 1 the given section of H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( 1 ) ) . Take s 2 , s 3 two other sections of H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( 1 ) ) given by two lines not passing through 𝑝. Then consider the quadric Q = s 1 2 ⁹ s 3 ⊙ s 2 2 ⁹ s 3 − s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ s 3 ⊙ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ s 3 ∈ I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) . Set ω = s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ s 3 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) ; then ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ p ⁹ ( a ⁹ z + b ω ) ) ] and the computation in Proposition 4.4 gives

II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = b 2 ⁹ Res p ⁥ ( s 1 s 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( s 2 s 1 ) ) = 0

if and only if b = 0 ; hence 𝜁 is a Schiffer variation at 𝑝, so it is not asymptotic. ∎

10 Maroni special trigonal curves of genus 6 , 7 and trigonal curves of genus 5

10.1 g = 6 Maroni special.

Let đ¶ be a (non-hyperelliptic) trigonal curve of genus 6 and Maroni degree k = 1 . We will show that, in this case, there can exist asymptotic directions that are not Schiffer variations in the ramification points of the g 3 1 . We will describe these asymptotic directions. Moreover, we give a parametrisation of the locus of the trigonal curves of genus 6 with Maroni degree 1 giving an explicit equation. We also describe the sublocus of those trigonal curves admitting such asymptotic directions.

Denote by 𝐿 the trigonal linear series. Recall that, by Definition 8.3 of the Maroni degree, h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 and h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = 5 . Then K C ⊗ L − 3 has degree 1, and by Riemann–Roch, h 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L − 3 ) = 1 , so K C = L ⊗ 3 ⊗ O C ⁱ ( q ) for a point q ∈ C . Hence

M = K ⊗ L ∹ = L ⊗ 2 ⁱ ( q ) ,

by Riemann–Roch, h 0 ⁹ ( M ) = 4 and the map ϕ : C → | M | ≅ P 3 is an embedding. In fact, ϕ ⁹ ( C ) is a curve of degree 7 and it is smooth since otherwise đ¶ would have a g 5 2 . We fix a basis { s 1 , s 2 } of H 0 ⁹ ( L ) , where we assume that s 2 ⁹ ( q ) = 0 . Consider the inclusion L ⊗ 2 ⊂ L ⊗ 2 ⁹ ( q ) ; then we can fix an ordered basis of 𝑀 given by { σ ⁹ s 1 2 , σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 , σ ⁹ s 2 2 , t } , where σ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( O C ⁹ ( q ) ) , σ ≠ 0 and t ⁹ ( q ) ≠ 0 .

Consider the rational functions

x = s 1 s 2 , g = σ ⁹ s 2 2 t , y = 1 g = t σ ⁹ s 2 2 .

Remark 10.1

Assume there exists a deformation 𝜁 of rank

1 = Cliff ⁡ ( C ) = gon ⁡ ( C ) − 2

that is asymptotic and it is not a Schiffer variation. Let 𝐿 be the g 3 1 . Then we can assume ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] , where đ· is the zero divisor of s 1 and ω = s 1 ⁹ t .

Proof

Since 𝜁 is not a Schiffer variation and h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) = 3 , by Theorem 7.2, we know that 𝜁 is split, and by Proposition 2.3, we can write ω = s 1 ⁹ τ , where τ ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) and s 1 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( L ) have disjoint support. Thus 𝜏 does not belong to ⟹ σ ⁹ s 1 2 , σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⟩ . Moreover, if τ = σ ⁹ s 2 2 , then 𝜁 is double split, so by Theorem 7.2, it is not asymptotic. Hence we can take ω = s 1 ⁹ t . ∎

Assume D = div ⁥ ( s 1 ) = p 1 + p 2 + p 3 is reduced.

Theorem 10.2

With the above notation, let ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] be a deformation of rank 1 that is not a Schiffer variation. Then 𝜁 is asymptotic if and only if the following conditions are satisfied:

(10.1) g ⁹ ( p 1 ) + g ⁹ ( p 2 ) + g ⁹ ( p 3 ) = 0 ,
(10.2) g 2 ⁹ ( p 1 ) + g 2 ⁹ ( p 2 ) + g 2 ⁹ ( p 3 ) = 0 ,
(10.3) Res p 1 ⁥ d ⁹ g x + Res p 2 ⁥ d ⁹ g x + Res p 3 ⁥ d ⁹ g x = 0 .

Proof

The space 𝑊 of quadrics that contain the canonical curve is spanned by the quadrics with rank at most 4 corresponding to all the pencils of H 0 ⁹ ( M ) (see Remark 6.1). Using the chosen basis and computing the second fundamental form as in Proposition 4.4, we easily see II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = 0 for all the quadrics constructed as above, except for (possibly) the ones corresponding to the three pencils in the subspace ⟹ σ ⁹ s 2 2 , σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 , t ⟩ ⊂ H 0 ⁹ ( M ) . Denote by

  • Γ 1 = t ⁹ s 1 ⊙ σ ⁹ s 2 3 − σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 ⊙ t ⁹ s 2 the quadric corresponding to the pencil ⟹ σ ⁹ s 2 2 , t ⟩ ,

  • Γ 2 = t ⁹ s 1 ⊙ σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 − σ ⁹ s 1 2 ⁹ s 2 ⊙ t ⁹ s 2 the quadric corresponding to the pencil ⟹ σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 , t ⟩ ,

  • Γ 3 = σ ⁹ s 1 2 ⁹ s 2 ⊙ σ ⁹ s 2 3 − ( σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 ) ⊙ 2 the quadric corresponding to the pencil ⟹ σ ⁹ s 2 2 , σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⟩ .

Then, using Proposition 4.4, we obtain
II ⁹ ( Γ 3 ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( σ ⁹ s 1 2 ⁹ s 2 s 1 ⁹ t ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 2 3 s 1 ⁹ t ) ) + 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 s 1 ⁹ t ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 s 1 ⁹ t ) ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 t ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 2 3 s 1 ⁹ t ) ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( x ⁹ g ⁹ d ⁹ ( g x ) ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( g 2 ⁹ d ⁹ x x ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ g 2 ⁹ ( p i ) ,
II ⁹ ( Γ 2 ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( t ⁹ s 1 s 1 ⁹ t ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 s 1 ⁹ t ) ) + 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( σ ⁹ s 1 2 ⁹ s 2 s 1 ⁹ t ⁹ d ⁹ ( t ⁹ s 2 s 1 ⁹ t ) ) = 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( x ⁹ g ⁹ d ⁹ ( 1 x ) ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( g ⁹ ( d ⁹ x x ) ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ g ⁹ ( p i ) ,
II ⁹ ( Γ 1 ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( t ⁹ s 1 s 1 ⁹ t ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 2 3 s 1 ⁹ t ) ) + 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 s 1 ⁹ t ⁹ d ⁹ ( t ⁹ s 2 s 1 ⁹ t ) ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( d ⁹ ( g x ) ) + 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( g ⁹ d ⁹ ( 1 x ) ) = − 2 ⁹ π ⁹ i ⁹ ∑ i Res p i ⁥ ( d ⁹ g x ) .
Hence 𝜁 is asymptotic if and only if equations (10.1), (10.2), (10.3) are satisfied. ∎

Remark 10.3

If D = div ⁥ ( s 1 ) is not reduced, the computation is the same; one only has to consider the multiplicity of the points p i and take the sum over the support of đ·.

Now, by Riemann–Roch,

h 0 ⁱ ( M ⊗ 3 ⊗ L ) = 24 − 5 = 19 .

Note that M ⊗ 3 ⊗ L ≅ L ⊗ 7 ⁱ ( 3 ⁱ q ) . Set V = H 0 ⁱ ( L ) ; then s 1 i ⋅ s 2 n − i is a basis of Sym n ⁡ ( V ) , the space of symmetric tensors of 𝑉. Consider the space

t 3 ⋅ V + t 2 ⋅ Sym 3 ⁥ ( V ) ⁹ σ + t ⋅ Sym 5 ⁥ ( V ) ⁹ σ 2 + Sym 7 ⁥ ( V ) ⁹ σ 3 ⊂ H 0 ⁹ ( M ⊗ 3 ⊗ L ) ;

in fact,

t 3 − i ⁱ Sym 2 ⁱ i + 1 ⁡ ( V ) ⊂ H 0 ⁱ ( M ⊗ 3 ⊗ L ⁱ ( − i ⁱ q ) ) .

Since dim Sym k ⁡ ( V ) = k + 1 and h 0 ⁱ ( M ⊗ 3 ⊗ L ) = 19 , counting dimensions, we see that we must have an equation

ϕ 1 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⋅ t 3 + σ ⁹ ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t 2 + σ 2 ⁹ ϕ 5 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t + σ 3 ⁹ ϕ 7 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = 0 .

Since the curve is trigonal (non-hyperelliptic) ϕ 1 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ≠ 0 and since

σ ⁹ ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t 2 + σ 2 ⁹ ϕ 5 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t + σ 3 ⁹ ϕ 7 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 )

vanishes on 𝑞, we may take ϕ 1 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = s 2 ; then we get the relation

s 2 ⁹ t 3 + σ ⁹ ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t 2 + σ 2 ⁹ ϕ 5 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t + σ 3 ⁹ ϕ 7 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = 0 .

Remark 10.4

Looking at the order of vanishing of the terms of the above equation in 𝑞, since s 2 ⁹ ( q ) = σ ⁹ ( q ) = 0 , we see that ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) must contain the term s 1 3 . By a suitable change of coordinates of the form

t â€Č : = t + α σ s 1 2 + ÎČ Ïƒ s 1 s 2 ,

we can assume that ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = a ⁹ s 1 3 + b ⁹ s 2 3 , with a ≠ 0 .

Dividing by σ 3 ⁹ s 2 7 , we get the equation

y 3 + y 2 s 2 3 ⁹ ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) + y s 2 5 ⁹ ϕ 5 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) + 1 s 2 7 ⁹ ϕ 7 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = y 3 + y 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 7 ⁹ ( x ) = y 3 + y 2 ⁹ ( a ⁹ x 3 + b ) + y ⁹ ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 7 ⁹ ( x ) ,

where ψ k ⁹ ( x ) is the polynomial in đ‘„ obtained by ϕ k ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) dividing by s 2 k and a ≠ 0 .

So we have proven the following.

Proposition 10.5

Trigonal curves of genus 6 with Maroni degree k = 1 are described by the equation

(10.4) y 3 + y 2 ⁹ ( a ⁹ x 3 + b ) + y ⁹ ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 7 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 ,

where a , b ∈ C , a ≠ 0 and ψ 5 , ψ 7 polynomials of degree at most 5 , 7 .

We will now describe the locus of trigonal curves of genus 6 with Maroni degree k = 1 admitting an asymptotic direction of rank 1 different from a Schiffer variation at a ramification point of the g 3 1 . We have the following.

Theorem 10.6

Trigonal curves of genus 6 with Maroni degree k = 1 admitting an asymptotic direction of rank 1 different from a Schiffer variation at a ramification point of the g 3 1 satisfy the equation

(10.5) y 3 + y 2 ⁹ x 3 + y ⁹ x 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 7 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 ,

where ψ 3 , ψ 7 are polynomials of degree at most 3 , 7 such that ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 .

Proof

Recalling that y = 1 g , equations (10.1) and (10.2) easily give

∑ i = 1 3 y ⁱ ( p i ) = 0 , ∑ i = 1 3 ( y ⁱ ( p i ) ) 2 = 0 , ∑ i < j y ⁱ ( p i ) ⁱ y ⁱ ( p j ) = 0 .

Set y i : = y ( p i ) ; since x ⁹ ( p i ) = 0 , equation (10.4) gives

y i 3 + b ⁹ y i 2 + y i ⁹ ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) + ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 for all ⁹ i = 1 , 2 , 3 .

Hence the equation z 3 + b ⁹ z 2 + ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) ⁹ z + ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) has the elements y i as roots, so

b = − ∑ i = 1 3 y i = 0 and ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) = ∑ i < j y i ⁹ y j = 0 .

Moreover, since a ≠ 0 , changing 𝑡 (hence 𝑩) by a nonzero multiple, we can assume that a = 1 . So equation (10.4) becomes

P ⁹ ( x , y ) = y 3 + y 2 ⁹ x 3 + y ⁹ x ⁹ ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 7 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 .

Notice that y i 3 = − ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 , since s 1 and 𝑡 have no common zeros.

Consider now equation (10.3). We have

d ⁱ g x = 1 x ⁱ d ⁱ ( 1 y ) = − 1 x ⁱ d ⁱ y y 2 and P x ⁱ d ⁱ x + P y ⁱ d ⁱ y = 0 , so d ⁱ y = − P x ⁱ d ⁱ x P y .

Hence

P x = 3 ⁹ x 2 ⁹ y 2 + ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) ⁹ y + x ⁹ y ⁹ ψ 4 â€Č ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( x ) , P y = 3 ⁹ y 2 + 2 ⁹ y ⁹ x 3 + x ⁹ ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) .

So equation (10.3) is

0 = ∑ i = 1 3 Res p i ⁥ ( d ⁹ g x ) = − ∑ i = 1 3 Res p i ⁥ ( P x y 2 ⁹ P y ⁹ d ⁹ x x ) = − ∑ i = 1 3 P x y 2 ⁹ P y ⁹ ( p i ) = − ∑ i = 1 3 ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) ⁹ y i + ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) 3 ⁹ y i 4 = − 1 3 ⁹ ∑ i = 1 3 ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) y i 3 − 1 3 ⁹ ∑ i = 1 3 ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) y i 4 = ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) − 1 3 ⁹ ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) ⁹ ∑ i = 1 3 1 y i = ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) ;

hence ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 and equation (10.4) is

P ⁹ ( x , y ) = y 3 + y 2 ⁹ x 3 + y ⁹ x 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 7 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 . ∎

Remark 10.7

Since, in equation (10.5), we have ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 , changing s 1 and s 2 (hence đ‘„ and 𝑩) by suitable nonzero multiples, we can assume ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 1 . Hence equation (10.5) depends on 11 parameters, while the dimension of the locus of trigonal curves of genus 6 with Maroni degree 1 has dimension 12.

By [5, Lemma 3.3], the tangent space to the trigonal locus is

(10.6) T tri , [ C ] = { ζ ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( T C ) ∣ ζ ⋅ Ω = 0 ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) } ,

where Ω = ÎŒ 1 , L ⁹ ( s 1 ∧ s 2 ) = s 2 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( s 1 s 2 ) , while the tangent space to the locus of trigonal curves with Maroni degree k = 1 is

T Maroni , [ C ] = { ζ ∈ T tri , [ C ] | ζ ⋅ ÎŒ 1 , M ⁹ ( t ∧ σ ⁹ s 2 2 ) s 2 = 0 } .

Notice that ÎŒ 1 , M ⁹ ( t ∧ σ ⁹ s 2 2 ) = t 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( g ) and clearly s 2 divides t 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( g ) , hence the element

ÎŒ 1 , M ⁹ ( t ∧ σ ⁹ s 2 2 ) s 2 ∈ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ 2 ) .

Assume ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] , with ω = s 1 ⁹ t as above.

Proposition 10.8

We have the following.

  1. ζ ∈ T tri , [ C ] if and only if equation (10.1) is satisfied.

  2. ζ ∈ T Maroni , [ C ] and it is asymptotic if and only if it satisfies (10.5) with ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 and ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 .

Proof

Notice that ζ ⋅ Ω = 0 ∈ H 1 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ) if and only if ζ ⋅ Ω ⋅ s i = 0 for i = 1 , 2 . We have

ζ ⋅ Ω ⋅ s 1 = ∫ C Ω ⁹ s 1 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ D s 1 ⁹ t = 0 ,

since ρ D ≡ 0 on the zero locus of 𝑡, while

ζ ⋅ Ω ⋅ s 2 = ∫ C Ω ⁹ s 2 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C s 2 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( s 1 s 2 ) ⁹ s 2 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C s 2 2 t ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ ⁹ d ⁹ x x = ∑ i = 1 3 g ⁹ ( p i ) ;

hence the first statement follows.

We have

∫ C ÎŒ 1 , M ⁹ ( t ∧ σ ⁹ s 2 2 ) s 2 ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C t 2 s 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 2 2 t ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 2 2 t ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ t ) s 1 ⁹ s 2 = − ∫ C d ⁹ ( ρ ⁹ t s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 2 2 t ) ) = ∫ ⋃ ∂ D i t s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( σ ⁹ s 2 2 t ) = ∑ i = 1 3 Res p i ⁥ ( t s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⁹ d ⁹ g ) = ∑ i = 1 3 Res p i ⁥ ( f g ⁹ d ⁹ g ) .

Now we have f g ⁱ d ⁱ g = y x ⁱ d ⁱ ( 1 y ) = − 1 x ⁱ y ⁱ d ⁱ y , d ⁱ y = − P x ⁱ d ⁱ x P y , so

∑ i = 1 3 Res p i ⁥ ( f g ⁹ d ⁹ g ) = − ∑ i = 1 3 Res p i ⁥ ( P x y ⁹ P y ) ⁹ d ⁹ x x = − ∑ i = 1 3 P x y ⁹ P y ⁹ ( p i ) = ∑ i = 1 3 ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) 3 ⁹ y i 3 = ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) ψ 7 ⁹ ( 0 ) .

So 𝜁 asymptotic is in T Maroni , [ C ] if and only if ψ 7 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 . ∎

10.2 Genus 7 Maroni special

Assume đ¶ is a (non-hyperelliptic) trigonal curve of genus 7 with Maroni degree k = 1 . We will show that, also in this case, there can exist asymptotic directions that are not Schiffer variations in the ramification points of the g 3 1 and we will describe them. Moreover, we give a parametrisation of the locus of the trigonal curves of genus 7 with Maroni degree 1 giving an explicit equation and we describe the sublocus of those trigonal curves admitting such asymptotic directions.

Take a deformation 𝜁 of rank

1 = Cliff ⁡ ( C ) = gon ⁡ ( C ) − 2

and let 𝐿 be the g 3 1 . The assumption on the Maroni degree gives h 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = 5 . By Riemann–Roch, we have h 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L − 3 ) = 2 , so K C ⊗ L − 3 is the g 3 1 , so K C = L ⊗ 4 . Set as usual V = H 0 ⁹ ( L ) = ⟹ s 1 , s 2 ⟩ ; then H 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = ⟹ s 1 3 , s 2 3 , s 1 2 ⁹ s 2 , s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 , t ⟩ .

As in the case g = 6 , we can use Remark 10.1 and assume ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] , where đ· is the zero divisor of s 1 and ω = s 1 ⁹ t .

Set x = s 1 / s 2 , g = s 2 3 / t , y = 1 / g = t / s 2 3 , D = div ⁥ ( s 1 ) = p 1 + p 2 + p 3 . When đ· is not reduced, the computation is the same; one only has to consider the multiplicity of the points p i and take the sum over the support of đ·.

Theorem 10.9

With the above notation, let ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] be a deformation of rank 1 that is not a Schiffer variation. Then 𝜁 is asymptotic if and only if equations (10.1), (10.2), (10.3) are satisfied, where x = s 1 / s 2 , g = s 2 3 / t .

Proof

A basis of I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) is given by the quadrics with rank at most 4 determined by the pencils in

H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) = H 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 3 ) = ⟹ s 1 3 , s 2 3 , s 1 2 ⁹ s 2 , s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 , t ⟩ .

Computing the second fundamental form as in Proposition 4.4, we easily see II ⁹ ( Q ) ⁹ ( ζ ⊙ ζ ) = 0 for all the quadrics constructed as above, except for (possibly) the three pencils in the subspace ⟹ s 2 3 , s 1 ⁹ s 2 2 , t ⟩ ⊂ H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) . Denote by

Γ 1 = t ⁱ s 1 ⊙ s 2 4 − t ⁱ s 2 ⊙ s 1 ⁱ s 2 3 , Γ 2 = t ⁱ s 1 ⊙ s 1 ⁱ s 2 3 − t ⁱ s 2 ⊙ s 1 2 ⁱ s 2 2 , Γ 3 = s 1 2 ⁱ s 2 2 ⊙ s 2 4 − ( s 1 ⁱ s 2 3 ) ⊙ 2

the corresponding three quadrics. A computation similar to the case g = 6 shows that 𝜁 is asymptotic if and only if equations (10.1), (10.2), (10.3) are satisfied. ∎

Observe that

t 3 + t 2 ⁱ Sym 3 ⁡ ( V ) + t ⁱ Sym 6 ⁡ ( V ) + Sym 9 ⁡ ( V ) ⊂ H 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 9 ) = H 0 ⁱ ( M ⊗ 3 ) .

Since dim ⁡ ( Sym k ⁡ ( V ) ) = k + 1 and h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 9 ) = 21 , we have an equation

t 3 + t 2 ⁹ ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) + t ⁹ ϕ 6 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) + ϕ 9 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = 0 .

Dividing by s 2 9 , we get the equation

P ⁹ ( x , y ) = y 3 + y 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ ψ 6 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 9 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 .

So we have proven the following.

Proposition 10.10

Trigonal curves of genus 7 with Maroni degree k = 1 are described by the equation

(10.7) y 3 + y 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ ψ 6 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 9 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 ,

where ψ 3 , ψ 6 , ψ 9 are polynomials of degree at most 3 , 6 , 9 .

We will now describe the locus of trigonal curves of genus 7 with Maroni degree k = 1 admitting an asymptotic direction of rank 1 different from a Schiffer variation at a ramification point of the g 3 1 .

Theorem 10.11

Trigonal curves of genus 7 with Maroni degree k = 1 admitting an asymptotic direction of rank 1 different from a Schiffer variation at a ramification point of the g 3 1 satisfy the equation

y 3 + y 2 ⁹ x ⁹ ψ 2 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ x 2 ⁹ ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 9 ⁹ ( x ) ,

where ψ 2 , ψ 4 , ψ 9 are polynomials of degree at most 2 , 4 , 9 and ψ 9 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 .

Proof

Set y i : = y ( p i ) ; then equations (10.1), (10.2) imply that

∑ i = 1 3 y i = 0 , ∑ i = 1 3 y i 2 = 0 , ∑ i < j y i ⁱ y j = 0 .

Since x ⁹ ( p i ) = 0 for all i = 1 , 2 , 3 , equation (10.7) gives

y i 3 + y i 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( 0 ) + y i ⁹ ψ 6 ⁹ ( 0 ) + ψ 9 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 for all ⁹ i = 1 , 2 , 3 .

Hence the equation z 3 + z 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( 0 ) + z ⁹ ψ 6 ⁹ ( 0 ) + ψ 9 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 has y 1 , y 2 , y 3 as roots. So we obtain

ψ 3 ⁹ ( 0 ) = − ∑ i = 1 3 y i = 0 , ψ 6 ⁹ ( 0 ) = ∑ i < j y i ⁹ y j = 0 .

Hence equation (10.7) is of the form

P ⁹ ( x , y ) = y 3 + y 2 ⁹ x ⁹ ψ 2 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ x ⁹ ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 9 ⁹ ( x ) ,

and ψ 9 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 , since s 1 and 𝑡 do not have common zeros. Now we compute d ⁹ g = − d ⁹ y / y 2 and P x ⁹ d ⁹ x + P y ⁹ d ⁹ y = 0 , so d ⁹ y = − P x ⁹ d ⁹ x / P y .

So equation (10.3) becomes

0 = ∑ i = 1 3 P x y 2 ⁹ P y ⁹ ( p i ) = ∑ i = 1 3 y i 2 ⁹ ψ 2 ⁹ ( 0 ) + y i ⁹ ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) + ψ 9 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) 3 ⁹ y i 4 = 1 3 ⁹ ∑ i = 1 3 ψ 2 ⁹ ( 0 ) y i 2 + 1 3 ⁹ ∑ i = 1 3 ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) y i 3 + 1 3 ⁹ ∑ i = 1 3 ψ 9 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) y i 4 = − ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) ψ 9 ⁹ ( 0 ) ,

since

∑ i = 1 3 1 y i = ∑ i = 1 3 1 y i 2 = 0

and y i 3 = − ψ 9 ⁹ ( 0 ) . So we get ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 , and equation (10.7) is

P ⁹ ( x , y ) = y 3 + y 2 ⁹ x ⁹ ψ 2 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ x 2 ⁹ ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 9 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 ,

where ψ 9 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 . ∎

Remark 10.12

If 𝜁 is an asymptotic direction, then it is tangent to the trigonal locus.

Proof

By (10.6), ζ ∈ T tri , [ C ] if and only if ζ ⋅ Ω ⋅ s i ⁹ s j = 0 , i , j = 1 , 2 . We have

ζ ⋅ Ω ⋅ s 1 ⁹ s j = ∫ C Ω ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s j ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = 0 for ⁹ j = 1 , 2 , ζ ⋅ Ω ⋅ s 2 2 = ∫ C Ω ⁹ s 2 2 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C s 2 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( s 1 s 2 ) ⁹ s 2 2 ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C s 2 3 t ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ ⁹ d ⁹ x x = ∑ i = 1 3 g ⁹ ( p i ) = 0

if and only if it satisfies equation (10.1). ∎

10.3 Genus 5

Assume đ¶ is a non-hyperelliptic trigonal curve of genus 5; denote by 𝐿 the trigonal line bundle. We will show that, also in this case, there can exist asymptotic directions that are not Schiffer variations in the ramification points of the g 3 1 and we will describe them. Moreover, we give a parametrisation of the locus of the trigonal curves of genus 5 and of the sublocus of those trigonal curves admitting such asymptotic directions.

Then K C ⊗ L − 2 has degree 2, and by Riemann–Roch, we have h 0 ⁱ ( K C ⊗ L − 2 ) = 1 , so K C = L ⊗ 2 ⊗ O C ⁱ ( p + q ) for some p , q ∈ C . Then M = K C ⊗ L ∹ = L ⁱ ( p + q ) . Set

H 0 ⁹ ( L ) = ⟹ s 1 , s 2 ⟩ , H 0 ⁹ ( K C ⊗ L √ ) = ⟹ σ ⁹ s 1 , σ ⁹ s 2 , t ⟩ ,

where div ⁥ ( σ ) = p + q and t ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 , t ⁹ ( q ) ≠ 0 , since đ¶ is not hyperelliptic. So we have

H 0 ⁹ ( K C ) = H 0 ⁹ ( L ⊗ 2 ⁹ ( p + q ) ) = ⟹ σ ⁹ s 1 2 , σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 , σ ⁹ s 2 2 , t ⁹ s 1 , t ⁹ s 2 ⟩ .

Set x = s 1 / s 2 , g = σ ⁹ s 2 / t , y = 1 / g , D = div ⁥ ( s 1 ) = p 1 + p 2 + p 3 , and again, we can choose ω = s 1 ⁹ t . When đ· is not reduced, the computation is the same, considering the multiplicity of the points p i and taking the sum over the support of đ·.

We have the following.

Theorem 10.13

With the above notation, let ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] be a deformation of rank 1 that is not a Schiffer variation. Then 𝜁 is asymptotic if and only if equations (10.1), (10.2), (10.3) are satisfied, where x = s 1 / s 2 , g = σ ⁹ s 2 / t .

Proof

The space I 2 ⁹ ( K C ) is three-dimensional and it is generated by the quadrics

Γ 1 = σ ⁹ s 2 2 ⊙ s 1 ⁹ t − σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⊙ s 2 ⁹ t , Γ 2 = σ ⁹ s 1 2 ⊙ s 2 ⁹ t − σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⊙ s 1 ⁹ t , Γ 3 = σ ⁹ s 1 2 ⊙ σ ⁹ s 2 2 − σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ⊙ σ ⁹ s 1 ⁹ s 2 ,

corresponding to the three pencils of | K ⊗ L ∹ | .

A straightforward computation as in the case g = 6 , 7 shows that 𝜁 is asymptotic if and only if equations (10.1), (10.2), (10.3) are satisfied. ∎

Now, by Riemann–Roch, h 0 ⁱ ( M ⊗ 3 ⊗ L ⊗ 2 ) = h 0 ⁱ ( L ⊗ 5 ⁱ ( 3 ⁱ p + 3 ⁱ q ) ) = 21 − 4 = 17 . Set V = H 0 ⁱ ( L ) and consider

t 3 ⋅ Sym 2 ⁥ V + t 2 ⋅ Sym 3 ⁥ ( V ) ⁹ σ + t ⋅ Sym 4 ⁥ ( V ) ⁹ σ 2 + Sym 5 ⁥ ( V ) ⁹ σ 3 ⊂ H 0 ⁹ ( M ⊗ 3 ⊗ L ⊗ 2 ) .

Counting dimensions, we see that we have an equation

ϕ 2 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⋅ t 3 + σ ⁹ ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t 2 + σ 2 ⁹ ϕ 4 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t + σ 3 ⁹ ϕ 5 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = 0 .

Since the curve is not hyperelliptic, ϕ 2 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ≠ 0 ; moreover,

σ ⁹ ϕ 3 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) ⁹ t 2 + σ 2 ⁹ ϕ 4 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) + σ 3 ⁹ ϕ 5 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 )

vanishes on p + q . Thus we can choose s 2 such that ( s 1 + s 2 ) ⁹ ( p ) = 0 , ( s 1 + s 2 ) ⁹ ( q ) ≠ 0 , ( s 1 − s 2 ) ⁹ ( p ) ≠ 0 , ( s 1 − s 2 ) ⁹ ( q ) = 0 and ϕ 2 ⁹ ( s 1 , s 2 ) = s 1 2 − s 2 2 . Dividing the equation by σ 3 ⁹ s 2 5 , we get

y 3 ⁹ ( x 2 − 1 ) + y 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 .

So we have proven the following.

Proposition 10.14

Trigonal curves of genus 5 are described by the equation

(10.8) y 3 ⁹ ( x 2 − 1 ) + y 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) = 0 ,

where ψ 3 , ψ 4 , ψ 5 are polynomials of degree at most 3 , 4 , 5 .

We will now describe the locus of trigonal curves of genus 5 admitting an asymptotic direction of rank 1 different from a Schiffer variation at a ramification point of the g 3 1 .

Theorem 10.15

Trigonal curves of genus 5 admitting an asymptotic direction of rank 1 different from a Schiffer variation at a ramification point of the g 3 1 satisfy the equation

y 3 ⁹ ( x 2 − 1 ) + y 2 ⁹ x ⁹ α 2 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ x 2 ⁹ χ 2 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) ,

where α 2 , χ 2 are polynomials of degree at most 2, ψ 5 is a polynomial of degree at most 5 and ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 1 .

Proof

Equations (10.1), (10.2) are equivalent to

∑ i y i = 0 , ∑ i y i 2 = 0 , ∑ i , j y i ⁱ y j = 0 ,

where y i : = y ( p i ) . Since x ⁹ ( p i ) = 0 , equation (10.8) gives

− y i 3 + y i 2 ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( 0 ) + y i ⁹ ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) + ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 for all ⁹ i = 1 , 2 , 3 .

Hence the polynomial − z 3 + ψ 3 ⁹ ( 0 ) ⁹ z 2 + ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) ⁹ z + ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) has the elements y i as roots, so

ψ 3 ⁹ ( 0 ) = ∑ i = 1 3 y i = 0 and ψ 4 ⁹ ( 0 ) = − ∑ i < j y i ⁹ y j = 0 ,

while ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) ≠ 0 .

Writing 𝑔 as a function of đ‘„, d ⁹ g x = g â€Č ⁹ ( x ) ⁹ d ⁹ x x , so condition (10.3) is

0 = ∑ i g â€Č ⁹ ( p i ) = − ∑ i y â€Č y 2 ⁹ ( p i ) .

Since d ⁱ y = − P x P y ⁱ d ⁱ x , and

P x = 2 ⁹ x ⁹ y 3 + y 2 ⁹ ψ 3 â€Č ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ ψ 4 â€Č ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 5 â€Č ⁹ ( x ) , P y = 3 ⁹ y 2 ⁹ ( x 2 − 1 ) + 2 ⁹ y ⁹ ψ 3 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 4 ⁹ ( x ) .

Then

0 = ∑ i y â€Č y 2 ⁹ ( p i ) = − ∑ i y i 2 ⁹ ψ 3 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) + y i ⁹ ψ 4 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) + ψ 5 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) 3 ⁹ y i 4 = − 1 3 ⁹ ∑ i ψ 4 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) y i 3 = − ψ 4 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) .

So ψ 4 â€Č ⁹ ( 0 ) = 0 and equation (10.8) becomes

P ⁹ ( x , y ) = y 3 ⁹ ( x 2 − 1 ) + y 2 ⁹ x ⁹ α 2 ⁹ ( x ) + y ⁹ x 2 ⁹ χ 2 ⁹ ( x ) + ψ 5 ⁹ ( x ) ,

where we can assume ψ 5 ⁹ ( 0 ) = 1 . ∎

Remark 10.16

Notice that, changing 𝑡 with t + λ ⁹ σ ⁹ s 1 , the deformation 𝜁 does not change. Hence we can change 𝑩 with y + λ ⁹ x in such a way that α 2 ⁹ ( x ) = x ⁹ α 1 ⁹ ( x ) , where α 1 is a polynomial of degree at most 1. So the equation depends on 10 parameters, while the trigonal locus has dimension 11.

Remark 10.17

If 𝜁 is an asymptotic direction, then it is tangent to the trigonal locus.

Proof

By (10.6), the infinitesimal deformation ζ = [ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ( ρ D ω ) ] is tangent to the trigonal locus if and only if

ζ ⋅ Ω = ∫ C Ω ⁹ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C s 2 2 ⁹ d ⁹ ( s 1 s 2 ) ∧ ∂ ̄ ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t = ∫ C d ⁹ ( d ⁹ ( s 1 s 2 ) ⁹ s 2 2 ⁹ ρ s 1 ⁹ t ) = ∑ i Res p i ⁥ d ⁹ ( s 1 s 2 ) ⁹ s 2 2 ⁹ 1 s 1 ⁹ t = ∑ i Res p i ⁥ g ⁹ d ⁹ x x = ∑ i g ⁹ ( p i ) = 0 ,

which is equation (10.1). ∎

Funding statement: Elisabetta Colombo, Paola Frediani and Gian Pietro Pirola are members of GNSAGA (INdAM) and are partially supported by PRIN project Moduli spaces and special varieties (2022).

References

[1] R. D. M. Accola, Topics in the theory of Riemann surfaces, Lecture Notes in Math. 1595, Springer, Berlin 1994. 10.1007/BFb0073575Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Albano and G. P. Pirola, Dihedral monodromy and Xiao fibrations, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 195 (2016), no. 4, 1255–1268. 10.1007/s10231-015-0514-ySearch in Google Scholar

[3] A. Andreotti and A. L. Mayer, On period relations for abelian integrals on algebraic curves, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (3) 21 (1967), 189–238. Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. A. Barja, V. González-Alonso and J. C. Naranjo, Xiao’s conjecture for general fibred surfaces, J. reine angew. Math. 739 (2018), 297–308. 10.1515/crelle-2015-0080Search in Google Scholar

[5] V. Beorchia, G. P. Pirola and F. Zucconi, Trigonal deformations of rank one and Jacobians, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021 (2021), no. 12, 8868–8884. 10.1093/imrn/rnz216Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Carlson, M. Green, P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Infinitesimal variations of Hodge structure. I, Compos. Math. 50 (1983), no. 2–3, 109–205. Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. Colombo and P. Frediani, Some results on the second G aussian map for curves, Michigan Math. J. 58 (2009), no. 3, 745–758. 10.1307/mmj/1260475698Search in Google Scholar

[8] E. Colombo and P. Frediani, Siegel metric and curvature of the moduli space of curves, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), no. 3, 1231–1246. 10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04845-4Search in Google Scholar

[9] E. Colombo, P. Frediani and A. Ghigi, On totally geodesic submanifolds in the Jacobian locus, Internat. J. Math. 26 (2015), no. 1, Article ID 1550005. 10.1142/S0129167X15500056Search in Google Scholar

[10] E. Colombo, G. P. Pirola and A. Tortora, Hodge-Gaussian maps, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 30 (2001), no. 1, 125–146. Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Coppens and G. Martens, Secant spaces and Clifford’s theorem, Compos. Math. 78 (1991), no. 2, 193–212. Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. de Jong and R. Noot, Jacobians with complex multiplication, Arithmetic algebraic geometry (Texel 1989), Progr. Math. 89, BirkhĂ€user, Boston (1991), 177–192. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0457-2_8Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Frediani, A. Ghigi and M. Penegini, Shimura varieties in the Torelli locus via Galois coverings, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2015 (2015), no. 20, 10595–10623. 10.1093/imrn/rnu272Search in Google Scholar

[14] P. Frediani, A. Ghigi and I. Spelta, Infinitely many Shimura varieties in the Jacobian locus for g ≀ 4 , Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 22 (2021), no. 4, 1597–1619. 10.2422/2036-2145.201910_009Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. Frediani, M. Penegini and P. Porru, Shimura varieties in the Torelli locus via Galois coverings of elliptic curves, Geom. Dedicata 181 (2016), 177–192. 10.1007/s10711-015-0118-0Search in Google Scholar

[16] P. Frediani and G. P. Pirola, On the geometry of the second fundamental form of the Torelli map, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (2021), no. 3, 1011–1024. 10.1090/proc/15291Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Ghigi, G. P. Pirola and S. Torelli, Totally geodesic subvarieties in the moduli space of curves, Commun. Contemp. Math. 23 (2021), no. 3, Article ID 2050020. 10.1142/S0219199720500200Search in Google Scholar

[18] V. González-Alonso and S. Torelli, Families of curves with Higgs field of arbitrarily large kernel, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 53 (2021), no. 2, 493–506. 10.1112/blms.12437Search in Google Scholar

[19] M. Green, Restrictions of linear series to hyperplanes, and some results of Macaulay and Gotzmann, Algebraic curves and projective geometry (Trento, 1988), Lecture Notes in Math. 1389, Springer, Berlin (1989), 76–86. 10.1007/BFb0085925Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Green and R. Lazarsfeld, On the projective normality of complete linear series on an algebraic curve, Invent. Math. 83 (1986), no. 1, 73–90. 10.1007/BF01388754Search in Google Scholar

[21] P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Infinitesimal variations of Hodge structure. II. An infinitesimal invariant of Hodge classes, Compos. Math. 50 (1983), no. 2–3, 207–265. Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. A. Griffiths, Infinitesimal variations of Hodge structure. III. Determinantal varieties and the infinitesimal invariant of normal functions, Compos. Math. 50 (1983), no. 2–3, 267–324. Search in Google Scholar

[23] S. Grushevsky and M. Möller, Shimura curves within the locus of hyperelliptic Jacobians in genus 3, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2016 (2016), no. 6, 1603–1639. 10.1093/imrn/rnv155Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry. II, Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3) 49, Springer, Berlin 2004. 10.1007/978-3-642-18810-7Search in Google Scholar

[25] A. Maroni, Le serie lineari speciali sulle curve trigonali, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 25 (1946), 343–354. 10.1007/BF02418090Search in Google Scholar

[26] G. Martens, Über den Clifford-Index algebraischer Kurven, J. reine angew. math. 336 (1982), 83–90. 10.1515/crll.1982.336.83Search in Google Scholar

[27] B. Moonen, Special subvarieties arising from families of cyclic covers of the projective line, Doc. Math. 15 (2010), 793–819. 10.4171/dm/314Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. Moonen and F. Oort, The Torelli locus and special subvarieties, Handbook of moduli. Vol. II, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM) 25, International Press, Somerville (2013), 549–594. Search in Google Scholar

[29] F. Oort and J. Steenbrink, The local Torelli problem for algebraic curves, JournĂ©es de gĂ©ometrie algĂ©brique, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn (1980), 157–204. Search in Google Scholar

[30] G. P. Pirola, On a conjecture of Xiao, J. reine angew. Math. 431 (1992), 75–89. 10.1515/crll.1992.431.75Search in Google Scholar

[31] J. C. Rohde, Cyclic coverings, Calabi–Yau manifolds and complex multiplication, Lecture Notes in Math. 1975, Springer, Berlin 2009. 10.1007/978-3-642-00639-5Search in Google Scholar

[32] G. Shimura, On purely transcendental fields automorphic functions of several variable, Osaka Math. J. 1 (1964), no. 1, 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

[33] I. Spelta, Shimura subvarieties via endomorphisms, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 360 (2022), 1117–1124. 10.5802/crmath.369Search in Google Scholar

[34] C. Voisin, Théorie de Hodge et géométrie algébrique complexe, Cours Spéc. 10, Société Mathématique de France, Paris 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[35] G. Xiao, Irregularity of surfaces with a linear pencil, Duke Math. J. 55 (1987), no. 3, 597–602. 10.1215/S0012-7094-87-05529-3Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-07-20
Revised: 2025-04-04
Published Online: 2025-05-29
Published in Print: 2025-08-01

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2025-0035/html
Scroll to top button