Home Topology and dynamics of compact plane waves
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Topology and dynamics of compact plane waves

  • Malek Hanounah , Ines Kath EMAIL logo , Lilia Mehidi and Abdelghani Zeghib
Published/Copyright: January 8, 2025

Abstract

We study compact locally homogeneous plane waves. Such a manifold is a quotient of a homogeneous plane wave 𝑋 by a discrete subgroup of its isometry group. This quotient is called standard if the discrete subgroup is contained in a connected subgroup of the isometry group that acts properly cocompactly on 𝑋. We show that compact quotients of homogeneous plane waves are “essentially” standard; more precisely, we show that they are standard or “semi-standard”. We find conditions which ensure that a quotient is not only semi-standard but even standard. As a consequence of these results, we obtain that the flow of the parallel lightlike vector field of a compact locally homogeneous plane wave is equicontinuous.

A Cocompact proper actions of Lie groups

In this appendix, we consider cocompact proper actions of Lie groups admitting a torsion-free uniform lattice.

Proposition A.1

Let đș be a connected Lie group which admits a torsion-free uniform lattice Γ. Assume that đș acts properly cocompactly on a contractible manifold 𝑋. Then đș acts transitively.

The proof uses techniques from cohomology theory of discrete groups.

Proof

Since Γ is torsion-free, Γ \ X is a closed K ⁹ ( Γ , 1 ) manifold. We have by [7, VIII, (8.1)] that the cohomological dimension of Γ is equal to dim ( Γ \ X ) . Now, let đŸ be a maximal compact subgroup of đș. We know that đș is diffeomorphic to K × R k ; see [22]. We claim that Γ \ G / K is a K ⁹ ( Γ , 1 ) manifold. Indeed, Γ acts freely (torsion-free) and cocompactly. Moreover, Γ acts properly, since the fiber bundle map π : G → G / K is a proper map. Hence [7] we get that dim ( Γ \ G / K ) = dim ( Γ \ X ) , i.e. dim ( G ) = dim ( K ) + dim ( X ) . Because the đș-action is proper (in particular, the stabilizer of any point is compact), we conclude that the đș-orbits are open. The claim follows from the connectedness of 𝑋. ∎

When đș is linear, Selberg’s lemma applies. Namely, any finitely generated subgroup of đș is virtually torsion-free. For linear groups, we get the following corollary.

Corollary A.2

Let đș be a connected linear Lie group which admits a uniform lattice Γ. Assume that đș acts properly cocompactly on a contractible manifold 𝑋. Then đș acts transitively.

Proposition A.3

G ρ is linear.

Proof

We have a natural morphism

f : G ρ → Aut ⁹ ( Heis ) ⋉ Heis , f ⁹ ( r , k , h ) = ( ρ ⁹ ( r , k ) , h )

(which is not necessarily injective). Moreover, the group Aut ⁱ ( Heis ) ⋉ Heis is linear. Indeed, it has a trivial center (due to existence of homotheties); hence the adjoint representation

Ad : Aut ⁱ ( Heis ) ⋉ Heis → GL ⁱ ( g ) ,

where đ”€ is the Lie algebra of Aut ⁹ ( Heis ) ⋉ Heis , is an embedding (faithful). Define now

Ί : G ρ → ( R × K ) × GL ⁹ ( g ) , Ί ⁹ ( r , k , h ) = ( r , k , Ad ⁹ ( f ⁹ ( r , k , h ) ) ) .

Then Ω is clearly a faithful morphism into ( R × K ) × GL ⁱ ( g ) , which is a linear group. The claim follows. ∎

B A non-periodic example

Let L = R ⋉ R n + 1 , with coordinates ( v , y ) ∈ R n + 1 = R × R n and the ℝ-action defined by t ⋅ ( v , y ) = ( v , R t ⁹ ( y ) ) , where R t is some periodic elliptic action on R n . Define a Lorentzian left-invariant metric 𝑔 on 𝐿 such that the induced metric on R n + 1 is degenerate and V : = ∂ v is lightlike. Then ( L , g ) is a homogeneous plane wave, by [15, Theorem 3]. Let Γ : = ⟹ Îł ̂ ⟩ × Γ 0 , with Γ 0 a lattice in R n + 1 and Îł ̂ generates a lattice in the ℝ-factor acting trivially on Γ 0 . Suppose further that Γ 0 does not intersect the subgroup generated by the 𝑣-translations. Then Γ is a (uniform) lattice in 𝐿, and the flow of 𝑉 is not periodic in Γ \ L .

Acknowledgements

We thank the referee for the valuable comments and suggestions that helped improve the quality of the presentation.

References

[1] S. Allout, A. Belkacem and A. Zeghib, On homogeneous 3-dimensional spacetimes: Focus on plane waves, preprint (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11439. Search in Google Scholar

[2] L. Auslander, Bieberbach’s theorem on space groups and discrete uniform subgroups of Lie groups. II, Amer. J. Math. 83 (1961), 276–280. 10.2307/2372956Search in Google Scholar

[3] H. Baum, K. LĂ€rz and T. Leistner, On the full holonomy group of Lorentzian manifolds, Math. Z. 277 (2014), no. 3–4, 797–828. 10.1007/s00209-014-1279-5Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Bieberbach, Über die Bewegungsgruppen der Euklidischen RĂ€ume, Math. Ann. 70 (1911), no. 3, 297–336. 10.1007/BF01564500Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Blau and M. O’Loughlin, Homogeneous plane waves, Nuclear Phys. B 654 (2003), no. 1–2, 135–176. 10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00055-5Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Boucetta, A. Meliani and A. Zeghib, Kundt three-dimensional left invariant spacetimes, J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022), no. 11, Paper No. 112501. 10.1063/5.0091202Search in Google Scholar

[7] K. S. Brown, Cohomology of groups, Grad. Texts in Math. 87, Springer, New York 1982. 10.1007/978-1-4684-9327-6Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Cahen and N. Wallach, Lorentzian symmetric spaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1970), 585–591. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1970-12448-XSearch in Google Scholar

[9] E. Calabi and L. Markus, Relativistic space forms, Ann. of Math. (2) 75 (1962), 63–76. 10.2307/1970419Search in Google Scholar

[10] Y. CarriĂšre, Autour de la conjecture de L. Markus sur les variĂ©tĂ©s affines, Invent. Math. 95 (1989), no. 3, 615–628. 10.1007/BF01393894Search in Google Scholar

[11] Y. CarriĂšre and F. Dal’bo, GĂ©nĂ©ralisations du premier thĂ©orĂšme de Bieberbach sur les groupes cristallographiques, Enseign. Math. (2) 35 (1989), no. 3–4, 245–262. Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Danciger, F. GuĂ©ritaud and F. Kassel, Geometry and topology of complete Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. SupĂ©r. (4) 49 (2016), no. 1, 1–56. 10.24033/asens.2275Search in Google Scholar

[13] D. Fried, W. Goldman and M. W. Hirsch, Affine manifolds with nilpotent holonomy, Comment. Math. Helv. 56 (1981), no. 4, 487–523. 10.1007/BF02566225Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. Fried and W. M. Goldman, Three-dimensional affine crystallographic groups, Adv. Math. 47 (1983), no. 1, 1–49. 10.1016/0001-8708(83)90053-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] W. Globke and T. Leistner, Locally homogeneous pp-waves, J. Geom. Phys. 108 (2016), 83–101. 10.1016/j.geomphys.2016.06.013Search in Google Scholar

[16] W. M. Goldman, Nonstandard Lorentz space forms, J. Differential Geom. 21 (1985), no. 2, 301–308. 10.4310/jdg/1214439567Search in Google Scholar

[17] W. M. Goldman, Geometric structures on manifolds, Grad. Stud. Math. 227, American Mathematical Society, Providence 2022. 10.1090/gsm/227Search in Google Scholar

[18] W. M. Goldman and Y. Kamishima, The fundamental group of a compact flat Lorentz space form is virtually polycyclic, J. Differential Geom. 19 (1984), no. 1, 233–240. 10.4310/jdg/1214438430Search in Google Scholar

[19] F. Grunewald and G. Margulis, Transitive and quasitransitive actions of affine groups preserving a generalized Lorentz-structure, J. Geom. Phys. 5 (1988), no. 4, 493–531. 10.1016/0393-0440(88)90017-4Search in Google Scholar

[20] F. GuĂ©ritaud, F. Kassel and M. Wolff, Compact anti–de Sitter 3-manifolds and folded hyperbolic structures on surfaces, Pacific J. Math. 275 (2015), no. 2, 325–359. 10.2140/pjm.2015.275.325Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Hanounah, L. Mehidi and A. Zeghib, On homogeneous plane waves, preprint (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07459. Search in Google Scholar

[22] K. Iwasawa, On some types of topological groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 50 (1949), 507–558. 10.2307/1969548Search in Google Scholar

[23] I. Kath and M. Olbrich, Compact quotients of Cahen–Wallach spaces, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1264 (2019), 1–84. Search in Google Scholar

[24] B. Klingler, ComplĂ©tude des variĂ©tĂ©s lorentziennes Ă  courbure constante, Math. Ann. 306 (1996), no. 2, 353–370. 10.1007/BF01445255Search in Google Scholar

[25] T. Leistner and D. Schliebner, Completeness of compact Lorentzian manifolds with abelian holonomy, Math. Ann. 364 (2016), no. 3–4, 1469–1503. 10.1007/s00208-015-1270-4Search in Google Scholar

[26] K. Maeta, Four-dimensional compact Clifford–Klein forms of pseudo-Riemannian symmetric spaces with signature ( 2 , 2 ) , Internat. J. Math. 34 (2023), no. 12, Article ID 2350071. 10.1142/S0129167X23500714Search in Google Scholar

[27] A. I. Mal’cev, On a class of homogeneous spaces, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 13 (1949), 9–32. Search in Google Scholar

[28] L. Mehidi and A. Zeghib, On completeness and dynamics of compact Brinkmann spacetimes, preprint (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07243. Search in Google Scholar

[29] J. Milnor, On fundamental groups of complete affinely flat manifolds, Adv. Math. 25 (1977), no. 2, 178–187. 10.1016/0001-8708(77)90004-4Search in Google Scholar

[30] K. Nomizu, On the group of affine transformations of an affinely connected manifold, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1953), 816–823. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1953-0059049-4Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. S. Raghunathan, Discrete subgroups of Lie groups, Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3) 68, Springer, New York 1972. 10.1007/978-3-642-86426-1Search in Google Scholar

[32] W. P. Thurston, Three-dimensional geometry and topology. Vol. 1, Princeton Math. Ser. 35, Princeton University, Princeton 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[33] W. P. Thurston, The geometry and topology of three-manifolds. Vol. 27, American Mathematical Society, Providence 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Zeghib, On closed anti-de Sitter spacetimes, Math. Ann. 310 (1998), no. 4, 695–716. 10.1007/s002080050167Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-10-01
Revised: 2024-11-08
Published Online: 2025-01-08
Published in Print: 2025-03-01

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2024-0095/html
Scroll to top button