Home Mathematics The dualizing sheaf on first-order deformations of toric surface singularities
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The dualizing sheaf on first-order deformations of toric surface singularities

  • Klaus Altmann EMAIL logo and János Kollár
Published/Copyright: November 8, 2016

Abstract

We explicitly describe infinitesimal deformations of cyclic quotient singularities that satisfy one of the deformation conditions introduced by Wahl, Kollár–Shepherd-Barron (KSB) and Viehweg. The conclusion is that in many cases these three notions are different from each other. In particular, we see that while the KSB and the Viehweg versions of the moduli space of surfaces of general type have the same underlying reduced subscheme, their infinitesimal structures are different.

Award Identifier / Grant number: CRC 647

Award Identifier / Grant number: DMS-1362960

Funding statement: Partial financial support to Klaus Altmann was provided by the DFG via the CRC 647 and to János Kollár by the NSF under grant number DMS-1362960.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank F.-O. Schreyer for many fruitful discussions and initiating the contact on this topic. Thanks to Jan Stevens for finding mistakes in the originally submitted arXiv version and to the anonymous referee for valuable suggestions.

References

[1] K. Altmann, Minkowski sums and homogeneous deformations of toric varieties, Tohoku Math. J. (2) 47 (1995), no. 2, 151–184. 10.2748/tmj/1178225590Search in Google Scholar

[2] K. Altmann, P-resolutions of cyclic quotients from the toric viewpoint, Singularities. The Brieskorn anniversary volume (Oberwolfach 1996), Progr. Math. 162, Birkhäuser, Basel (1998), 241–250. 10.1007/978-3-0348-8770-0_12Search in Google Scholar

[3] K. Altmann, One parameter families containing three-dimensional toric Gorenstein singularities, Explicit birational geometry of 3-folds, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 281, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000), 21–50. 10.1017/CBO9780511758942.002Search in Google Scholar

[4] F. Ambro, Quasi-log varieties, Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 240 (2003), 220–239. Search in Google Scholar

[5] E. Brieskorn, Rationale Singularitäten komplexer Flächen, Invent. Math. 4 (1968), 336–358. 10.1007/BF01425318Search in Google Scholar

[6] D. A. Cox, J. B. Little and H. K. Schenck, Toric varieties, American Mathematical Society, Providence 2011. 10.1090/gsm/124Search in Google Scholar

[7] O. Fujino, Introduction to the log minimal model program for log canonical pairs, preprint (2009), https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.1506. Search in Google Scholar

[8] P. Hacking and Y. Prokhorov, Smoothable del Pezzo surfaces with quotient singularities, Compos. Math. 146 (2010), no. 1, 169–192. 10.1112/S0010437X09004370Search in Google Scholar

[9] C. D. Hacon and S. Kovács, Classification of higher-dimensional algebraic varieties, Birkhäuser, Basel 2010. 10.1007/978-3-0346-0290-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. Hartshorne, Residues and duality. Appendix: Cohomologie à support propre et construction du foncteur f!, par P. Deligne, Lecture Notes in Math. 20, Springer, Berlin 1966. 10.1007/BFb0080482Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Kawakita, Inversion of adjunction on log canonicity, Invent. Math. 167 (2007), no. 1, 129–133. 10.1007/s00222-006-0008-zSearch in Google Scholar

[12] J. Kollár, Flips and abundance for algebraic threefolds (Utah 1991), Astérisque 211, Société Mathématique de France, Paris 1992. Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Kollár, Flatness criteria, J. Algebra 175 (1995), no. 2, 715–727. 10.1006/jabr.1995.1209Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Kollár, Hulls and husks, preprint (2008), https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0576. Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Kollár, Moduli of varieties of general type, Handbook of moduli. Volume II, Adv. Lect. Math. 25, International Press, Somerville (2013), 131–157. Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Kollár, Singularities of the minimal model program. With the collaboration of Sándor Kovács, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013. 10.1017/CBO9781139547895Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. Kollár and N. Shepherd-Barron, Threefolds and deformations of surface singularities, Invent. Math. 91 (1988), no. 2, 299–338. 10.1007/BF01389370Search in Google Scholar

[18] D. Mumford, Some footnotes to the work of C. P. Ramanujam, C. P. Ramanujam. A tribute, Stud. Math. 8, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay (1978), 247–262. Search in Google Scholar

[19] H. C. Pinkham, Deformations of algebraic varieties with Gm action, Astérisque 20, Société Mathématique de France, Paris 1974. Search in Google Scholar

[20] H. C. Pinkham, Deformations of quotient surface singularities (Williamstown 1975), Several complex variables, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 30. Part 1, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1977), 65–67. 10.1090/pspum/030.1/0447240Search in Google Scholar

[21] O. Riemenschneider, Deformationen von Quotientensingularitäten (nach zyklischen Gruppen), Math. Ann. 209 (1974), 211–248. 10.1007/BF01351850Search in Google Scholar

[22] J. Stevens, Deformations of singularities, Springer, Berlin 2003. 10.1007/b10723Search in Google Scholar

[23] E. Viehweg, Quasi-projective moduli for polarized manifolds, Springer, Berlin 1995. 10.1007/978-3-642-79745-3Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. M. Wahl, Elliptic deformations of minimally elliptic singularities, Math. Ann. 253 (1980), 241–262. 10.1007/BF0322000Search in Google Scholar

[25] J. M. Wahl, Smoothings of normal surface singularities, Topology 20 (1981), 219–246. 10.1016/0040-9383(81)90001-XSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-02-15
Revised: 2016-09-06
Published Online: 2016-11-08
Published in Print: 2019-08-01

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2016-0063/html
Scroll to top button