Fluid characterization and splitting the heavy fraction by using a gamma distribution model and flash calculation based on EOS: a case study of one of the Iranian oil reservoirs
-
Kamyar Movagharnejad
,
Fatemeh Aali
Abstract
This study explores advanced methods to improve the accuracy of hydrocarbon property predictions in oil reservoir fluids, utilizing novel data from an Iranian oil reservoir. The objectives include calculating molecular weights, specific gravity, and molar ratios of hydrocarbons (C11–C50) while evaluating the performance of models for critical properties and phase equilibria. Key approaches involve the gamma distribution and single carbon number (SCN) techniques for hydrocarbon characterization, alongside flash calculations using cubic and non-cubic equations of state, including Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK), Peng-Robinson (PR), and Perturbed Chain-SAFT (PC-SAFT). Empirical data were generated using the Pederson regression method and compared with predictions from the gamma distribution function. Results indicate that the gamma distribution method reduces prediction errors by 50 %, with deviations of 5.19 % compared to 10.39 % for the SCN method. Among the equations of state, PC-SAFT achieved the highest accuracy, predicting vapor phase mole fractions with a deviation of 0.0172 % and gas and liquid densities with deviations of 22.125 % and 0.24 %, respectively. The novelty of this study lies in integrating unique field data from an Iranian reservoir with advanced modeling techniques, providing a reliable framework for reservoir fluid analysis. These findings contribute to optimizing oil recovery and improving hydrocarbon prediction accuracy.
Funding source: Babol Noshirvani University of Technology
Award Identifier / Grant number: BNUT/370675/02
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Babol Noshirvani University of Technology [Grant number BNUT/370675/02].
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The contributions of the authors are as follows: Fatemeh Aali: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing, Data Curation, Supervision. Mahnam Ketabi: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization, Supervision. Fatemeh Hejazi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software. Nastaran Rasoolzadeh: Investigation, Resources, Writing – Original Draft. Sara Gooran: Investigation, Resources, Writing – Original Draft. Sayyed Ali Taheri: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Supervision, Project Administration. Kamyar Movagharnejad: Corresponding Author, Project Administration, Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: The authors used ChatGPT solely to assist with the English translation and language refinement of the manuscript. The scientific content, analysis, and interpretation are entirely the work of the authors.
-
Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the Babol Noshirvani University of Technology.
-
Data availability: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
1. Varzandeh, F, Yan, W, Stenby, EH. General approach to characterize reservoir fluids using a large PVT database. In: SPE Europec featured at 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. SPE, Vienna, Austria; 2016.10.2118/180082-MSSearch in Google Scholar
2. Varzandeh, F, Stenby, EH, Yan, W. General approach to characterizing reservoir fluids for EoS models using a large PVT database. Fluid Phase Equilib 2017;433:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.10.018.Search in Google Scholar
3. Zhang, T, Li, Y, Li, Y, Sun, S, Gao, X. A self-adaptive deep learning algorithm for accelerating multi-component flash calculation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2020;369:113207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113207.Search in Google Scholar
4. Assareh, M, Ghotbi, C, Tavakkoli, M, Bashiri, G. PC-SAFT modeling of petroleum reservoir fluid phase behavior using new correlations for petroleum cuts and plus fractions. Fluid Phase Equilib 2016;408:273–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.10.032.Search in Google Scholar
5. Jamialahmadi, M, Zangeneh, H, Hosseini, SS. A generalized set of correlations for plus fraction characterization. Pet Sci 2012;9:370–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-012-0221-x.Search in Google Scholar
6. Peng, D-Y, Robinson, DB. A new two-constant equation of state. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1976;15:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/i160057a011.Search in Google Scholar
7. Soave, G. Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state. Chem Eng Sci 1972;27:1197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(72)80096-4.Search in Google Scholar
8. Riazi, MR, Daubert, TE. Characterization parameters for petroleum fractions. Ind Eng Chem Res 1987;26:755–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00064a023.Search in Google Scholar
9. Riazi, MR, Daubert, TE. Improved characterization of wide boiling range undefined petroleum fractions. Ind Eng Chem Res 1987;26:629–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00063a036.Search in Google Scholar
10. Pedersen, KS, Milter, J, Sørensen, H. Cubic equations of state applied to HT/HP and highly aromatic fluids. SPE J 2004;9:186–92. https://doi.org/10.2118/88364-PA.Search in Google Scholar
11. Zuo, JY, Zhang, D. Plus fraction characterization and PVT data regression for reservoir fluids near critical conditions. In: SPE Asia pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition. Brisbane, Australia: SPE; 2000.10.2118/64520-MSSearch in Google Scholar
12. Hosseinifar, P, Assareh, M, Ghotbi, C. Developing a new model for the determination of petroleum fraction PC-SAFT parameters to model reservoir fluids. Fluid Phase Equilib 2016;412:145–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.12.044.Search in Google Scholar
13. Gessner, TR, Barbosa, JR. An internally consistent procedure to characterize single carbon number fractions for phase equilibrium of petroleum mixtures: application to Brazilian pre-salt reservoir fluids. J Pet Sci Eng 2022;208:109723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109723.Search in Google Scholar
14. Gross, J, Sadowski, G. Perturbed-chain SAFT: an equation of state based on a perturbation theory for chain molecules. Ind Eng Chem Res 2001;40:1244–60. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0003887.Search in Google Scholar
15. Liu, Y, Regueira, T, Stenby, EH, Yan, W. High-pressure phase equilibrium and volumetric properties of pseudo-binary mixtures of stock tank oil + methane up to 463K. Fluid Phase Equilib 2021;541:113054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113054.Search in Google Scholar
16. Whitson, CH, Anderson, TF, Søreide, I. Application of the gamma distribution model to molecular weight and boiling point data for petroleum fractions. Chem Eng Commun 1990;96:259–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986449008911495.Search in Google Scholar
17. Foroughi, S, Khoozan, D, Jamshidi, S. Optimal distribution function determination for plus fraction splitting. Can J Chem Eng 2019;97:2752–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23516.Search in Google Scholar
18. Hosseinifar, P, Jamshidi, S. Determination of perturbed-chain statistical association fluid theory parameters for pure substances, single carbon number groups, and petroleum fractions using cubic equations of state parameters. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015;54:11448–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03103.Search in Google Scholar
19. Regueira, VB, Pereira, VJ, Costa, GMN, Vieira de Melo, SAB. Calculation of bubble pressure for crude oils: the effect of q -Weibull distribution for splitting the heavy fraction. J Chem Eng Data 2019;64:1885–97. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00942.Search in Google Scholar
20. Duan, J, Wang, W, Liu, H, Gong, J. Modeling the characterization of the plus fractions by using continuous distribution function. Fluid Phase Equilib 2013;345:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.01.016.Search in Google Scholar
21. Pedersen, KS, Blilie, AL, Meisingset, KK. PVT calculations on petroleum reservoir fluids using measured and estimated compositional data for the plus fraction. Ind Eng Chem Res 1992;31:1378–84. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00005a019.Search in Google Scholar
22. Foroughi, S, Khoozan, D, Jamshidi, S. Optimal distribution function determination for plus fraction splitting. Can J Chem Eng 2019;97:2752–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23516.Search in Google Scholar
23. Hosseinifar, P, Jamshidi, S. Development of a new generalized correlation to characterize physical properties of pure components and petroleum fractions. Fluid Phase Equilib 2014;363:189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2013.11.043.Search in Google Scholar
24. Edmister, WC. Applied hydrocarbon thermodynamics. Hydrocarb Process 1973;52:123–9.Search in Google Scholar
25. Watson, KM, Nelson, EF, Murphy, GB. Characterization of petroleum fractions. Ind Eng Chem 1935;27:1460–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50312a018.Search in Google Scholar
26. Jaubert, J-N, Avaullee, L, Souvay, J-F. A crude oil data bank containing more than 5000 PVT and gas injection data. J Pet Sci Eng 2002;34:65–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(02)00153-5.Search in Google Scholar
27. Krejbjerg, K, Pedersen, KS. Controlling VLLE equilibrium with a cubic EoS in heavy oil modeling. In: Canadian international petroleum conference, petroleum society of Canada. Calgary, Alberta; 2006.10.2118/2006-052Search in Google Scholar
28. Riazi, MR, Daubert, TE. Prediction of the composition of petroleum fractions. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 1980;19:289–94. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260074a016.Search in Google Scholar
29. Hosseinifar, P, Shahverdi, H. An effective characterization procedure for petroleum reservoir fluids using molecular type methods and cubic equations of state. Can J Chem Eng 2023;101:2250–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24567.Search in Google Scholar
30. Yan, B, Wang, Y, Nasrabadi, H, Killough, JE, Wu, K. Accelerating flash calculation using compositional space for compositional simulation. J Pet Sci Eng 2017;159:1000–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.045.Search in Google Scholar
31. Bagheri, H, Ghader, S. Correlating ionic liquids density over wide range of temperature and pressure by volume shift concept. J Mol Liq 2017;236:172–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.03.101.Search in Google Scholar
32. Bagheri, H, Ali Mansoori, G, Hashemipour, H. A novel approach to predict drugs solubility in supercritical solvents for RESS process using various cubic EoS-mixing rule. J Mol Liq 2018;261:174–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.081.Search in Google Scholar
33. Bagheri, H, Ghader, S, AbdulAmeer, S, Ahmad, N. Comprehensive study on deep eutectic solvent density based on various EoSs: SRK, PT, VTSRK, sPC-SAFT. J Mol Liq 2024;393:123627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123627.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
