CFD modeling and simulation of catalytic pyrolysis of heavy oils in a tapered fluidized bed reactor
-
Chellappandian Gowtham
Abstract
A fluidized bed reactors (FBRs) have been widely used for catlytic cracking, combustion, gasification, pyrolysis and other applications. However, to improve the performance of FBRs, a better understanding of its flow behaviour is required, especially when multiphases are present. In this research work, we have studied the hydrodynamics and performance of FBR for the catalytic pyrolysis of heavy oil into lighter fractions using a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach. The eight-lump kinetic model was used to model the pyrolysis of heavy oil. The effect of riser geometry on the pyrolysis was investigated using a 2D transient Eulerian and the granular flow models. The fluid flow behaviour in tapered-in and tapered-out reactors (risers) for two different tapering angles (1° and 2°), conventional cylindrical reactor and pyrolysis at two different temperatures (600 °C and 700 °C) are studied, and the results are compared. The yield of pyrolysis products from the cylindrical riser is validated using previous mathematical models and experimental results from the literature. The results of the present CFD model for the cylindrical riser are in concert with the experimental results reported in the literature. The yields of light olefins, ethene, propene and butene are 48 wt%, 18 wt%, 34 wt%, respectively, at 700° as higher temperature favours a better yield of pyrolysis products. The same CFD model is extended to study the tapered riser geometries, and the simulation results support that the tapered-in geometry favours the pyrolysis, resulting in the higher conversion of gas oil compared to cylindrical riser due to increased residence time of solids (catalysts) and hence better contact with the fluid phase for the reactions.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to greatly acknowledge the Department of Chemical Engineering and Central Reserach Facility (CRF), NITK Surathkal for the support and ANSYS facility provided for running CFD simulations.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Zhu, C, Fan, L-S, Yu, Z. Dynamics of multipahse flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.10.1017/9781108679039Search in Google Scholar
2. Gopan, G, Hauchhum, L, Kalita, P, Krishnan, R, Pattanayak, S. Parametric study of tapered fluidized bed reactor under varied taper angle using TFM. In: AIP Conference Proceedings; 2021, vol 2396.10.1063/5.0066547Search in Google Scholar
3. Chalermsinsuwan, B, Kuchonthara, P, Piumsomboon, P. Effect of circulating fluidized bed reactor riser geometries on chemical reaction rates by using CFD simulations. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 2009;48:165–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2008.03.008.Search in Google Scholar
4. Bermudez, JM, Fidalgo, B. Production of bio-syngas and bio-hydrogen via gasification. In: Handbook of Biofuels Production: Processes and Technologies, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Ltd. Woodhead Publishing; 2016:431–94 pp.10.1016/B978-0-08-100455-5.00015-1Search in Google Scholar
5. Askaripour, H, Dehkordi, AM. Two-dimensional CFD simulation of chemical reactions in tapered-in and tapered-out fluidized bed reactors. Adv Powder Technol 2019;30:136–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.10.016.Search in Google Scholar
6. Theologos, KN, Nikou, ID, Lygeros, AI, Markatos, NC. Simulation and design of fluid-catalytic cracking riser-type reactors. Comput Chem Eng 1996;20:S757–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(96)00134-2.Search in Google Scholar
7. Theologos, KN, Markatos, NC. Advanced modeling of fluid catalytic cracking riser-type reactors. AIChE J 1993;39:1007–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690390610.Search in Google Scholar
8. Songip, AR, Masuda, T, Kuwahara, H, Hashimoto, K. Kinetic studies for catalytic cracking of heavy oil from waste plastics over REY zeolite. Energy Fuel 1994;8:131–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00043a022.Search in Google Scholar
9. Dewachtere, NV, Froment, GF, Vasalos, I, Markatos, N, Skandalis, N. Advanced modeling of riser-type catalytic cracking reactors. Appl Therm Eng 1997;17:837–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(96)00074-9.Search in Google Scholar
10. Ali, H and Rohani, S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a riser-type fluid catalytic cracking unit. Chem Eng Technol 1997;20:118–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.270200209Search in Google Scholar
11. Lan, X, Xu, C, Wang, G, Wu, L, Gao, J. CFD modeling of gas–solid flow and cracking reaction in two-stage riser FCC reactors. Chem Eng Sci 2009;64:3847–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CES.2009.05.019.Search in Google Scholar
12. Ahsan, M. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) prediction of mass fraction profiles of gas oil and gasoline in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) riser. Ain Shams Eng J 2012;3:403–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2012.04.003.Search in Google Scholar
13. Chalermsinsuwan, B, Gidaspow, D, Piumsomboon, P. Comparisons of particle cluster diameter and concentration in circulating fluidized bed riser and downer using computational fluid dynamics simulation. Kor J Chem Eng 2013;30:963–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-012-0216-8.Search in Google Scholar
14. Zhao, Y, Lu, B, Zhong, Y. Euler-euler modeling of a gas-solid bubbling fluidized bed with kinetic theory of rough particles. Chem Eng Sci 2013;104:767–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.10.001.Search in Google Scholar
15. Khongprom, P, Whansungnoen, T, Pienduangsri, P, Wanchan, W, Limtrakul, S. Catalytic cracking of heavy oil from waste plastic in tapered circulating fluidized bed riser reactor. In: E3S Web of Conferences 2020; vol 141.10.1051/e3sconf/202014101012Search in Google Scholar
16. Behjat, Y, Shahhosseini, S, Marvast, MA. CFD analysis of hydrodynamic, heat transfer and reaction of three phase riser reactor. Chem Eng Res Des 2011;89:978–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.10.018.Search in Google Scholar
17. Farizhandi, AAK, Zhao, H, & Lau, R. Modeling the change in particle size distribution in a gas-solid fluidized bed due to particle attrition using a hybrid artificial neural network-genetic algorithm approach. Chem Eng Sci 2016;155:210–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.08.015Search in Google Scholar
18. Metolina, P, Lopes, GC. Numerical analysis of liquid-solid flow in tapered and cylindrical fluidized beds for wastewater treatment and biogas production. Energy Convers Manag 2019;187:447–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.092.Search in Google Scholar
19. Wang, T, Tang, T, Gao, Q, Yuan, Z, He, Y. Experimental and numerical investigations on the particle behaviours in a bubbling fluidized bed with binary solids. Powder Technol 2020;362:436–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.11.105.Search in Google Scholar
20. Meng, X, Xu, C, Gao, J, & Li, L. Catalytic pyrolysis of heavy oils: 8-lump kinetic model. Appl Catal Gen 2006;301:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.11.010Search in Google Scholar
21. Li, T, Zhang, Y. A new model for two-dimensional numerical simulation of pseudo-2D gas–solids fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 2013;102:246–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.08.019.Search in Google Scholar
22. Shah, MT, Utikar, RP, Pareek, VK, Evans, GM, Joshi, JB. Computational fluid dynamic modelling of FCC riser: a review. In Chemical Engineering Research and Design. Institution of Chemical Engineers; 2016, vol 111:403–48 pp.10.1016/j.cherd.2016.04.017Search in Google Scholar
23. Ivanchina, E, Ivashkina, E, & Nazarova, G. Mathematical modelling of catalytic cracking riser reactor. Chem Eng J 2017;329:262–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.098Search in Google Scholar
24. Pinilla, JA, Guerrero, E, Pineda, H, Posada, R, Pereyra, E, & Ratkovich, N. CFD modeling and validation for two-phase medium viscosity oil-air flow in horizontal pipes. Chem Eng Commun 2019;206:654–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.1516646Search in Google Scholar
25. ANSYS FLUENT 12.0 Theory Guide ANSYS Inc.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
