Home Modeling the kinetics, energy consumption and shrinkage of avocado pear pulp during drying in a microwave assisted dryer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Modeling the kinetics, energy consumption and shrinkage of avocado pear pulp during drying in a microwave assisted dryer

  • James Chinaka Ehiem , Okechukwu Oduma , Austin O. Igbozulike , Vijayan G. S. Raghavan and Ndubisi A. Aviara EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 25, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Drying kinetics, energy utilization (EU) and shrinkage level of avocado pear pulp during drying were investigated and modeled to determine the condition that enhances the quality of the dried product. Drying was carried out using a microwave assisted dryer with data lodger. The system was set at a constant power of 200 W, air velocity of 1.4 m/s, and temperatures of 50, 60 and 70 °C with pulp thickness being 5 mm. Fifteen thin-layer drying models, five non-linear shrinkage models and ANN methods were tested for describing the drying behaviour of avocado pulp using statistical parameters. The results revealed that drying took place in the falling rate period with the above temperatures reducing the moisture content of the pulp from 64.12 to 2.16 % wet basis within 15,360, 11,520 and 5,130 s, respectively. The drying rate and effective diffusivity increased with increase in temperature and ranged from 6.05 × 10−3 to 1.70 × 10−2 kg/kgs and 3.11 to 9.34 × 10−9 m2/s, respectively. The activation energy of the pulp was 50.34 kJ/mol. Among the drying models tested, Page and Aghashilo models provided the best statistical parameters for describing the drying behaviour of the pulp, while ANN demonstrated great ability to predict MR and SR more accurately with high and low R2 and RMSE. A non-linear shrinkage model developed also had the best fit qualities for describing the shrinkage behaviour of the pulp. The energy utilized (EU), specific energy utilized (S EU ), heat transfer coefficient (h tc ) and mass transfer coefficient (M tc ) of the pulp ranged from 7.36 to 3.19 kWh, 11.21 to 5.76 × 10−2 Wh/kg, 0.1054 to 7.98 × 10−7 W/mK and 2.06 to 4.28 × 10−6 m/s respectively and were statistically (5 %) influenced by temperature. The EU model developed had the best description behaviour of the energy relationship with other factors, having high R2 and low RMSE and SSE values.


Corresponding author: Ndubisi A. Aviara, Department of Agricultural and Bio-Resources Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, P.M.B. 7267, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria, E-mail:

Funding source: None declared

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Ehiem, James C.: conceived and designed the analysis and wrote the paper. Oduma, Okechukwu: collected data and perform analysis. Igbozulike, Austin O.: collected data and perform analysis. Raghavan, Vijayan G. S.: Provided analysis tools and designed analysis. Aviara, Ndubisi A.: designed and perform analysis.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared

  5. Conflict of interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Nomenclatures

Mx

Moisture content at a given time

Mi

Initial moisture content

Me

Equilibrium moisture content

MR

Moisture ratio

Deff

Effective diffusivity

Z

Thickness

S

Slope

A

Constant

Ea

Activation energy

Do

Arrhenius constant

R

Universal gas constant

T

Absolute temperature

Ʀ t

Dry rate

w t + 1

Moisture content at the time t + 1

w t

Moisture content at time t (kg)

SEU

Specific energy utilized

Mwr

Mass of moisture removed

S MRR

Specific moisture removal rate

htc

Heat transfer coefficient

mtc

Moisture transfer coefficient

ρ

Density

PMW

Microwave power

Cp

Specific heat capacity

G Lewis

Lewis dimensionless number

Sc

Schmidt number

Pr

Prandtl number

μ

Dynamic viscosity

Re

Renold number.

Vt

Volume of the product at the time (t)

Ve

Volume of the product at constant mass

Vo

Initial volume of the product

n

Number of product piece in the drying tray

Vdry

Volume of dry matter

VH2O

Volume of water in the product

mH2O

Mass of water removed (kg)

ρ H 2 O

Density of water removed

SR

Shrinkage ratio

a, b, c, d, e, f, g

Constants

ANN

Artificial neural network

RMSE

Root mean square error

References

1. Segovia, FJ, Hidalgo, GI, Villasante, J, Ramis, X, Almajano, MP. Avocado seed: a comparative study of antioxidant content and capacity in protecting oil models from oxidation. Mol 2018;2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102421.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Vinha, AF, Sousa, C, Soares, MO, Barreira, SVP. Current research in agricultural and food science vol. 1. In: Mastanjević, DK, editor. Current Research in Agricultural and Food Science. West Bengal, India: Book Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International); 2020:82–96 pp.Search in Google Scholar

3. Dantas, LF, Fleck, JL, Oliveira, FLC, Hamacher, S. No-shows in appointment scheduling–a systematic literature review. Health Pol 2018;122:412–21.10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.02.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. FAOSTAT, FAOSTAT. Fao stat database. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

5. Raw Materials Research and Development Council (RMRDC). Avocado utilisation: its industrial and economic potential. Raw Mat Res Dev Coun Publ 2012;76.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ogunwusi, AA, Ibrahim, HD. Economics significance of avocado pear in Nigeria. J. of Adv Pub Pol and Inte Aff (JAPPIA) 2018;4:7–21.Search in Google Scholar

7. Araujo, RA, de Neiva, JNM, Pompeu, RCFF, Candido, MJD, Rogerio, MCP, Lucas, RC, et al.. Feeding behavior and physiological parameters of rearing goats fed diets containing detoxified castor cake. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2018;39:2247–60. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2018v39n5p2247.Search in Google Scholar

8. Cortés-Rojo, C, Montoya-Pérez, R, Rodríguez-Orozco, AR, Saavedra-Molina, A, Calderón-Cortés, E. Avocado oil and diabetic complications related to mitochondrial dysfunction. In: Watson, R, Preedy, V, editors. Bioactive Food as Dietary Interventions for Diabetes, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2019.10.1016/B978-0-12-813822-9.00006-0Search in Google Scholar

9. Peou, S, Milliard-Hasting, B, Shah, SA. Impact of avocado-enriched diets on plasma lipoproteins: a meta-analysis. J. Clin Lipidol. 2016;10:161–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2015.10.0118.Search in Google Scholar

10. Jesus, D, Oliveira, JR, Oliveira, FE, Higa, KC, Junqueira, JC, Jorge, AOC, et al.. Persea americana glycolic extract: in nitro study of antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans biofilm and cytotoxicity evaluation. Sci World J 2015;2015:531972. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/531972.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Colombo, R, Papetti, A. Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) by-products and their impact: from bioactive compounds to biomass energy and sorbent material for removing contaminants. A Rev Inter J. of Food Sci and Techn. 2019; 54:943-51, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14143.Search in Google Scholar

12. Zhao, P, Ndayambaje, JP, Liu, X, Xia, X. Microbial spoilage of fruits: a review on causes and prevention methods. Food Rev Int 2020;38:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2020.1858859.Search in Google Scholar

13. Gera, Y, Odudu, JH, Atii, RD. Microbial spoilage of fruit and vegetables: implications for human health. J Fam Soc Res. 2022;1:139–43.Search in Google Scholar

14. Gunathilake, C, Senanayaka, DP, Adiletta, G, Senadeera, W. Drying of agricultural crops. In: Advances in agricultural machinery and technologies. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018:331–65 pp.10.1201/9781351132398-14Search in Google Scholar

15. Majdi, H, Esfahani, JA, Mohebbi, M. Optimization of convective drying by response surface methodology. Comput Electron Agric 2019;156:574–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.021.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kumar, D, Kalita, P. Reducing postharvest losses during storage of grain crops to strengthen food security in developing countries. Foods 2017;6:8. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6010008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Tarawate, AR, Özçelik, B, Sh, A, Sultanova, SA, Safarov, JE. Analysis of the process of mass transfer during drying. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;848. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/848/1/012003.Search in Google Scholar

18. Ndukwu, MC, Dirioha, C, Abama, FI, Ihediwa, VE. Heat and mass transfer parameters in the drying of cocoyam slice. Case Stud Therm Eng 2017;9:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2016.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kaveh, M, Chayjan, RA, Taghinezhad, E, Sharabiani, VR, Motevali, A. Evaluation of specific energy consumption and GHG emissions for different drying methods (Case study: pistacia Atlantica). J Clean Prod 2020;259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120963.Search in Google Scholar

20. Djebli, A, Hanini, S, Badaoui, O, Boumahdi, M. A new approach to the thermodynamics study of drying tomatoes in mixed solar dryer. Sol Energy 2019;193:164–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.057.Search in Google Scholar

21. Alpaslan, MM, Yalvac, B. Integrating mathematical modelling into problem based research: an evaporation activity. J Probl Based Learn Higher Edu 2023;11:61–73. https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i3.7501.Search in Google Scholar

22. Pandey, VK, Srivastava, S, Dash, KK, Singh, R, Mukarram, SA, Kovács, B, et al.. Machine learning algorithms and fundamentals as emerging safety tools in preservation of fruits and vegetables: a review. Processes 2023;11:1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061720.Search in Google Scholar

23. Leukel, J, González, J, Riekert, J. Adoption of machine learning technology for failure prediction in industrial maintenance: a systematic review. J Manuf Syst 2021;61:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.08.012.Search in Google Scholar

24. Zhan, Z, He, L, Tong, Y, Liang, X, Guo, S, Lan, X. The effectiveness of gamification in programming education: evidence from a meta-analysis. Comput Educ: Artif Intell 2022;3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100096.Search in Google Scholar

25. Chen, C, Guo, Z, Judge, J. A QGIS plugin for GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis:an application of developing alternative future land-UseScenarios in Ghana. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 2024;17:779.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-024-09566-x.Search in Google Scholar

26. Sistla, SMK, Krishnamoorthy, G, Jeyaraman, J, Konidena, BK. Machine learning for demand forecasting in manufacturing. Int J Multidiscip Res (IJFMR) 2024;6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.14204.Search in Google Scholar

27. Mammadov, M, Yazıcı, B, Yolaçan, S, Aslanargun, A, Yüzer, AF, Ağaoğlu, E (2006). Statistical methods and artificial neural networks, J Mod Appl Stat Methods, 2006;5: 495–512, https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1162354980,Search in Google Scholar

28. Selvi, KÇ, Alkhaled, AY, Yıldız, T. Application of artificial neural network for predicting the drying kinetics and chemical attributes of linden (tilia platyphyllos scop.) during the infrared drying process. SAVE Proc 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102069.Search in Google Scholar

29. Nguyen, TTD, Nguyen, VT. Influence of drying temperature on drying kinetics and appearance of avocado slices in heat pump drying process. Int J Eng Technol 2013;15:89–92. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2023.V15.1226.Search in Google Scholar

30. Nguyen, TVL, Nguyen, QD, Nguyen, TTD, Nguyen, PBD. Effects of infrared drying conditions and maltodextrin addition on some physicochemical characteristics of avocado (persea americana) pulp powder. Appl Sci 2021;11:11803. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411803.Search in Google Scholar

31. Babiker, EE, Ahmed, ISM, Uslu, N, Özcan, MM, Juhaimi, FA, Ghafoor, K, et al.. Influence of drying methods on bioactive properties, fatty acids and phenolic compounds of different parts of ripe and unripe avocado fruits. Japan Oil Chem’ Soc 2021;70:589–98. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess20343.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Karaaslan, S, Ekinci, K. Determination and mathematical modeling of drying kinetics of avocado slices by tunnel type solar drying and microwave drying method. J of Nat and App Sci 2023;27:305–12.Search in Google Scholar

33. Arackal, JJ, Parameshwari, DS. Fatty acid profile of freeze – dried avocado powder. Int. J of Interdisp Res and Inno 2018;6:660–4.Search in Google Scholar

34. Nayaka, VSK, Azeez, S, Suresha, GJ, Tiwari, RB, Prasanth, SJ, Karunakaran, G, et al.. Influence of inlet drying temperature on the physical attributes of spray dried avocado (Persea americana Mill) Powder. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2020;9:1761–70. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.912.208.Search in Google Scholar

35. Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y, Kaveh, M, Aziz, M. Ultrasonic-microwave and infrared assisted convective drying of carrot: drying kinetic, quality and energy consumption. Appl Sci 2020;10:6309. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186309.Search in Google Scholar

36. Crank, J. The Mathematics of diffusion, 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press; 1075.69–88 pp.Search in Google Scholar

37. Borah, SN, Goswami, D, Lahkar, J, Sarma, HK, Khan, MR, Deka, S. Rhamnolipid produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa SS14 causes complete suppression of wilt by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi in Pisum sativum. Biocontrol 2015;60:375–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-014-9645-0.Search in Google Scholar

38. Ononogbo, C, Nwufo, OC, Nwakuba, NR, Okoronkwo, CA, Igbokwe, JO, Anyanwu, EE. Energy consumption of yam slice drying in an exhaust gas waste heat recovery hot air tray dryer. Sci. Res. J. 2021;9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.31364/SCIRJ/v9.i08.2021.P0821872.Search in Google Scholar

39. Aviara, NA, Igbeka, JC. Modeling for drying of thin layer of native cassava starch in tray dryer. J Bioeng 2016;41:342–56. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2016.41.4.342.Search in Google Scholar

40. Kohli, D, Champawat, PS, Jain, SK, Mudgal, VD, Shahi, NC. Mathematical modelling for drying kinetics of Asparagus roots (Asparagus racemosus L.) and determination of energy consumption. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 2022;12:3572–89. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC123.35723589.Search in Google Scholar

41. Abano, E. Microwave and blanching pretreatments for hot air drying of orange-feshed sweet potato slices (Ipomoea batatas). Int J Food Sci 2020;51:200–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8872429.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Akoy, EO. Experimental characterization and modeling of thin-layer drying of mango slices. Intl Food Res. J. 2014;21:1911–7.Search in Google Scholar

43. Alibas, I, Kacar, O. Microwave drying kinetics, hypericin content, efective moisture difusivity and activation energy of Hypericum perforatum L. J Essent Oil Bear Plants 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2016.1159530.Search in Google Scholar

44. Şeremet, L, Botez, E, Nistor, OV, Gogus, F, Andronoiu, DG, Mocanu, GD. Infuence of drying conditions on the effective difusivity and activation energy during convective air and vacuum drying of pumpkin. The Ann Univ Dunarea de Jos of Galati Fascicle VI Food Technol 2015;39:20–9.Search in Google Scholar

45. Ruiz-López, II, Córdova, AV, Rodríguez-Jimenez, GC, García-Alvarado, MA. Moisture and temperature evolution during food drying: efect of variable properties. J Food Eng 2004;63:117–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00290-5.Search in Google Scholar

46. Midilli, A, Kucuk, H, Yapar, Z. A new model for single layer drying. Dry Tech 2002;20:1503–13. https://doi.org/10.1081/drt-120005864.Search in Google Scholar

47. Tzempelikos, DA, Mitrakos, D, Vouros, AP, Bardakas, AV, Filios, AE, Margaris, DP. Numerical modeling of heat and mass transfer during convective drying of cylindrical quince slices. J Food Eng 2015;156:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.01.017.Search in Google Scholar

48. Aghbashlo, M, Kianmehr, MH, Arabhosseini, A. Modeling of thin-layer drying of potato slices in length of continuous band dryer. Energy Conv and Manag 2009;50:1348–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

49. Hii, CL, Law, CL, Cloke, M. Modelling of thin layer drying kinetics of cocoa bean during artificial and natural drying. J of Eng Sci and Techn 2008;3:1–10.Search in Google Scholar

50. Hamdami, N, Sayyad, M, Oladegaragoze, A. Mathematical modeling of thin layer drying kinetics of apple slices. IUFoST Food Sci Technol 2006;1949–58. https://doi.org/10.1051/IUFoST:20060324.10.1051/IUFoST:20060324Search in Google Scholar

51. Aviara, NA, Igbeka, JC. Modeling for drying of thin layer of native cassava starch in tray dryer. J of Biosy Eng 2016;41:342–56. https://doi.org/10.5307/jbe.2016.41.4.342.Search in Google Scholar

52. Dash, KK, Gope, S, Sethi, A, Doloi, M. Star fruit slices. Intl J Agric Food Sci Technol 2013;4:679–86.Search in Google Scholar

53. Verma, LR, Bucklin, RA, Endan, JB, Wratten, FT. Effects of drying air parameters on rice drying models. Trans ASAE 1985;28:296–301. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.32245.Search in Google Scholar

54. Yaldiz, O, Ertekin, C, Uzun, HI. Mathematical modeling of thin layer solar drying of Sultana grapes. Energy 2001;26:457–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(01)00018-4.Search in Google Scholar

55. Demir, V, Gunhan, T, Yagcioglu, AK. Mathematical modeling of convection drying of green table olives. Biosy Eng 2007;98:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.06.011.Search in Google Scholar

56. Miller, MW. Prediction of energy requirements and drying times for surface drying fresh produce. Am Soci Agric Engr 1995:84–6542.Search in Google Scholar

57. Beaton, CF. Heat exchanger design handbook. New York: Mile Vujicic, Sterling Thermal Technology Ltd.; 1986.Search in Google Scholar

58. Miller, WM. Prediction of energy requirements and drying times for surface drying of fresh produce. J of Am Soc of Agric Eng 1985;1:87–90.10.13031/2013.26771Search in Google Scholar

59. Motevali, A, Minaei, S, Khoshtagaza, MH. Evaluation of energy consumption in different drying methods. Energy Conv and Manag. 2011;52:1192–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.014.Search in Google Scholar

60. Motevali, A, Minaei, S, Khoshtagaza, MH, Amirnejat, H. Comparison of energy consumption and specific energy requirements of different methods for drying mushroom slices. Energy 2011;36:6433–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.024.Search in Google Scholar

61. Candler, G, Nompelis, I. Computational fluid dynamics for atmospheric entry. In: Von karman institute. von karman institute for fluid dynamics lecture series hypersonic entry and cruise vehicles – via defence technical information centre. Minneapolis: Minnesota Univ Minneapolis; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

62. Camargo, J, Ebinuma, CD, Cardoso, S. A mathematical model for direct evaporative cooling air conditioning system. Eng. Term. 2003;4:30–4. https://doi.org/10.5380/reterm.v2i2.3473.Search in Google Scholar

63. Heldman, DR. Encyclopedia of agricultural food and rheological engineering. Boca Raton: Marcel Dekker, CRC PRESS; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429257599.Search in Google Scholar

64. Chasiotis, VK, Tzempelikos, DA, Filios, AE, Moustris, KP. Artificial neural network modelling of moisture content evolution for convective drying of cylindrical quince slices. Comput Electron Agric 2020;172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105074.Search in Google Scholar

65. Xiao, H, Pang, C, Wang, L, Bai, J, Yang, W, Gao, Z. Drying kinetics and quality of monukka seedless grapes dried in an air-impingement jet dryer. Biosy Eng 2010;105:233–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

66. Goyal, RK, Kingsly, ARP, Manikantan, MR, Ilyas, SM. Mathematical modelling of thin layer drying kinetics of plum in a tunnel dryer. J Food Eng 2007;79:176–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.041.Search in Google Scholar

67. Nahimana, H, Zhang, M. Shrinkage and color change during microwave vacuum drying of carrot Drying Tech; 2011;29:836–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2011.573753.Search in Google Scholar

68. Mohammadi, A, Rafiee, S, Emam-Djomeh, Z, Keyhani, A. Kinetic models for colour changes in kiwifruit slices during hot air drying. W J of Agric Sci. 2008;4:376–83.Search in Google Scholar

69. Marwa, B, Oumaima, B, Soufien, A, Salaheddine, A. Moisture diffusivity of medicinal and aromatic plants during convective drying by hot air: myrtle leaves. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023;1:2784–801.10.21203/rs.3.rs-2219589/v1Search in Google Scholar

70. Amankwah, EA, Dzisi, KA, Agyabeng, FE, Marmah, P, van Boxtel, AJB. Drying characteristics of dried banana (musa sapientum). GSTF J on Agric Eng (JAE). 2014;1:22–32. https://doi.org/10.5176/0000-0000_1.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

71. Benmakhlouf, N, Azzouz, S, Cabrera, MJ, Khdhira, H, Elcafsi, A. Controlling mechanisms of moisture diffusion in convective drying of leather. Heat Mass Tran 2017;53:1237–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1900-8.Search in Google Scholar

72. Samadi, SH, Loghmanieh, I. Evaluation of energy aspects of apple drying in the hot-air and infrared dryers. Energy Res J 2023;4:30–8. https://doi.org/10.3844/erjsp.2013.30.38.Search in Google Scholar

73. Akoy, EO. Experimental characterization and modeling of thin-layer drying of mango slices. Intl Food Res. J. 2014;21:1911–7.Search in Google Scholar

74. Tzempelikos, DA, Vouros, AP, Bardakas, AV, Filios, AE, Margaris, DP. Experimental study on convective drying of quince slices and evaluation of thin-layer drying models. Engr Agric Environ Food 2015;8:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2014.12.002.Search in Google Scholar

75. Hii, CLIK, Ogugo, JF. Effect of pre-treatment on the drying kinetics and product quality of star fruit slices. J Engr Sci Technol. 2014;9:123–35.Search in Google Scholar

76. Ghaderi, A, Abbasi, S, Motevali, A, Minaei, S. Comparison of mathematical models and artificial neural networks for prediction of drying kinetics of mushroom in microwave–vacuum drier. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 2012;18:283–93. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ110823005G.Search in Google Scholar

77. Jun-Wen, B, Hong-Wei, X, Hai-Le, M, Cun-Shan, Z. Artificial neural network modeling of drying kinetics and color changes of ginkgo biloba seeds during microwave drying process. Hindawi J of Food Quality 2018;1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3278595.Search in Google Scholar

78. Selvi, KÇ, Alkhaled, AY, Yıldız, T. Application of artificial neural network for predicting the drying kinetics and chemical attributes of linden (tilia platyphyllos scop.) during the infrared drying process. Processes 2022;10:2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10102069.Search in Google Scholar

79. Zogzas, NP, Maroulis, ZB, Marinoskouris, D. Moisture diffusivity data compilation in foodstuffs. Drying Technol 1996;14:2225–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373939608917205.Search in Google Scholar

80. Mujaffar, S, Dipnarine, T. The production of a dried avocado (Persea americana) powder. In: The International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (IConETech-2020) Faculty of Engineering. West Indies: The UWI, St. Augustine 1st–5th; 2020:44–54 pp.10.47412/DDSD1316Search in Google Scholar

81. Olurin, TO, Adelekan, AO, Olosunde, WA. Mathematical modeling of drying characteristics of blanched field pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L) slices. Agric Engr Intl: CIGR J 2012;14:246–54.Search in Google Scholar

82. Kumar, N, Sarkar, BC, Sharma, HK. Mathematical modeling of thin-layer hot air drying of carrot pomace. J Food Sci Technol 2012;49:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0266-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

83. Doymaz, I. Drying behaviour of green beans. J Food Eng 2005;69:161–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.08.009.Search in Google Scholar

84. Ehiem, JC, Eke, AB. Determination of drying characteristics and kinetics of bitter kola (garcinia kola) using page’s model. Agric Eng Int CIGR E J 2014;16:278–84.Search in Google Scholar

85. Troncoso, E, Pedreschi, F. Modeling of textural changes during drying of potato slices. J Food Eng 2007;82:577–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.03.015.Search in Google Scholar

86. Darıcı, S, Sen, S. Experimental investigation of convective drying kinetics of kiwi under different conditions. Heat Mass Trans 2015;51:1167–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1487-x.Search in Google Scholar

87. Aghbashlo, M, Kianmehr, MH, Samimi-Akhijahani, H. Influence of drying conditions on the effective moisture diffusivity, energy of activation and energy consumption during the thin-layer drying of berberis fruit (Berberidaceae). Ener Conver Manage. 2008;49:2865–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.03.009.Search in Google Scholar

88. Doymaz, I. Evaluation of some thin-layer drying models of persimmon slices (Diospyros kaki L.). Ener Conver Manage. 2012;56:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.11.027.Search in Google Scholar

89. Tzempelikos, DA, Vouros, AP, Bardakas, AV, Filios, AE, Margaris, DP. Case studies on the effect of the air drying conditions on the convective drying of quinces. Case Stud Thermal Engr. 2014;3:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2014.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

90. Nahimana, H, Mujumdar, A, Zhang, M. Drying and radial shrinkage characteristics and changes in color and shape of carrot tissues (Daucus Carota L) during air drying. African J of Biotech 2011;10. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.576.Search in Google Scholar

91. Ratti, C. Shrinkage during drying of foodstuffs. J Food Eng 1994;3:91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(94)90125-2.Search in Google Scholar

92. El-Mesery, HS. Improving the thermal efficiency and energy consumption of convective dryer using various energy sources for tomato drying. Alex Eng J 2022;61:10245–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.03.076.Search in Google Scholar

93. Lin, Q, Zong, X, Lin, H, Huang, X, Wang, J, Nie, S. Based on quality, energy consumption selecting optimal drying methods of mango slices and kinetics modelling. Food Chem X 2023;17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100600.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

94. Zeng, Z, Han, C, Wang, Q, Yuan, H, Zhang, X, Li, B. Analysis of drying characteristic, effective moisture diffusivity and energy, exergy and environment performance indicators during thin layer drying of tea in a convective-hot air dryer. Front Sustain Food Syst 2024;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1371696.Search in Google Scholar

95. Kaveh, M, Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y, Nowacka, M. Comparison of different drying techniques and their carbon emissions in green peas. Chem. Eng. Process. – Process Intensif. 2021;160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108274.Search in Google Scholar

96. Jahanbakhshi, A, Kaveh, M, Taghinezhad, E, Sharabiani, VR. Assessment of kinetics, effective moisture diffusivity, specific energy consumption, shrinkage, and color in the pistachio kernel drying process in microwave drying with ultrasonic pretreatment. J Food Proc Preserv 2020;44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.v44.610.1111/jfpp.14449.Search in Google Scholar

97. Zheng, Z-A, Wang, S-Y, Wang, H, Xiao, H, Liu, Z-L, Pan, Y-H, et al.. Comparative study on the influence of various drying techniques on drying characteristics and physicochemical quality of garlic slices. Foods 2023;12:1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

98. Amedor, EN, Sarpong, F, Bordoh, PK, Boateng, EF, Owusu-Kwarteng, J. (2024). Modelling convectional oven drying characteristics and energy consumption of dehydrated yam (Dioscorea rotundata) chips. Heliyon, 2024; 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34672.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

99. Okunola, A, Adekanye, T, Idahosa, E. Energy and exergy analyses of okra drying process in a forced convection cabinet dryer. Res. Agr. Eng. 2021;67:8–16. https://doi.org/10.17221/48/2020-rae.Search in Google Scholar

100. Polatcı, H, Erkmen, Y. Effects of different drying methods on modelling, energy consumption and final quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill). Turk J Agricul – Food Sci Technol, 2019; 7: 2148-53, 2019 https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i12.2148-2153.2909.Search in Google Scholar

101. Chen, K, Yuan, Y, Zhao, B, Kaveh, M, Beigi, M, Zheng, Y, et al.. Optimum drying conditions for ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) based on time, energy consumption and physicochemical quality. Food Chem X 2023;20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100987.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

102. Zadhossein, S, Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y, Kaveh, M, Nadimi, M, Paliwal, J. Comparison of the energy and exergy parameters in cantaloupe (Cucurbita maxima) drying using hot air. Smart Agricul Technol 2023;4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100198.Search in Google Scholar

103. Ye, L, El-Mesery, HS, Ashfaq, MM, Shi, Y, Zicheng, H, Alshaer, WG. Analysis of energy and specific energy requirements in various drying process of mint leaves. Case Stud Therm Eng 2021;26: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101113.Search in Google Scholar

104. Maysami, MA, Sedighi, R, Ghaffari, H. Evaluation of different drying processes by energy consumption in an insulated and not insulated laboratory convection dryer. Food Res 2020;4:107–11. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.4(S6).042.Search in Google Scholar

105. Akhtaruzzaman, MD, Mondal, HT, Sazzat, HSSA, Biswas, M, Shanta, SA, Sheikh, AM. Evaluation of drying characteristics, energy consumption and quality of parboiled paddy: two stage drying. J of Agric and Food Res 2022;8:100284.10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100284Search in Google Scholar

106. Igbozulike, AO, Ndirika, VIO, Simonyan, KJ. Evaluation of energy consumption in drying African oil bean seeds usingresponse surface methodology. Arab J of Basic and App Sci. 2023;30:137–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2023.2191955.Search in Google Scholar

107. Darvishi, H, Asl, AR, Asghari, A, Azadbakht, M, Najafi, G, Khodaei, J. Study of the drying kinetics of pepper. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2014;13:130–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2013.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

108. Parhizi, Z, Karami, H, Golpour, I, Kaveh, M, Szymanek, M, Blanco-Marigorta, AM, et al.. Modeling and optimization of energy and exergy parameters of a hybrid-solar dryer for basil leaf drying using RSM. Sustainability 2022;14:8839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148839.Search in Google Scholar

109. Ertekin, C, Yaldiz, O. Drying of eggplant and selection of a suitable thin layer drying model. J Food Eng 2004;63:349–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.08.007.Search in Google Scholar

110. Kumar, A, Kandasamy, P, Chakraborty, I, Hangshing, L. Analysis of energy consumption, heat and mass transfer, drying kinetics and effective moisture diffusivity during foam-mat drying of mango in a convective hot-air dryer. Biosyst Eng 2022;219:85–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.04.026.Search in Google Scholar

111. Khan, MIH, Batuwatta-Gamage, CP, Karim, MA, Gu, YT. Fundamental understanding of heat and mass transfer processes for physics-informed machine learning-based drying modelling. Energies 2022;15:9347. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249347.Search in Google Scholar

112. Villa–Corrales, L, Flores-Prieto, JJ, Xamán-Villaseñor, JP, García-Hernández, E. Numerical and experimental analysis of heat and moisture transfer during drying of Ataulfo mango. J Food Eng 2010;98:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.12.026.Search in Google Scholar

113. Tzempelikos, DA, Mitrakos, D, Vouros, AP, Bardakas, AV, Filios, AE, Margaris, DP. Numerical modeling of heat and mass transfer during convective drying of cylindrical quince slices. J Food Eng 2015;156:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.01.017.Search in Google Scholar

114. Beigi, M. Influence of drying air parameters on mass transfer characteristics of apple slices. Heat Mass Tran 2016;52:2213–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-015-1735-8.Search in Google Scholar

115. Baptestini, FM, Corrêa, PC, de Oliveira, GHH, Botelho, FM, de Oliveira, APLR. Heat and mass transfer coefficients and modeling of infrared drying of banana slices. Rev. Ceres, Viçosa 2017;64:457–64. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201764050002.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-07-08
Accepted: 2024-10-12
Published Online: 2024-11-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2024-0062/pdf
Scroll to top button