Home Physical Sciences Nonlinear model predictive controller of hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate for ethylene glycol production
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Nonlinear model predictive controller of hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate for ethylene glycol production

  • Fakhrony Sholahudin Rohman , Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi EMAIL logo , Dinie Muhammad , Ashraf Azmi and Muhamad Nazri Murat
Published/Copyright: November 13, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Ethylene glycol (EG) is a valuable commodity organic intermediate that is produced using the catalyzed gas-phase hydrogenation process of dimethyl oxalate (DMO) from syngas. The reactor process is challenging to control because of its nonlinearity and multivariable condition. Thus, this study proposes the application of Neural Wiener model predictive control (NWMPC) for DMO hydrogenation reactor control. The application of empirical-based MPC, such as NWMPC, is still new in DMO hydrogenation reactor control. In order to simulate the process, the DMO hydrogenation reactor is modeled using Aspen Plus and Aspen Dynamic software. The Neural Wiener (NW) model is developed based on state space and neural network modeling using a Linear-Nonlinear (L-N) identification approach. A validation test is also performed to verify the accuracy of the NW model. Based on the test, the model accuracy is acceptable with the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.965 for EG output mole fraction (first output) and R2 of 0.936 for product temperature (second output). The NWMPC capability is evaluated with a PID controller to handle a setpoint change in EG output mole fraction and reject disturbance in the feed stream flow rate. The control performance results have demonstrated the superior ability of the NWMPC to handle such scenarios better than PID in terms of controller action speed and profile.


Corresponding author: Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi, Process Systems Engineering Centre (PROSPECT), Research Institute of Sustainable Environment (RISE), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; and Chemical Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: Q.J130000.21A2.07E17

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

  6. Research funding: The financial support from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Professional Development Research University Grant (UTM-PDRU) with Vote number Q.J130000.21A2.07E17 is greatly acknowledged.

  7. Data availability: Datasets used and/or analysed in this study are available upon reasonable request.

References

1. Schwaar, RH, Ethylene oxide and ethylene glycol, SRI Consulting. ihs.com/pdf/RP002F_toc_173616110917062932.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2020]; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

2. Jiang, CW, Zheng, ZW, Zhu, YP, Luo, ZH. Design of a two-stage fluidized bed reactor for preparation of diethyl oxalate from carbon monoxide. Chem Eng Res Des 2012;90:915–25.10.1016/j.cherd.2011.10.018Search in Google Scholar

3. Taqvi, SA, Tufa, LD, Muhadizir, S. Optimization and dynamics of distillation column using Aspen Plus®, Procedia Eng 2016;148:978–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.484.Search in Google Scholar

4. Akpa, JG, Onuorah, P. Simulation and control of a reactor for the non-catalytic hydrolysis of ethylene oxide to ethylene glycol. Math Theory Model 2018;8:23–45.Search in Google Scholar

5. Rohman, FS, Sulaiman, SHS, Aziz, N. Multivariable optimisation of hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate for maximising productivity of ethylene glycol. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:30882–90.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.003Search in Google Scholar

6. Muhammad, D, Ahmad, Z, Aziz, N. Low density polyethylene tubular reactor control using state space model predictive control. Chem Eng Commun 2021a;208:500–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2019.1674816.Search in Google Scholar

7. Zheng, J, Zhou, J, Lin, H, Duan, X, Williams, CT, Yuan, Y. CO-mediated deactivation mechanism of SIO2-supported copper catalysts during dimethyl oxalate hydrogenation to ethylene glycol. J Phys Chem C 2015;119:13758–66. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03569.Search in Google Scholar

8. Schoukens, M, Tiels, K. Identification of block-oriented nonlinear systems starting from linear approximations: a survey. Automatica 2017;85:272–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2017.06.044.Search in Google Scholar

9. Lawryńczuk, M. Identification of Wiener models for dynamic and steady-state performance with application to solid oxide fuel cell. Asian J Control 2019;21:1836–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2038.Search in Google Scholar

10. Lawryńczuk, M, Tatjewski, P. Offset-free state-space nonlinear predictive control for Wiener systems. Inf Sci 2020;511:127–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.042.Search in Google Scholar

11. Giri, F, Bai, EW. Block-oriented nonlinear system identification. London: Springer; 2010.10.1007/978-1-84996-513-2Search in Google Scholar

12. Yu, BY, Chien, IL. Design and optimization of dimethyl oxalate (DMO) hydrogenation process to produce ethylene glycol (EG). Chem Eng Res Des 2017;121:173–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.03.012.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhu, YP, Chen, GQ, Luo, ZH. Iterative multiscale computational fluid dynamics – single-particle model for intraparticle transfer and catalytic hydrogenation reaction of dimethyl oxalate in a fluidized-bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53:110–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie403227z.Search in Google Scholar

14. Yang, Q, Zhang, D, Zhou, H, Zhang, C. Process simulation, analysis and optimization of a coal to ethylene glycol process. Energy 2018;155:521–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.153.Search in Google Scholar

15. Eden, MR. Introduction to Aspen plus simulation. Auburn: Auburn University; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

16. Li, S, Wang, Y, Zhang, J, Wang, S, Xu, Y, Zhao, Y, et al.. Kinetics study of hydrogenation of dimethyl oxalate over Cu/SiO2 catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015;54:1243–50.10.1021/ie5043038Search in Google Scholar

17. Pearson, RK, Pottmann, M. Gray-box identification of block-oriented nonlinear models. J Process Control 2000;10:301–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-1524(99)00055-4.Search in Google Scholar

18. Sudibyo. Study of different nonlinear models and optimizers for model predictive control in methyl tertiary butyl ether reactive distillation column. Penang, Malaysia: University Sains Malaysia; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

19. Zhu, Y. Multivariable system identification for process control. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology Books; 2001.10.1016/B978-008043985-3/50012-0Search in Google Scholar

20. Iqbal, IM, Aziz, N. Comparison of various wiener model identification approach in modelling nonlinear process. In: 3rd conference on data mining and optimization (DMO). Putra Jaya, Malaysia; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

21. Cervantes, AL, Agamennoni, OE, Figueroa, JL. A nonlinear model predictive control system based on Wiener piecewise linear models. J Process Control 2003;13:655–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-1524(02)00121-x.Search in Google Scholar

22. Muhammad, D, Ahmad, Z, Aziz, N. Modeling and nonlinearity studies of low density polyethylene (LDPE) tubular reactor. Mater Today Proc 2021b;42:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.238.Search in Google Scholar

23. Ławryńczuk, M. MPC algorithms using input-output wiener models. In: Nonlinear predictive control using Wiener models: computationally efficient approaches for polynomial and neural structures. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2022a:71–141 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-83815-7_3Search in Google Scholar

24. Ławryńczuk, M. Wiener models. In: Nonlinear predictive control using Wiener models: computationally efficient approaches for polynomial and neural structures. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2022b:41–68 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-83815-7_2Search in Google Scholar

25. Pearson, RK. Selecting nonlinear model structures for computer control. J Process Control 2003;13:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00022-7.Search in Google Scholar

26. Seborg, DE, Edgar, TF, Mellichamp, DA. Process dynamics and control, 2nd ed.. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

27. Muhammad, D. Low density polyethylene grade transition and conversion control using neural wiener model predictive control with soft sensor PhD Thesis. Universiti Sains Malaysia; 2021.10.1002/apj.2699Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-04-07
Accepted: 2024-08-13
Published Online: 2024-11-13

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2024-0025/pdf
Scroll to top button