Home Dynamic behavior of CO2 adsorption from CH4 mixture in a packed bed of SAPO-34 by CFD-based modeling
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dynamic behavior of CO2 adsorption from CH4 mixture in a packed bed of SAPO-34 by CFD-based modeling

  • Ahmad Hoghooghi Bonyad , Shohreh Fatemi and Zahra Mansourpour EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 18, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this work, a dynamic non-isothermal adsorption process of CH4 and CO2 in a fixed bed of SAPO-34 particles was modeled by coupled DEM-CFD. This Euler–Lagrange method gives access to specification of each adsorbent pellet including location, temperature and concentrations, and facilitates study of phenomena like adsorption. Transport phenomena including heat and mass transfer in fluid and between solid and gas were taken into account. Eventually the model was validated by experimental results of breakthrough curve. Especially near wall channeling effect and the role of inlet feed velocity on the bed efficiency were addressed in this work. Local and bulk porosity values calculated using DEM model showed an acceptable agreement with previous empirical equations. Results indicated that this coupled method can be applied as a promising tool to study the mass transfer zone and efficiency of the adsorption process. The results revealed that as the feed continues to flow into the column, the lower layers of the adsorbent particles become practically saturated and then the mass transfer zone starts moving upward to a region of fresher adsorbent in the column. Also, the results showed that, at a low inlet velocity with a low Peclet number (Pe = 0.195), channeling effect is reduced and the diffusion mechanism controls the mass transfer. However, HETP enhances with increase in the feed gas velocity (Pe = 2.25) as well as increase in deviation from plug flow regime, and consequently the adsorption efficiency decreases. HETP decreases drastically at the beginning with increase in interstitial velocity. Increase in the interstitial velocity beyond a particular value of 0.5 cm s−1 leads to increase in the HETP value. This trend and presence of a minimum in this graph were explained based on Van Deemter concept.


Corresponding author: Zahra Mansourpour, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 11155/4563, Tehran, Iran, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Atmakidis, T, Eugeny, YK. CFD-based analysis of the wall effect on the pressure drop in packed beds with moderate tube/particle diameter ratios in the laminar flow regime. Chem Eng J 2009;155:404–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.057.Search in Google Scholar

2. Augier, F, Laroche, C, Brehon, E. Application of computational fluid dynamics to fixed bed adsorption calculations: effect of hydrodynamics at laboratory and industrial scale. Separ Purif Technol 2008;63:466–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.06.007.Search in Google Scholar

3. Giese, M, Rottschafer, K, Vortmeyer, D. Measured and modeled superficial flow profiles in packed beds with liquid flow. AIChE J 1998;44:484–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690440225.Search in Google Scholar

4. Dixon, AG, Medeiros, NJ. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of gas-phase radial dispersion in fixed beds with wall effects. Fluids 2017;2:56. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids2040056.Search in Google Scholar

5. Van Deemter, JJ, Zuiderweg, FZ, Klinkenberg, A. Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography. Chem Eng Sci 1956;6:271–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(56)80003-1.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ruthven, DM. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1984.Search in Google Scholar

7. Bey, O, Eigenberger, G. Fluid flow through catalyst filled tubes. Chem Eng Sci 1997;52:1365–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(96)00509-x.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kwapinski, W, Winterberg, M, Tsotsas, E, Mewes, D. Modeling of the wall effect in packed bed adsorption. Chem Eng Technol 2004;27:1179–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200407001.Search in Google Scholar

9. McTigue, JD. A comparison of radial-flow and axial-flow packed beds for thermal energy storage. Appl Energy 2018;227:533–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.179.Search in Google Scholar

10. Vortmeyer, D, Winter, RP. Impact of porosity and velocity distribution on the theoretical prediction of fixed bed chemical reactor performance. Chem Reac Eng 1982;5:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1982-0196.ch005.Search in Google Scholar

11. Vortmeyer, D, Schuster, J. Evaluation of steady flow profiles and circular packed beds by a variational method. Chem Eng Sci 1983;38:1691–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(83)85026-x.Search in Google Scholar

12. Delmas, H, Froment, GF. A simulation model accounting for structural radial non-uniformities in fixed bed reactors. Chem Eng Sci 1988;43:2281–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(88)87116-1.Search in Google Scholar

13. Winterberg, M, Tsotsas, E, Krischke, A, Vortmeyer, D. A simple and coherent set of coefficients for modelling of heat and mass transport with and without chemical reaction in tubes filled with spheres. Chem Eng Sci 2000;55:967–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00379-6.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kwapinski, W, Winterberg, M, Tsotsas, E, Mewes, D. Modelling of the wall effect in packed bed adsorption. Chem Eng Technol 2004;27:1179–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200407001.Search in Google Scholar

15. Papageorgiou, JN, Froment, GF. Simulation models accounting for radial voidage profiles in fixed-bed reactors. Chem Eng Sci 1995;50:3043–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00138-u.Search in Google Scholar

16. Castillo-Araiza, CO, Lopez-Isunza, F. Hydrodynamic models for packed beds with low tube-to-particle diameter ratio. Int J Chem React Eng 2008;6:A1. https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-6580.1550.Search in Google Scholar

17. Deen, NG, Van Sint Annaland, M, Van der Hoef, MA, Kuipers, JAM. Review of discrete particle modeling of fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 2007;62:28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.08.014.Search in Google Scholar

18. Hoomans, BPB, Kuipers, JAM, Briels, WJ, van Swaaij, WPM. Discrete particle simulation of bubble and slug formation in a two-dimensional gas-fluidized bed: a hard sphere approach. Chem Eng Sci 1996;51:99–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00271-5.Search in Google Scholar

19. Anderson, TB, Jackson, R. A fluid mechanical description of fluidized beds: equations of motion. Ind Eng Chem Fund 1967;6:527–39. https://doi.org/10.1021/i160024a007.Search in Google Scholar

20. Siahpoosh, M, Fatemi, S, Vatani, A. Mathematical modeling of single and multi-component adsorption fixed beds to rigorously predict the mass transfer zone and breakthrough curves. Iran J Chem Chem Eng IJCCE 2009;28:25–44.Search in Google Scholar

21. Ranz, WE, Marshall, WR. Friction and transfer coefficients for single particles and packed beds. Chem Eng Prog 1952;48:247–53.Search in Google Scholar

22. de Klerk, A. Voidage variation in packed beds at small column to particle diameter ratio. AIChE J 2003;49:2022–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690490812.Search in Google Scholar

23. Dixon, AG. Correlations for wall and particle shape effects on fixed bed bulk voidage. Can J Chem Eng 1988;66:705–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450660501.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-27
Accepted: 2022-02-28
Published Online: 2022-04-18

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2021-0071/pdf
Scroll to top button