Flexible digital twins from commercial off-the-shelf software solutions: a driver for energy efficiency and decarbonisation in process industries?

Molly Alford; Isuru Udugama; Wei Yu; Brent Young

doi:10.1515/cppm-2021-0045

Enjoy 40% off

academic books on De Gruyter Brill *

Article

Flexible digital twins from commercial off-the-shelf software solutions: a driver for energy efficiency and decarbonisation in process industries?

Molly Alford , Isuru Udugama , Wei Yu and Brent Young

Published/Copyright: August 9, 2022

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information

From the journal Chemical Product and Process Modeling Volume 17 Issue 4

Abstract

The term ‘digital twin’ refers to a virtual simulation/model (virtual twin) of a physical plant or object (physical twin), where data flows between the virtual and physical twins. A digital twin can be used for different purposes, such as process optimisation/control, design, training, and maintenance/service. This manuscript found an increasing number of simulation and modelling publications in literature year on year, which illustrates the current trend towards implementing digital twins in a broad range of process engineering applications. A targeted literature review into the area found several commercial off-the-shelf software solutions (COTS) for different industrial applications providing the necessary flexibility to analyse a broad range of industries. However, most of the process modelling software is designed for petroleum and fine chemicals processes. There is still a need for software solutions that can model a broader range of applications. While most of the software found was licensed, open source process modelling software was also available. There is a lack of independent research into the accuracy of these software solutions. The literature review also found that 37% of the research based on process simulations is carried out to improve energy efficiencies. In comparison, 27% of the research found Decarbonization to be a secondary "added" benefit. It can be concluded that digital twins are ideally suited for driving energy efficiency improvements and decarbonisation goals. However, none of the COTS identified in the literature meets all the requirements for a digital twin. A solution to this problem is to create a layered digital twin, combining and interfacing different tools to accomplish a visually similar, self-optimising, self-learning virtual plant.

Keywords: digital twins; process heat; process modelling; software

Corresponding author: Brent Young, Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, E-mail: b.young@auckland.ac.nz

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. EECA. Process heat in New Zealand: overview; 2019. Available from: https://www.mbie.govt.nz [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

2. Grieves, M, Vickers, J. Digital twin: mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Kahlen, FJ, Flumerfelt, S, Alves, A, editors. Trans-disciplinary perspectives on system complexity. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4Search in Google Scholar

3. Yu, W, Patros, P, Young, BR, Klinac, E, Walmsley, TG. Energy digital twin technology for industrial energy management: classification, challenges and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2022;16:112407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112407.Search in Google Scholar

4. Wright, L, Davidson, S. How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin. Adv Model Simul Eng 2020;7:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4.Search in Google Scholar

5. Berutti, M. Understanding the digital twin. In: Chemical engineering; 27 February 2019:1–5 pp. Available from: https://www.chemengonline.com/understanding-the-digital-twin [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

6. Min, Q, Lu, Y, Liu, Z, Su, C, Wang, B. Machine learning based digital twin framework for production optimisation in petrochemical industry. Int J Inf Manag 2019;49:502–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.020.Search in Google Scholar

7. ARUP. Digital twin towards a meaningful framework. Available from: https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/digital-twin-towards-a-meaningful-framework [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

8. Örs, E, Schmidt, R, Mighani, M, Shalaby, M. A conceptual framework for AI-based operational digital twin in chemical process engineering. In: Proceeding in IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC); 2020. 1–8 pp.10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198575Search in Google Scholar

9. Udugama, IA, Lopez, PC, Gargalo, CL, Li, X, Bayer, C, Gernaey, KV. Digital Twin in biomanufacturing: challenges and opportunities towards its implementation. Syst Microbiol Biomanuf 2021;1:257–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-021-00024-0.Search in Google Scholar

10. Martínez, GS, Sierla, S, Karhela, T, Vyatkin, V. Automatic generation of a simulation- based digital twin of an industrial process plant. In: Proceeding in 44th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society; 2018.10.1109/IECON.2018.8591464Search in Google Scholar

11. Maria, G. What is digital twin technology, and how do you ready your business for It? Available from: https://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/what-is-digital-twin-technology/ [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

12. Hussain, M. Review of the applications of neural networks in chemical process control — simulation and online implementation. Artif Intell Eng 1999;13:55–68.10.1016/S0954-1810(98)00011-9Search in Google Scholar

13. AspenTech. Available from: https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-hysys [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

14. AspenTech. Available from: https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/full-product-listing [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

15. Liu, Z, Karimi, IA. Simulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in Aspen HYSYS. Energy Convers Manag 2018;171:1213–25.10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.049Search in Google Scholar

16. Giwa, A, Giwa, SO, Olugbade, EA. Application of ASPEN-HYSYS process simulator in green energy revolution: a case study of biodiesel production. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2018;13:569–81.Search in Google Scholar

17. Omoregie, O, Olateju, I, GIWA, A. Steady-state simulation and economic analysis of methanol-to-butene process using Aspen HYSYS. Int J Sci Eng 2020;7:102–14.Search in Google Scholar

18. Giwa, A, Umanah, KS. Optimisation of biodiesel production from used cooking oil: Aspen HYSYS simulation and experimental validation. Int J Eng Res Afr 2019;43:38–48. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/jera.43.38.Search in Google Scholar

19. Øi, LE. Aspen HYSYS Simulation of CO2 removal by amine absorption from a gas based power plant. Proceeding in The 48th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and ModelingGoteborg 2007;27:73–81.Search in Google Scholar

20. Lam, HL, Klemeš, JJ, Kravanja, Z, Varbanov, PS. Software tools overview: process integration, modelling and optimisation for energy saving and pollution reduction. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2011;6:696–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.469.Search in Google Scholar

21. Yusupbekov, NR, Abdurasulov, FR, Adilov, FT, Ivanyan, AI. Application of cloud technologies for optimization of complex processes of industrial enterprises. In: Proceeding in international conference on theory and applications of fuzzy systems and soft computing; 2018;896:852–8.10.1007/978-3-030-04164-9_112Search in Google Scholar

22. Duan, W, Yu, Q, Wang, K, Qin, Q, Hou, L, Yao, X, et al.. ASPEN Plus simulation of coal integrated gasification combined blast furnace slag waste heat recovery system. Energy Convers Manag 2015;100:30–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.04.066.Search in Google Scholar

23. Smejkal, Q, Šoóš, M. Comparison of computer simulation of reactive distillation using Aspen plus and Hysys software. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensif 2022;41:413–8.10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00160-XSearch in Google Scholar

24. Schlumburger. Symmetry process software platform [internet]. Available from: https://www.software.slb.com/ [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

25. Lie, M, Habib, B, Yu, W, Wilson, D, Young, BR. Validating control of extreme disturbance of an organic Rankine cycle using VMGsim. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2018;44:745–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64241-7.50119-1.Search in Google Scholar

26. Proctor, M, Yu, W, Kirkpatrick, R, Young, BR. Dynamic modelling and validation of a commercial scale geothermal organic Rankine cycle power plant. Geothermics 2016;61:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2016.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

27. Liao, B, Lei, Z, Xu, Z, Zhou, R, Duan, Z. New process for separating propylene and propane by extractive distillation with aqueous acetonitrile. Chem Eng J 2001;84:581–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1385-8947(01)00175-9.Search in Google Scholar

28. AVEVA. AVEVATM-PRO/IITM simulation [internet]. Available from: https://www.aveva.com/en/products/pro-ii-simulation/ [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

29. James, C, Armstrong, M, Washington, G, Biaglow, A. Consistency of thermodynamic properties from CHEMCAD process simulations. Chem Data Collect 2020;27:100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100371.Search in Google Scholar

30. James, C, Armstrong, M, Biaglow, A. Comparison of pure component thermodynamic properties from CHEMCAD with direct calculation using the Peng-Robinson equation of state. Chem Data Collect 2020;30:100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100571.Search in Google Scholar

31. Cormos, CC, Starr, F, Tzimas, E, Peteves, S. Innovative concepts for hydrogen production processes based on coal gasification with CO2 capture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:1286–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.048.Search in Google Scholar

32. DWSIM. Chemical process simulation for everyone [internet]. Available from: https://dwsim.org/ [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

33. Tangsriwong, K, Lapchit, P, Klamrassamee, TKT, Sukjai, Y, Laoonual, Y. Modeling of chemical processes using commercial and opensource software: a comparison between Aspen Plus and DWSIM. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2020;463:012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012057.Search in Google Scholar

34. KBC. Petro-SIM: the digital twin to minimise process engineering waste [internet]. Available from https://www.kbc.global/digital-twin/ [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

35. Howell, A. Why digitalisation is only scratching the surface, and how deeper intergration of Engineering silod can increase production [internet]. Available from: https://www.kbc.global/uploads/files/whitepapers/Engineering%20Silos%20Paper.pdf [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

36. KBC. South east Asia gas processing plant increased profits by over USD 10 million/year [internet]. Available from: https://www.kbc.global/uploads/files/case-studies/0019-GPPB-PIP-CAS-US-112019.pdf [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

37. Gueddar, T, Dua, V. Novel model reduction techniques for refinery-wide energy optimisation. Appl Energy 2012;89:117–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.056.Search in Google Scholar

38. Siemens, PSE. Next-generation modelling tools across the process lifecycle [internet]. Available from https://www.psenterprise.com/products/gproms [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

39. Franke, MB. Design of dividing-wall columns by mixed-integer nonlinear programming optimization. Chem Ing Tech 2017;89:581–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700005.Search in Google Scholar

40. Im, D, Jay, HJ, Lee, H. Modeling, simulation and optimisation of the rotating packed bed (RPB) absorber and stripper for MEA-based carbon capture. Comput Chem Eng 2020;143:107102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107102.Search in Google Scholar

41. Balas. Simulation Available from: https://www.simulationstore.com/node/41 [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

42. APROS. Available from: http://www.apros.fi/en/industries [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

43. Pruess, K. TOUGH2-A general-purpose numerical simulator for multiphase fluid and heat flow. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2172/5212064 [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

44. Dabbour, M, Yu, W, Archer, R, Young, BR. Coupled geothermal process and reservoir management. In: Proceedings in 39th New Zealand geothermal workshop. New Zealand: Rotorua; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

45. Sierla, S, Sorsamäki, L, Azangoo, M, Villberg, A, Hytönen, E, Vyatkin, V. Towards semi- automatic generation of a steady state digital twin of a brownfield process plant. J Appl Sci 2020;10:6959. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196959.Search in Google Scholar

46. Schlumberger. Optimising gas plant performance with the symmetry process software platform [internet]. Available from: https://www.slb.com/resource-library/case-study/so/symmetry-dcp-midstream-cs [Accessed 1 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

47. Hwangbo, S, Sin, G. Design of control framework based on deep reinforcement learning and Monte-Carlo sampling in downstream separation. Comput Chem Eng 2020;140:106910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106910.Search in Google Scholar

48. Ponomarev, K, Kudryashov, N, Popelnukha, N. Main principals and issues of digital twin development for complex technological processes. In: Proceeding in annals of DAAAM & proceedings; 2018.10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.074Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-13

Accepted: 2022-07-25

Published Online: 2022-08-09

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2021-0045

Keywords for this article

digital twins; process heat; process modelling; software