Home Performance assessment of high temperature water-gas-shift reaction for hydrogen generation and its purification in a membrane reactor/separator of hydrogen or of carbon dioxide
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performance assessment of high temperature water-gas-shift reaction for hydrogen generation and its purification in a membrane reactor/separator of hydrogen or of carbon dioxide

  • Imed Eddi EMAIL logo and Lemnouer Chibane
Published/Copyright: July 27, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the current work, the high temperature water gas shift reaction assessment for hydrogen generation and its purification was carried out in reactors integrating hydrogen or carbon dioxide perm-selective membranes. Indeed, the performance of the high temperature water gas shift reaction was analyzed under adiabatic conditions through a mathematical model developed for this purpose. The main results indicate that both membrane reactors provide under some conditions a complete carbon monoxide conversion. As a result the dual phase membrane presents a great separation capacity of carbon dioxide. This gives us the opportunity to obtain a high purity of hydrogen. Thus, it can be concluded that the concept of the membrane reactor that used for carbon dioxide separation could be a veritable competitor and a great promise candidate for replacing the Pd based membrane reactors which is used for hydrogen separation.


Corresponding author: Imed Eddi, Laboratory of Chemical Processes Engineering, Department of Processes Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Ferhat Abbas University of Setif 1, 19000, Setif, Algeria, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Gallucci, F, Basile, A, Hai, FI. Introduction – a review of membrane reactors. In: Basile, A, Gallucci, F, editors. Membranes for membrane reactors: preparation, optimization and selection. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. pp. 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470977569.ch.Search in Google Scholar

2. Fard, AK, McKay, G, Buekenhoudt, A, Al Sulaiti, H, Motmans, F, Khraisheh, M, et al.. Inorganic membranes: preparation and application for water treatment and desalination. Materials 2018;11:74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010074.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Lin, JYS. Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by a new dual phase ceramic carbonate membrane reactor. Tempe, AZ (United States): Arizona State University; 2015. https://doi.org/10.2172/1172599.Search in Google Scholar

4. Barbieri, G, Brunetti, A, Caravella, A, Drioli, E. Pd-based membrane reactors for one-stage process of water gas shift. RSC Adv 2011;1:651–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RA00375E.Search in Google Scholar

5. Romero, EL, Wilhite, BA. Composite catalytic-permselective membranes: modeling analysis for H2 purification assisted by water-gas-shift reaction. Chem Eng J 2012;207–208:552–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.016.Search in Google Scholar

6. Perry, JD, Nagai, K, Koros, WJ. Polymer membrane for hydrogens separations. MRS Bull 2006;31:745–9. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2006.187.Search in Google Scholar

7. Scholes, CA, Smith, KH, Kentish, SE, Stevens, GW. CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes-strategies for membrane gas separation. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010;4:739–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.001.Search in Google Scholar

8. Zuo, M, Zhuang, S, Tan, X, Meng, B, Yang, N, Liu, S. Ionic conducting ceramic–carbonate dual phase hollow fibre membranes for high temperature carbon dioxide separation. J Membr Sci 2014;458:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.-2014.01.047.Search in Google Scholar

9. Chung, SJ, Park, JH, Li, D, Ida, JI, Kumakiri, I, Lin, JYS. Dual-phase metal-carbonate membrane for high-temperature carbon dioxide separation. Ind Eng Chem Res 2005;44:7999–8006. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0503141.Search in Google Scholar

10. Rui, Z, Anderson, M, Lin, YS, Li, Y. Modeling and analysis of carbon dioxide permeation through ceramic–carbonate dual phase membranes. J Membr Sci 2009;345:110–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.034.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dolan, MD, Donelson, R, Dave, NC. Performance and economics of a Pd-based planar WGS membrane reactor for coal gasification. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:10994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.039.Search in Google Scholar

12. Rui, ZB, Ji, HB, Lin, YS. Modeling and analysis of ceramic–carbonate dual phase membrane reactor for carbon dioxide reforming with methane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;36:8292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.110.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hla, SS, Park, D, Duffy, GJ, Edwards, JH, Roberts, DG, Ilyushechkin, A, Morpeth, LD, Nguyen, T. Kinetics of high-temperature water-gas shift reaction over two iron-based commercial catalysts using simulated coal-derived syngases. Chem Eng J 2009;146:148–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.09.023.Search in Google Scholar

14. Piemonte, V, Falco, MD, Basile, A. Performance assessment of water gas shift membrane reactors by a two-dimensional model. Eng Sources 2015;37:2174–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2012.691945.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gallucci, F, Medrano, JA, Fernandez, E, Melendez, J, Annaland, MVS, Tanaka, DP. Advances on high temperature Pd-based membranes and membrane reactors for hydrogen purification and production. J Membr Sci Res 2017;3:142–56 https://doi.org/10.22079/jmsr.2017.23644.Search in Google Scholar

16. Norton, TT, Lin, YS. Ceramic–carbonate dual-phase membrane with improved chemical stability for carbon dioxide separation at high temperature. Solid State Ionics 2014;263:172–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2014.06.005.Search in Google Scholar

17. Rui, Z, Anderson, M, Li, Y, Lin, YS. Ionic conducting ceramic and carbonate dual phase membranes for carbon dioxide separation. J Membr Sci 2012;417:174–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.06.030.Search in Google Scholar

18. Chen, T, Yu, B, Zhao, Y, Li, Y, Lin, YS. Carbon dioxide permeation through ceramic–carbonate dual-phase membrane-effects of sulfur dioxide. J Membr Sci 2017;540:477–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.063.Search in Google Scholar

19. Zhang, L, Xu, N, Li, X, Wang, S, Huang, K, Harris, WH, Chiu, WKS. High CO2 permeation flux enabled by highly interconnected three-dimensional ionic channels in selective CO2 separation membranes. Energy Environ Sci 2012;5:8310–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE22045H.Search in Google Scholar

20. Wade, JL, Lee, C, West, AC, Lackner, KS. Composite electrolyte membranes for high temperature CO2 separation. J Membr Sci 2011;369:20–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.053.Search in Google Scholar

21. Wade, JL, Lackner, KL, West, AC. Transport model for a high temperature, mixed conducting CO2 separation membrane. Solid State Ionics 2007;178:1530–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2007.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

22. Madia, GS, Barbieri, G, Drioli, E. Theoretical and experimental analysis of methane steam reforming in a membrane reactor. Can J Chem Eng 1999;77:698–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450770411.Search in Google Scholar

23. Gallucci, F, Van Sintannaland, M, Kuipers, JAM. Theoretical comparison of packed bed and fluidized bed membrane reactors for methane reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:7142–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.050.Search in Google Scholar

24. Demirel, E, Ayas, N. Thermodynamic modeling of the water-gas shift reaction in supercritical water for hydrogen production. Theor Found Chem Engineering 2017;51:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579517010067.Search in Google Scholar

25. Basile, A, Curcio, S, Bagnato, G, Liguori, S, Jokar, SM, Iulianelli, A. Water gas shift reaction in membrane reactors: Theoretical investigation by artificial neural networks model and experimental validation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40:5897–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.039.Search in Google Scholar

26. Chen, WH, Lin, MR, Jiang, TL, Chen, MH. Modeling and simulation of hydrogen generation from high-temperature and low-temperature water gas shift reactions. Int J hydrogen energy 2008;33:6644–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.-2008.08.039.Search in Google Scholar

27. Chein, R, Chen, YC, Chung, JN. Parametric study of membrane reactors for hydrogen production via high-temperature water gas shift reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:2292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.122.Search in Google Scholar

28. Mendes, D, Sa, S, Tosti, S, Sousa, JM, Madeira, LM, Mendes, A. Experimental and modeling studies on the low-temperature water-gas shift reaction in a dense Pd–Ag packed-bed membrane reactor. Chem Eng Sci 2011;66:2356–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.035.Search in Google Scholar

29. Mendes, D, Mendes, A, Madeira, LM, Iulianelli, A, Sousa, JM, Basile, A. The water-gas shift reaction: from conventional catalytic systems to Pd-based membrane reactors–a review. Asia Pac J Chem Eng 2010;5:111–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/-apj.364.Search in Google Scholar

30. Hla, SS, Morpeth, LD, Dolan, MD. Modelling and experimental studies of a water-gas shift catalytic membrane reactor. Chem Eng J 2015;276:289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.079.Search in Google Scholar

31. Tosti, S. Overview of Pd-based membranes for producing pure hydrogen and state of art at ENEA laboratories. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:12650–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.07.116.Search in Google Scholar

32. Hou, K, Hughes, R. The effect of external mass transfer, competitive adsorption and coking on hydrogen permeation through thin Pd/Ag membranes. J Membr Sci 2002;206:119–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00770-0.Search in Google Scholar

33. Damle, A, Richardson, C, Powers, T, Love, C, Acquaviva, J. Demonstration of a pilot-scale membrane reactor process for hydrogen production. ECS Trans 2008;12:499–510. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2921576.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-12-08
Accepted: 2020-06-14
Published Online: 2020-07-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2019-0134/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button