Steam Reforming of Acetic Acid: Response Surface Modelling and Study of Factor Interactions

References

[1] Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO. Study of process factor effects and interactions in synthesis gas production via a simulated model for glycerol steam reforming. Chem Prod Process Model. 2018;14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2018-0034.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chen G, Tao J, Liu C, Yan B, Li W, Li X. Hydrogen production via acetic acid steam reforming: a critical review on catalysts. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2017;79:1091–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.107.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bossola F, Evangelisti C, Allieta M, Psaro R, Recchia S, Santo VD. Well-formed, size-controlled ruthenium nanoparticles active and stable for acetic acid steam reforming. Appl Catal B. 2016;181:599–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.024.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Valle B, Aramburu B, Benito PL, Bilbao J, Gayubo AG. Biomass to hydrogen-rich gas via steam reforming of raw bio-oil over Ni/La 2 O 3-αAl 2 O 3 catalyst: effect of space-time and steam-to-carbon ratio. Fuel. 2018;216:445–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.151.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Santamaria L, Lopez G, Arregi A, Amutio M, Artetxe M, Bilbao J, et al. Influence of the support on Ni catalysts performance in the in-line steam reforming of biomass fast pyrolysis derived volatiles. Appl Catal B. 2018;229:105–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zhang F, Wang M, Zhu L, Wang S, Zhou J, Luo Z. A comparative research on the catalytic activity of La2O3 and g-Al2O3 supported catalysts for acetic acid steam reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;42:1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.264.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Czernik S, French R, Feik C, Chornet E. Hydrogen by catalytic steam reforming of liquid byproducts from biomass thermoconversion processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:4209–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020107q.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hu X, Lu G. Investigation of the steam reforming of a series of model compounds derived from bio-oil for hydrogen production. Appl Catal B. 2009;88:376–85.10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.10.021Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zheng X-x, Yan C, Hu R, Li J, Hai H, Luo W, et al. Hydrogen from acetic acid as the model compound of biomass fast-pyralysis oil over Ni catalyst supported on ceria–zirconia. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37:12987–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.067.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Abdullah T, Nabgan W, Kamaruddin MJ, Mat R, Johari A, Ahmad A. Hydrogen production from acetic acid steam reforming over bimetallic Ni-Co on La2O3 catalyst-effect of the catalyst dilution. Appl Mech. Mater. 2014;493:39–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.493.39.Trans Tech Publ.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhang F, Wang N, Yang L, Li M, Huang L. Ni–co bimetallic MgO-based catalysts for hydrogen production via steam reforming of acetic acid from bio-oil. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:18688–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.025.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wang S, Zhang F, Cai Q, Zhu L, Luo Z. Steam reforming of acetic acid over coal ash supported Fe and Ni catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40:11406–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.056.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Goicoechea S, Kraleva E, Sokolov S, Schneider M, Pohl M, Kockmann N, et al. Support effect on structure and performance of Co and Ni catalysts for steam reforming of acetic acid. Appl Catal A. 2016;514:182–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.12.025.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hoang TM, Geerdink B, Lefferts L, Seshan K. Steam reforming of acetic acid–A major component in the volatiles formed during gasification of humin. Appl Catal B. 2015;163:74–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.046.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Nabgan W, Abdullah TA, Mat R, Nabgan B, Gambo Y, Moghadamian K. Acetic acid-phenol steam reforming for hydrogen production: effect of different composition of La2O3-Al2O3 support for bimetallic Ni-Co catalyst. J Environ Chem Eng. 2016;4:2765–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.05.030.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nabgan W, Abdullah TA, Mat R, Nabgan B, Jalil AA, Firmansyah L, et al. Production of hydrogen via steam reforming of acetic acid over Ni and Co supported on La2O3 catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;42:8975–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.176.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Xie J, Su D, Yin X, Wu C, Zhu J. Thermodynamic analysis of aqueous phase reforming of three model compounds in bio-oil for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36:15561–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.103.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Goyal N, Pant K, Gupta R. Hydrogen production by steam reforming of model bio-oil using structured Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:921–33.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.080Search in Google Scholar

[19] Vagia EC, Lemonidou AA. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via steam reforming of selected components of aqueous bio-oil fraction. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2007;32:212–23.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.08.021Search in Google Scholar

[20] Vagia EC, Lemonidou AA. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via autothermal steam reforming of selected components of aqueous bio-oil fraction. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:2489–500.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.057Search in Google Scholar

[21] Goicoechea S, Ehrich H, Arias PL, Kockmann N. Thermodynamic analysis of acetic acid steam reforming for hydrogen production. J Power Sources. 2015;279:312–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.012.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Khuri AI, Mukhopadhyay S. Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2010;2:128–49.10.1002/wics.73Search in Google Scholar

[23] Baş D, Boyacı IH. Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng. 2007;78:836–45.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024Search in Google Scholar

[24] Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO, Eletta AA. Process integration and feedstock optimisation of a Two-step biodiesel production process from jatropha curcas using aspen plus. Chem Prod Process Model 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2018-0055.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Ghadge SV, Raheman H. Process optimization for biodiesel production from mahua (Madhuca indica) oil using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97:379–84.10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Omulo G, Banadda N, Kabenge I, Seay J. Optimizing slow pyrolysis of banana peels wastes using response surface methodology. Environ Eng Res. 2019;24:354–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.269.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Abnisa F, Daud W, Jaya Narayan S. Optimization and modeling of bio-oil production from palm shell by pyrolysis using response surface methodology. 2010.10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.05.011Search in Google Scholar

[28] Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO, Abdulsalam A. Modelling of integrated processes for the recovery of the energetic content of sugarcane bagasse. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1998.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO. Hydrogen production by the steam reforming of waste lubricating oil. Indian Chem Eng 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00194506.2019.1605847.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Kumar MS, Phanikumar B. Response surface modelling of Cr6 + adsorption from aqueous solution by neem bark powder: box–behnken experimental approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20:1327–43.10.1007/s11356-012-0981-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Garg UK, Kaur MP, Sud D, Garg VK. Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by adsorption on treated sugarcane bagasse using response surface methodological approach. Desalination. 2009;249:475–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.10.025.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Adeniyi AG, Otoikhian KS, Ighalo JO. Steam reforming of biomass pyrolysis oil: a review. Int J Chem Reactor Eng. 2019;17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2018-0328.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Hill WJ, Hunter WG. A review of response surface methodology: a literature survey. Technometrics. 1966;8:571–90.10.2307/1266632Search in Google Scholar