Home Optimization of microfluidic gallotannic acid extraction using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of microfluidic gallotannic acid extraction using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm

  • Mahnaz Yasemi , Masoud Rahimi EMAIL logo , Amir Heydarinasab and Mehdi Ardjmand
Published/Copyright: November 12, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract:

The current study presents the outcomes of modeling and optimizing extraction of gallotannic acid from Quercus leaves using a microfluidic system. In this study, the effects of various experimental parameters were investigated using the method of design expert. Number of experiments suggested is 31 by central composite design of Design Expert. The experimental results of design expert were analyzed by artificial neural network (ANN). Based on the results of ANN, independent variables experiment: temperature (T), flow rate ratio (FR) and pH have shown a negative effect on extraction yield (dependent variable), while the residence time (RT) has shown a positive effect. In trained network, R2=0.9805 and RMSE = 0.0166 shows good agreement between the predicted values of ANN and experimental results. Optimum extraction conditions, to reach maximum yield by genetic algorithms (GA), were FR = 0.53, RT = 26.4, pH = 2.06 and T = 21.44R2=0.9805. The extraction yield under the optimum predicated conditions was 96.4 %, which was well matched with the experimental value 95.01 % ±0.63. Based on the obtained results, it was found that the ANN model could be employed successfully in estimating the gallotannic acid extraction efficiency using microfluidic extraction method.

References

1. Noh MJ, Choi ES, Kim SH, Yoot YH, Choi YW, Kim J. Supercritical fluid extraction and bioassay identification of prodrug substances from natural resources. Korean J Chem Eng 1997;14(2):109–116.10.1007/BF02706069Search in Google Scholar

2. Pan Y, Zhang J, Shen T, Zuo ZT, Jin H, Wang YZ, et al. Optimization of ultrasonic extraction by response surface methodology combined with ultrafast liquid chromatography–ultraviolet method for determination of four iridoids in Gentiana rigescens. J Food Drug Anal 2015;23(3):529–537.10.1016/j.jfda.2014.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Tabaraki R, Safari AM, Yeganeh Faal A. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of condensed tannin from acron, gland, leaf and gall of oak using response surface methodology. J Appl Chem Res 2013;7(3):67–77.Search in Google Scholar

4. Helléa G, Marieta C, Coteb G. Microfluidic tools for the liquid-liquid extraction of radionuclides in analytical procedures. Int Conf Nucl Chem Sustainable Fuel Cycles Procedia Chem 2012;7:679–684.10.1016/j.proche.2012.10.103Search in Google Scholar

5. Baharudin L. Microfluidics: fabrications and applications. Instrum Sci Technol 2008;36(2):222–230.10.1080/10739140701850993Search in Google Scholar

6. Přibyl M, Knápková V, Šnita D, Marek M. Analysis of reaction-transport phenomena in a microfluidic system for the detection of IgG. Chem Pap 2005;59(6):434–440.Search in Google Scholar

7. Huh YS, Jeon SJ, Lee EZ, Park HS, Hong WH. Microfluidic extraction using two phase laminar flow for chemical and biological applications. Korean J Chem Eng 2011;28(3):633–642.10.1007/s11814-010-0533-8Search in Google Scholar

8. Beebe DJ, Mensing GA, Walker GM. Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2002;4(1):261–286.10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.112601.125916Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Hansen C, Quake SR. Microfluidics in structural biology: Smaller, faster … better. Curr Opin Struc Biol 2003;13(1):38–544.10.1016/j.sbi.2003.09.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Yamasaki Y, Goto M, Kariyasaki A, Morooka S, Yamaguchi Y, Miyazaki M, et al. Layered liquid-liquid flow in microchannels having selectively modified hydrophilic and hydrophobic walls. Korean J Chem Eng 2009;26(6):1759–1765.10.1007/s11814-009-0265-9Search in Google Scholar

11. Priest C, Zhou J, Sedev R, Ralston J, Aota A, Mawatari K. Microfluidic extraction of copper from particle-laden solutions. Int J Miner Process 2011;98(3):168–173.10.1016/j.minpro.2010.11.005Search in Google Scholar

12. Stone HA, Kim S. Microfluidics: basic issues, applications, and challenges. AIChE J 2001;47(6):1250–1254.10.1002/aic.690470602Search in Google Scholar

13. Veličković DT, Milenović DM, Ristić MS, Veljković VB. Kinetics of ultrasonic extraction of extractive substances from garden (Salvia officinalis L.) and glutinous (Salvia glutinosa L.) sage. Ultrason Sonochem 2006;13(2):150–156.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2005.02.002Search in Google Scholar

14. Huaneng X, Yingxin Z, Chaohong H. Ultrasonically assisted extraction of isoflavones from stem of Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi and its mathematical model. Chin J Chem Eng 2007;15(6):861–867.10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60015-4Search in Google Scholar

15. Altissimi R, Brambilla A, Deidda A, Semino D. Optimal operation of a separation plant using artificial neural networks. Comput Chem Eng 1998;22:S939–942.10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00185-9Search in Google Scholar

16. Sharma R, Singh K, Singhal D, Ghosh R. Neural network applications for detecting process faults in packed towers. Chem Eng Process 2004;43(7):841–847.10.1016/S0255-2701(03)00103-XSearch in Google Scholar

17. Himmelblau DM. Applications of artificial neural networks in chemical engineering. Korean J Chem Eng 2000;17(4):373–392.10.1007/BF02706848Search in Google Scholar

18. Chetouani Y. Using artificial neural networks for the modelling of a distillation column. Int J Comput Sci Appl 2007;4(3):119–133.Search in Google Scholar

19. Rabiee Kenaree A, Fatemi S. Application of artificial neural network in simulation of super critical extraction of Valerenic acid from Valeriana officinalis L. ISRN Chem Eng 2012:1–7. Article ID 572421.10.5402/2012/572421Search in Google Scholar

20. Singh V, Khan M, Khan S, Tripathi CK. Optimization of actinomycin V production by Streptomyces triostinicus using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009;82(2):379–385.10.1007/s00253-008-1828-0Search in Google Scholar

21. Dong-sheng Y, Xi Z, Yan-zhen W, Jia S, Xiu-ting Z, Ming-zhe Z, et al. Optimizing the conditions for polysaccharide ultrasonic-assisted extraction in Cordyceps gunnii mycelia using genetic algorithm. J Chem Pharm Res 2013;5(11):64–68.Search in Google Scholar

22. Yang Y, Gao M, Yu X, Zhang Y, Shuxia L. Optimization of medium composition for two step fermentation of vitamin C based on artificial neural network–genetic algorithm techniques. Biotechnol Biotec Eq 2015;29(6):1128–1234.10.1080/13102818.2015.1063970Search in Google Scholar

23. Toboc A, Lavric V. Artificial neural network modelling of ultrasound and microwave extraction of bioactive constituents from medicinal plants. Rev Chim 2012;63(7):743–748.Search in Google Scholar

24. Scrucca L. GA: a package for genetic algorithms in R. J Stat Software 2013;53(4):37.10.18637/jss.v053.i04Search in Google Scholar

25. Ting W, Yan H, Ying Hong J, Yu L. Application of genetic algorithm neutral network model in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction condition optimization of decabrominated diphenyl ether. Environ Sci Technol 2010;33(10):15–18.Search in Google Scholar

26. Srecnik G, Debeljak Z, Cerjan-Stefanovic S, Novic M, Bolanca T. Optimization of artificial neural networks used for retention modelling in ion chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2002;973(1):47–59.10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01116-0Search in Google Scholar

27. Design- Expert- Software. 2015 Available at www.statease.comTrial versionAccessed: 24Nov2015.Search in Google Scholar

28. 2015 Available at https://www.rstudio.comAccessed: Nov2015.Search in Google Scholar

29. Anitha M, Singh H. Artificial neural network simulation of rare earths solvent extraction equilibrium data. Desalination 2008;232(1–3):59–70.10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.037Search in Google Scholar

30. Krishnaa D, Padma Sreeb R. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach for modeling chromium (VI) adsorption from aqueous solution using a Borasus Flabellifer coir powder. Int J Appli Sci Eng 2014;12(3):177–192.Search in Google Scholar

31. Lazzús JA. Neural network based on quantum chemistry for predicting melting point of organic compounds. Chin J Chem Phys 2009;22(1):19–26.10.1088/1674-0068/22/01/19-26Search in Google Scholar

32. Lazzús JA. rho-T-P prediction for ionic liquids using neural networks. J Taiwan Instit Chem Eng 2009;40(2):213–232.10.1016/j.jtice.2008.08.001Search in Google Scholar

33. Eyupoglu V, Eren B, Dogan E. Prediction of ionic Cr (VI) extraction efficiency in flat sheet supported liquid membrane using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). Int J Environ Res 2010;4(3):463–470.Search in Google Scholar

34. Kashaninejad M, Dehghani AA, Kashiri M. Modeling of wheat soaking using two artificial neural networks (MLP and RBF). J Food Eng 2009;91(4):602–607.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.012Search in Google Scholar

35. Jun X, Xue Y, Yinxiang X, Shen Y. Artificial neural network modeling and optimization of ultrahigh pressure extraction of green tea polyphenols. Food Chem 2013;141(1):320–326.10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.084Search in Google Scholar

36. Kalteh AM, Caspian J. Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks (ANNs): modelling and understanding. Environ Sci 2008;6(1):53–58.Search in Google Scholar

37. Ibrahim OM. A comparison of methods for assessing the relative importance of input variables in artificial neural networks. J Appl Sci Res 2013;9(11):5692–5700.Search in Google Scholar

38. Ahmad I, Jeenanunta C, Chanvarasuth P, Komolavanij S. Prediction of physical quality parameters of frozen shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) through an artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Food Bioprocess Technol 2014;7(5):1433–1444.10.1007/s11947-013-1135-3Search in Google Scholar

39. Weckman G, Young W, Hernndez S, Rangwala M, Ghai V. Extracting knowledge from carbon dioxide corrosion inhibition with artificial neural networks. Int J Indust Eng 2010;17(1):69–79.Search in Google Scholar

40. Khajeh M, Safaei Moghaddam Z, Bohlooli M, Khajeh A. Modeling of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for determination of essential oil from Borago officinalis L. By using combination of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm method. J Chromatogr Sci 2015;53(10):1801–1807.10.1093/chromsci/bmv065Search in Google Scholar

41. Garson GD. Interpreting neural network connection weights. Artif Intell Expert 1998;6(4):46–51.Search in Google Scholar

42. Olden JD, Joy MK, Death RG. An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecol Modell 2004;178(3):389–397.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.013Search in Google Scholar

43. Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, Dimopoulos I, Lauga J, Aulagnier S. Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in Ecology. Ecol Modell 1996;90(1):39–52.10.1016/0304-3800(95)00142-5Search in Google Scholar

44. Hatamia T, Meirelesb MAA, Zahedic G. Mathematical modeling and genetic algorithm optimization of clove oil extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide. J Supercrit Fluid 2010;51(3):331–338.10.1016/j.supflu.2009.10.001Search in Google Scholar

45. Sette S, Boullartb L, Van Langenhove L. Using genetic algorithms to design a control strategy of an industrial process. Control Eng Pract 1998;6(4):523–527.10.1016/S0967-0661(98)00046-XSearch in Google Scholar

46. Nandi S, Mukherjee P, Tambe SS, Kumar R, Kulkarni BD. Reaction modeling and optimization using neural networks and genetic algorithms: case study involving TS-1 catalyzed hydroxylation of benzene. Ind Engg Chem Res 2002;41(9):2159–2169.10.1021/ie010414gSearch in Google Scholar

47. Bajpai P. Genetic algorithm – an approach to solve global optimization problems. Indian J Comput Sci Eng 2010;1(3):199–206.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-6-29
Revised: 2016-9-14
Accepted: 2016-10-4
Published Online: 2016-11-12
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2016-0053/html
Scroll to top button