Home Genetic Algorithm Approach to Optimize Biodiesel Production by Ultrasonic System
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Genetic Algorithm Approach to Optimize Biodiesel Production by Ultrasonic System

  • Ebrahim Fayyazi , Barat Ghobadian EMAIL logo , Gholamhassan Najafi and Bahram Hosseinzadeh
Published/Copyright: January 25, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Ultrasonic processing is an effective tool to attain required mixing while providing the necessary activation energy in the field of biofuels. In this regard, optimization of fast transesterification of waste cooking oil is very important. The goal of this research paper is therefore to determine the effect of important parameters such as methanol to oil molar ratio, catalyst concentration (potassium hydroxide), temperature, and horn position on oil conversion to methyl ester in ultrasonic mixing method. Result of experiments showed that the optimum conditions for the transesterification process have been obtained as molar ratio of alcohol to oil as 6:1, catalyst concentration of 1 wt.%, temperature as 45°C, and horn position at the interface of methanol to oil. The results show that the ultrasonic method decreases the reaction time as much as up to eight times compare to the conventional stirring. For practically evaluating the theoretical optimum point using genetic algorithm, the obtained values were verified experimentally. In order to perform this, the catalyst concentration, temperature, and the time of reaction were determined, and the values are 1%, 48°C, and 449s, respectively. For the obtained values, the biodiesel conversion was 93.2%, so that the experimental optimum value is closed to that of the theoretical values. As a result, experimental data confirmed the obtained values from optimization method in this research work.

Acknowledgments

This research work has been conducted at Biofuel Laboratories of Agriculture faculty of Tarbiat Modares University. Hereby the authors would also like to acknowledge the funds provided by Iranian Fuel Conservation Company (IFCO) to carry out this research work.

References

1. MaF, HannaMA. Biodiesel production: a review. Bioresour Technol1999;70:115.Search in Google Scholar

2. XieWL, LiHT. Alumina-supported potassium iodide as a heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production from soybean oil. J Mol Catal A: Chem2006;255:19.10.1016/j.molcata.2006.03.061Search in Google Scholar

3. SchuchardtU, SercheliR, VargasRM. Transesterification of vegetable oils: a review. J Braz Chem Soc1998;9:199210.10.1590/S0103-50531998000300002Search in Google Scholar

4. ChandP, ChintareddyVR, VerkadeJG, GrewellD. Enhancing biodiesel production from soybean oil using ultrasonics. Energy Fuels2010;24:201015.10.1021/ef9011752Search in Google Scholar

5. TomasevicA, Siler-MarinkovicS. Methanolysis of used frying oil. Fuel Process Technol2003;81:16.10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00096-6Search in Google Scholar

6. StavaracheC, VinatoruM, NishimuraR, MaedaY. Conversion of vegetable oil to biodiesel using ultrasonic irradiation. Chem Lett2003;32:71617.10.1246/cl.2003.716Search in Google Scholar

7. StavaracheC, VinatoruM, NishimuraR, MaedaY. Fatty acids methyl esters from vegetable oil by means of ultrasonic energy. Ultrason Sonochem2005;12:36772.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.04.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. GhobadianB, RahimiH. Biofuels: past, present and future perspective. In: The 4th international Iran and Russia conference, Shahrekord, Iran, 8–10 Sept 2004.Search in Google Scholar

9. ColucciJA, BorreroEE, AlapeF. Biodiesel from an alkaline transesterification reaction of soybean oil using ultrasonic mixing. Am Oil Chem Soc2005;82:52530.10.1007/s11746-005-1104-3Search in Google Scholar

10. JiJ. Preparation of biodiesel with help of ultrasonic and hydrodynamic cavitation. Ultrasonics2006;44:41114.10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. SuslickKS. Ultrasound: its chemical, physical and biological effects. New York: VCH Publishers, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

12. MasonTJ. Sonochemistry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

13. ErtlG, KnozingerH, WeitkampJ. Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis. Hielscher: Ringwood, NJ,1997; Ultrasonic laboratory devices (manual); Available at: www.hielscher.com; http://www.scs.uiuc.edu/suslick/pdf/hbhetcat.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

14. SinghAK, FernandoSD, HernandezR. Base-catalyzed fast transesterification of soybean oil using ultrasonication. Energy Fuels2007;21:11614.10.1021/ef060507gSearch in Google Scholar

15. SanayeS, HajabdollahiH. Thermal-economic multi-objective optimization of plate fin heat exchanger using genetic algorithm. Appl Energy2010;87:1893902.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.016Search in Google Scholar

16. WangJJ, JingYY, ZhangCF. Optimization of capacity and operation for CCHP system by genetic algorithm. Appl Energy2010;87:132535.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.005Search in Google Scholar

17. GoldbergDE, HollandJH. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kulwer Academic Publishers, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

18. JenaPC, RahemanH, Prasanna KumarG, MachavaramR. Biodiesel production from mixture of Mahua and Simarouba oils with high free fatty acids. Biomass Bioenergy2010;34:110816.10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.02.019Search in Google Scholar

19. RajendraM, JenaPC, RahemanH. Prediction of optimized pretreatment process parameters for biodiesel production using ANN and GA. Fuel2009;88:86875.10.1016/j.fuel.2008.12.008Search in Google Scholar

20. SaccoWF, PereiraCM, SoaresPP, SchirruR. Genetic algorithms applied to turbine extraction optimization of a pressurized-water reactor. Appl Energy2002;73:21722.10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00122-8Search in Google Scholar

21. VarunS. Thermal performance optimization of a flat plate solar air heater using genetic algorithm. Appl Energy2010;87:17939.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.015Search in Google Scholar

22. WangY, HeYL, MeiDH, TaoWQ. Optimization design of slotted fin by numerical simulation coupled with genetic algorithm. Appl Energy2011;88:444150.10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.030Search in Google Scholar

23. ZengM, DuL, LiaoD, ChuW, WangQ, LuoY, et al.. Investigation on pressure drop and heat transfer performances of plate-fin iron air preheater unit with experimental and genetic algorithm methods. Appl Energy2012;92:72532.10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.008Search in Google Scholar

24. CanakciM, Van GerpenJ. A pilot plant to produce biodiesel from high free fatty acid feedstocks. Trans ASAE2003;46:94554.10.13031/2013.13949Search in Google Scholar

25. HuangY, LanY, ThomsonSJ, FangA, HoffmanWC, LaceyRE. Review: development of soft computing and applications in agricultural and biological engineering. Comput Electron Agric2010;71:10727.10.1016/j.compag.2010.01.001Search in Google Scholar

26. HinguSM, GogatePR, RathodVK. Synthesis of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using sonochemical reactors. Ultrason Sonochem2010;17:82732.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. KimHJ, KangBS, KimMJ, ParkYM, KimDK, LeeJS, et al. Transesterification of vegetable oil to biodiesel using heterogeneous base catalyst. Catal Today2004;93–95:31520.10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.007Search in Google Scholar

28 ] Anonymous.2009a. www.chemwiki.ucdavis.edu.Search in Google Scholar

29. LeungDY, WuX, LeungM. A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Appl Energy2010;87:108395.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006Search in Google Scholar

30. SharmaY, SinghB, UpadhyayS. Advancements in development and characterization of biodiesel: a review. Fuel2008;87:235573.10.1016/j.fuel.2008.01.014Search in Google Scholar

31. KhatamifarM. Design, manufacturing and evaluation of a vegoil processor. A publication of Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-1-25
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2013-0043/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button