Home Computational Antioxidant Capacity Simulation (CAOCS): A Novel Framework of Antioxidant Capacity Profiling
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Computational Antioxidant Capacity Simulation (CAOCS): A Novel Framework of Antioxidant Capacity Profiling

  • Sunday O. Idowu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 4, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Inconsistent ranking is a well-known drawback of antioxidant capacity (AOC) profiling methodologies that use free-radical species as oxidant. This problem leads to assay results that are not biorelevant. Linear free energy relationships (LFER) theory predicts proton transfer (PT) kinetics as a surrogate for biorelevant hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) kinetics. Computational antioxidant capacity simulation (CAOCS), based on real-time proton transfer kinetics modeling (PTKM) of polyphenols and phenol-like small molecules, inspired a novel AOC profiling methodology.

Kinetic data acquired by incremental addition of resorcinol to an oxidized probe (phenol red), was fitted to mono-exponential decay equation (MED). Absorbance decay data from strongly antioxidant phenol-like molecules (e.g. ascorbic acid) and a new chromogenic probe (phenolphthalein) was fitted to MED and bi-exponential decay equation. The preferred model and corresponding best-fit rate constant (Kptt) was identified by comparison of fits, using Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc).

Photometric phenolphthalein assay (PPA)-derived metric was normalized with photometric phenol red assay (PPRA) results by using a function developed from proton concentration differential between phenolphthalein and phenol red, with respect to decay threshold to plateau (assay endpoint) interval. pKa dependence of the CAOCS’ metric is a signature of structure–function relationships, and hence, biorelevance.

It is shown, unambiguously, that a combination of two phenolic probe molecules, an analytical system devoid of free radicals, and statistical identification of preferred exponential decay fit to PT kinetics data, constitutes a novel algorithm for AOC profiling of polyphenols and phenol-like molecules. This methodology holds a promise of utility in quality assurance of dietary supplements.

Acknowledgement

The author thanks Tope Obe, Keji Adeyemo and Segun Aderibigbe for their technical assistance.

References

1. FatokunAA, StoneTW, SmithRA. Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration and available means of protection. Front Biosci2008;13:3288311.10.2741/2926Search in Google Scholar

2. FinkelT. Oxidant signals and oxidative stress. Curr Opin Cell Biol2003;15:24754.10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00002-4Search in Google Scholar

3. FinkelT, HolbrookNJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature2000;408:23947.10.1038/35041687Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. DimitriosB. Sources of natural phenolic antioxidants. Trends Food Sci Technol2006;17:50512.10.1016/j.tifs.2006.04.004Search in Google Scholar

5. PadayattySJ, KatzA, WangY, et al. Vitamin C as an antioxidant: evaluation of its role in disease prevention. J Am Coll Nutr2003;22:1835.10.1080/07315724.2003.10719272Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. KongA-N, MandlekarS, YuR, LeiW, FasanmadeA. Pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of drug action: signaling in cell survival and cell death. Pharm Res1999;16:79008.10.1023/A:1011953431486Search in Google Scholar

7. BurtonGW, IngoldKU. Vitamin E: application of the principles of physical organic chemistry to the explanation of its structure and function. Acct Chem Res1986;19:194201.10.1021/ar00127a001Search in Google Scholar

8. HuangD, OuB, PriorRL. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J Agric Food Chem2005;53:184156.10.1021/jf030723cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

9. PriorRL, WuX, SchaichK. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem2005;53:4290302.10.1021/jf0502698Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. WolfeKL, LiuRH. Cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) assay for assessing antioxidants, foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem2007;55:8896907.10.1021/jf0715166Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. RoschD, BergmannM, KnorrD, KrohLW. Structure-antioxidant efficiency relationships of phenolic compounds and their contribution to the antioxidant activity of sea buckthorn juice. J Agric Food Chem2003;51:42339.10.1021/jf0300339Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. IdowuSO, AdeyemoMA, ItiolaAJ. Computational models for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in dietary supplements using real-time proton transfer kinetics data. Chem Prod Proc Model2009;4:41. DOI:10.2202/1934-2659.1385.10.2202/1934-2659.1385Search in Google Scholar

13. IwuMM. Antihepatotoxic constituents of garcinia kola seeds. Experientia1985;41:699700.10.1007/BF02007729Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. AkaikeH. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automatic Control1974;19:71623.10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705Search in Google Scholar

15. United States Pharmacopoeia and National Formulary USP 24/NF 19. 2000:222930.Search in Google Scholar

16. WaringWS, ConveryA, MishraV, ShenkinA, WebbDJ. Uric acid reduces exercise-induced oxidative stress in healthy adults. Clin Sci2003;105:42530.10.1042/CS20030149Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. PedenDB, HohmanR, BrownME, et al. Uric acid is a major antioxidant in human nasal airway secretions. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA1990;87:763842.10.1073/pnas.87.19.7638Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Godycki-CwirkoM, KrolM, KrolB, et al. Uric acid but not apple polyphenols is responsible for the rise of plasma antoxidant acitivtiy after apple juice consumption in healthy subjects. J Am Coll Nutr2010;29:397406.10.1080/07315724.2010.10719857Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. SimonZ, PeragovicA, Vigh-SmallerM, et al. Drug effect prediction by polypharmacology-based interaction modeling. J Chem Inf Model2012;52:13445.10.1021/ci2002022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Gawlik-DzikiU, SwiecaM, DzikiD. Comparison of phenolic acids profile and antioxidant potential of six varieties of spelt (triticum spelta, L). J Agric Food Chem2012;60:460312.10.1021/jf3011239Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. PiazzonA, VrhovsekU, MasueroD, MattiviF, MandojF, NardiniM. Antioxidant activity of phenolic acids and their metabolites:synthesis and antioxidant properties of the sulfate derivatives of ferulic and caffeic acids and of the acylglucuronide of ferulic acid. J Agric Food Chem2012;60:1231223.10.1021/jf304076zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22. CrucianiG, MilletiF, StorchiL, GoracciL. In silico pKaprediction and ADME profiling. Chem Biodivers2009;6:181221.10.1002/cbdv.200900153Search in Google Scholar

23. HuangD, OuB, Hapsch-WoodillM, FlanaganJA, PriorRL. High-throughput assay of oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) using a mutltichannel liquid handling system coupled with a microplate fluorescence reader in 96-well format. J Agric Food Chem2002;50:443744.10.1021/jf0201529Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Rice-EvansPA, MillerNJ, PagangaG. Structure – antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids. Free Rad Biol Med1996;20:93356.10.1016/0891-5849(95)02227-9Search in Google Scholar

25. WolfeK, KangX, HeX, DongM, ZhangQ, LiuRH. Cellular antioxidant activity of common fruits. J Agric Food Chem2008;56:841826.10.1021/jf801381ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

26. WolfeK, LiuRH. Structure-activity relationships of flavonoids in the cellular antioxidant activity assay. J Agric Food Chem2008;56:840411.10.1021/jf8013074Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. NikkiE. Assessment of antioxidant capacity in-vitro and in-vivo. Free Rad Biol Med2010;49:50315.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.04.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Prieto-SimonB, CortinaM, CampasM, Calas-BlanchardC. Electrochemical biosensors as a tool for antioxidant capacity assessment. Sensors Actuators B: Chem2008;129:45666.10.1016/j.snb.2007.08.004Search in Google Scholar

29. YangY, JiawanZ, PengboB, XiahouaZ, JinhuaC. Electrochemical evaluation of total antioxidant capacities in fruit juice based on the guanine/grapheme nanocarbon/glassy electrode. Talanta2013;106:20611.10.1016/j.talanta.2012.12.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. ChobotV, KubicovaL, BachmannG, HadaceckF. Versatile redox chemistry complicates antioxidant capacity assessment: flavonoids as a milieu-dependent anti- and pro-oxidants. Int J Mol Sci2013;14:1183041.10.3390/ijms140611830Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. IdowuSO, AdeyemoMA, OgbonnaUI. Engineering and validation of a novel lipid thin film for biomembrane modeling in lipophilicity determination of drugs and xenobiotics. J Biol Eng2009;3:14. DOI:10. 1186/1754-1611-3-14.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-12-4
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2013-0041/pdf
Scroll to top button