Home Drying of Apple Slices in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Dryer: Comparison of Mathematical Models and Neural Networks
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Drying of Apple Slices in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Dryer: Comparison of Mathematical Models and Neural Networks

  • Seyed Hashem Samadi , Barat Ghobadian EMAIL logo , GholamHassan Najafi , Ali Motevali and Saeid Faal
Published/Copyright: June 26, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Consuming a high amount of energy in industrial dryer makes the drying as an important and highly energy-intensive industrial process. In this study, the required energy for drying of apple slice was supplied from the outlet heat of an engine generation set exhaust. The drying behavior of apple slice was studied in a combined heat and power (CHP) dryer system at four engine load levels (25, 50, 75, and 100%) in order to provide different temperatures (50, 65, 80, and 95°C), and at three levels of drying product thickness (3, 5, and 7 mm) with the constant air flow velocity of 1 m/s. The empirical data from experiments with variants of semi-theoretical and empirical models were evaluated and finally, a suitable model proposed by Midilli et al. was selected to be the best model, as for as the RMSE, R2, and χ2 criterion is concerned. Comparing the results from implementing artificial neural network (ANN) and mathematical models, it was found that the dynamic ANNs is more powerful for modeling the drying process of apple slice in a CHP dryer system than static ANNs and mathematical models.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Iranian Fuel Conservation Organization (IFCO) of NIOC for the research grant provided to complete this project and Tarbiat Modares University for providing of laboratory facilities.

Nomenclature

a, b, cDrying coefficients
kDrying constants
MRMoisture ratio
MeEquilibrium moisture content (kg water/kg solids)
MRexp,iith moisture ratio value determined experimentally (kg water/kg solids)
MRpre,iith predicted moisture ratio value (kg water/kg solids)
M0Initial moisture content (kg water/kg solids)
MtMoisture content at any given time (kg water/kg solids)
Mt+dtMoisture content at t+dt (kg water/kg solids)
mNumber of drying constants
NNumber of observations
nDrying constants
n0Number of neurons in the output layer
npNumber of patterns
R2Determination of coefficient
SSample thickness (mm)
SipDesired or actual output
RMSERoot mean square error
TTemperature (°C)
tDrying time (min)
TipPredicted output for the pattern
χ2chi-square

References

1. Barbosa-Canovas GV, Vega-Mercado H. Dehydration of foods. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1996.10.1007/978-1-4757-2456-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Brooker DB, Baker-Arkema FW, Hal CW. Drying and storage of grain and oilseeds. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

3. Sahin AZ, Dincer I. Graphical determination of drying process and moisture transfer parameters for solids drying. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 2002;45:3267–73.10.1016/S0017-9310(02)00057-1Search in Google Scholar

4. De Paepe M, D’Herdt P, Mertens D. Micro-CHP systems for residential applications. Energy Conversion Manage 2006;47:3435–46.10.1016/j.enconman.2005.12.024Search in Google Scholar

5. Wu DW, Wang RZ. Combined cooling, heating and power: a review. Prog Energy Combustion Sci 2006;32:459–95.10.1016/j.pecs.2006.02.001Search in Google Scholar

6. Khatri KK, Sharma D, Soni SL, Tanwar D. Experimental investigation of CI engine operated micro-trigeneration system. Appl Therm Eng 2010;30:1505–09.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.02.013Search in Google Scholar

7. Courtois F, Lebert A, Duquenoy A, Lasseran JC, Bimbenet JJ. Modelling of drying in order to improve processing quality of maize. Drying Technol 1991;9:927–45.10.1080/07373939108916728Search in Google Scholar

8. Alborzi M. Introduction with neural networks. Tehran: Sharif University of Technology Publications, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

9. Abe T, Ofoche CE, Hikida Y, Yamashita J. Utilization of engine-waste heat for grain drying. In Proceedings of the International Agricultural Engineering Conference, Bangkok, 1992; Vol. IV:1147–54.Search in Google Scholar

10. Basunia MA, Abe T. Performance study of a small engine waste heated bin dryer in deep bed drying of paddy. Agric Eng Int 2008:X.Search in Google Scholar

11. Basunia MA, Abe T, Hikida Y. Energy savings in intermittent drying of rough rice using engine waste heat. Agric Eng J 1996;5:149–59.Search in Google Scholar

12. Basunia MA, Abe T, Hikida Y. Simulation of engine wasted heat stationary-bed rough rice dryer. Agric Mechanization Asia, Africa Latin America 1996b;4:37–45.Search in Google Scholar

13. Li H, Chen Q, Zhang X, Finney KN, Sharifi VN, Swithenbank J. Evaluation of a biomass drying process using waste heat from process industries: a case study. Appl Therm Eng 2012;35:71–80.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.10.009Search in Google Scholar

14. Nguyen TD, Steinbrecht D. Modeling a combined heat and power cogeneration system in vietnam with a fluidized bed combustor burning biomass. Agric Eng Int. Manuscript EE 08 008 2008:X.Search in Google Scholar

15. Holmberg H, Ahtila P. Optimization of the bark drying process in combined heat and power production of pulp and paper mill. In Odilio AF, Eikevik TM, Strommen I, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Drying Conference, Karlstad, Sweden, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

16. Fath HSE. Diesel engine waste heat recovery for drying of clay minerals. Heat Recovery Syst CHP 1991;11:573–9.10.1016/0890-4332(91)90059-DSearch in Google Scholar

17. Kemp IC. Reducing dryer energy use by process integration and pinch analysis. Drying Technol 2005;23:2089–104.10.1080/07373930500210572Search in Google Scholar

18. Motevali A, Minaei S, Khoshtagaza MH. Evaluation of energy consumption in different drying methods. Energy Conversion Manage 2011;52:1192–9.10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.014Search in Google Scholar

19. Motevali A, Minaei S, Khoshtaghaza MH, Kazemi M, Mohamad Nikbakht A. Drying of pomegranate arils: comparison of predictions from mathematical models and neural networks. Int J Food Eng 2010;6:1–20.10.2202/1556-3758.1889Search in Google Scholar

20. Doymaz I, Ismail O. Drying characteristics of sweet cherry. Food Bioproducts Process 2011;89:31–8.10.1016/j.fbp.2010.03.006Search in Google Scholar

21. Aghbashlo M, Kianmehr MH, Arabhosseini A. Performance analysis of drying of carrot slices in a semi-industrial continuous band dryer. J Food Eng 2009;91:99–108.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.08.020Search in Google Scholar

22. Nazghelichi T, Kianmehr MH, Aghbashlo M. Prediction of carrot cubes drying kinetics during fluidized bed drying by artificial neural network. J Food Sci Technol 2011;48:542–50.10.1007/s13197-010-0166-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Rafiee S, Keyhani A, Jafari A. Modeling effective moisture diffusivity of wheat (tajan) during air drying. Int J Food Properties 2008;11:223–32.10.1080/10942910701291858Search in Google Scholar

24. Tahmasebi M, Tavakoli Hashjin T, Khoshtaghaza MH, Nikbakht AM. Valuation of thin-layer drying models for simulation of drying kinetics of quercus (quercus persica and quercus libani). J Agric Sci Technol 2011;13:55–163.Search in Google Scholar

25. Abbaszadeh A, Motevali A, Khoshtaghaza MH, Kazemi M. Evaluation of thin-layer drying models and neural network for describing drying kinetics of Lasagnas angustifolia L. Int Food Res J 2011;18:321–8.Search in Google Scholar

26. Chayjan RA, Alizade HHA, Shadidi B. Modeling of some pistachio drying characteristics in fix, semi fluid and fluid bed dryer. Agric Eng Int. Manuscript 2012;14:143.Search in Google Scholar

27. Doymaz I. Drying kinetics of black grapes treated with different solutions. J Food Eng 2006;76:212–17.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.05.009Search in Google Scholar

28. Chayjan R, Salari K, Barikloo H. Modelling moisture diffusivity of pomegranate seed cultivars under fixed, semi fluidized and fluidized bed using mathematical and neural network methods. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 2012;11:131–48.Search in Google Scholar

29. Chayjan R, Esna–Ashari M. Effect of moisture content on thermodynamic characteristics of grape: mathematical and artificial neural network modelling. Czech J Food Sci 2011;29:250–9.10.17221/328/2009-CJFSSearch in Google Scholar

30. Nazghelichi T, Kianmehr M, Aghbashlo M. Prediction of carrot cubes drying kinetics during fluidized bed drying by artificial neural network. J Food Sci Technol 2011a;48:542–50.10.1007/s13197-010-0166-2Search in Google Scholar

31. Çakmak G, Yıldız C. The prediction of seedy grape drying rate using a neural network method. Comput Electron Agric 2011;75:132–8.10.1016/j.compag.2010.10.008Search in Google Scholar

32. Lertworasirikul S, Tipsuwan Y. Moisture content and water activity prediction of semi-finished cassava crackers from drying process with artificial neural network. J Food Eng 2008;84:65–74.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.019Search in Google Scholar

33. Vega A, Uribe E, Lemus R, Miranda M. Hot-air drying characteristics of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis Miller) and influence of temperature on kinetic parameters. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2007;40:1698–707.10.1016/j.lwt.2007.01.001Search in Google Scholar

34. Gorjian S, Tavakkol Hashjin T, Khoshtaghaza M. Designing and optimizing a back propagation neural network to model a thin-layer drying process. Int Agrophys 2011;25:13–39.Search in Google Scholar

35. Doymaz I. Influence of pretreatment solution on the drying of sour cherry. J Food Eng 2007;78:591–6.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.037Search in Google Scholar

36. Chhinnan MS. Evaluation of selected mathematical models for describing thin-layer drying of in-shell pecans. Trans ASAE 1984;26:610–15.10.13031/2013.32837Search in Google Scholar

37. Dandamrongrak R, Young G, Mason R. Evaluation of various pre-treatments for the dehydration of banana and selection of suitable drying models. J Food Eng 2002;55:139–46.10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00028-6Search in Google Scholar

38. Wang Z, et al. Mathematical modeling on hot air drying of thin layer apple pomace. Food Res Int 2007;40:39–46.10.1016/j.foodres.2006.07.017Search in Google Scholar

39. Ertekin C, Yaldiz O. Drying of eggplant and selection of a suitable thin layer drying model. J Food Eng 2004;63:349–59.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.08.007Search in Google Scholar

40. Sharma GP, Verma RC, Pathare P. Mathematical modeling of infrared radiation thin layer drying of onion slices. J Food Eng 2005;71:282–6.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.02.010Search in Google Scholar

41. Motevali A, Abbaszadeh A, Minaei S, Khoshtaghaza M, Ghobadian B. Effective moisture diffusivity, activation energy and energy consumption in thin-layer drying of jujube. J Agric Sci Technol (JAST) 2012;14:523–32.Search in Google Scholar

42. Akpinar E, Midilli A, Bicer Y. Single layer drying behaviour of potato slices in a convective cyclone dryer and mathematical modeling. Energy Conversion Manage 2003;44:1689–705.10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00171-1Search in Google Scholar

43. Engelbrecht A. Computational intelligence: an introduction. Chichester: Second Edition. University of Pretoria South Africa, England, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, the Atrium, Southern Gate 2007. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-6-26

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2013-0009/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button