Home Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents for the Extraction of Endosulfan from Aqueous Solution: A Quantum Chemical Approach
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents for the Extraction of Endosulfan from Aqueous Solution: A Quantum Chemical Approach

  • Santhi Raju Pilli , Tamal Banerjee and Kaustubha Mohanty EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 8, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This work presents a judicious screening of 986 possible ionic liquid (IL) combinations for the removal of Endosulfan using COSMO-RS (Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents) model. Initially, benchmarking studies have been carried out for α-Endosulfan, β-Endosulfan, Endosulfan sulfate, Endosulfan-alcohol, Endosulfan lactone, and Endosulfan ether by comparing COSMO-RS experimental and predicted octanol–water partition coefficients. Thereafter, COSMO-RS selectivity predictions were done on 986 ionic liquid combinations at infinite dilution. The order of selectivity for the five cation groups were found to be as follows: [TBP] > [TIBMP] > [TBMP] > [C2DMIM] > [BEPYR] > [DPPYR] > [C4DMIM] > [C8MPY] > [BTNH] > [BETNH]. Highest selectivity was obtained for phosphonium based IL namely: [TBP][TOS] (212.5). Anions such as [C8H17SO4], [Br], [Sal], [TOS], [MDEGSO4], and [DEC] contributed high selectivities because of the absence of sterical shielding effect around their charge centers. Further capacity and the performance index (PI) values were calculated and predicted along with selectivity. The increasing order of performance index values were found to follow: [TBP][Sal] (1.71+E5) > [DPPYR][Br] (1.07+E6) > [C2DMIM] (1.01+E6) > [C8MPY][Cl] (1.6+E5) > [BETNH][DEC] (1.2+E5).

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research grant from the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India vide sanction No. SR/FTP/ETA-56/2010.

References

1. Colborn T, Dumanoski D, Meyers JP. Our stolen future: how we are threatening our fertility. Intelligence and Survival, 1997, Plume.Search in Google Scholar

2. Begum A, Gautam SK. Dechlorination of endocrine disrupting chemicals using Mg0/ZnCl2 bimetallic system. Water Res 2011;45:2383–91.10.1016/j.watres.2011.01.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Pesticide Action Network North America. Speaking the truth saves lives in the Philippines and India, PAN Magazine, Fall 2006.Search in Google Scholar

4. Agency of Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Endosulfan, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

5. Banasiak L, Van der Bruggen B, Schäfer AI. Sorption of pesticide Endosulfan by electrodialysis membranes. Chem Eng J 2011;166:233–9.10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.066Search in Google Scholar

6. Mühiberger B, Lemke G. Endosulfan and metabolites, 1–octanol/water partition coefficient 1–octonal/water partition coefficient (HPLC method). Bayer CropScinece GmbH, Product Technology–Analytics Frankfurt, D–65926, Germany, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lide DR. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kwon JH, Liljestrand HM, Katz LE. Partitioning of moderately hydrophobic endocrine disrupters between water and synthetic membrane vesicles. Environ Toxicol Chem 2006;25:1984–92.10.1897/05-550R.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Romeo F, Quijano MD. Endosulfan Poisoning in Kasargod, Kerala, India, Report of a \Fact Finding Mission, Manila, Philippines, Unpublished Report, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

10. Chowdhari DK, Nazir A, Saxena DK. Effect of Three Chlorinated Pesticides on hsromega stress gene in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2001;15:173–86.10.1002/jbt.15Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Sudhakar Y, Dikshit AK. Removal mechanism of Endosulfan sorption onto wood Charcoal. Int J Environ Pollut 2001;15:528–42.10.1504/IJEP.2001.004921Search in Google Scholar

12. Rogers RD, Seddon KR. Ionic liquids as green solvents: progress and prospects, ACS, Edited in 2003.10.1021/bk-2003-0856Search in Google Scholar

13. Guillermo Q, Annabelle C, Abdeltif A, Guillaume D, Catherine C, Pierre LC, et al. Toxicity and biodegradability of ionic liquids: New perspectives towards whole–cell biotechnological applications. Chem Eng J 2011;174:27–32.10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.055Search in Google Scholar

14. Klamt A. Conductor like screening model for real solvents: a new approach to the quantitative calculation of solvation phenomena. J Phys Chem A 1995;99:2224–35.10.1021/j100007a062Search in Google Scholar

15. Preiss U, Jungnickel C, Thöming J, Krossing I, Łuczak J, Diedenhofen M, Klamt A. Predicting the critical micelle concentrations of aqueous solutions of ionic liquids and other ionic surfactants. Chem–A Eur J 2009;15:8880–5.10.1002/chem.200900024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Philipp E, Bulut S, Köchner T, Friedrich C, Schubert T, Krossing I. In silico predictions of the temperature–dependent viscosities and electrical conductivities of functionalized and nonfunctionalized ionic liquids. J Phys Chem B 2011;115:300–9.10.1021/jp108059xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Palomar J, Ferro VR, José ST, Rodrígue F. Density and molar volume predictions using COSMO–RS for ionic liquids: an approach to solvent design. Ind Eng Chem Res 2007;46:6041–8.10.1021/ie070445xSearch in Google Scholar

18. Banerjee T, Verma KK, Khanna A. Liquid–liquid equilibrium for ionic liquid systems using COSMO–RS: Effect of cation and anion dissociation. AIChE J 2008;54:1874–85.10.1002/aic.11495Search in Google Scholar

19. Klamt A. COSMO–RS: from quantum chemistry to fluid phase thermodynamics and drug design, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 246, 2005. ISBN: 0444519947.Search in Google Scholar

20. Klamt A, Schuüürmann G. COSMO: a new approach to dielectric screening in solvents with explicit expressions for the screening energy and its gradient. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1993;1, II:799–805.10.1039/P29930000799Search in Google Scholar

21. Lin S, Sandler SI. A priori phase equilibrium prediction from a segment contribution solvation model. Ind Eng Chem Res 2002;41:899–913.10.1021/ie001047wSearch in Google Scholar

22. Schaftenaar G, Noordik JH. Molden: a pre–and post–processing program for molecular and electronic structures. J Comp Aid Mol Des 2000;14:123–34.10.1023/A:1008193805436Search in Google Scholar

23. Fock VZ. Näherungsmethode zur Lösung des quantenmechanischen Mehrkörper problems. Physik 1930;61:126.10.1007/BF01340294Search in Google Scholar

24. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, et al. Gaussian 03, revision C.02. Pittsburgh, PA: Gaussian, Inc, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

25. Schaefer A, Huber C, Ahlrichs R. Fully optimized contracted gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr. J Chem Phys 1994;100:5829–35.10.1063/1.467146Search in Google Scholar

26. Sosa C, Andzelm J, Elkin BC, Wimmer E, Dobbs KD, Dixon DA. A local density functional study of the structure and vibrational frequencies of molecular transition–metal compounds. J Phys Chem 1992;96:6630–6.10.1021/j100195a022Search in Google Scholar

27. Kumar AAP, Banerjee T. Thiophene separation with ionic liquids for desulphurization: a quantum chemical approach. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2009;278:1–8.10.1016/j.fluid.2008.11.019Search in Google Scholar

28. Domanska U, Krolikowski M, Slesinska K. Phase equilibria study of the binary systems (ionic liquid+thiophene): Desulphurization process. J Chem Thermodynamics, 2009;41:1303–11.10.1016/j.jct.2009.06.003Search in Google Scholar

29. Gerber RP, Rafael de PS. Prediction of infinite–dilution activity coefficients using UNIFAC and COSMO–SAC variants. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010;49:7488–96.10.1021/ie901947mSearch in Google Scholar

30. Putnam R, Taylor R, Klamt A, Eckert F, Schiller M. Prediction of infinite dilution activity coefficients using COSMO–RS. Ind Eng Chem Res 2003;42:3635–41.10.1021/ie020974vSearch in Google Scholar

31. Jaime–Leal JE, Bonilla–Petriciolet A. Correlation of activity coefficients in aqueous solutions of ammonium salts using local composition models and stochastic optimization methods. Chem Product aProcess Model 2008;3:1934–2659.10.2202/1934-2659.1237Search in Google Scholar

32. Pinter B, Fievez T, Matthias FB, Geerlings P, De Proft F. On the origin of the steric effect. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2012;14:9846–54.10.1039/c2cp41090gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Fan J, Fan Y, Pei Y, Wu K, Wang J, Fan M. Solvent extraction of selected endocrine disrupting phenols using ionic liquids. Sep Purif Technol 2008;61:324–31.10.1016/j.seppur.2007.11.005Search in Google Scholar

34. Blanchard LA, Hancu D, Beckman EJ, Brennecke JF. Green processing using ionic liquids and CO2. Nature 1999;399:28–9.10.1038/19887Search in Google Scholar

35. Luisa P, Nevesb LA, Afonsoc CAM, Coelhosob IM, Crespob JG, Gareaa A, Irabien A. Facilitated transport of CO2 and SO2 through supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs). Desalination 2009;245:485–93.10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.012Search in Google Scholar

36. Shiflett MB, Yokozeki A. Separation of CO2 and H2S using room–temperature ionic liquid [bmim][PF6]. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2010;294:105–13.10.1016/j.fluid.2010.01.013Search in Google Scholar

37. Ramalingam A, Banerjee T. Prediction and validation of carbon dioxide gas solubility in ionic liquids at T=298K and atmospheric pressure using quantum chemical approach. Chem Product Process Model 2011;6:1934–2659.10.2202/1934-2659.1576Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-6-8

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2013-0001/pdf
Scroll to top button