Home Sweden’s online nation branding in times of refugee movement: A multimodal analysis of “Portraits of migration”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sweden’s online nation branding in times of refugee movement: A multimodal analysis of “Portraits of migration”

  • Weronika Rucka ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Rozane De Cock
Published/Copyright: March 10, 2023

Abstract

Textual and visual analyses of nation-branding campaigns are rare but highly needed (Bolin and Ståhlberg, 2010; Hao, Paul, Trott, Guo, and Wu, 2019) as online media have become a popular tool for states to shape people’s perception (Volcic and Andrejevic, 2011). In Anholt’s much applied nation brand hexagon (2007), immigration and investment, society, governance, and culture and heritage are, along with tourism and export, the core aspects that build a country’s reputation. As the 2015 refugee peak situation resulted in a more restrictive approach of the Swedish government towards asylum applicants, the country’s brand was put under pressure. How could Sweden’s values related to openness be highlighted while policymakers chose a deterrent road? In this study, we bridge streams of research on nation branding, framing, and migration studies by presenting a multimodal analysis of the “Portraits of migration” campaign as a strategic response to the refugee situation.

References

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso Books.Search in Google Scholar

Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230627727Search in Google Scholar

Anholt, S. (2010). Places: identity, image and reputation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Aronczyk, M. (2008). “Living the brand”: Nationality, globality and the identity strategies of nation branding consultants. International Journal of Communication, 2, 41–65. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/218Search in Google Scholar

Bell, P. (2001). Content analysis of visual images. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 10–34). London, UK: Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/978085702006210.4135/9780857020062Search in Google Scholar

Bengtsson, S. (2011). Virtual nation branding: The Swedish embassy in Second Life. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 4(2), 1–26. https://jvwr-ojs-utexas.tdl.org/jvwr/index.php/jvwr/article/view/211110.4101/jvwr.v4i2.2111Search in Google Scholar

Berbers, A., Joris, W., Boesman, J., d’Haenens, L., Koeman, J., & Van Gorp, B. (2016). The news framing of the ‘Syria fighters’ in Flanders and the Netherlands: Victims or terrorists. Ethnicities, 16(6), 798–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879681560375310.1177/1468796815603753Search in Google Scholar

Berry, M., Garcia-Blanco, I., & Moore, K. (2015). Press coverage of the refugee and migrant crisis in the EU: A content analysis of five European countries. Geneva: United Nations High Commission for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/protection/operations/56bb369c9/press-coverage-refugee-migrant-crisis-eu-content-analysis-five-european.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchinson, E., & Nicholson, X. (2013). The visual dehumanisation of refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2013.84076910.1080/10361146.2013.840769Search in Google Scholar

Bolin, G., & Miazhevich, G. (2018). The soft power of commercialised nationalist symbols: Using media analysis to understand nation branding campaigns. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754941775115310.1177/1367549417751153Search in Google Scholar

Bolin, G., & Ståhlberg, P. (2010). Between community and commodity. Nationalism and nation branding. In A. Roosvall & I. Salovaara-Moring (Eds.), Communicating the nation: National topographies of global media landscapes (pp. 79–101). Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.Search in Google Scholar

Buhmann, A., & Ingenhoff, D. (2014). The 4D Model of the country image: An integrative approach from the perspective of communication management. International Communication Gazette, 77(1), 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/174804851455698610.1177/1748048514556986Search in Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, L., & Stolic, T. (2017). Rethinking media responsibility in the refugee ‘crisis’: A visual typology of European news. Media, Culture & Society, 39(8), 1162–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371772616310.1177/0163443717726163Search in Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, L., & Stolić, T. (2019). Photojournalism as political encounter: Western news photography in the 2015 migration ‘crisis’. Visual Communication, 18(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035721984638110.1177/1470357219846381Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, C. (2013). @Sweden: Curating a nation on Twitter. Popular Communication, 11, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2013.75185510.1080/15405702.2013.751855Search in Google Scholar

Daalmans, S., Schaap, G., & Rovers, M. (2020). Loved and feared in fortress Europe: Framing the European refugee crisis. Communications, 45(2), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-206310.1515/commun-2019-2063Search in Google Scholar

De Cock, R., Mertens, S., Sundin, E., Lams, L., Mistiaen, V., Joris, W., & d’Haenens, L. (2018). Refugees in the news: Comparing Belgian and Swedish newspaper coverage of the European refugee situation during summer 2015. Communications, 43(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-001210.1515/commun-2018-0012Search in Google Scholar

De Cock, R., Sundin, E., & Mistiaen, V. (2019). The refugee situation as portrayed in news media: A content analysis of Belgian and Swedish newspapers – 2015–2017. In L. d’Haenens, W. Joris, & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Images of immigrants and refugees in Western Europe: Media representations, public opinion and refugees’ experiences (pp. 39–55). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Coninck, D., Vandenberghe, H., & Matthijs, K. (2019). Discordance between public opinion and news media representations of immigrants and refugees in Belgium and Sweden. In L. d’Haenens, W. Joris, & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Images of immigrants and refugees in Western Europe: Media representations, public opinion and refugees’ experiences (pp. 123–140). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.Search in Google Scholar

d’Haenens, L., & Joris, W. (2019). Images of immigrants and refugees in Western Europe: Media representations, public opinion, and refugees’ experiences. In L. d’Haenens, W. Joris, & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Images of immigrants and refugees in Western Europe: Media representations, public opinion, and refugees’ experiences (pp. 7–18). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.10.11116/9789461662811Search in Google Scholar

Dolea, A., Ingenhoff, D., & Beju, A. (2020). Country images and identities in times of populism: Swiss media discourses on the ‘stop mass immigration’ initiative. International Communication Gazette, 83(4), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/174804852091346210.1177/1748048520913462Search in Google Scholar

Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.xSearch in Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2016, March 4). Asylum in the EU Member States: Record number of over 1.2 million first time asylum seekers registered in 2015. Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7203832/3-04032016-AP-EN.pdf/790eba01-381c-4163-bcd2-a54959b99ed6Search in Google Scholar

Fawzy, R. M. (2019). Aestheticizing suffering: Evaluative stance in pulitzer-winning photos of refugees’ crisis in Europe. Discourse, Context & Media, 28, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.10.00110.1016/j.dcm.2018.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Fotopoulos, S., & Kaimaklioti, M. (2016). Media discourses on the refugee crisis: On what have the Greek, German and British press focused? European View, 15(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0407-510.1007/s12290-016-0407-5Search in Google Scholar

Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2017). Refugee policy as ‘negative nation branding’: The case of Denmark and the Nordics. Danish Foreign Policy Review, 2017, 99–125. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.390258910.2139/ssrn.3902589Search in Google Scholar

Hao, A., Paul, J., Trott, S., Guo, C., & Wu, H.-H. (2019). Two decades of research on nation branding: A review and future research agenda. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2019-002810.1108/IMR-01-2019-0028Search in Google Scholar

Hovden, J. F., Mjelde, H., & Gripsrud, J. (2018). The Syrian refugee crisis in Scandinavian newspapers. Communications, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-001310.1515/commun-2018-0013Search in Google Scholar

Kaneva, N. (2011). Nation branding: Toward an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 117–141. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/704Search in Google Scholar

Kaneva, N. (2017). The branded national imagination and its limits: Insights from the post-socialist experience. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 39(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v39i1.32510.35293/srsa.v39i1.325Search in Google Scholar

Kaneva, N. (2018). Simulation nations: Nation brands and Baudrillard’s theory of media. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/136754941775114910.1177/1367549417751149Search in Google Scholar

Kaneva, N., & Popescu, D. (2011). National identity lite: Nation branding in post-Communist Romania and Bulgaria. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787791038218110.1177/1367877910382181Search in Google Scholar

Lobinger, K., & Brantner, C. (2015). Likable, funny or ridiculous? A Q-sort study on audience perceptions of visual portrayals of politicians. Visual Communication, 14(1), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035721455488810.1177/1470357214554888Search in Google Scholar

Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.xSearch in Google Scholar

Migrationsverket. (2019). Asylum. Retrieved July 31, 2019, from Asylum: https://www.migrationsverket.se/English/About-the-Migration-Agency/Statistics/Asylum.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Olins, W. (2002). Branding the nation – the historical context. Brand Management, 9, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.254007510.1057/palgrave.bm.2540075Search in Google Scholar

Pamment, J. (2011). Innovations in public diplomacy and nation brands: Inside the House of Sweden. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 7, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2011.310.1057/pb.2011.3Search in Google Scholar

Pamment, J., Olofsson, A., & Hjorth-Jenssen, R. (2017). The response of Swedish and Norwegian public diplomacy and nation branding actors to the refugee crisis. Journal of Communication Management, 21(4), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-03-2017-004010.1108/JCOM-03-2017-0040Search in Google Scholar

Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339–370. http://www.jstor.org/stable/307876710.1086/341396Search in Google Scholar

Sharing Sweden. (2015). Strategy for the promotion of Sweden abroad. Sharing Sweden. https://sharingsweden.se/app/uploads/2015/06/Sverigefoldern-engelska-i-A5-format.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Sharing Sweden. (2017). 2.0. Strategy for the promotion of Sweden abroad. Sharing Sweden. https://sharingsweden.se/app/uploads/2017/09/strategy-for-the-promotion-of-sweden-abroad-2.0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Silvanto, S., Ryan, J., & McNulty, Y. (2015). An empirical study of nation branding for attracting internationally mobile skilled professionals. Career Development International, 20(3), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2014-010510.1108/CDI-08-2014-0105Search in Google Scholar

Skodo, A. (2018, December 6). Sweden: By turns welcoming and restrictive in its immigration policy. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/sweden-turns-welcoming-and-restrictive-its-immigration-policySearch in Google Scholar

Strömbäck, J., Andersson, F., & Nedlund, E. (2017). Invandring i medierna – Hur rapporterade svenska tidningar åren 2010–2015 [Immigration in the media – How did Swedish newspapers report during the years 2010–2015]? Delmi. http://delmi.se/upl/files/140688.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Szczepanik, M. (2016). The ‘good’ and ‘bad’ refugees? Imagined refugeehood(s) in the media coverage of the migration crisis. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 10(2), 23–33. http://www.e-migration.ro/jims/Vol10_No2_2016/JIMS_Vol10_No2_2016_pp23_33_SZCZEPANIK.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

The Place Brand Observer. (2016, August 18). Jose Filipe Torres on the Branding and Digital Reputation of Countries, Regions and Cities. The Place Brand Observer. https://placebrandobserver.com/interview-jose-filipe-torres/Search in Google Scholar

Thorburn Stern, R. (2016). Responses to the “refugee crisis”: What is the role of self-image among EU countries? Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2016(10), 1–16. https://www.sieps.se/en/publications/2016/responses-to-the-refugee-crisis-what-is-the-role-of-self-image-among-eu-countries-201610epa/Search in Google Scholar

Van Gorp. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/026732310505825310.1177/0267323105058253Search in Google Scholar

Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57 (1), 60–78.10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.xSearch in Google Scholar

Volcic, Z. (2008). Former Yugoslavia on the World Wide Web: Commercialization and branding of nation-states. The International Communication Gazette, 70(5), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/174804850809429210.1177/1748048508094292Search in Google Scholar

Volcic, Z., & Andrejevic, M. (2011). Nation branding in the era of commercial nationalism. International Journal of Communication, 5(1), 598–618. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/849/544Search in Google Scholar

Wilmott, A. C. (2017). The politics of photography: Visual depictions of Syrian refugees in U.K. online media. Visual Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2017.130711310.1080/15551393.2017.1307113Search in Google Scholar

Appendix

Frame matrix (based on textual and visual analysis)

Reasoning devices

Framing devices

Frame

Definition of the problem/situation

Cause

Consequences

Possible solution

Moral values

Catchphrases, lexical choices, visual representation

Refugees as passive actors

Refugees have had to leave their country of origin and not chosen actively to move to Sweden.

Situation in refugees’ country of origin: war, persecution

Refugees are passive and unhappy as they had to leave their homes and now need to wait for an asylum permit.

Not mentioned

Loneliness Anger

Frustration

“have to flee”

“had to leave”

“forced to flee”

“We didn’t choose to come here. (…) We ended up here”

“now we wait”

Photos presenting subjects sitting, lying, sleeping, no direct eye-contact with the camera

Refugees as active and future-oriented actors

Refugees choose to act in their new country: Sweden.

Escaping from war, persecution, and coming to Sweden is perceived as a new chance.

Refugees can benefit from their new life and be happy in Sweden.

Not perceived as a problem, so no solution needed

Enthusiasm Happiness

Feeling of agency

“a new beginning”

“I got this life and this chance”

“Life is too short (…). I want to experience every moment of it. (…) I want to learn things, meet people. My philosophy is that you only live once.”

“Life will be good”

“Refugee team playing in the cup. It was one of the best days of my life”

“We opened our restaurant”

“We founded Refugees Welcome Stockholm”

Photos presenting dynamic subjects being in a motion: throwing or kicking a ball while doing sport; subjects laughing, smiling, positive face expression

Refugees as talented and passionate individuals

Refugees are people having their interests and talents. They can follow them in Sweden.

Because of war, persecution refugees are not able to focus on their passions and career in countries of origin.

Coming to Sweden and pursuing career there

Coming to Sweden

Talent

Passion

Progress

Success

Authenticity

“I was a famous conductor in my home country”

“I was a champion in Syria. Me and my teammates won a lot”

“Everyone has a passion. Mine is water polo”

Photos presenting individual subjects focused on playing water polo, football, piano, weaving

Refugees as caring and loving individuals

Refugees are humans who feel love, care about their beloved ones.

Human nature

Refugees are portrayed as people like any others who have feelings, families.

Not perceived as a problem so no solution needed

Love

Feeling of community

Care

Authenticity

“(…) his honesty enticed me. (…) We fell in love”

“I love the people I’m surrounded by”

“there are some people who mean a lot to me, like the family that took me in”

Images presenting small groups of subjects, gestures of intimacy: kissing, hugging, smiling, laughing

Sweden as a safe country

Refugees flee from their country of origin to live safely with their beloved ones in Sweden.

Situation in refugees’ country of origin: war, persecution

Refugees have to flee to be able to live with their beloved ones; they can do so in Sweden.

Fleeing to Sweden

Security

Peace

Care

Love

Feeling of community

“secure”

“But now, we all wake up under the same roof”

“Now we want to live in a house together (…)”

“It takes time to feel at home. But now we do”

“(…) Sweden is bound by the European Convention, which guarantees everyone the right to family life.”

Sweden as an open country

Sweden as an open country where people can be free and whoever they want

Openness as a Swedish value

Refugees can live in Sweden freely and happily.

Not perceived as a problem so no solution needed

Freedom

Authenticity Integrity

“People here are mostly open-minded (…). You can be whoever you want to be, do whatever you want (…).”

“(…) it’s very diverse, something (…) that can give me new perspectives”

Sweden as a strict country

Sweden as a strict country regarding asylum policy

Unprecedented number of asylum seekers coming to Sweden

(“state of emergency”)

Newcomers need to wait for asylum permit which causes their frustration.

Limiting number of given asylum permits;

Waiting for asylum permit by newcomers

Strictness

Impassiveness

Adamancy

Lack of solidarity

Frustration

“struggled to get [a personal identification number]”

“the Migration Agency, the agency that decides if you’ll get shelter or get kicked out of Sweden”

“Sweden has made the refugee rules stricter in the past year. Now we are among the strictest in Europe when it comes to denying families the right to be reunited.”

“(…) the police came. They thought I was undocumented”

Negative image / bad memories of refugees’ country of origin

Bad situation in their country of origin caused that refugees had to leave their homeland.

War

Dictatorship

Persecution

Fleeing from country of origin;

Leaving families and friends

Fleeing to Sweden

Fear

Loneliness

“the war came”

“we fled a dictatorship”

“(…) the asphalt had been bombed to pieces. Then came the alarm.”

“A grenade fell (…).”

Published Online: 2023-03-10
Published in Print: 2024-03-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2021-0130/html
Scroll to top button