Abstract
Disease-related challenges are often associated with perceived uncertainties in individuals, triggering attempts to cope with the situation. Our study aims to understand patients’ coping strategies regarding health information-seeking behaviors (HISBs). It is guided by the Uncertainty Management Theory, and seeks to grant insights into multi-channel HISB by describing how uses of interpersonal and media channels interact to cope with uncertainties, and how trust influences the process of multi-channel HISB. Patients diagnosed with osteoarthrosis (N = 34) participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews, from which five patterns of multi-channel HISB, ranging from a focus on the physician to a focus on the internet, were identified. These patterns are distinguished by underlying functions of trust – including trust serving as an additional coping strategy, and as an important influencing factor for perceiving information as meaningful – and by whether information needs remain and patients turn to multiple sources. These findings form the basis for further theory development considering the iterative nature of HISB and the role of trust.
Acknowledgement
Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – SFB/TRR-298-SIIRI – Project-ID 426335750
References
Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14(2), 167–190. doi:10.1093/ct/14.2.16710.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.xSearch in Google Scholar
Anker, A. E., Reinhart, A. M., & Feeley, T. H. (2011). Health information seeking: A review of measures and methods. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(3), 346–354. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.00810.1016/j.pec.2010.12.008Search in Google Scholar
Asan, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Choudhury, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and human trust in healthcare: Focus on clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e15154. doi:10.2196/1515410.2196/15154Search in Google Scholar
Asan, O., Yu, Z., & Crotty, B. H. (2021). How clinician-patient communication affects trust in health information sources: Temporal trends from a national cross-sectional survey. PLoS One, 16(2), e0247583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.024758310.1371/journal.pone.0247583Search in Google Scholar
Babrow, A. S., & Kline, K. N. (2000). From ‘reducing’ to ‘coping’ with uncertainty: Reconceptualizing the central challenge in breast self-exams. Social Science & Medicine, 51(12), 1805–1816. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00112-x10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00112-XSearch in Google Scholar
Barbour, J. B., Rintamaki, L. S., Ramsey, J. A., & Brashers, D. E. (2012). Avoiding health information. Journal of Health Communication, 17(2), 212–229. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.58569110.1080/10810730.2011.585691Search in Google Scholar
Baumann, E., Czerwinski, F., Rosset, M., Seelig, M., & Suhr, R. (2020). Wie informieren sich die Menschen in Deutschland zum Thema Gesundheit? Erkenntnisse aus der ersten Welle von HINTS Germany [How do people in Germany seek health information? Insights from the first wave of HINTS Germany]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung –Gesundheitsschutz, 63, 1151–1160. doi:10.1007/s00103-020-03192-x10.1007/s00103-020-03192-xSearch in Google Scholar
Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191. doi:10.1177/016555150809578110.1177/0165551508095781Search in Google Scholar
Blöbaum, B. (2016). Key factors in the process of trust. On the analysis of trust under digital conditions. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Progress in IS. Trust and communication in a digitized world (pp. 3–25). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_110.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_1Search in Google Scholar
Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 477–497. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.xSearch in Google Scholar
Brashers, D. E., & Hogan, T. P. (2013). The appraisal and management of uncertainty: Implications for information-retrieval systems. Information Processing & Management, 49(6), 1241–1249. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2013.06.00210.1016/j.ipm.2013.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Brossard, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2006). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 24–52. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl00310.1093/ijpor/edl003Search in Google Scholar
Carcioppolo, N., Yang, F., & Yang, Q. (2016). Reducing, maintaining, or escalating uncertainty? The development and validation of four uncertainty preference scales related to cancer information seeking and avoidance. Journal of Health Communication, 21(9), 979–988. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.118435710.1080/10810730.2016.1184357Search in Google Scholar
Cornejo Müller, A., Wachtler, B., & Lampert, T. (2020). Digital Divide – Soziale Unterschiede in der Nutzung digitaler Gesundheitsangebote [Digital divide: Social inequalities in the utilisation of digital healthcare]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 63(2), 185–191. doi:10.1007/s00103-019-03081-y10.1007/s00103-019-03081-ySearch in Google Scholar
Cummings, L. (2014). The trust’ heuristic: Arguments from authority in public health. Health Communication, 29(10), 1043–1056. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.83168510.1080/10410236.2013.831685Search in Google Scholar
Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. T. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport, CT: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Engdahl, E., & Lidskog, R. (2012). Risk, communication and trust: Towards an emotional understanding of trust. Public Understanding of Science, 23(6), 703–717. doi:10.1177/096366251246095310.1177/0963662512460953Search in Google Scholar
Fareed, N., Swoboda, C. M., Jonnalagadda, P., Walker, D. M., & Huerta, T. R. (2021). Differences between races in health information seeking and trust over time: Evidence from a cross-sectional, pooled analyses of HINTS Data. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(1), 84–92. doi:10.1177/089011712093460910.1177/0890117120934609Search in Google Scholar
Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P. & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1229–1245.10.1080/08870440903194015Search in Google Scholar
Galarce, E. M., Ramanadhan, S., & Viswanath, K. (2011). Health information seeking. In T. L. Thompson, R. Parrott, & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Goold, S. D. (2001). Trust and the ethics of health care institutions. Hastings Center Report, 31(6), 26–33.10.2307/3527779Search in Google Scholar
Goudge, J., & Gilson, L. (2005). How can trust be investigated? Drawing lessons from past experience. Social Science & Medicine, 61(7), 1439–1451. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.07110.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.071Search in Google Scholar
Hall, A. K., Bernhard, J. M., Dodd, V., & Vollrath, M. W. (2015). The digital health divide: Evaluating online health information access and use among older adults. Health Education & Behavior, 42(2), 202–209. doi:10.1177/109019811454781510.1177/1090198114547815Search in Google Scholar
Hall, M. A., Dugan, E., Zheng, B., & Mishra, A. K. (2001). Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? The Milbank Quarterly, 79(4), 613–639.10.1111/1468-0009.00223Search in Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. (1959). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1997). Properties of trust: An analytical view. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(1), 67–73. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.267310.1006/obhd.1996.2673Search in Google Scholar
Jia, X., Pang, Y., & Liu, L. S. (2021). Online health information seeking behavior: A systematic review. Healthcare, 9(12). doi:10.3390/healthcare912174010.3390/healthcare9121740Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, J. D., & Meischke, H. (1993). A comprehensive model of cancer-related information seeking applied to magazines. Human Communication Research, 19(3), 343–367. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00305.x10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00305.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kar, B., & Satpathy, S. (2021). Trust between physicians and older patients: Review and qualitative study. Journal of Geriatric Care and Research, 8(1), 56–64.Search in Google Scholar
Kelle, U., & Kluge, S. (2010). Vom Einzelfall zum Typus: Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung (2nd ed.) [From individual case to type: Comparing and contrasting cases in qualitative social research]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.10.1007/978-3-531-92366-6Search in Google Scholar
Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315771359Search in Google Scholar
Kuang, K. (2018). Reconceptualizing uncertainty in illness: Commonalities, variations, and the multidimensional nature of uncertainty. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(3), 181–206. doi:10.1080/23808985.2018.149235410.1080/23808985.2018.1492354Search in Google Scholar
Kuang, K., & Wilson, S. R. (2017). A meta-analysis of uncertainty and information management in illness contexts. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 378–401. doi:10.1111/jcom.1229910.1111/jcom.12299Search in Google Scholar
Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2007). Health information seeking behavior. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1006–1019. doi:10.1177/104973230730519910.1177/1049732307305199Search in Google Scholar
Lee, C.-J., & Hornik, R. C. (2009). Physician trust moderates the internet use and physician visit relationship. Journal of Health Communication, 14(1), 70–76. doi:10.1080/1081073080259226210.1080/10810730802592262Search in Google Scholar
Lee, S. T., Dutta, M. J., Lin, J., Luk, P., & Kaur-Gill, S. (2018). Trust ecologies and channel complementarity for information seeking in cancer prevention. Journal of Health Communication, 23(3), 254–263. doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.143325310.1080/10810730.2018.1433253Search in Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., & Hawkins, R. (2010). Why do patients seek an alternative channel? The effects of unmet needs on patients’ health-related internet use. Journal of Health Communication, 15(2), 152–166. doi:10.1080/10810730903528033.10.1080/10810730903528033Search in Google Scholar
Link, E., & Baumann, E. (2021). Efficacy assessments as predictors of uncertainty preferences: Findings of a cross-sectional German study. European Journal of Health Psychology. doi:10.1027/2512-8442/a00009210.1027/2512-8442/a000092Search in Google Scholar
Link, E., Baumann, E., Linn, A., Fahr, A., Schulz, P., & Abuzahra, M. E. (2021). Influencing factors of online health information seeking in selected European countries. European Journal of Health Communication, 2(1), 29–55. doi:10.47368/ejhc.2021.00210.47368/ejhc.2021.002Search in Google Scholar
Lu, X., Zhang, R., Wu, W., Shang, X., & Liu, M. (2018). Relationship between internet health information and patient compliance based on trust: Empirical study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(8), e253. doi:10.2196/jmir.936410.2196/jmir.9364Search in Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1989). Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (3rd ed.) [Trust: A mechanism to reduce social complexity]. Stuttgart: Enke.Search in Google Scholar
Maslen, S., & Lupton, D. (2020). Enacting chronic illness with and through digital media: A feminist new materialist approach. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1640–1654. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.160266510.1080/1369118X.2019.1602665Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335Search in Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (11th ed.) [Qualitative content analysis: Basics and techniques]. Weinheim: Beltz.10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42Search in Google Scholar
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.xSearch in Google Scholar
Mishel, M. H. (1988). Uncertainty in illness. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 20, 225–232. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1988.tb00082.x10.1111/j.1547-5069.1988.tb00082.xSearch in Google Scholar
Nan, X., Zhao, X., & Briones, R. (2014). Parental cancer beliefs and trust in health information from medical authorities as predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability. Journal of Health Communication, 19(1), 100–114. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.81131910.1080/10810730.2013.811319Search in Google Scholar
Netemeyer, R. G., Dobolyi, D. G., Abbasi, A., Clifford, G., & Taylor, H. (2020). Health literacy, health numeracy, and trust in doctor: Effects on key patient health outcomes. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54(1), 3–42.10.1111/joca.12267Search in Google Scholar
Oedekoven, M., Herrmann, W. J., Ernsting, C., Schnitzer, S., Kanzler, M., Kuhlmey, A., & Gellert, P. (2019). Patients’ health literacy in relation to the preference for a general practitioner as the source of health information. BMC Family Practice, 20(1), 94. doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0975-y10.1186/s12875-019-0975-ySearch in Google Scholar
Peng, W., Carcioppolo, N., Occa, A., Ali, K., Yang, Q., & Yang, F. (2021). Feel worried, overloaded, or fatalistic? The determinants of cancer uncertainty management preferences. Health Communication, 36(3), 347–360. doi:10.1080/10410236.2019.169248910.1080/10410236.2019.1692489Search in Google Scholar
Rains, S. A., & Ruppel, E. K. (2016). Channel complementarity theory and the health information-seeking process: Further investigating the implications of source characteristic complementarity. Communication Research, 43(2), 232–252. doi:10.1177/009365021351093910.1177/0093650213510939Search in Google Scholar
Rains, S. A., & Tukachinsky, R. (2015). An examination of the relationships among uncertainty, appraisal, and information-seeking behavior proposed in uncertainty management theory. Health Communication, 30(4), 339–349. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.85828510.1080/10410236.2013.858285Search in Google Scholar
Ruppel, E. K. (2016). Scanning health information sources: Applying and extending the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking. Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 208–216. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.105843810.1080/10810730.2015.1058438Search in Google Scholar
Ruppel, E. K., & Rains, S. A. (2012). Information sources and the health information-seeking process: An application and extension of channel complementarity theory. Communication Monographs, 79(3), 385–405. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.69762710.1080/03637751.2012.697627Search in Google Scholar
Salaschek, M., & Bonfadelli, H. (2020). Digitale Gesundheitskommunikation: Kontext und Einflussfaktoren [Digital health communication: Context and factors of influence]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 63(2), 160–165. doi:10.1007/s00103-019-03086-710.1007/s00103-019-03086-7Search in Google Scholar
Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.xSearch in Google Scholar
Somera, L. P., Lee, H.-R., Badowski, G., & Cassel, K. (2016). Health information seeking, source trust, and culture: A comparative analysis of health information trends and needs between Guam and the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 21(4), 469–478. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.109582210.1080/10810730.2015.1095822Search in Google Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. doi:10.1177/009365020325337110.1177/0093650203253371Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, A., Hamilton, K., White, K., & Hyde, M. (2015). Use of health information to manage children’s health care: A prospective study investigating parental decisions. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 131. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0793-410.1186/s12913-015-0793-4Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Shi, J., & Kong, H. (2021). Online health information seeking: A review and meta-analysis. Health Communication, 36(10), 1163–1175. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.174882910.1080/10410236.2020.1748829Search in Google Scholar
Yang, Q., Chen, Y., & Wendorf Muhamad, J. (2017). Social support, trust in health information, and health information-seeking behaviors (HISBs): A study using the 2012 Annenberg National Health Communication Survey (ANHCS). Health Communication, 32(9), 1142–1150. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.121422010.1080/10410236.2016.1214220Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Zhang, R., Lu, X., & Zhu, X. (2020). Impact of personal trust tendency on patient compliance based on Internet Health Information Seeking. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 26(3), 294–303. doi:10.1089/tmj.2018.029610.1089/tmj.2018.0296Search in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. S., & Shaw, G. (2020). Health information seeking behaviour: A concept analysis. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 37(3), 173–191. doi:10.1111/hir.1228710.1111/hir.12287Search in Google Scholar
Appendix
List of main domains and examples of questions covered in the interviews.
Experienced uncertainty during the course of the disease, e. g.: |
– ‘Please think back to when you first noticed symptoms of your disease. What have you experienced since then?’ – ‘When did you decide to have surgery? Why? What encouraged or prevented you from taking action?’ – ‘How did you feel during the course of your disease?’ – ‘For example, how did you feel, and what questions did you ask yourself, – … when the first symptoms occurred? – … when you received the recommendation to have surgery? – … when you had to decide to have surgery?’ – ‘In which situations do you feel uncertain? Why? How do you handle moments in which you feel uncertain?’ – ‘In comparison: When did you feel safe and were certain about what to do now?’ |
Information seeking – processes and dynamics, e. g.: ‘How did you inform yourself about your disease, the implant, or the surgery since you noticed first symptoms/for the discussion about the implant and surgery/for your decision-making/after surgery?’ |
– ‘At what moments did you feel the need for more information?’ – ‘About which topics did you want to know more? Was there anything you didn’t want to know more about?’ – ‘From whom or where did you get helpful information and answers to your questions?’ |
Focusing on various information sources such as physicians, media health information, family and friends, other physicians, e. g.: |
– ‘How would you describe the relationship between you and your physician? Why did you or did you not trust your physician?’ – ‘How would you describe your interactions with the doctor? How would you describe a typical appointment during treatment?’ – ‘How did the doctor explain the disease, the surgery, and the implant to you?’ – ‘Why were you satisfied or perhaps dissatisfied with the information provided by your physician?’ Media health information, e. g.: – ‘How important was information from the media for this disease?’ – ‘Where did you find particularly valuable information or which media were superfluous for you? Why?’ – ‘For what reasons did you use information from newspapers/magazines/internet/forums? Do these have other functions than, for example, the physician?’ – ‘What role did the media or specific information from the media play in the surgery decision?’ – ‘In your view, was the information from the media trustworthy? Why?’ |
Interaction between various sources for health information, e. g.: – ‘Looking back, I would be interested to know whom (people or sources) you trusted? And why?’ – ‘If you compare the different information sources and persons (such as family, physicians, but also media sources): How do you rate their trustworthiness? On whom did you rely, and how much, to make your decision?’ – ‘If you received different information on certain issues, how did you evaluate it and deal with these contradictions?’ |
Overview of the deductive coding scheme.
Health information-seeking behavior |
Understanding of trust and its functions |
Interaction between information sources |
Specific for certain sources (physicians, media sources, family, and friends): – Triggers – Perceived uncertainty – Topics/information needed – Topics/information searched for – Functions/utility/outcomes – Trustworthiness (including its reasons) |
– Definition and dimensions – Functions – Influencing factors |
– Combination of sources – Reasons to use more than one source, to combine specific sources – Triggers to use more than one source, to combine specific sources – Outcomes of combining specific sources |
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Editorial 2024
- Articles
- The role of different “media diets” on the perception of immigration: Evidence from nine European countries
- “You just have to join in” – A mixed-methods study on children’s media consumption worlds and parental mediation
- An online world of bias. The mediating role of cognitive biases on extremist attitudes
- Understanding the importance of trust in patients’ coping with uncertainty via health information-seeking behaviors
- Women politicians in Austria: Still not breaking the media ceiling
- Sweden’s online nation branding in times of refugee movement: A multimodal analysis of “Portraits of migration”
- Clearing the air: A systematic review of mass media campaigns to increase indoor radon testing and remediation
- Book Reviews
- Maarek, P. J. (ed.) (2022). Manufacturing government communication on Covid-19: A comparative perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 395 pp.
- Friesem, Y., Raman, U., Kanižaj, I., & Choi, Grace Y. (ed.) (2022). The Routledge handbook of media education futures post-pandemic. London: Routledge. 558 pp.
- Kopecka-Piech, K., & Bolin, G. (Eds.) (2023). Contemporary challenges in mediatisation research. London: Routledge. 200 pp.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Editorial 2024
- Articles
- The role of different “media diets” on the perception of immigration: Evidence from nine European countries
- “You just have to join in” – A mixed-methods study on children’s media consumption worlds and parental mediation
- An online world of bias. The mediating role of cognitive biases on extremist attitudes
- Understanding the importance of trust in patients’ coping with uncertainty via health information-seeking behaviors
- Women politicians in Austria: Still not breaking the media ceiling
- Sweden’s online nation branding in times of refugee movement: A multimodal analysis of “Portraits of migration”
- Clearing the air: A systematic review of mass media campaigns to increase indoor radon testing and remediation
- Book Reviews
- Maarek, P. J. (ed.) (2022). Manufacturing government communication on Covid-19: A comparative perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 395 pp.
- Friesem, Y., Raman, U., Kanižaj, I., & Choi, Grace Y. (ed.) (2022). The Routledge handbook of media education futures post-pandemic. London: Routledge. 558 pp.
- Kopecka-Piech, K., & Bolin, G. (Eds.) (2023). Contemporary challenges in mediatisation research. London: Routledge. 200 pp.