The role of sex and gender in search behavior for political information on the internet
-
Sabrina Heike Kessler
und
Klara Langmann
Abstract
Previous studies have emphasized a person’s biological sex as a factor which influences online search behavior. This study aims to investigate how people (N = 44 students) search online for political information (N = 220 search tasks) and if gendered online search exists. We examined online search behavior via eye tracking while the participants searched for information about political party positions on the Internet. A content analysis of the eye tracking data followed and was evaluated with a special focus on the role of biological sex and social gender, and the relationship of both factors with other variables, such as self-reported prior political knowledge, political interest, and Internet skills (via an online survey). The results accord with previous studies in that the sex influences the online search process. However, this relationship was partially mediated by self-reported political interest and prior knowledge. This outcome calls for a more critical use of the sex variable in reference to political online search behavior, and the inclusion of sex and gender related variables.
References
Al-Maskari, A., & Sanderson, M. (2011). The effect of user characteristics in search effectiveness in information retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 47(5), 719–729.10.1016/j.ipm.2011.03.002Suche in Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01Suche in Google Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.10.1037/h0036215Suche in Google Scholar
Bimber, B., Cunill, M. C., Copeland, L., & Gibson, R. (2015). Digital media and political participation: The moderating role of political interest across acts and over time. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 21–42.10.1177/0894439314526559Suche in Google Scholar
Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Bingley: Emerald.10.1108/S2055-53772016022Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. (2010). Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 379–387.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.009Suche in Google Scholar
D’Haenens, L., Jankowski, N., & Heuvelman, A. (2004). News in online and print newspapers: Differences in reader consumption and recall. New Media & Society, 6(3), 363–382.10.1177/1461444804042520Suche in Google Scholar
Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118.10.1177/0093650211426004Suche in Google Scholar
Dutton, W. H., Reisdorf, B. C., Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2017). Search and politics: The uses and impacts of search in Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and the United States. Quello Center Working Paper, 5, 1–17.10.2139/ssrn.2960697Suche in Google Scholar
Enquiro (2005). Google eye tracking report: How searchers see and click on google search results. Mountain View, CA: Enquiro.Suche in Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1996). A queer encounter: Sociology and the study of sexuality. In S. Seidmann (Eds.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 145–167). Cambridge: Blackwell.10.2307/201864Suche in Google Scholar
Eurobarometer (2017). Standard Eurobarometer 88. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a575c1c9-58b6-11e8-ab41-01aa75ed71a1.Suche in Google Scholar
Groshek, J., & Dimitrova, D. (2011). A cross-section of voter learning, campaign interest and intention to vote in the 2008 American election: Did web 2.0 matter? Estudos em Comunicacão, 9, 355–375.Suche in Google Scholar
Hargittai, E. (2009). An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 130–137.10.1177/0894439308318213Suche in Google Scholar
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality. Differences in young adults’ use of the internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621.10.1177/0093650208321782Suche in Google Scholar
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448.10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.xSuche in Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713.10.1177/0267323113499113Suche in Google Scholar
Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2017). Revisiting the gender gap in political knowledge. Political Behavior, 39(4), 817–838.10.1007/s11109-016-9380-6Suche in Google Scholar
Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017). Gender and political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/978-1-137-60880-2Suche in Google Scholar
Kessler, S. H., & Engelmann, I. (2019). Why do we click? Investigating reasons for user selection on a news aggregator website. Communications, 44(2), 225–247. 10.1515/commun-2018-2003Suche in Google Scholar
Kessler, S. H., & Guenther, L. (2017). Eyes on the frame: Explaining people’s online searching behavior in response to TV consumption. Internet Research, 27(2), 303–320.10.1108/IntR-01-2016-0015Suche in Google Scholar
Kessler, S. H., & Zillich, A. F. (2019). Searching online for information about vaccination: Assessing the influence of user-specific cognitive factors using eye-tracking. Health Communication, 34(10), 1150–1158.10.1080/10410236.2018.1465793Suche in Google Scholar
Klaus, E. (2002). Ein Zimmer mit Ausblick? Perspektiven kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Geschlechterforschung [Perspectives of communication science based gender research]. In E. Klaus, J. Röser, & U. Wischermann (Eds.), Kommunikationswissenschaft und Gender Studies [Communication science and gender studies] (pp. 20–40). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.10.1007/978-3-322-80386-3_2Suche in Google Scholar
Kruikemeier, S., Lecheler, S., & Boyer, M. M. (2018). Learning from news on different media platforms: An eye-tracking experiment. Political Communication, 35(1), 75–96.10.4324/9780429202483-5Suche in Google Scholar
Large, A., Beheshti, J., & Rahman, T. (2002). Gender differences in collaborative web searching behavior: An elementary school study. Information Process & Management, 38(3), 427–443.10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00034-6Suche in Google Scholar
Lizotte, M., & Sidman, A. (2009). Explaining the gender gap in political knowledge. Politics & Gender, 5(2), 127–151.10.1017/S1743923X09000130Suche in Google Scholar
Lorigo, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Granka, L., & Gay, G. (2006). The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Information Processing & Management, 42(4), 1123–1131.10.1016/j.ipm.2005.10.001Suche in Google Scholar
Machill, M., Neuberger, C., Schweiger, W., & Wirth, W. (2004). Navigating the internet: A study of German-language search engines. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 321–347.10.1177/0267323104045258Suche in Google Scholar
Mao, J., Liu, Y., Kando, N., Zhang, M., & Ma, S. (2018). How does domain expertise affect users’ search interaction and outcome in exploratory search? ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 36(4), 1–30.10.1145/3223045Suche in Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E.F. & Munson, J.M. (1992). A revised product involvement inventory: Improved usability and validity. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 108–115.Suche in Google Scholar
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5Suche in Google Scholar
Oost, M. (2012). Knowledge about the European Union and its predictors in twenty-five European Countries. Leiden University. Retrieved February 28, 2020 from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/19747/Thesis%20Mark%20Oost%20120820.pdf?sequence=1.Suche in Google Scholar
Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 801–823.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00351.xSuche in Google Scholar
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2014). An updated and streamlined technology readiness. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74.10.1177/1094670514539730Suche in Google Scholar
Partheymüller, J., & Faas, T. (2015). The impact of online versus offline campaign information on citizens’ knowledge, attitudes and political behaviour: Comparing the German federal elections of 2005 and 2009. German Politics, 24(4), 507–524.10.1080/09644008.2015.1021789Suche in Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2018). Americans still prefer watching to reading the news – and mostly still through television. Retrieved January 2, 2019 from www.journalism.org/2018/12/03/americans-still-prefer-watching-to-reading-the-news-and-mostly-still-through-television/.Suche in Google Scholar
Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2003). Gender differences in patterns of searching the web. Journal of Educational Computational Research, 29(3), 335–348.10.2190/7BR8-VXA0-07A7-8AVNSuche in Google Scholar
Salmerón, L., Kammerer, Y., & García-Carrión, P. (2013). Searching the web for conflicting topics: Page and user factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2161–2171.10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.034Suche in Google Scholar
Sanchiz, M., Chin, J., Chevalier, A., Fu, W. T., Amadieu, F., & He, J. (2017). Searching for information on the web: Impact of cognitive aging, prior domain knowledge and complexity of the search problems. Information Processing & Management, 53(1), 281–294.10.1016/j.ipm.2016.09.003Suche in Google Scholar
Simon, A. (2017). How can we explain the gender gap in children’s political knowledge? American Behavioral Scientist, 61(2), 222–237.10.1177/0002764216689123Suche in Google Scholar
Sülflow, M., Schäfer, S., & Winter, S. (2018). Selective attention in the news feed: An eye-tracking study on the perception and selection of political news posts on Facebook. New Media & Society, 21(1), 168–190.10.1177/1461444818791520Suche in Google Scholar
Thatcher, A. (2008). Web search strategies. Information Process and Management, 44(3), 1308–1329.10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.004Suche in Google Scholar
Troche, S., & Rammsayer, T. (2011). Eine Revision des deutschsprachigen Bem Sex-Role Inventory. [A revision of the German-language BEM sex-role inventory]. Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation, 4, 262–283.Suche in Google Scholar
Unkel, J., & Haas, A. (2017). The effects of credibility cues on the selection of search engine results. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(8), 1850–1862.10.1002/asi.23820Suche in Google Scholar
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., …, & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27.10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551Suche in Google Scholar
Van Deursen, A., Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, E. (2015). Development and validation of the internet skills scale. Information, Communication, & Society, 19(6), 804–823.10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834Suche in Google Scholar
Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.10.1177/1461444813487959Suche in Google Scholar
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.10.1177/0891243287001002002Suche in Google Scholar
White, R. W., Dumais, S. T., & Teevan, J. (2009, February 9–11). Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior. Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 132–141), Barcelona, Spain.10.1145/1498759.1498819Suche in Google Scholar
Wirth, W., Böcking, T., Karnowski, V., & Von Pape, T. (2007). Heuristic and systematic use of search engines. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12, 778–800.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00350.xSuche in Google Scholar
Wirth, W., Sommer, K., Von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2016). Success in online searches: Differences between evaluation and finding tasks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 2897–2908.10.1002/asi.23389Suche in Google Scholar
Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.xSuche in Google Scholar
Xie, I., & Joo, S. (2012). Factors affecting the selection of search tactics: Tasks, knowledge, process, and systems. Information Processing and Management, 48(3), 254–270.10.1016/j.ipm.2011.08.009Suche in Google Scholar
YouGov (2017). Politisches Informationsverhalten der Deutschen [Political information behavior of Germans]. Cologne: YouGov.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhou, M. (2014). Gender difference in web search perceptions and behavior: Does it vary by task performance? Computers & Education, 78, 174–184.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.005Suche in Google Scholar
Zillich, A. F., & Kessler, S. H. (2019). Measuring selective exposure to online information. Combining eye-tracking and content analysis of users’ actual search behavior. In C. Peter, T. Naab, & R. Kühne (Eds.), Measuring media use and exposure: Recent developments and challenges (pp. 196–220). Köln, GER: Halem.Suche in Google Scholar
Tables
Search tasks.
Party | Task |
AfD | What is the position of the party Alternative for Germany (AfD) on the topic of statutory health insurance? |
SPD | What is the position of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) on the topic of bottle deposits? |
The Left | What is the position of the party The Left on the topic of consumer protection in credit institutions? |
CDU | What is the position of the party the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) on the topic of a label for animal welfare in animal husbandry? |
The Greens | What is the position of the party The Greens on the topic of the camera use on the uniforms of police officers? |
Question categories/constructs in the questionnaires.
Question category | Source/Description | Descriptives | Cronbach’s α | Survey | |||
Internet skills (prevalence)I | van Deursen et al., 2015 (17 items, 5-point scale) | M=3.4 (0.36); min=2.75, max=4.25 | α=.86 | F | |||
Internet skills (knowledge)I | Hargittai, 2009 (30 items; 3-point scale) | M=2.3 (0.36); min=1, max=3 | α=.90 | F | |||
Internet skills (self-efficacy)I | Helsper and Eynon, 2013 (15 items, 5-point scale) | M=3.46 (0.59); min=2.4, max=4.9 | α=.84 | F | |||
Prior knowledge concerning the questionI | closed-ended question (dichotomous) | No participant was aware of the position of the political party on the specific issue before. | B | ||||
Issue-specific involvementC | McQuarrie and Munson, 1992 (6 items, 5-point scale) | M=3.13 (0.82); min=1, max=5 | α=.90 | B | |||
Satisfaction with search resultC | closed-ended question (5-point scale) | M=3.28 (1.14); min=1 (totally satisfied), max=5 | B | ||||
Similarity to ordinary search behaviorC | closed-ended question (5-point scale) | M=1.97 (0.88); min=1 (totally similar), max=5 | B | ||||
Experience + motivation with new technologyI | Parasuraman and Colby, 2014 (16 items, 4 subscales, 5-point scale) | Optimism: M=3.47 (0.66); min=2.3, max=4.8 Innovation: M=2.95 (0.80); min=1.3, max=4.5 Discomfort: M=2.20 (0.64); min=1.0, max=3.5 Uncertainty: M=3.3 (0.61); min=1.75, max=4.5 | α=.71 | A | |||
Political interestI Prior political knowledgeI | closed-ended question (5-point Likert scale) closed-ended question (5-point Likert scale) | M=3.11 (0.97); min=1, max=5 M=2.80 (0.93); min=1, max=4 | A A | ||||
GenderI / BEM-Sex-Role InventoryI | Troche and Rammsayer, 2011 (30 items, 2 subscales, 7-point scale) | Masculinism: M=4.47 (0.7); min=2.8, max=5.6 Femininism: M=5.14 (0.8); min=3.3, max=6.7 | α=.87 | A | |||
SexI AgeC | dichotomous open-ended question | n(female)=22; n(male)=22 M=23.1 (4.2); min=19, max=45 | A A | ||||
Note:I=independent variable; C=control variable
F=before questionnaire for each person (n=44); B=between questionnaires per search task (n=220); A=after questionnaire for each person (n=44)
Overview of the variable measures, descriptives, and intercoder reliability coefficients of content analysis of the eye tracking data.
Variables | Measures | Descriptive values for the entire search that represents the five search tasks for each person (M (SD)) | Reliability coefficient (Krippendorff’s α); n=25 |
Search task | 5 values | The Greens, SPD, CDU, AfD, The Left | α=1 |
Length of online search behavior | seconds | M=1841 (637); min=508, max=1841 | α=1 |
Number of search queries on SERPs | 0 to x | M=12.6 (5.9); min=5, max=30 | α=1 |
Time on SERPs | seconds | M=425 (162); min=164, max=873 | α=.81 (10 % tolerance) |
Scanpath on SERPs | 4 values | n(strictly linear)=224; n(linear)=114; n(linear with step back)=54; n(non-linear)=36 | α=.78 |
Length of search queries | 3 values | n(one word)=31; n(2–4 words)=478; n(5 or more words)=54 | α=.96 |
Number of clicked-on search results | 0 to x | M=19.9 (7.0); min=8, max=39 | α=.96 |
Number of viewed and unselected search results | 0 to x | M=32.5 (16.5); min=9, max=79 | α=.67 (10 % tolerance) |
Number of selected search results position 1 | 0 to x | M=5.3 (2.6); min=1, max=14 | α=.98 |
Number of selected search results positions 2–3 | 0 to x | M=6.4 (2.7); min=1, max=12 | α=.98 |
Number of perceived websites | 0 to x | M=15.8 (6.1); min=4, max=31 | α=.93 |
Type of website accessed | 19 values | e. g., journalistic websites (n=345), homepage of the party (n=339), online encyclopedia (n=3) | α=.88 |
Website scanpaths | 4 values | n(strictly linear)=323; n(linear)=267; n(linear with step back)=69; n(non-linear)=119 | α=.81 |
Reception scope on website | 3 values | n(one paragraph)=97; n(>3 paragraphs)=188; n(complete)=228 | α=.84 |
Time on websites | seconds | M=991 (409); min=245, max=2353 | α=.81 (10 % tolerance) |
Differences in the personal variables of the participants regarding their sex.
Variables | M (SD) for female (n=22) | M (SD) for male (n=22) | ANOVA |
Political interest | 2.59 (0.65) | 3.64 (0.94) | F(1,44)=17.77*** |
Prior political knowledge | 2.32 (0.70) | 3.27 (0.87) | F(1,44)=15.51*** |
Internet skills (self-efficacy) | 3.28 (0.44) | 3.64 (0.66) | F(1,44)=4.44* |
Internet skills (knowledge) | 2.20 (0.35) | 2.42 (0.33) | F(1,44)=4.61* |
Note: *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001
Differences for variables of the online search behavior according the participants’ sex.
Variables | M (SD) for female; n=22 | M (SD) for male n=22 | ANOVA n=220 | Estimates of fixed effects (SD) n=44 |
Number of search queries | 2.27 (1.55) | 2.80 (1.99) | F(1,220)=4.80* | –0.51 (0.34) |
Number of websites from whose articles only one paragraph was read | 0.62 (0.80) | 0.27 (0.61) | F(1,220)=12.76*** | 0.35 (0.10)*** |
Number of websites whose articles were read completely | 0.84 (1.00) | 1.26 (1.16) | F(1,220)=7.89** | –0.41 (0,21)* |
Number of websites with strictly linear scanpaths | 1.71 (1.32) | 1.30 (1.19) | F(1,220)=5.72* | 0.41 (0.21)* |
Number of websites with non-linear scanpaths | 0.35 (0.72) | 0.76 (1.43) | F(1,220)=6.50** | –0.40 (0.25) |
Note: *p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001
Figures
Standardized regression coefficients for the relationship between sex and number of websites whose articles were read completely, as mediated by prior political knowledge
Standardized regression coefficients for the relationship between sex and number of websites from whose articles only on paragraph was read, as mediated by political interest
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Is YouTube being used to its full potential? Proposal for an indicator of interactivity for the top YouTuber content in Spanish
- Neighborhood hotspot and community awareness: The double role of social network sites in local communities
- The role of sex and gender in search behavior for political information on the internet
- Whose media are hostile? The spillover effect of interpersonal discussions on media bias perceptions
- Negativity about Europe: Does it propel parties’ media visibility?
- Communicating about Alzheimer’s disease: Designing and testing a campaign using a framing approach
- Book review
- Nikunen, K. (2019). Media solidarities. Emotions, power and justice in the digital age. London: Sage. 208 pp.
- van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge/Medford: Polity. 208 pp.
- Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Cambridge: Polity Press. 264 pp.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Titelseiten
- Articles
- Is YouTube being used to its full potential? Proposal for an indicator of interactivity for the top YouTuber content in Spanish
- Neighborhood hotspot and community awareness: The double role of social network sites in local communities
- The role of sex and gender in search behavior for political information on the internet
- Whose media are hostile? The spillover effect of interpersonal discussions on media bias perceptions
- Negativity about Europe: Does it propel parties’ media visibility?
- Communicating about Alzheimer’s disease: Designing and testing a campaign using a framing approach
- Book review
- Nikunen, K. (2019). Media solidarities. Emotions, power and justice in the digital age. London: Sage. 208 pp.
- van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge/Medford: Polity. 208 pp.
- Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual social media cultures. Cambridge: Polity Press. 264 pp.
