Metacognition and diagrams in marking-for-self

References

Anderson, Miranda, Michael Wheeler & Mark Sprevak. 2019. Distributed cognition and the humanities. In Miranda Anderson & Michael Wheeler (eds.), Distributed cognition in medieval and renaissance culture, 1–17. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Arango-Muñoz, Santiago. 2019. Metacognición. SEFA. http://www.sefaweb.es/metacognicion/ (accessed 16 October 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Atã, Pedro & João Queiroz. 2016. Habit in semiosis: Two different perspectives based on hierarchical multi-level system modeling and niche construction theory. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics 31. 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45920-2_7.Search in Google Scholar

Atã, Pedro & João Queiroz. 2019. Semiosis is cognitive niche construction. Semiotica 228. 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0092.Search in Google Scholar

Atã, Pedro & João Queiroz. 2021. Nicho de artefatos semióticos e externalismo cognitivo. deSignis 35. 211–227. https://doi.org/10.35659/designis.i35p211-227.Search in Google Scholar

Atã, Pedro, Breno Bitarello & João Queiroz. 2014. Iconic semiosis and representational efficiency in the London underground diagram. Cognitive Semiotics 7(2). 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2014-0012.Search in Google Scholar

Baars, Martine, Sigrid Vink, Tamara van Gog, Anique de Bruin & Fred Paas. 2014. Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving. Learning and Instruction 33. 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Barlassina, Luca & Robert M. Gordon. 2017. Folk psychology as mental simulation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/folkpsych-simulation/ (accessed 16 October 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Beran, Michael J., Johannes L. Brandl, Josef Perner & Joëlle Proust (eds.). 2012. Foundations of metacognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Browne, Derek. 2004. Do dolphins know their own minds? Biology and Philosophy 19(4). 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/sbiph-004-0928-1.Search in Google Scholar

Bugnyar, Thomas, Stephan A. Reber & Cameron Buckner. 2016. Ravens attribute visual access to unseen competitors. Nature Communications 7(1). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10506.Search in Google Scholar

Butterworth, Jo & Liesbeth Wildschut. 2018. Contemporary choreography: A critical reader. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315563596Search in Google Scholar

Call, Josep & Malinda Carpenter. 2001. Do apes and children know what they have seen? Animal Cognition 3(4). 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710100078.Search in Google Scholar

Call, Josep & Michael Tomasello. 2008. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(5). 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 2008. Meta-cognition in animals: A skeptical look. Mind & Language 23(1). 58–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2007.00329.x.Search in Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 2020. Explicit nonconceptual metacognition. Philosophical Studies 178(7). 2337–2356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01557-1.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 1998. Magic words: How language augments human computation. Language and thought, 162–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597909.011Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Jim & Kourken Michaelian. 2016. Identifying and individuating cognitive systems: A task-based distributed cognition alternative to agent-based extended cognition. Cognitive Processing 17(3). 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0759-4.Search in Google Scholar

Desoete, Annemie, Herbert Roeyers & Ann Buysse. 2001. Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities 34(5). 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400505.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Castro, Víctor & Fernando Martínez-Manrique. 2020. Shaping your own mind: The self-mindshaping view on metacognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20(1). 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09658-2.Search in Google Scholar

Flavell, John H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34(10). 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906.Search in Google Scholar

Fleming, Stephen M. & Nathaniel D. Daw. 2017. Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychological Review 124(1). 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000045.Search in Google Scholar

Fusaroli, Riccardo & Claudio Paolucci. 2011. The external mind: An introduction. Versus 112–113. 3–30.Search in Google Scholar

Ginns, Paul & Jimmie Leppink. 2019. Special issue on cognitive load theory: Editorial. Educational Psychology Review 31(2). 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09474-4.Search in Google Scholar

Groen, Iris I. A., Tessa M. Dekker, Tomas Knapen & Edward H. Silson. 2022. Visuospatial coding as ubiquitous scaffolding for human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 26(1). 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

Heyes, Cecilia, Dan Bang, Nicholas Shea, Christopher D. Frith & Stephen M. Fleming. 2020. Knowing ourselves together: The cultural origins of metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24(5). 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.007.Search in Google Scholar

Hookway, Christopher. 2002. Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199256586.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Homans, Jennifer. 2010. Apollo’s angels: A history of ballet. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1996. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10). 1555–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 2013. The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology 27(1). 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.830548.Search in Google Scholar

Kirsh, David. 2009. Problem solving and situated cognition. The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, 264–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816826.015Search in Google Scholar

Kirsh, David. 2011. How marking in dance constitutes thinking with the body. Versus: Quaderni di Studi Semiotici 113–115. 179–210.Search in Google Scholar

Kirsh, David. 2017. Thinking with external representations. In Stephen J. Cowley & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau (eds.), Cognition beyond the brain, 61–84. London: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-49115-8_4Search in Google Scholar

Koriat, Asher & Rakefet Ackerman. 2010. Metacognition and mindreading: Judgments of learning for self and other during self-paced study. Consciousness and Cognition 19(1). 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.010.Search in Google Scholar

Koriat, Asher. 2000. The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition 9(2). 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.2000.0433.Search in Google Scholar

Loon, Mariëtte H. van & Claudia M. Roebers. 2017. Effects of feedback on self-evaluations and self-regulation in Elementary School. Applied Cognitive Psychology 31(5). 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3347.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Alia & Laurie R. Santos. 2014. The origins of belief representation: Monkeys fail to automatically represent others’ beliefs. Cognition 130(3). 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.016.Search in Google Scholar

Matsuda, Noboru, Wenting Weng & Natalie Wall. 2020. The effect of metacognitive scaffolding for learning by teaching a teachable agent. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 30. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00190-2.Search in Google Scholar

Miłkowski, Marcin & Przemysław Nowakowski. 2021. Representational unification in cognitive science: Is embodied cognition a unifying perspective? Synthese 199(1). 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02445-w.Search in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. 2019. Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica 228. 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0090.Search in Google Scholar

Muntanyola-Saura, Dafne & David Kirsh. 2010. Marking as physical thinking: A cognitive ethnography of dance. In Luis A. P. Miranda & Aitor I. Madariaga (eds.), 10th proceedings of the international workshop on cognitive science: institute for logic, cognition, language, and information, 1–20. Donostia: Universidad del País Basco Servicio Editorial.Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Thomas O. & Louis Narens. 1990. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 26. 125–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60053-5.Search in Google Scholar

Ortner, Catherine N., Philip D. Zelazo & Adam K. Anderson. 2013. Effects of emotion regulation on concurrent attentional performance. Motivation and Emotion 37(2). 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9310-9.Search in Google Scholar

Pakes, Anna. 2020. Choreography invisible the disappearing work of dance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199988211.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 8. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton library of Harvard university, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1982. Writings of Charles S. Peirce, Vol. 6. Max Fisch, Edward Moore & Christian Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated W followed by volume and page number].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1992. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Vol. 1, (1867–1893), Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 1.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, Vol. 2, (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.].Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1976. New elements of mathematics by Charles S. Peirce. In Carolyn Eisele (ed.). The Hague: Mouton. [Reference to Peirce’s writings will be designated NEM followed by volume and page number].Search in Google Scholar

Proust, Joëlle. 2008. Epistemic agency and metacognition: An externalist view. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 108. 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2008.00245.x.Search in Google Scholar

Proust, Joëlle. 2010. Metacognition. Philosophy Compass 5(11). 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00340.x.Search in Google Scholar

Proust, Joëlle. 2013. The philosophy of metacognition mental agency and self-awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602162.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Proust, Joëlle. 2014a. Epistemic action, extended knowledge, and metacognition. Philosophical Issues 24(1). 364–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12038.Search in Google Scholar

Proust, Joëlle. 2014b. Précis of the philosophy of metacognition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89(3). 703–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12152.Search in Google Scholar

Proust, Joëlle. 2019. From comparative studies to interdisciplinary research on metacognition. Animal Behavior and Cognition 6(4). 309–328. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.06.04.10.2019.Search in Google Scholar

Queiroz, João & Floyd Merrell. 2006. Semiosis and pragmatism: Toward a dynamic concept of meaning. Sign Systems Studies 34(1). 37–65. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2006.34.1.02.Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2000. Oratio obliqua, oratio recta: An essay on metarepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5163.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Reiss, Diana. 2012. The dolphin in the mirror: Exploring dolphin minds and saving dolphin lives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. 1996. Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 32(4). 689–697.10.2307/jj.18252631Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, Lawrence & Shannon Spaulding. 2021. Embodied cognition. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/embodied-cognition/ (accessed 16 October 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Shea, Nicholas, Annika Boldt, Dan Bang, Nick Yeung, Cecilia Heyes & Chris D. Frith. 2014. Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18(4). 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006.Search in Google Scholar

Sinha, Chris. 2021. Culture in language and cognition. In Wen Xu & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive linguistics, 387–407. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351034708-27Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. David, Wendy E. Shields & David A. Washburn. 2003. The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26(03). 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x03000086.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Catherine & Shirley McKechnie. 2005. Thinking in action: Thought made visible in contemporary dance. Cognitive Processing 6(4). 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-005-0014-x.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Catherine J., Vincs Kim, deLahunta Scott & Elizabeth Old. 2019. Long-term memory for contemporary dance is distributed and collaborative. Acta Psychologica 194. 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.002.Search in Google Scholar

Timms, Ryan & David Spurrett. 2023. Hostile scaffolding. Philosophical Papers 52(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2023.2231652.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2018. How children come to understand false beliefs: A shared intentionality account. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 8491–8498. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804761115.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2019. Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674988651Search in Google Scholar

Tylén, Kristian, Riccardo Fusaroli, Johanne Stege Bjørndahl, Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi, Svend Østergaard & Frederik Stjernfelt. 2014. Diagrammatic reasoning. Diagrammatic Reasoning 22(2). 264–283. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.06tyl.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1998. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Warburton, Edward C. 2011. Of meanings and movements: Re-languaging embodiment in dance phenomenology and cognition. Dance Research Journal 43(2). 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0149767711000064.Search in Google Scholar

Warburton, Edward C. 2017. Dance marking diplomacy: Rehearsing intercultural exchange. Journal of Dance Education 17(4). 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2017.1292358.Search in Google Scholar

Warburton, Edward C., Margaret Wilson, Molly Lynch & Cuykendall Shannon. 2013. The cognitive benefits of movement reduction. Psychological Science 24(9). 1732–1739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613478824.Search in Google Scholar

Whittlesea, Bruce W. & Lisa D. Williams. 2001a. The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27(1). 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Whittlesea, Bruce W. & Lisa D. Williams. 2001b. The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27(1). 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.14.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Margaret & Young-Hoo Kwon. 2008. The role of biomechanics in understanding dance movement: A review. Journal of Dance Medicine and Science 12(3). 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313x0801200306.Search in Google Scholar

Winman, Anders & Peter Juslin. 2005. “I’m m/n confident that I’m correct”: Confidence in foresight and hindsight as a sampling probability. In Klaus Fiedler & Juslin Peter (eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition, 409–439. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614576.017Search in Google Scholar