Abstract
In this paper, we connect two research directions concerning numeral symbol systems and their epistemological significance. The first direction concerns the cognitive processes involved in acquiring and applying different numeral symbols, e.g. the Indo-Arabic or Roman numeral systems. The second direction is a semiotic one, with focus on Charles Peirce’s Philosophy of Notation. Peirce’s work on logical formalism is well known, but he also wrote extensively on numeral systems. Here we take Peirce’s considerations on central notions like iconicity and simplicity and examine their relevance for comparing different numeral symbol systems. We argue that simplicity and iconicity, for example, cannot be understood as single notions. Instead, they should be connected to different aims of numeral symbols that different systems fulfill to different degrees. Consequently, we focus on the kind of trade-offs that different symbol systems imply in acquiring and applying numeral symbol systems.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Dirk Schlimm for very helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
References
Anellis, Irving H. 1995. Peirce Rustled, Russell Pierced: How Charles Peirce and Bertrand Russell viewed each other’s work in logic, and an assessment of Russell’s accuracy and role in the historiography of logic. Modern Logic 5. 270–328.Search in Google Scholar
Ashlock, R. B. 2005. Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to improve instruction, 9th edn. Upper Saddle River NJ: Merrill.Search in Google Scholar
Bellucci, Francesco. 2017. Peirce’s speculative grammar. Logic as semiotics. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315211008Search in Google Scholar
Bellucci, Francesco, Daniele Chiffi & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen. 2021. Assertion, conjunction, and other signs of logic: A contribution to the philosophy of notation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 57(2). 270–287. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.2.07.Search in Google Scholar
Chrisomalis, S. 2010. Numerical notation: A comparative history. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511676062Search in Google Scholar
Döhler, Christian. 2018. A grammar of Komnzo. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dowker, Ann, Sheila Bala & Delyth Lloyd. 2008. Linguistic influences on mathematical development: How important is the transparency of the counting system? Philosophical Psychology 21(4). 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802285511.Search in Google Scholar
Dutz, Jonah & Dirk Schlimm. 2021. Babbage’s guidelines for the design of mathematical notations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 88. 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift. Halle: Louis Nebert.Search in Google Scholar
Fuson, Karen C. & Youngshim Kwon. 1992. Learning addition and subtraction: Effects of number words and other cultural tools. In Jacqueline Bideaud, Claire Meljac & Jean-Paul Fischer (eds.), Pathways to number: Children’s developing numerical abilities, 283–306. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar
Lengnink, Katja & Dirk Schlimm. 2010. Learning and understanding numeral systems: Semantic aspects of number representations from an educational perspective. In Benedikt Löwe & Thomas Müller (eds.), Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice, 235–264. London: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, George Armitage. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Kevin F., Catherine M. Smith, Jianjun Zhu & Houcan Zhang. 1995. Preschool origins of cross-national differences in mathematical competence: The role of number-naming systems. Psychological Science 6(1). 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00305.x.Search in Google Scholar
Pantsar, Markus. 2014. An empirically feasible approach to the epistemology of arithmetic. Synthese 191(17). 4201–4229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0526-y.Search in Google Scholar
Pantsar, Markus. 2021a. Cognitive and computational complexity: Considerations from mathematical problem solving. Erkenntnis 86(4). 961–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00140-3.Search in Google Scholar
Pantsar, Markus. 2021b. Descriptive complexity, computational tractability, and the logical and cognitive foundations of mathematics. Minds and Machines 31(1). 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09545-4.Search in Google Scholar
Pantsar, Markus. Numerical cognition and the epistemology of arithmetic. Cambridge: University Press, in press.Search in Google Scholar
Pantsar, Markus & Frederik Stjernfelt. How numeral symbols shape arithmetical understanding, in press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders (ed.). 1883. Studies in logic by members of the Johns Hopkins University. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.10.1037/12811-000Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958; 1998. Collected papers. Volumes I–VIII. In Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.), Referred to as CP; references given by volume and paragraph numbers. London: Thoemmes Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1976. In Carolyn Eisele (ed.), New elements of mathematics. Volumes I–IV. Referred to as NEM. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1977. In Charles S. Hardwick & James Cook (eds.), Semiotic & significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce & Victoria Lady Welby. Referred to as SS. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1982ff. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Volumes I–IV; VIII. Referred to as W. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992. In Nathan Houser & Christian J. W. Kloesel (eds.), The essential Peirce. Volume I (1867–1893). Referred to as EP I. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. In Nathan Houser & Christian J. W. Kloesel (eds.), The essential Peirce. Volume II (1893–1913). Referred to as EP II. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 2010. In Matthew Moore (ed.), Philosophy of mathematics. Selected writings. Referred to as PM. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 2020. In Francesco Bellucci (ed.), Selected writings on semiotics 1894–1912. Referred to as SWS. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 2020–2022. In Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (ed.), Logic of the future: Writings on existential graphs. Volumes I–III. Referred to as LoF. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter (referred to as LoF).Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. Various, partially undated. Manuscripts at the Houghton Library. Referenced by Ms. numbers in the 1966 microfilm edition (The Charles S. Peirce Papers. Microfilm Edition Thirty Reels with Two Supplementary Reels Later Added). Cambridge: Harvard University Library Photographic Service; numbers refer simultaneously to the Robin catalogue of the manuscripts (1967, 1971). Referred to as R.Search in Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko. 2006. Signs of logic. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko & Frederik Stjernfelt. 2015. Peirce and diagrams: Two contributors to an actual discussion review each other. Synthese 192(4). 1073–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0658-8.Search in Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko & Frederik Stjernfelt. 2023. Semiotics of mathematics and logic. In Jamin Pelkey (ed.), Bloomsbury companion to semiotics, vol. 2, 13–34. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781350139350.ch-1Search in Google Scholar
Schlimm, Dirk. 2018. On Frege’s Begriffsschrift notation for propositional logic: Design principles and trade-offs. History and Philosophy of Logic 39(1). 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1317429.Search in Google Scholar
Schlimm, Dirk & Hansjörg Neth. 2008. Modeling ancient and modern arithmetic practices: Addition and multiplication with Arabic and Roman numerals. In Bradley C. Love, Ken McRae & Vladimir M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2097–2102. Washington, DC: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar
Shin, Sun-Joo. 2000. The iconic logic of Peirce’s graphs. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. Diagrams as a centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 36(3). 357–384.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology. An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5652-9Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2011a. Peirce’s notion of diagram experiment. Corollarial and theorematical experiments with diagrams. In Richard Heinrich, Elisabeth Nemeth, Woldram Pichler & David Wagner (eds.), Papers from the 33rd International Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchberg am Wechsel 2010. Frankfurt and Lancaster: Ontos.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2011b. On operational and optimal iconicity in Peirce’s diagrammatology. Semiotica 186(1). 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.061.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2015a. Dicisigns. Synthese 192(4). 1019–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2015b. Iconicity of logic—and the roots of the ‘iconicity’ concept. In Masako Hiraga, William J. Herlofsky, Kazuko Shinohara & Kimi Akita (eds.), Iconicity: East Meets West, 35–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.14.02stjSearch in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2021. Review of ‘logic of the future: Writings on existential graphs. Volume 1: History and applications’. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 57(1). 114–127. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.1.06.Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2022. Sheets, diagrams, and realism. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110793628Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Jiaje & Donald A. Norman. 1994. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 18(1). 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Reframing self-talk in endurance sports using grammatical taxonomy
- Peirce’s philosophy of notations and the trade-offs in comparing numeral symbol systems
- Metacognition and diagrams in marking-for-self
- Review
- Morphogenesis of symbolic forms: a synthesizing formulation
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Reframing self-talk in endurance sports using grammatical taxonomy
- Peirce’s philosophy of notations and the trade-offs in comparing numeral symbol systems
- Metacognition and diagrams in marking-for-self
- Review
- Morphogenesis of symbolic forms: a synthesizing formulation