Rhythm in verse

Line Brandt

doi:10.1515/cogsem-2022-2011

Article

Rhythm in verse

Line Brandt

Published/Copyright: July 15, 2022

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Cognitive Semiotics Volume 15 Issue 1

Abstract

This paper on rhythm is an adaptation of the semiotic research on rhythm in versified language presented as one of the seven types of poetic iconicity in Chapter 5 of The Communicative Mind: A Linguistic Exploration of Conceptual Integration and Meaning Construction (L. Brandt 2013) entitled “Effects of poetic enunciation: Seven types of iconicity”. Defined by the linebreak, poetic language use engenders distinctive interpretive affordances, some of which manifest themselves as emphatically iconic sign relations contributing to the expressive whole of a text. In “Effects of poetic enunciation”, I explore syntactic, semantic, phonetic, rhythmic and rhetorical aspects of the phenomenon of semiotic iconicity, and its counterpart aniconicity, in language characterized by an intentionally (line)broken syntax and contribute a systematic account of the different types of semiotic iconicity relations, understood as figural or diagrammatic similarity relations – or, conversely, potent dissimilarity relations, i.e. aniconicity – between expressive means and semantic content. Rhythmic iconicity is the fifth type of iconicity in this typology.

Keywords: iconicity; metered verse; poetry; rhythm; syntax

Corresponding author: Line Brandt, Independent Scholar, Denmark, E-mail: linebrandt@yahoo.com

I dedicate this work on rhythm to the memory of my father – musician, semiotician, poet.

References

Brandt, L. 2013. The communicative mind. A linguistic exploration of conceptual Integration and meaning construction. Monograph, 636. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Empson, William. [1930] (1966). 7 Types of ambiguity. New York: New Directions.Search in Google Scholar

Holst, F. 2002. Conceptual integration in the domain of music. Paper presented at the 2002 Conference on Conceptual Integration, University of Southern Denmark, Odense. In A Hougaard & S Nordahl Lund (eds.), The way we think. Odense working papers in language and communication, No. 23, August 2002, I, 181–192. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lilja, Eva. 1999. Dikters Ljudbild. Om betydelse i vers. In Bidrag Till En Nordisk Metrik, vol. I. Göteborg: Centrum för Metriska Studier 9.Search in Google Scholar

Mukarovsky, J. 1964. Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (ed.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary scructure, and style, 17–30. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pöppel, Ernst. 1989. The measurement of music and the cerebral clock: A new theory. Leonardo 22(1). 83–89.10.2307/1575145Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1979. Communication and cooperation in early infancy. In Margaret Bullowa (ed.), Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication, 321–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1994. Infant semiosis. In Winfried Noth (ed.), Origins of semiosis, 219–252. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110877502.219Search in Google Scholar

Wellek, Rene & Austin Warren. 1956. Theory of literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & co.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-07-15

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2022-2011

Keywords for this article

iconicity; metered verse; poetry; rhythm; syntax