Home Swampman encounters an Immediate Object
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Swampman encounters an Immediate Object

Social and psychological reductions of signs: Discussion of some criticisms of Natural Propositions
  • Frederik Stjernfelt

    Frederik Stjernfelt is a professor at the University of Copenhagen, teaching semiotics, intellectual history, and theory of science. He has published, inter alia, the books Diagrammatology (2007), Democratic Contradictions of Multiculturalism (with J.M. Eriksen, 2012), and Natural Propositions (2014).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 10, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper is a response to three reviews of the author’s 2014 book Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns, by Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, Helmut Pape, and Göran Sonesson, respectively. Addressed here are issues like the Swampman argument and the character of Peirce’s concept of “Immediate Object”. A conclusion makes a general observation that semiotics is threatened by reductions of signs to sociological conventions on the one hand and mental phenomena on the other – arguing that communities as well as minds presuppose sign structure and use.

About the author

Frederik Stjernfelt

Frederik Stjernfelt is a professor at the University of Copenhagen, teaching semiotics, intellectual history, and theory of science. He has published, inter alia, the books Diagrammatology (2007), Democratic Contradictions of Multiculturalism (with J.M. Eriksen, 2012), and Natural Propositions (2014).

References

Bellucci, F. In press. Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign. Sign Systems Studies 43(4).10.12697/SSS.2015.43.4.02Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1987. Knowing one’s own mind. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 61. 441–458.10.2307/3131782Search in Google Scholar

Eriksen, J. M. & F. Stjernfelt. 2012. The democratic contradictions of multiculturalism. New York: Telos Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pape, H. 2015. Review: Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of Dicisigns by Frederik Stjernfelt. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51(1). 108–120.10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.51.1.108Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. 1977. Semiotics and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. C. S. Hardwick, ed., with the assistance of J. Cook. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pietarinen, A. V. 2014. Natural propositions naturalized. Cognitive Semiotics 7(2). 297–303.10.1515/cogsem-2014-0015Search in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 2014. Still do not block the line of inquiry: On the Peircean way to cognitive semiotics. Cognitive Semiotics 7(2). 281–296.10.1515/cogsem-2014-0090Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, F. 2014. Natural propositions – the actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, F. In press. Dicisigns and habits: Implicit propositions and habit-taking in Peirce’s pragmatism. In Donna West (ed.), Peirce’s concept of Habit: Before and beyond consciousness. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, F. In press A. Blocking evil infinites: A note on a note on a Peircean strategy. Sign System Studies 43(4).10.12697/SSS.2015.43.4.09Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-11-10
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2015-0008/html
Scroll to top button