Do natural pictures mean natural tastes? Assessing visual semantics experimentally

References

Andersson, Richard. 2012. Language and vision: Using visual information in real world language situations. Lund University Cognitive Studies 152. Lund: Lund University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barrett, Deirdre. 2010. Supernormal stimuli: How primal urges overran their evolutionary purpose. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1987. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In UlricNeisser (ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, 101–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences22. 577–660.10.1017/S0140525X99002149Search in Google Scholar

Bartes, Roland. 1968. Elements of semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Beauchamp, Michael S., Kathryn ELee, James VHaxby & AlexMartin. 2002. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron34. 149–59.10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00642-6Search in Google Scholar

Benczes, Réka. 2006. Creative compounding in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.19Search in Google Scholar

Bone Paula, F. & Karen RFrance. 2001. Package graphics and consumer product beliefs. Journal of Business and Psychology15. 467–89.10.1023/A:1007826818206Search in Google Scholar

Bundgaard, Peer F., SvendOstergaard & FrederikStjernfelt. 2006. Waterproof fire stations? Conceptual schemata and cognitive operations involved in compound constructions. Semiotica161(1/4). 363–93.10.1515/SEM.2006.071Search in Google Scholar

Chandon, Pierre & BrianWansink. 2011. Is food marketing making us fat? A multi-disciplinary review. Foundations and Trends in Marketing5. 113–96.10.1561/1700000016Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Yi-Chuan & CharlesSpence. 2010. When hearing the bark helps to identify the dog: Semantically-congruent sounds modulate the identification of masked pictures. Cognition114. 389–404.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Chun, Marvin M. & Jeremy MWolfe. 2001. Visual attention. In E.Bruce Goldstein (ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception, 272–310. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470753477.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Henry and ClaireLefebvre (eds.). 2005. Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Connell, Louise & DermotLynott. 2012. When does perception facilitate or interfere with conceptual processing? The effect of attentional modulation. Frontiers in Psychology3. 474.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00474Search in Google Scholar

Cummings, Louise. 2005. Pragmatics: A multidisciplinary perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Currie, Gregory. 1991. Photography, painting and perception. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism49(1). 23–29.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac49.1.0023Search in Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio R. & HannaDamasio. 1994. Cortical systems for retrieval of concrete knowledge: The convergence zone framework. In ChristofKoch and Joel L.Davis, (eds.), Large-scale neuronal theories of the brain, 61–74. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Debes, John L. 1969. The loom of visual literacy. Audiovisual Instruction14. 25–27.Search in Google Scholar

Estes, Zachary & SamGlucksberg. 2000. Interactive property attribution in concept combination. Memory & Cognition28. 28–34.10.3758/BF03211572Search in Google Scholar

Estes, Zachary & Lara L.Jones. 2006. Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language55. 89–101.10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & MarkTurner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fernbach, Philip M., AdamDarlow & Steven A.Sloman. 2011. When good evidence goes bad: The weak evidence effect in judgment and decision-making. Cognition119. 459–67.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.013Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. 1996. Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203272305Search in Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles J. & EduardoUrios-Aparisi. 2008. Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215366Search in Google Scholar

Frewer, Lynn and Hansvan Trijp, (eds.). 2007. Understanding consumers of food products. Cambridge: Woodhead.10.1533/9781845692506Search in Google Scholar

Gagné, Christina L. & Edward J.Shoben. 1997. Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23. 71–87.Search in Google Scholar

Gagné, Christina L. & Thomas L.Spalding. 2006. Using conceptual combination research to Better understand novel compound words. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics3. 9–16.Search in Google Scholar

Gagné, Christina L., Thomas L.Spalding & Melissa C.Gorrie. 2005. Sentential context and the interpretation of familiar open-compounds and novel modifier-noun phrases. Language and Speech48. 203–21.10.1177/00238309050480020401Search in Google Scholar

Gidlöf, Kerstin, AnnikaWallin, PeterMøgelvang-Hansen & KennethHolmqvist. 2013. Material distortion of economic behaviour and everyday decision quality. Journal of Consumer Policy36(4). 389–402.10.1007/s10603-013-9228-ySearch in Google Scholar

Gill, Tripat & LauretteDubé. 2007. What is a leather iron or a bird phone? Using conceptual combinations to generate and understand new product concepts. Journal of Consumer Psychology17. 202–17.10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70029-3Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic in conversation. In PeterCole and Jerry L.Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Torben. 2005. Perspectives on consumer decision making: An integrated approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour4. 420–37.10.1002/cb.33Search in Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, Robert J., Clara. M.Catchpole, Nivja H.de Jong & Martin J.Pickering. 2008. Concurrent processing of words and their replacements during speech. Cognition108. 601–7.10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Howells, Geraint, Hans-WolfgangMicklitz & ThomasWilhelmsson. 2006. European fair trading law. Burlington: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Hoyer, Wayne D. 1984. An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research11. 822–29.10.1086/209017Search in Google Scholar

Incardona, Rossella & CristinaPoncibò. 2007. The average consumer, the unfair commercial practices directive, and the cognitive revolution. Journal of Consumer Policy30. 21–38.10.1007/s10603-006-9027-9Search in Google Scholar

Iyengar, Sheena S. & LepperMark R. 2000. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79. 995–1006.10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995Search in Google Scholar

Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2005. Default semantics: Foundations of a compositional theory of acts of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A modern English grammar on historical principles. Vol. VI. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Phil. 2007. Constructing meaning from letterforms: Reflections on the development of a practice-based research proposal. Journal of Research Practice3. Article M9.Search in Google Scholar

Kauppinen, Hannele. 2004. Colours as non-verbal signs on packages. Doctoral Thesis. Economics and Society 139. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.Search in Google Scholar

Khan, Uzma, RaviDhar & KlausWertenbroch. 2005. A behavioral decision theory perspective on hedonic and utilitarian choice. In S.Ratneshwar and David G.Mick, (eds.), Inside consumption: Frontiers of research on consumer motives, goals, and desires, 144–65. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kircher, Tilo, KatharinaSass, OlgaSachs & SörenKrach. 2009. Priming words with pictures: Neural correlates of semantic associations in a cross-modal priming task using fMRI. Human Brain Mapping30. 4116–28.10.1002/hbm.20833Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theovan Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Search in Google Scholar

Krott, Andrea. 2009. The role of analogy for compound words. In James P.Blevins and J.Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 118–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Kuramori, Mihoko, TatsuyaIwaki & TakashiKusumi. 2009. Emergence of form and function in a visual image combination. Psychologia52. 50–66.10.2117/psysoc.2009.50Search in Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre. 1996. How to compare now?. Legal Studies16. 232–42.10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00005.xSearch in Google Scholar

Libben, Gary & Jarema, Gonia (eds.). 2006. The representation and processing of compound words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad. 1970. Studies in animal and human behaviour. Vol. I. Translated by R. Martin. London: Methuen.10.4159/harvard.9780674430389Search in Google Scholar

Lynott, Dermot & LouiseConnell. 2010. Embodied conceptual combination. Frontiers in Psychology1. 212.10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00212Search in Google Scholar

MacMaoláin, Caoimhin. 2007. EU food law: Protecting consumers and health in a common market. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Marcus, Gary F. 2001. The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science (learning, development, and conceptual change). Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1187.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Messaris, Paul. 1994. Visual literacy: Image, mind, and reality. Boulder: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Messaris, Paul. 1997. Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781452233444Search in Google Scholar

Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang, ViktorSmith, and Mette OhmRørdam (eds.). 2010. New challenges for the assessment of fairness in a common market. EUI Working papers LAW (21). Florence: European University Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Moskowitz, Howard R., MicheleReisner, BarbaraItty, RachelKatz & BertKrieger. 2006. Steps towards a consumer-driven ‘concept innovation machine’ for food and drink. Food Quality and Preference17(7–8). 536–51.10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Gregory L. 1988. Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science12. 529–62.10.1207/s15516709cog1204_2Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Gregory L. 1990. Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language29. 259–88.10.1016/0749-596X(90)90001-GSearch in Google Scholar

Møgelvang-Hansen, Peter. 2010. Methods of legal regulation and real-life case scenarios. In Hans-WolfgangMicklitz, ViktorSmith, and Mette OhmRørdam, eds., New challenges for the assessment of fairness in a common market. EUI Working papers LAW(21), 49–57. Florence: European University Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1867–1893/1992. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, volume 1 (1867–1893). Peirce Edition Project, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pieters, Rik & LukWarlop. 1999. Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing16. 1–16.10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00022-6Search in Google Scholar

Pilditch, James. 1973. The silent salesman, 2nd edn. London: Business Books Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Plantinga, Carl R. 1997. Rhetoric and representation in the nonfiction film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ran, Bing & P.Robert Duimering. 2010. Conceptual combination: Models, theories and controversies. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics1. 65–90.Search in Google Scholar

Roe, Brian, Alan S.Levy & Brenda M.Derby. 1999. The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: Results from FDA experimental data. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing18. 89–105.10.1177/074391569901800110Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General104. 192–233.10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192Search in Google Scholar

Ross, Brian H. & Gregory L.Murphy. 1999. Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology38. 495–553.10.1006/cogp.1998.0712Search in Google Scholar

Rumelhart, David E., James L.McClelland, and the PDP Research Group (eds.). 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: foundations. Vol. 2: psychological and biological models. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ryder, Mary E. 1994. Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Linda. 1994. Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research21. 252–73.10.1086/209396Search in Google Scholar

Selsøe Sørensen, Henrik, JesperClement & GormGabrielsen. 2012. Food labels: An explorative study into label information and what consumers see and understand. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research22. 101–14.Search in Google Scholar

Selsøe Sørensen, Henrik, LotteHolm, PeterMøgelvang-Hansen, DanielBarratt, FrançoiseQvistgaard & ViktorSmith. 2013. Consumer understanding of food labels: Towards a generic tool for identifying the average consumer. Report from a Danish exploration. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research23(3). 291–304.Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, Brendan. 2010. The economics of abundance: Affluent consumption and the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Simmons, W. Kyle, AlexMartin & Lawrence WBarsalou. 2005. Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. Cerebral Cortex15. 1602–8.10.1093/cercor/bhi038Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Viktor, DanielBarratt & JordanZlatev. 2014. Unpacking noun-noun compounds: Interpreting novel and conventional food names in isolation and on food labels. Cognitive Linguistics25. 1.10.1515/cog-2013-0032Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Viktor, JesperClement, PeterMøgelvang-Hansen & HenrikSelsøe Sørensen. 2011. Assessing in-store food-to-consumer communication from a fairness perspective: An integrated approach. Fachsprache – International Journal of Specialized Communication33(1–2). 84–106.10.24989/fs.v33i1-2.1382Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Viktor, DitteGreen-Petersen, PeterMøgelvang-Hansen, Rune H. B.Christensen, FrançoiseQvistgaard & GretheHyldig. 2013. What’s (in) a real smoothie: A division of linguistic labour in consumers’ acceptance of name-product combinations?Appetite63. 129–40.10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.020Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Viktor, PeterMøgelvang-Hansen & GretheHyldig. 2010. Spin versus fair speak in food labelling: A matter of taste?Food Quality and Preference21. 1016–25.10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.016Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Edward E., Daniel N.Osherson, Lance J.Rips & MargaretKeane. 1988. Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. Cognitive Science12. 485–527.10.1207/s15516709cog1204_1Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Viktor, Mette OhmSøndergaard, JesperClement, PeterMøgelvang-Hansen, HenrikSelsøe Sørensen & GormGabrielsen. 2009. Fair speak: Scenarier for vildledning på det danske fødevaremarked [fair speak: scenarios of misleading practices on the Danish food market). Copenhagen: Ex Tuto Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Sonesson, Göran. 1989. Pictorial concepts: Inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance for the analysis of the visual world. Lund: Lund University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & DeirdreWilson. 1987. Précis of relevance: Communication and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences10. 697–710.10.1017/S0140525X00055345Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & DeirdreWilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Tagalakis, Georgios & Mark T.Keane. 2005. How understanding novel compounds is facilitated by priming from similar, known compounds. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 1989. Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Niko. 1951. The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trzaskowski, Jan. 2011. Behavioural economics, neuroscience, and the unfair commercial practices directive. Journal of Consumer Policy34. 377–92.10.1007/s10603-011-9169-2Search in Google Scholar

Tylén, Kristian, MikkelWallentin & AndreasRoepstorff. 2009. Say it with flowers! An fMRI study of object mediated communication. Brain & Language108. 159–66.10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Underwood, Robert L. & Noreen M.Klein. 2002. Packaging as brand communication: Effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and brand. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice10. 58–68.10.1080/10696679.2002.11501926Search in Google Scholar

van Jaarsveld, Henk J., RietCoolen & RobertSchreuder. 1994. The role of analogy in the interpretation of novel compounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research23. 111–37.10.1007/BF02143919Search in Google Scholar

Veale, Tony & YanfenHao. 2008. Generating and understanding creative comparisons. In Creative intelligent systems. Papers from the 2008 AAAI spring symposium, 123–127. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Search in Google Scholar

Vermeulen, Nicolas, OlivierCorneille & Paula M.Niedenthal. 2008. Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs. Cognition109. 287–94.10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Wansink, Brian & PierreChandon. 2006. Can “low fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity?. Journal of Marketing Research43. 605–17.10.1509/jmkr.43.4.605Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Peter. 2005. Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods. Nutrition Reviews63. 256–64.10.1111/j.1753-4887.2005.tb00382.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wisniewski, Edward J. 1996. Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language35. 434–53.10.1006/jmla.1996.0024Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Jeremy M. 1999. Inattentional amnesia. In VeronikaColtheart, (ed.), Fleeting memories, cognition of brief visual stimuli, 71–94. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woodruff, Guy & DavidPremack. 1979. Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: The development of deception. Cognition7. 333–62.10.1016/0010-0277(79)90021-0Search in Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordan. 2009. The semiotic hierarchy: Life, consciousness, signs and language. Cognitive Semiotics4. 169–200.Search in Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordan, ViktorSmith, Joostvan de Weijer & KristinaSkydsgaard. 2010. Noun-noun compounds for fictive food products: Experimenting in the borderzone of semantics and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics42(10). 2799–813.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.011Search in Google Scholar