The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation

References

Aaron, Jessi E. 2016. The road already traveled: Constructional analogy in lexico-syntactic change. Studies in Language 40. 26–62.10.1075/sl.40.1.02aarSearch in Google Scholar

Abbot-Smith, Kirsten & Heike Behrens. 2006. How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: The German passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science 30(6). 995–1026.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_61Search in Google Scholar

Alba-Salas, Josep. 2007. On the life and death of a collocation: A corpus-based diachronic study of dar miedo/hacer miedo-type structures in Spanish. Diachronica 24(2). 207–252.10.1075/dia.24.2.02albSearch in Google Scholar

Anttila, Raymond. 2003. Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 425–440. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas. 2014. Competition as a unifying concept for the study of language. The Mental Lexicon 9(2). 338–370.10.1075/ml.9.2.08berSearch in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and form. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Breban, Tine. 2009. Structural persistence: A case based on the grammaticalization of English adjectives of difference. English Language and Linguistics 13. 77–96.10.1017/S1360674308002888Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Buyle, Anouk & Hendrik De Smet. Submitted. Meaning in a changing paradigm: The semantics of you and the pragmatics of thou.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1994. The grammaticization of zero: Asymmetries in tense and aspect systems. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 235–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.02bybSearch in Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2000. The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginnings of sentences, syllables, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longmann.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2011. N-grams and word frequency data from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Downloaded from http://www.ngrams.info.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2012. Recent shifts with three nonfinite verbal complements in English: Data from the 100 million word TIME Corpus (1920s–2000s). In Bas Aarts, Jeanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds.), The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora, 46–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139060998.004Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics12. 55–102.10.1017/S136067430700250XSearch in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2010a. English -ing-clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics 48. 1153–1193.10.1515/ling.2010.038Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2010b. Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and phrasal verb particle out. In Elizabeth Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience and grammaticalization, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.90.06desSearch in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88(3). 601–633.10.1353/lan.2012.0056Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading patterns: Diffusional change in the English system of complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812752.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2014. Constrained confusion: The gerund/participle distinction in Late Modern English. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English syntax, 224–238. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139507226.017Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28. 83–102.10.1017/S0954394515000186Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik & Hubert Cuyckens. 2007. Diachronic aspects of complementation: Constructions, entrenchment and the matching-problem. In Christopher Cain & Geoffry Russom (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language III. Managing chaos: Strategies for identifying change in English (Topics in English Linguistics [TiEL] 53), 1–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110198515.3.187Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik & Van de Velde Freek. 2013. Serving two masters: Form-function friction in syntactic amalgams. Studies in Language 37. 534–565.10.1075/bct.79.04desSearch in Google Scholar

De Vogelaer, Gunther & Coussé. Evie. 2011. The functional nature of pronominal change: Innovative plural pronouns in English and Dutch. Neophilologus 95. 1–26.10.1007/s11061-010-9210-8Search in Google Scholar

Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Degand, Liesbeth & Benjamin Fagard. 2012. Competing connectives in the causal domain: French car and parce que. Journal of Pragmatics 44(2). 154–168.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.009Search in Google Scholar

D'hoedt, Frauke. 2017. Language change in constructional networks: The development of the english secondary predicate construction. Leuven: University of Leuven dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon C. 1988. Isomorfisme als functioneel verklaringsprincipe [Isomorphism as a functional explanatory principle]. GLOT 11. 87–106.Search in Google Scholar

Duffley, Patrick J. 1999. The use of the infinitive and the -ing after verbs denoting the beginning, middle and end of an event. Folia Linguistica 33. 295–331.10.1515/flin.1999.33.3-4.295Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga, Hendrik De Smet & Wim van der Wurff. 2017. A brief history of English syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139049559Search in Google Scholar

Foolen, Ad. 2012. The relevance of emotion for language and linguistics. In Ad Foolen, Ulrike M. Lüdtke, Timothy P. Racine & Jordan Zlatev (eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others. Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language, 347–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/ceb.6.13fooSearch in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1995. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Iconicity in language, 47–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.110.07givSearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco. 2009. The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: Towards a usage-based constructionist analysis. Language Sciences 31. 663–723.10.1016/j.langsci.2008.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56. 515–540.10.2307/414448Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18. 180–205.10.1515/zfsw.1999.18.2.180Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John. 2001. Why are categories adjacent?. Journal of Linguistics 37. 1–34.10.1017/S002222670100860XSearch in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 2003. Causes and consequences of word structure. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203495131Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004206Search in Google Scholar

Hoeksema, Jack. 2005. Rijkdom en weelde van het Nederlands [Wealth and riches of the Dutch language]. Tabu 34. 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hopSearch in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Roman. 1932. Zur Struktur des russischen Verbum. In Charisteria Gvilelmo Mathesio quinquagenario a discipulis et Circuli Linguistici Pragensis soladibus oblata, 74–84. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1940. A Modern English grammar on historical principles, vol. 5: Syntax. London: George Allan & Undwin.Search in Google Scholar

Kauhanen, Henri. 2017. Neutral change. Journal of Linguistics 53. 327–358.10.1017/S0022226716000141Search in Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1990. Sprachwandel von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244.10.1017/S0954394500000168Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2002 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization (2nd, rev. edn.). Erfurt: Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt.Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2014. Conclusions: Competition across time. In Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage, 364–386. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0022Search in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2002. Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6. 105–131.10.1017/S1360674302001065Search in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2003. Gerundial complements after begin and start: Grammatical and sociolinguistic factors, and how they work against each other. In Günther Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 329–345. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110900019.329Search in Google Scholar

Markman, Ellen M. & Gwyn F. Wachtel. 1988. Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20. 121–157.10.1016/0010-0285(88)90017-5Search in Google Scholar

Mondorf, Britta. 2010. Variation and change in English resultative constructions. Language Variation and Change 22(3). 397–421.10.1017/S0954394510000165Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg & Heikki Mannila. 2011. The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23. 1–43.10.1017/S0954394510000207Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan & Pieter Byloo. 2015. Competing modals: Beyond (inter)subjectification. Diachronica 32(1). 34–68.10.1075/dia.32.1.02nuySearch in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2012. General productivity: How become waxed and wax became a copula. Cognitive Linguistics 23. 27–65.10.1515/cog-2012-0002Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2014. Constructions and environments: Copular, passive and related constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199373390.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pijpops, Dirk & Freek Van De Velde 2016. Constructional contamination: How does it work and how do we measure it?. Folia Linguistica 50. 543–581.10.1515/flin-2016-0020Search in Google Scholar

Pilley, John W. & Alliston K. Reed. 2011. Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes 86. 184–195.10.1016/j.beproc.2010.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. 2015. Pursuing symmetry by eradicating variability. Keynote lecture presented at New Ways of Analysing Variation (NWAV) 44, University of Toronto, 22–25 October.Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Reinöhl, Uta & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2017. Renewal: A figure of speech or a process sui generis?. Language 93(2). 381–413.10.1353/lan.2017.0018Search in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Günther. 1995. On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies 76. 367–388.10.1080/00138389508598980Search in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Günther. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7. 149–182.10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.149Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbach, Anette. 2007. Emerging variation: Determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English. English Language and Linguistics 11. 143–189.10.1017/S1360674306002140Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916/1995. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Payot & Rivages.Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Roland. 2015. Processing and querying large web corpora with the COW14 architecture. In Piotr Bański, Hanno Biber, Evelyn Breiteneder, Marc Kupietz, Harald Lüngen & Andreas Witt (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC-3), 28–34. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Roland & Felix Bildhauer. 2012. Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), 486–493. Istanbul: ELRA.Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2012. Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker. 2009. The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language 85(2). 321–354.10.1353/lan.0.0110Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Degeneracy: The maintenance of constructional networks. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar, 141–179. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110366273.141Search in Google Scholar

Van de Velde, Freek. 2015. Schijnbare syntactische feniksen [Apparent syntactic phoenixes]. Nederlandse Taalkunde 20. 69–107.10.5117/NEDTAA2015.1.VELDSearch in Google Scholar

Van der Horst, Joop. 2008. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis [History of Dutch Syntax]. Leuven: Universitaire Pers.Search in Google Scholar

Van Goethem, Kristel, Gudrun Vanderbauwhede & Hendrik De Smet. 2018. The emergence of a new adverbial downtoner: Constructional change and constructionalization of Dutch [ver van X] and [verre van X] ‘far from X’. In Muriel Norde, Kristel Van Goethem, Gudrun Vanderbauwhede & Evie Coussé (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective (Constructional Approaches to Language 20), 179–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.20.07goeSearch in Google Scholar

Vartiainen, Turo. 2016. A constructionist approach to category change: Constraining factors in the adjectivization of participles. Journal of English Linguistics 44. 34–60.10.1177/0075424215622973Search in Google Scholar

Visser, Frederikus Theodorus. 1963–1973. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.18Search in Google Scholar

Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica 30. 382–419.10.1075/dia.30.3.04wolSearch in Google Scholar