Home Usage-based linguistics and the magic number four
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Usage-based linguistics and the magic number four

  • Clarence Green EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 17, 2017

Abstract

Miller’s (1956, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97) working memory (WM) capacity of around seven items, plus or minus two, was never found by usage-based linguists to be a recurrent pattern in language. Thus, it has not figured prominently in cognitive models of grammar. Upon reflection, this is somewhat unusual, since WM has been considered a fundamental cognitive domain for information processing in psychology, so one might have reasonably expected properties such as capacity constraints to be reflected in language use and structures derived from use. This paper proposes that Miller’s (1956) number has not been particularly productive in usage-based linguistics because it turns out to have been an overestimate. A revised WM capacity has now superseded it within cognitive science, a “magic number four plus or minus one” (Cowan 2001, The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(1). 87–185). This paper suggests, drawing on evidence from spoken language corpora and multiple languages, that a range of linguistic structures and patterns align with this revised capacity estimate, unlike Miller’s (1956), ranging from phrasal verbs, idioms, n-grams, the lengths of intonation units and some abstract grammatical properties of phrasal categories and clause structure.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. James Lambert for his assistance with a Perl script for NP extraction. Further, I am grateful to Dr. Mike Scott for some technical advice, and for the immensely valuable input of the anonymous reviewers and editorial team.

References

Aboitiz, Francisco, Ricardo R. García, Conrado Bosman & Enzo Brunetti. 2006. Cortical memory mechanisms and language origins. Brain and Language 98. 40–56.10.1016/j.bandl.2006.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Allen, Shanley & Heike Schröder. 2003. Preferred argument structure in early Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In John Du Bois, Lorriane Kumpf & William Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 301–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.14.14allSearch in Google Scholar

Arnon, Inbal & Neal Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62. 67–82.10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan. 2003. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36. 189–208.10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4Search in Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan. 2007. Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan, Neil Thomson & Mary Buchanan. 1975. Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 14(6). 575–589.10.4324/9781315111261-11Search in Google Scholar

Bannard, Colin & Elena Lieven. 2012. Formulaic language in L1 acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 3–16.10.1017/S0267190512000062Search in Google Scholar

Bannard, Colin & Danielle Matthews. 2008. Stored word sequences in language learning the effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19. 241–248.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. Philadelphia: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Vivian Cortes. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3). 371–405.10.1093/applin/25.3.371Search in Google Scholar

BNC – The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML edn.). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/pSearch in Google Scholar

Bor, Daniel. 2016. Advances in the scientific investigation of consciousness. In Martin Monti & Walter G. Sannita (eds.), Brain function and responsiveness in disorders of consciousness, 13–24. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-21425-2_2Search in Google Scholar

Broadbent, Donald. 1975. The magic number seven after fifteen years. In Alan Kennedy & Alan Wilkes (eds.), Studies in long-term memory, 2–18. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733.10.1353/lan.2006.0186Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace & Jane Danielewicz. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Rosalind Horowitz & S. Jay Samuels (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language, 83–113. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27(1). 3–42.10.1017/S0142716406060024Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Peter & Carmella Hollo. 2009. English grammar: An introduction. Chippenham: Palgrave McMillian.10.1007/978-0-230-36576-6Search in Google Scholar

Colston, Herbert. 2008. A new look at common ground: Memory, egocentrism, and joint meaning. In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 151–187. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Conklin, Kathy & Norbert Schmitt. 2012. The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 45–61.10.1017/S0267190512000074Search in Google Scholar

Cowan, Nelson. 2001. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(1). 87–185.10.1017/S0140525X01003922Search in Google Scholar

Cowan, Nelson, Emily Elliott, Scott Saults, Candice Morey, Sam Mattox, Anna Hismjatullina & Andrew Conway. 2005. On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology 51(1). 42–100.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Cowan, Nelson, Candice Morey, Zhijian Chen, Amanda Gilchrist & Scott Saults. 2008. Theory and measurement of working memory capacity limits. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 49. 49–104.10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00002-9Search in Google Scholar

Denison, David. 2004. English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Downing, Angela. 2015. English grammar: A university course. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315750040Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John, Wallace Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra Thompson & Nii Martey. 2005. Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Parts 1–4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane Edwards & Martin Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick. 2001. Memory for language. In Catherine Doughty & Paul Robinson (eds.). Cognition and second language instruction, 33–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.004Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick & Susan Sinclair. 1996. Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49(1). 234–250.10.1080/713755604Search in Google Scholar

Ericcson, K. Anders, William Chase & Steven Faloon. 1980. Acquisition of a memory skill. Science 208. 1181–1182.10.1126/science.7375930Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 429–448.10.1017/S0140525X0999094XSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan. 2014. The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107358300Search in Google Scholar

Gathercole, Susan & Tracy Alloway. 2008. Working memory and learning: A practical guide for teachers. Sage: London.Search in Google Scholar

Gathercole, Susan, Leanne Brown & Susan Pickering. 2003. Working memory assessments at school entry as longitudinal predictors of national curriculum attainment levels. Educational and Child Psychology 20(3). 109–122.Search in Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, Michael. 2015. Tales from both sides of the brain: A life in neuroscience. New York: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Talmy Givón (eds.). 1995. Coherence in spontaneous text, Vol. 31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.31Search in Google Scholar

Gilchrist, Amanda, Nelson Cowan & Moshe Naveh-Benjamin. 2008. Working memory capacity for spoken sentences decreases with adult ageing: Recall of fewer but not smaller chunks in older adults. Memory 16(7). 773–787.10.1080/09658210802261124Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1984. Prolegomena to discourse-pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 8(4). 489–516.10.1016/0378-2166(84)90039-0Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2002. Bio-linguistics: The Santa Barbara lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.113Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2012. The adaptive approach to grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 27–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gobet, Fernand & Gary Clarkson. 2004. Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four … or is it two? Memory 12(6). 732–747.10.1080/09658210344000530Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Graff, David & Steven Bird. 2000. Many uses, many annotations for large speech corpora: Switchboard and TDT as case studies. In Maria Gavrilidou, George Carayannis, Stelios Piperidis, Stella Markantonatou & Gregory Steinhauer (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 427–433. Athens: LREC.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. Explaining the ditransitive person-role constraint: A usage-based approach. Constructions 2. 1–71.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–3310.1515/COG.2008.001Search in Google Scholar

Henry, Lucy. 2012. The development of working memory in children. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781446251348Search in Google Scholar

Hills, Peter & Michael Pake. 2016. Cognitive psychology for dummies. Chichester: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodeny & Geoffrey Pullum 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Hurford, James. 2007. The origins of meaning: Language in the light of evolution, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ibbotson, Paul & Michael Tomasello. 2009. Prototype constructions in early language acquisition. Language and Cognition 1(1). 59–85.10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.004Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2003. Précis of foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26(6). 651–665.10.1017/S0140525X03000153Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Barbara, Gillian Wigglesworth, Rachel Nordlinger & Joe Blythe. 2014. The acquisition of polysynthetic languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(2). 51–64.10.1111/lnc3.12062Search in Google Scholar

Kuhl, Patricia. 2004. Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5. 831–843.10.1038/nrn1533Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2009. The neural theory of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 17–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2009. Cognitive (construction) grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 167–176.10.1515/COGL.2009.010Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem, Ardi Roelofs & Antje Meyer. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1). 1–38.10.3115/992628.992631Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Dilin. 2003. The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications. Tesol Quarterly 37(4). 671–700.10.2307/3588217Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2005. A unified model of language acquisition. In Judith Kroll & Annette De Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 39–67. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mahlberg, Michaela, Kathy Conklin & Marie-Josée Bisson. 2014. Reading Dickens’s characters: Employing psycholinguistic methods to investigate the cognitive reality of patterns in texts. Language and Literature 23(4). 369–388.10.1177/0963947014543887Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Joel, Howard Johnson, Benoit Farley & Anna Maclachlan. 2003. Aligning and using an English-Inuktitut parallel corpus. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Building and using parallel texts: Data driven machine translation and beyond, 115–118. Edmonton: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/1118905.1118925Search in Google Scholar

Martinez, Ron & Norbert Schmitt. 2012. A phrasal expressions List. Applied Linguistics 33(3). 299–320.10.1093/applin/ams010Search in Google Scholar

Miller, George. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97.10.1525/9780520318267-011Search in Google Scholar

Oberauer, Klaus. 2005. Control of the contents of working memory – a comparison of two paradigms and two age groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(4). 714–728.10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.714Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pothos, Emmanuel. 2007. Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin 133(2). 227–244.10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227Search in Google Scholar

Pothos, Emmanuel & Patrick Juola. 2001. Linguistic structure and short term memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(1). 138–139.10.4324/9781410603494-168Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartik, 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson-Riegler, Bridget & Gregory Robinson-Riegler. 2008. Cognitive psychology: Applying the science of the mind. London: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Sampson, Geoffrey, Abdul Rahman & Alanna Morris. 2000. The Christine corpus (Release 2). Sussex: University of Sussex.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert, Sarah Grandage & Svenja Adolphs. 2004. Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In Norbert Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use, 127–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.9.08schSearch in Google Scholar

Scott, Mike. 2015. WordSmith Tools (Version 6) [software]. Liverpool.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna. 2015. On the ‘holistic’ nature of formulaic language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11. 285–301.10.1515/cllt-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. (ed). 1985. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Theoretical issue, Vol. 2. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Sosa, Anna Vogel & James MacFarlane. 2002. Evidence for frequency-based constituents in the mental lexicon: Collocations involving the word of. Brain and Language 83(2). 227–236.10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00032-9Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun & Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dyke, Julie A. & Clinton L. Johns. 2012. Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4). 193–211.10.1002/lnc3.330Search in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Search in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2013. Formulaic language. Language Teaching 46(3). 316–334.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04777-5Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Chu-hsia. 1995. On the cultural traits of Chinese idioms. Intercultural Communication Studies 5. 61–82.Search in Google Scholar

Xiao, Richard. 2010. Idioms, word clusters and reformulation markers in translational Chinese. In Richard Xiao (ed.), Proceedings of the international symposium on using corpora in contrastive and translation studies 2010 conference (UCCTS2010). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-10-26
Revised: 2017-1-28
Accepted: 2017-2-13
Published Online: 2017-3-17
Published in Print: 2017-5-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cog-2015-0112/html
Scroll to top button