Home Metaphor in culture: LIFE IS A SHOW in Chinese
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Metaphor in culture: LIFE IS A SHOW in Chinese

  • Ning Yu EMAIL logo and Dingding Jia
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2016

Abstract

This study analyzes the linguistic patterns via both qualitative and quantitative data that manifest the underlying conceptual metaphor life is a show in Chinese. It starts with an analysis of the performing arts frame as the source domain of the show metaphor. The frame comprises three major aspects: people, performance, and venue, and each of them has a focal element, respectively role, opera, and stage. It argues that the second one, opera, which refers to “Chinese opera”, a prominent form of performing arts in traditional Chinese culture, is the central element that dominates the whole frame. A systematic qualitative analysis of linguistic data shows that, because its source domain centers on Chinese opera, the life is a show metaphor generates a large number of culture-specific linguistic instantiations in Chinese. A quantitative perspective supported by corpus data reinforces the argument that this metaphor plays a central role in the Chinese conceptualization of events and phenomena in various domains of life, constituting a core component of the Chinese cultural model of life. The study concludes that the show metaphor has a salient subversion life is an opera in Chinese, in contrast with its sister life is a play found salient in English.

Acknowledgments

We want to express our sincere thanks to John Newman, the Editor, an Associate Editor, and three anonymous reviewers of Cognitive Linguistics for their very helpful comments and suggestions. Needless to say, we are solely responsible for any deficiencies that may remain.

References

Bennardo, Giovanni & Victor C. de Munck. 2014. Cultural models: Genesis, methods, and experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199908042.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Cathy Cogen, Henry Thompson, Graham Thurgood, Kenneth Whistler & James Wright (eds.), Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Search in Google Scholar

Fusaroli, Riccardo & Simone Morgagni. 2013 (eds.). Conceptual metaphor theory: Thirty years after. [Special issue]. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1/2). 407.10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.1Search in Google Scholar

Gabler, Neal. 1998. Life the movie: How entertainment conquered reality. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Gao, Xiaojian. 2005. 中国戏曲电影史 [History of Chinese opera and film]. Beijing: Culture and Arts Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (ed.). 2008. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2011. Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48. 529–562.10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2013. Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1/2). 14–36.10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2014. Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action. In Mark J. Landau, Michael D. Robinson & Brian Meier (eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life, 17–40. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/14278-002Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. & Gerard J. Steen (eds.). 1999. Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.175Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph. 1997a. Foundation of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph. 1997b. Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8(4). 267–290.10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267Search in Google Scholar

Holland, Dorothy & Naomi Quinn (eds.). 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607660Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edn, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Afterword. In George Lakoff & Mark Johnson (eds.), Metaphors we live by, 2nd edn, 243–276. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mackerras, Colin. 1997. Peking opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas. 2005. Genetic information as part of the “Great Chain of Being”. Metaphorik.de 8. 52–70.Search in Google Scholar

Sharifian, Farzad. 2003. On cultural conceptualizations. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3. 187–207.10.1163/156853703322336625Search in Google Scholar

Sharifian, Farzad. 2008. Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualization and language. In Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke & Enrique Bernárdez (eds.), Body, language, and mind (Vol. 2): Sociocultural situatedness, 109–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199116.1.109Search in Google Scholar

Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, culture, and cognition: Human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195073256.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195088359.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wikipedia. Performing arts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performing_arts (accessed 27 March 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Jingrong & Zhenqiu Cheng (eds.). 2004. 新时代汉英大词典 [New age Chinese-English dictionary]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2009. The Chinese heart in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213348Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2011a. Beijing Olympics and Beijing opera: A multimodal metaphor in a CCTV Olympics commercial. Cognitive Linguistics 22(3). 595–628.10.1515/cogl.2011.023Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2011b. A decompositional approach to metaphorical compound analysis: The case of a TV commercial. Metaphor and Symbol 26(4). 243–259.10.1080/10926488.2011.609041Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2015. Metaphorical character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 30(3). 163–183.10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yihe (ed.). 1998. 中国戏曲 [Chinese opera]. Beijing: Culture and Arts Press.Search in Google Scholar

Appendix

Examples of Chinese visual art that are multimodal (visual, verbal, and calligraphic) realizations of “Life is an opera” as cultural artifacts

These images are taken as examples from a large pool of “images for 人生如戏” in Google search, accessed in July, 2015 at the following link: https://www.google.com/search?q=images+for+%E4%BA%BA%E7%94%9F%E5%A6%82%E6%88%8F&biw=1366&bih=657&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CBwQsARqFQoTCLTJ8J_3_McCFYFZPgodOgQMLA

Received: 2015-8-13
Revised: 2015-9-23
Accepted: 2015-9-24
Published Online: 2016-3-26
Published in Print: 2016-5-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cog-2015-0080/html
Scroll to top button