An ERP Study on the Processing of Chinese Applied-Object Structures

References

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Review 59(1), 55-73.10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, J. (2009). 虚词假设与增元结构——论不及物动词后非核心论元的句法属性[The null preposition hypothesis and the applicative construction: A syntactic study of the post-intransitive-verb non-core arguments]. Modern Foreign Languages 32(1), 23-32.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, S. (1976). An object-creating rule in Bahasa Indonesian. Linguist. Inquiry 7(1), 41-87.Search in Google Scholar

Coulson, S., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain responses to morphosyntactic violations. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 13(1), 21-58.10.1080/016909698386582Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3), 547-619.10.1353/lan.1991.0021Search in Google Scholar

Friederici, A., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument-specific information. Journal of Memory and Language 43(3), 476-507.10.1006/jmla.2000.2709Search in Google Scholar

Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22(5), 1219-1248.10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1219Search in Google Scholar

Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological pattern reflecting aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31(1), 45-63.10.1023/A:1014376204525Search in Google Scholar

Friederici, A. D., & Meyer, M. (2004). The brain knows the difference: Two types of grammatical violations. Brain Research 1000(1-2), 72-77.10.1016/j.brainres.2003.10.057Search in Google Scholar

Frisch, S., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. 2004. Word category and verb-argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing. Cognition 91(3), 191-219.Search in Google Scholar

Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2001). The N400 indicates problems of thematic hierarchizing. NeuroReport 12(15), 3391-3394.10.1097/00001756-200110290-00048Search in Google Scholar

Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 8(4), 439-483.10.1080/01690969308407585Search in Google Scholar

Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M., & Brown, C. M. (2003). Syntax-related ERP effects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research 16(1), 38-50.10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00208-2Search in Google Scholar

Hald, L. A., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., & Hagoort, P. (2007). The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension: Evidence from the N400. Brain Research 1146(1), 210-218.10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.054Search in Google Scholar

Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 19(1), 59-73.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022Search in Google Scholar

Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. J. (1991). Natural speech processing: an analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology 19(4), 286-300.10.3758/BF03332082Search in Google Scholar

Hu, J. H. (2010). 题元、论元和语法功能项——格标效应与语言差异[Theta-roles, arguments and GF]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 39(3), 163-168.Search in Google Scholar

Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 15(2) 159-201.10.1080/016909600386084Search in Google Scholar

Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003). Repair, revision and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive. Neuroscience 15(1), 98-110.10.1162/089892903321107855Search in Google Scholar

Kielar, A., Meltzer-Asscher, A., & Thompson, C. (2011). ERP responses to argument structure and semantic violations in sentence context in healthy and agrammatic aphasic adults. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 23, 45-46.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.162Search in Google Scholar

Kielar, A., Meltzer-Asscher, A., & Thompson, C. (2012). Electrophysiological responses to argument structure violations in healthy adults and individuals with agrammatic aphasia. Neuropsychologia 50(14), 3320-3337.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.013Search in Google Scholar

Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language 85(1), 1-36.10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00548-5Search in Google Scholar

Kos, M., Vosse, T., van den Brink, D., & Hagoort, P. (2010). About edible restaurants: Conflicts between syntax and semantics as revealed by ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology 1(222), 1-11.10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00222Search in Google Scholar

Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research 17(1), 117-129.10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00086-7Search in Google Scholar

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207(4427), 203-205.10.1126/science.7350657Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y. F. (1993). Structural head and aspectuality. Language 69(3), 480-504.10.2307/416696Search in Google Scholar

Lin, T. H. (2001). Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure Ph. D. dissertation. Irvine: University of California Irvine.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Y. H., Xu, X. D., & Panther, K. U. (2013). An ERP approach to thematic hierarchies regarding grammatical objects of the Chinese verb Chi (eat). Language Sciences 40(4), 36-44.10.1016/j.langsci.2013.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Münte, T. F., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9(3), 318-329.10.1162/jocn.1997.9.3.318Search in Google Scholar

Münte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B. M., & Johannes, S. (1998). Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia 36(3), 217-226.10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00119-XSearch in Google Scholar

Neville, H. J., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(2), 151-165.10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.151Search in Google Scholar

Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31(6), 785-806.10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-ZSearch in Google Scholar

Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information in parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20(4), 786-803.10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.786Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, L. (2002). Introducing arguments Ph. D. dissertation，Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, T. Q. (2009). 汉语非核心论元允准结构初探[On oblique objects in Chinese]. Chinese Language Learning 3, 70-77.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, C. K., & Meltzer-Asscher, A. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of verb argument structure processing. In A. Bachrach, I. Roy, & I. Stockall (Eds.), Structuring the argument (pp.141-168). Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins.Search in Google Scholar

van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H. J., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research 22(2), 241-255.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Z. H. (2000). “吃食堂”的认知考察[A cognitive exploration on the Mandarin phrase chi shitang ‘eat restaurant’]. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies 2, 58-64.Search in Google Scholar

Ye, Z., Zhan, W., & Zhou, X. (2007). The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study. Brain Research 1142(1), 135-145.10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.030Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Jiang, X., Ye. Z., Zhang, Y., Lou, K., & Zhan W. (2010). Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 48(6), 1551-1562.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.001Search in Google Scholar