Home A contrastive pragmatic study of politeness strategies in disagreement between native speakers of English and Chinese EFL learners
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A contrastive pragmatic study of politeness strategies in disagreement between native speakers of English and Chinese EFL learners

  • Chu Yan

    CHU Yan is a senior lecturer of English (applied linguistics) at Ningbo University of Technology. Her major research interests lie within pragmatics, second language acquisition and language teaching.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 15, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper attempts to make a contrastive cross-cultural study of a special speech act— “disagreement.” Participants are 35 American undergraduates and 42 Chinese undergraduates respectively with the data eliciting technique—DCT (discourse completion test). Findings show that Chinese undergraduates tend to use different politeness strategies according to different social distance and social power while American undergraduates prefer to use positive politeness strategy most followed by negative politeness strategy, regardless of social distance and social power. The results of the study reveal cultural differences between the U.S. and China that lead to the distribution of diverse politeness strategies and also offer insights into what Chinese EFL learners are struggling with during their development of interlanguage pragmatic competence.


This study was supported by a scholarship from China Scholarship Council and Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education


About the author

Chu Yan

CHU Yan is a senior lecturer of English (applied linguistics) at Ningbo University of Technology. Her major research interests lie within pragmatics, second language acquisition and language teaching.

References

Beebe, L. M., & Takahashi, T. (1989a). Do you have a bag?: Social status and pattern variation in second language acquisition. In S. Gass et al. (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse, pragmatics and communication (pp. 103-125). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Beebe, L. M., & Takahashi, T. (1989b). Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts: Chastisement and disagreement. In M. R. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation (pp. 199-218). NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-0900-8_13Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSAPP). In Z. X. He (Ed.), Selected readings for pragmatics (2003) (pp. 647ú676). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Chen, R., & Yang, D. F. (2010). Responding to compliments in Chinese: Has it changed? Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1951-1963.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Edstrom, A. (2004). Expressions of disagreement by Venezuelans in conversation: Reconsidering the influence of culture. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(8), 1499-1518.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Foley, W. (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

García, C. (1989). Disagreeing and requesting by Americans and Venezuelans. Linguistics and Education, 1(3), 299-322.10.1016/S0898-5898(89)80004-XSearch in Google Scholar

García, C. (1993). Making a request and responding to it: A case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(2), 127-152.10.1016/0378-2166(93)90085-4Search in Google Scholar

García, C. (1999). The three stages of Venezuelan invitations and responses. Multilingua, 18(4), 391-433.10.1515/mult.1999.18.4.391Search in Google Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2001). Arguing about the Future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 1881-1900.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00034-5Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Y. G. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-OSearch in Google Scholar

Holtgraves, T. (1992). Yes, but...: Positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(2), 222-239.10.1177/0261927X970162006Search in Google Scholar

Hwang, K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 944-974.10.1086/228588Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, S. (2002). Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1403-1426.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00071-1Search in Google Scholar

Jia, Y. X. (1997). Intercultural communication. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kakava, C. (2002). Opposition in modern Greek discourse: Cultural and contextual constraints. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), 1537-1568.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00075-9Search in Google Scholar

Koike, D. A., Vann, R. E., & Busquets, J. (2001). Spanish no, sí: Reactive moves to perceived face threatening acts, part II. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(6), 879-899.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80033-3Search in Google Scholar

Liang, G., & Han, J. (2005) A contrastive study on disagreement strategies for politeness between American English and Mandarin Chinese. Asian EFL Journal, 7(1), 155-166.Search in Google Scholar

Liao, C. C., & Bresnahan, M. I. (1996). A contrastive pragmatics study on American English and Mandarin refusal strategies. Language Sciences, 18(3), 703-727.10.1016/S0388-0001(96)00043-5Search in Google Scholar

Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: M. de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110926552Search in Google Scholar

Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “Face” revisited and renewed. In Z. X. He (Ed.), Selected readings for pragmatics (2003) (pp. 647-676). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marra, M. (2012). Disagreeing without being disagreeable: Negotiating workplace communities as an outsider. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1580-1590.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Rees-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1087-1111.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00088-0Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2000). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, S. (2002). Linguistic feature variation within disagreements: An empirical investigation. Text, 22(2), 301-328.10.1515/text.2002.011Search in Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C., & Singelis, T. M. (1998) Training to recognize individual differences in collectivism and individualism within culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(1), 35-47.10.1016/S0147-1767(97)00034-5Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, W. H. (2014). Managing relationships in everyday practice: The case of strong disagreement in Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 64(1), 85-101.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.010Search in Google Scholar


(Copyedited by Steve Samuels & Ding Yanren)


Published Online: 2016-6-15
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

© FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Downloaded on 15.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cjal-2016-0015/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqy4sEPWuO48N1qNkWM-PNb_POGhM2J5iHSeirdaeZvtm2vRaUb
Scroll to top button