Home On the Description of Nanomaterials
Article Publicly Available

On the Description of Nanomaterials

Published/Copyright: November 1, 2012
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

_

On the Description of Nanomaterials

by Françoise Roure and John Rumble

At the request of several groups involved in preparing standards for nanotechnology, the International Council for Science (ICSU) and CODATA organized a workshop addressing issues associated with developing systems for describing materials on the nanoscale (called nanomaterials for short).

The subject of describing nanomaterials is of great importance as nanotechnology progresses and becomes commercialized. Many recognized systems exist for naming and describing “traditional” materials—from chemicals to metals and alloys to polymers to biological species. The distinctive characteristics of nanomaterials and the broad interest in them, from researchers to regulators to the general public, makes it imperative to develop a robust system to describe them accurately—meaning a system that will allow complete specification of each unique nanomaterial as well as determination that two nanomaterials are the same (equivalency).

The ICSU-CODATA workshop was held on 23–24 February 2012 in Paris, with additional local support from the French government. Attendees included 51 representatives of 10 international scientific unions, the ISO Technical Committee 229 on Nanotechnology, industry, government, and academia, national standards development organizations, and the OECD.

Major Conclusions

  • The workshop reinforced the fact that materials with dimensions on the nanoscale (approximately 1 nm to 100 nm) have structure, properties, and interactions that can be quite different from macroscopic materials.

  • Materials on the nanoscale are of interest to and involve many diverse scientific disciplines, with each discipline bringing many perspectives, some of which are unique to their discipline.

  • A wide variety of applications and technologies will take advantage of materials on the nanoscale in the future and these diverse uses will require different types and amounts of data.

  • Standards for describing materials on the nanoscale must be developed with the inclusion of perspectives from different scientific disciplines and different user communities.

The workshop acknowledged a shared interest across disciplines and user communities for accessing and using information about materials on the nanoscale. It strongly supported the position that a discipline-independent description system was necessary as an enabler for many purposes, including informed interactions and decisions among and by stakeholders communities that must be based on meaningful scientific knowledge. Such a system would allow responsible research and innovation in novel materials in many areas, including bio-nano engineered materials.

The workshop pointed out the negative consequences of a “business as usual” scenario, in which the development of a nanomaterials description system proceeds almost exclusively emphasizing only environmental, health, and safety (EHS) uses. In that scenario, the needs of other scientific disciplines and user communities would not be met in a timely fashion.

Consequently, the workshop defined some principles for guiding the development of a robust and high impact description system. Such a project should have:

  • a well-defined governance for a project open to international cooperation researchers in many disciplines, perhaps through crowd sourcing

  • consideration of multi-lingual needs

  • early inclusion of general public and consumer needs

  • early inclusion of engineering and technological needs

  • early inclusion of public authority needs

The resulting system should possess the following characteristics:

  • establishment of the uniqueness of a specific nanomaterial and equivalency of two nanomaterials

  • accessibility and extensions to meet specific needs or those of interest groups

  • open access of the core characterization set, generic ontologies, and data sets for use by all

  • interoperable informatic formats

  • strong curation and high scientific quality

  • capability to respond to and include new knowledge and technology, that is, be dynamic

  • provision of a level playing field by international cooperation in research on nanometrology

Recommendations

The workshop strongly endorsed a vigorous effort to facilitate the development of a robust description system for materials on the nanoscale. To this end, the workshop made the following recommendations:

  • A two-phase, pre-normative project should be started as soon as possible. The first phase is to determine the requirements for a description system for materials on the nanoscale that takes into account the needs of as many scientific and technical disciplines and user communities as possible.

  • The second phase would develop a potential list of minimum characteristics that meet as many of the requirements defined in 1 above as possible.

  • The International Scientific Unions, and similar bodies for disciplines without an union, provide an ideal mechanism for bringing together the scientific knowledge necessary to complete the projects in points 1 and 2 successfully.

  • The results of these projects should be presented to international standards development organizations such as ISO TC229 on Nanotechnology to facilitate the development of standards on description systems for materials on the nanoscale.

  • CODATA as an official ICSU committee is ideally placed to bring together different scientific knowledge through its access to International Scientific Unions.

  • VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards), has ties to international standards development organizations such as ISO, and is ideally placed to provide strong leadership on pre-normalization research.

  • Consequently, CODATA and VAMAS should form a joint working group with the specific goal of developing a pre-normative White Paper presenting the requirements for a robust description system for materials at the nano-scale based on the needs of all scientific and technical disciplines on an international and multi-lingual basis.

  • The joint CODATA-VAMAS working group should seek funding from a variety of international and national funding agencies, as well as consider partial finding from industry.

  • Work should commence as soon as approval from CODATA and VAMAS is obtained.

The agenda of the meeting is available at <www.codata.org/Nanomaterials/Index-agenda-Nanomaterial.html>.

The report is reproduced from the CODATA Newsletter 103, May 2012.

www.codata.org

_

Page last modified 31 October 2012.

Copyright © 2003-2012 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.

Questions regarding the website, please contact edit.ci@iupac.org

Published Online: 2012-11-01
Published in Print: 2012-11

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. From the Editor
  3. Contents
  4. Our Roles, Responsibilities, and Legacy
  5. New Exhibit Shows the Influence of Alchemy on Modern Chemistry
  6. The European Chemicals Agency Experience
  7. IUPAC at the Helsinki Chemical Forum
  8. A Cross-Disciplinary, Multiclass Educational Project
  9. ICSTI at Work
  10. Young Chemists to the 44th IUPAC Congress
  11. John D. Petersen Appointed IUPAC Executive Director
  12. Mozambique and Argentina Join IUPAC as Full Members
  13. Winners of 2012 IUPAC Prizes for Young Chemists
  14. Rachel O’Reilly Receives the 2012 IUPAC-Samsung Young Polymer Scientist Award
  15. Second CHEMRAWN VII Prize Awarded to Rashmi Sanghi
  16. Ian Mills Awarded IUPAP SUNAMCO Prize
  17. Mark Cesa and James Economy Named ACS Fellows
  18. IUPAC Safety Training Program
  19. InChIs and Registry Numbers
  20. Guidelines for Reporting of Phase Equilibrium Measurements (IUPAC Recommendations 2012)
  21. Characterization of Photoluminescence Measuring Systems (IUPAC Technical Report)
  22. IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Investigating Out-of-Specification Test Results of Chemical Composition Based on Metrological Concepts (IUPAC Technical Report)
  23. A Brief Guide to Polymer Nomenclature
  24. IUPAC-NIST Solubility Data Series–Recent Volumes
  25. Going for Gold: The 44th International Chemistry Olympiad
  26. On the Description of Nanomaterials
  27. What’s in a Name? Possibly Death and Taxes!
  28. IUPAC MACRO World Polymer Congress 2012
  29. Analytical Chemistry in Africa
  30. Polymer
  31. Solution Chemistry
  32. Polymer Spectroscopy
  33. Grignard’s Gift to Chemistry
  34. Mark Your Calendar
  35. Index for 2012
Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci.2012.34.6.28/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button