Article Publicly Available

Simples and Compounds

Published/Copyright: September 1, 2009
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

_

Up for Discussion |A forum for members and member organizations to share ideas and concerns.

Send your comments by e-mail to edit.ci@iupac.org

_

Simples and Compounds

No more "emf"

As a follow-up to Vladimir Simeon's question about replacing the term "electromotive force," published in the November-December 2004 CI, p.18, Christopher Brett, vice president of the Physical and Biophysical Chemistry Division, informed CI that the issue has been a concern of the former Commission on Electrochemistry since the publication of the 2nd edition of the "Green Book"* in 1993. As Simeon rightly pointed out, the name is inconsistent with its meaning and the word "force " is misleading, since potential differences are not forces.

Beginning in 1997,an extensive revision of the Electrochemistry section of the "Green Book " was carried out by the Commission on Electrochemistry. The revisions include the removal of "electromotive force" and "emf." In referring to an electrochemical cell, only the terms "cell potential" or "potential difference of an electrochemical cell" are recommended.

The 3rd edition of the "Green Book " in which the revised section on Electrochemistry will appear, is highly anticipated. The Green Book will clarify this and other issues and be an important aid and source of recommended terminology and symbols, both for electrochemists and for the wider chemical community.

*I. Mills, et al, IUPAC Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford 1993.

_

Page last modified 21 April 2005.

Copyright © 2003-2005 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.

Questions regarding the website, please contact edit.ci@iupac.org

Published Online: 2009-09-01
Published in Print: 2005-05

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Downloaded on 2.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci.2005.27.3.12/html
Scroll to top button