Home Recommended Values of the Viscosity of Molten Iron and Aluminum
Article Publicly Available

Recommended Values of the Viscosity of Molten Iron and Aluminum

Published/Copyright: September 1, 2009
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

_

Recommended Values of the Viscosity of Molten Iron and Aluminum

The widely different data obtained for the viscosity of molten iron and aluminum will be critically reviewed via an interlaboratory comparison and recommended values will be proposed. Wide ranges of values of viscosity of both molten iron and aluminum are reported in the literature. The most widely used method is some form of oscillating vessel. For the oscillating cup a number of analytical techniques have been used to convert the measurements (logarithmic decrement and time period) to viscosity. The Roscoe equation (1958) was recommended as providing the most accurate data for molten metals. Ferriss et al (2002) have pointed out there is a missing numerator in one of the expansions and a number of workers and standard texts have quoted "1/2" but expansion shows it to be "3/2".

In a parallel development, chemical engineers have adopted a set of equations for oscillating cup viscometers by Kestin and Newell, which have been rarely used for molten metals. There are two challenges: 1) Agreement about the equations used to determine the viscosity by the oscillating cup method. At present the modified Roscoe equation by Ferriss and the Kestin and Newell appear to give similar results with one laboratory’s data. 2) The widely different data obtained for the viscosity of aluminum and iron need to be critically reviewed and recommended values suggested. This may result in the need for an interlaboratory comparison. The project should lead to a consistent, internationally approved set of values for the viscosity of these two metals, as an exemplar for the field.

References

Roscoe, R (1958), Proc. Phys. Soc. 72, 576.

Ferriss, D H; Quested, P N; Chapman, L A; and Day, A P (2002) "The Choice of Equations for the Measurement of Viscosity by the Oscillating Cylinder Method." Presented at ECTP, London.

Kestin, J and Newell, GF (1957) ZAMP VIII, 433.

For more information, contact the Task Group Chairman W. A. Wakeham <w.a.wakeham@soton.ac.uk>.

www.iupac.org/projects/2003/2003-005-1-100.html

_

Page last modified 29 April 2003.

Copyright © 2002-2003 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.

Questions regarding the website, please contact edit.ci@iupac.org

Published Online: 2009-09-01
Published in Print: 2003-05

© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. From the Editor
  2. Contents
  3. A Challenge to the World’s Scientists
  4. Discover Chemistry in Europe
  5. Philosophy of Chemistry
  6. Countdown to Ottawa
  7. David Shaw Appointed to J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data Editorial Board
  8. Data for Science and Technology
  9. Physical and Engineering Science in Health Care
  10. Boletin Electronico Latinoamericano
  11. Atmospheric Deposition and Its Impact on Ecosystems
  12. 2004 ICSU Grants Program–IUPAC Applications
  13. Interdisciplinary Harmonized Approach to Metrological Traceability of Chemical Measurement Results
  14. Establishment of a System to Implement the Global Sharing of Chemical Education Reading Material with the Aid of Bi-Directional Machine Translation
  15. Toxicology Postgraduate Research in Developing Countries
  16. Women in Physics and Physical Science Network in Africa
  17. Foundation of an African Institute for Mathematical Sciences
  18. Solubility Data of Compounds Relevant to Human Health
  19. Solubility of Substances Related to Urolithiasis
  20. Solubility of Hydroxybenzoic Acids and Hydroxybenzoates
  21. Solubility of Haloganated Aromatic Hydrocarbons
  22. Recommended Values of the Viscosity of Molten Iron and Aluminum
  23. Postgraduate Course in Polymer Science
  24. Impact of Transgenic Crops on the Use of Agrochemicals and the Environment
  25. Provisional Recommendations
  26. Measurement of pH. Definition, Standards, and Procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)
  27. Use of the Term "Recovery" and "Apparent Recovery" in Analytical Procedures (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)
  28. Impact of Scientific Developments on the Chemical Weapons Convention (IUPAC Technical Report)
  29. Critical Evaluation of Stability Constants and Thermodynamic Functions of Metal Complexes of Crown Ethers (IUPAC Technical Report)
  30. Critical Evaluation of the Chemical Properties of the Transactinide Elements
  31. Special Topic Articles Featuring the 2002 Winners of the IUPAC Prize for Young Chemists
  32. Polymer Science Insights
  33. Encouraging Independent Chemistry Learning Through Multimedia Design Experiences
  34. Scattering Methods for the Investigation of Polymers
  35. Acetonitrile Binary Systems
  36. Applications of Multiple Intelligences Theory to Chemistry Teaching and Learning
  37. Solid State Chemistry
  38. Photochemistry
  39. The Mission and Challenges of Polymer Science and Technology
  40. Polymer Characterization and Advanced Materials
  41. Bioinorganic Chemistry
  42. Degradation, Stabilization, and Recycling of Polymers
  43. Biological Inorganic Chemistry
  44. Molecular Characterization of Polymers
  45. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology
  46. Organic Chemistry
  47. Biodiversity and Natural Products
  48. Mycotoxins and Phycotoxins
  49. Polymers and Organic Chemistry
  50. Chemistry and Biological Chemistry of Vanadium
  51. Mark Your Calendar
Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci.2003.25.3.16a/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button