Skip to main content
Article Publicly Available

A review of current status of analytical chemistry education

Published/Copyright: July 16, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

There is plenty of anecdotal evidence for the erosion of analytical chemistry as a discipline. This is impacted by faculty appointments, funding structures and perception of the field as being a service function. Additionally, as instruments become easier to use there is a mistaken belief in some industrial organisations that there is a reduced need for highly trained analytical specialists. There have been warning signs that the current, university chemistry curriculum, often with a does not address the needs of chemistry graduates and future employers and does not enable analytical practitioners to maximise the value of their work. The project will reflect on the interdisciplinary curriculum development efforts which has been the trend in many universities worldwide. This is a significant economic cost, considering that in many economies the most used practical skills of graduates is actually related to chemical analysis. A deep and fundamental understanding of analytical chemistry is required to foster the next generation of analytical scientists who have the insight and capacity to contribute to fundamental new developments in this field as well as the generation of new disruptive technologies.

The project will document the status quo in various regions of the world regarding the health of the discipline, proportion of professorships, funding and quality of analytical chemistry education. It will examine current attempts to address these shortcomings and offer some ways forward. The findings will be published in the form of white paper to support future curriculum development, funding and hiring decision.

For more information and comments, contact Task Group Chair Zoltán Mester <> | https://iupac.org/project/2019-039-3-500

Online erschienen: 2020-07-16
Erschienen im Druck: 2020-07-01

©2020 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead - Full issue pdf
  2. Treasurer's Column
  3. IUPAC during COVID-19
  4. Features
  5. Reflecting on a Year of Elements
  6. Sustaining Active Learning in Virtual Classroom
  7. Blockchain Technology
  8. Extending electronegativities to superheavy Main Group atoms
  9. Gender Gap in Science
  10. IUPAC Wire
  11. The 2020 Bright Science Award in Materials Sciences goes to Marc Hillmyer
  12. The 2020 Hanwha-Total IUPAC Young Scientist Award goes to Athina Anastasaki and Changle Chen
  13. Ang Li is the recipient of the 2020 Thieme–IUPAC Prize
  14. Winners of the 2020 IUPAC-Solvay International Award for Young Chemists
  15. 2020 IUPAC-ThalesNano Prize In Flow Chemistry and Microfluidics—Call For Nominations
  16. Understanding Chemicals in Products
  17. The Beijing Declaration on Research Data
  18. Announcement of the 2020 L’Oreal Women in Science awardees
  19. IUPAC Periodic Table Challenge 2.0
  20. In Memoriam Maurice (Mo) Williams, 1933 - 2020
  21. Project Place
  22. Guidelines on developing robust biocatalysts for biorefinery
  23. Development of a Standard for FAIR Data Management of Spectroscopic Data
  24. Development of a Machine Accessible Kinetic Databank for Radical Polymerizations
  25. A review of current status of analytical chemistry education
  26. What is the NPU Terminology, and how is it used?
  27. Bookworm
  28. Superheavy
  29. Biomass Burning in Sub-Saharan Africa: Chemical Issues and Action Outreach
  30. Successful Drug Discovery
  31. Conference Call
  32. The World Chemistry Leaders meet the century-old IUPAC
  33. Noncovalent Interactions
  34. IUPAC For Africa
  35. Where 2B & Y
  36. Mark Your Calendar
Downloaded on 22.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci-2020-0320/html
Scroll to top button