Clausal complexity of expert and student writing: a corpus-based analysis of papers in social sciences

References

Ädel, Annelie. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.24Search in Google Scholar

Ai, Haiyang & Xiaofei Lu. 2013. A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’ writing. In Ana Díaz-Negrillo, Nicholas Ballier & Paul Thompson (eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data, 249–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.59.15aiSearch in Google Scholar

Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc 3.4.4. Tokyo: Waseda University.Search in Google Scholar

Aull, Laura, Dineth Bandarage & Meredith Richardson Miller. 2017. Generality in student and expert epistemic stance: A corpus analysis of first-year, upper-level, and published academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 26. 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles. 1994. Constructing experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Gena R. 2010. Using corpora in the language learning classroom: Corpus linguistics for teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.371534Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(1). 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2016. Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511920776Search in Google Scholar

Bondi, Marina. 2010. Arguing in economics and business discourse: Phraseological tools in research articles. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 2. 219–234.Search in Google Scholar

Boulton, Alex. 2012. Corpus consultation for ESP: A review of empirical research. In Alex Boulton, Shirley Carter-Thomas & Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet (eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues & applications, 261–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.52.11bouSearch in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2012. Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In Alex Housen, Folker Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.32.02bulSearch in Google Scholar

Casal, J. Elliott & Joseph J. Leeb. 2019. Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 44. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara. 2014. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, James P. 2006. How to support a one-handed economist: The role of modalisation in economic forecasting. English for Specific Purposes 25(2). 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.009.Search in Google Scholar

Dueñas, Mur. 2007. Pilar‘I/we focus on…’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(2). 143–162.10.1016/j.jeap.2007.05.002Search in Google Scholar

English Grammar Profile. 2015. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. www.englishprofile.org/english-grammar-profile/egp-online (accessed 24 August 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Flowerdew, Lynne. 2003. A combined corpus and systemic‐functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly 37(3). 489–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588401.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline & Peter Skehan. 1996. The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18. 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100015047.Search in Google Scholar

Gabrielatos, Costas & Anna Marchi. 2012. Keyness: Appropriate metrics and practical issues. In CADS International Conference 2012. Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies: More than the sum of Discourse Analysis and Computing?, 13–14 September. Italy: University of Bologna.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Sheena, Hilary Nesi & Douglas Biber. 2018. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics 40(4). 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005.Search in Google Scholar

Gimenez, Julio. 2016. Discipline-specific writing for business students: Research, practice and pedagogy. In John Flowerdew & Tracey Costley (eds.), Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice, 126–143. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Granger, Sylviane & Stephanie Tyson. 1996. Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes 15(1). 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1996.tb00089.x.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, Bethany. 2015. On the complexity of academic writing: Disciplinary variation and structural complexity. In Viviana Cortes & Eniko Csomay (eds.), Corpus-based research in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of Doug Biber, 49–78. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.66.03graSearch in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 2002. The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse, with reference to Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 150–170. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hannay, Mike & Elena Martinez Caro. 2008. Thematic choice in the written English of advanced Spanish and Dutch learners. In Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Szilvia Papp & Mara Beln Dez-Bedmar (eds.), Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research, 227–253. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401206204_010Search in Google Scholar

Hardy, Jack A. & Ute Römer. 2013. Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of upper-level student papers (MICUSP). Corpora 8(2). 183–207. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0040.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, Roger. 2001. The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17(4). 345–367.10.1177/026765830101700404Search in Google Scholar

Hiltunen, Turo. 2016. Passives in academic writing: Comparing research articles and student essays across four disciplines. In Maria Josè López-Couso, Belèn Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo & Ignacio M. Palacios-Martínez (eds.), Corpus linguistics on the move: Exploring and understanding English through corpora, 132–157. Leiden, Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004321342_008Search in Google Scholar

Hinkel, Eli. 2002. Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781410602848Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 1999. Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In Christopher N. Candlin & Ken Hyland (eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices, 99–121. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315840390-6Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2). 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1). 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

Johns, Tim F. 1991. Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. English Language Research Journal 4. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar

Johns, Tim F. 1997. Contexts: The background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In Anne Wichmann, Steven Fligelstone, Tony McEnery & Gerry Knowles (eds.), Teaching and language corpora, 100–115. London, New York: Longman.10.4324/9781315842677-9Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Craig & Sachiko Nakamura. 2019. Proficiency-related variation in syntactic complexity: A study of English L1 and L2 oral descriptive discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 29(2). 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12224.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, David & Sylvia Chen. 2009. Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 18. 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei. 2011. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly 45(1). 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859.Search in Google Scholar

Mazgutova, Diana & Judit Kormos. 2015. Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing 29. 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

Münch, Richard. 2015. Science in the hands of strategic management: The metrification of scientific work and its impact on the evolution of knowledge. In Isabell M. Welpe, Jutta Wollersheim, Stefanie Ringelhan & Margit Osterloh (eds.), Incentives and performance, 33–48. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_3Search in Google Scholar

Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2019. Complex, but in what way? A step towards greater understanding of academic writing proficiency. In Chisato Danjo, Indu Meddegama, Dave O’Brien, John Prudhoe, Linda Walz & Rachel Wicaksono (eds.), Online Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics: Taking Risks in Applied Linguistics, 6–8 September, 2018. York: York St John University. https://custom.cvent.com/01664CE00C344F7BA62E39C4CFE91FA8/files/0f77de05eb81461a8037170680562243.pdf (accessed 22 June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24. 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492.Search in Google Scholar

Päiviö, Hanna. 2008. The moral order of business studying. In Jussi Välimaa & Oili Helena Ylijoki (eds.), Cultural perspectives on higher education, 59–74. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6604-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, Philip. 2009. Linking adverbials in student and professional writing in literary studies: What makes writing mature. In Magie Charles, Susan Hunston & Diane Pecorari (eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and piscourse, 215–235. London, New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Siepmann, Dirk, John D. Gallagher, Mike Hannay & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2011. Writing in English: A guide for advanced learners. Tübingen: UTB.10.36198/9783838536002Search in Google Scholar

Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Bethany Gray. 2016. Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication 33(2). 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. & Christine B. Feak. 2004. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Waylen, Georgina. 1997. Gender, feminism and political economy. New Political Economy 2(2). 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563469708406297.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe-Quintero, Kate, Shunji Inagaki & Hae-Young Kim. 1998. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Search in Google Scholar