Home Medicine Analytical validation of the Mindray CL1200i analyzer high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: MERITnI study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analytical validation of the Mindray CL1200i analyzer high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: MERITnI study

  • ORCID logo , ORCID logo , , and ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 28, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

This study performed an analytical validation study of the Mindray high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay addressing limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), precision, linearity, analytical specificity and sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits.

Methods

LoB, LoD, precision, linearity and analytical specificity were studied according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. We used one reagent lot and one CL1200i analyzer. Skeletal troponin I and T, cardiac troponin T, troponin C, actin, tropomyosin, myosin light chain, myoglobin and creatine kinase (CK-MB) were studied for cross-reactivity. Interference with biotin was examined. Lithium heparin samples (one freeze thaw cycle) from healthy males and females were measured to determine the 99th percentiles by using the non-parametric method. Analyses were performed before and after excluding subjects with clinical conditions and/or increased surrogate biomarkers.

Results

The Mindray hs-cTnI assay met criteria to be considered as a hs-cTn assay. LoB and LoD was <0.1 ng/L and 0.1 ng/L, respectively. Repeatability had a coefficient of variation 1.2–3.8 %, and within-laboratory imprecision 1.7–5.0 %. The measuring interval ranged from 1.1 to 28,180 ng/L. The analytical specificity was clinically acceptable for the interferents studied. After exclusions, the 99th percentile URLs obtained were 10 ng/L overall, 5 ng/L for females and 12 ng/L for males.

Conclusions

Analytical observations of the Mindray hs-cTnI assay demonstrated excellent LoB, LoD, precision, linearity and analytical specificity, that were in alignment with the manufacturer’s claims and regulatory guidelines for hs-cTnI. The assay is suitable for clinical investigation for patient-oriented studies.


Corresponding author: Fred S. Apple, PhD, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Hennepin Healthcare/Hennepin County Medical Center, Clinical Laboratories P4, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA; and Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA, E-mail:

Funding source: Funded as investigator initiated trial in part by Mindray.

Award Identifier / Grant number: none

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the numerous technologists that performed all cTn testing.

  1. Research ethics: The clinicaltrials.gov MERITnI (Mindray-hs-cTnI Assay: Analytical and Clinical Evaluation for the Diagnosis and RIsk AssessmenT of Myocardial InfarctIon, NCT05853042), was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Hennepin Healthcare/Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC) (Minneapolis, MN, USA).

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: FSA: Consultant: Mindray; Associate Editor: Clinical Chemistry; Advisory Boards: Werfen, Abbott Vascular; PI on Industry Funded Grants (non-salaried) on cardiac biomarkers through Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute: Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott POC, BD, Beckman Coulter, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers. KS, BFE, AS: These authors state not conflict of interests.

  5. Research funding: This study was supported in part by Mindray as an investigator initiated study (FSA). We thank the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) for the support with the Professional Scientific Exchange Programme (PSEP) to BFE.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

  7. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT05853042.

References

1. Collet, JP, Thiele, H, Barbato, E, Barthélémy, O, Bauersachs, J, Bhatt, DL, ESC Scientific Document Group, et al.. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2021;42:1289–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Kontos, MC, de Lemos, JA, Deitelzweig, SB, Diercks, DB, Gore, MO, Hess, EP, et al.. 2022 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the evaluation and disposition of acute chest pain in the emergency department: a report of the American College of Cardiology solution set oversight committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:1925–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.750.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Gulati, M, Levy, PD, Mukherjee, D, Amsterdam, E, Bhatt, DL, Birtcher, KK, et al.. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021;144:e368–454. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001029.Search in Google Scholar

4. Thygesen, K, Alpert, JS, Jaffe, AS, Chaitman, BR, Bax, JJ, Morrow, DA, et al.. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2231–64. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000617.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Sandoval, Y, Lewis, BR, Mehta, RA, Ola, O, Knott, JD, De Michieli, L, et al.. Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial injury and infarction with a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in the emergency department. A multicenter United States Evaluation. Circulation 2022;145:1708–19. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.122.059235.Search in Google Scholar

6. Jaffe, AS, Body, R, Mills, NL, Aakre, KM, Collinson, PO, Saenger, A, et al.. Single troponin measurement to rule out myocardial infarction. Am Coll Cardiol 2023;82:60–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Apple, FS, Jaffe, AS, Collinson, P, Mockel, M, Ordonez-Llanos, J, Lindahl, B, et al.. IFCC educational materials on selected analytical and clinical applications of high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Biochem 2015;48:201–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.08.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Wu, AHB, Christenson, RH, Greene, DN, Jaffe, AS, Kavsak, PA, Ordonez-Llanos, J, et al.. Clinical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin in acute coronary syndrome: expert opinion from the Academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and the Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem 2018;64:645–55. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2017.277186.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Biomarkers reference tables [Internet]. IFCC. https://ifcc.org/ifcc-education-division/emd-committees/committee-on-clinical-applications-of-cardiac-bio-markers-c-cb/biomarkers-reference-tables/ [Accessed 28 Aug 2023].Search in Google Scholar

10. Apple, FS, Sandoval, Y, Jaffe, AS, Ordonez-Llanos, J, IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers. Cardiac troponin assays: guide to understanding analytical characteristics and their impact on clinical care. Clin Chem 2017;63:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.255109.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Apple, FS, Wu, AHB, Sandoval, Y, Sexter, A, Love, SA, Myers, G, et al.. Sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits for high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays derived using a universal sample bank. Clin Chem 2020;66:434–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvz029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Bozkaya, G, Sisman, AR. The comparison of analytical performances of Mindray CL-1000i and Beckman Coulter Access II Troponin I methods in the light of recent guidelines and the quality requirements. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:1237–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Li, L, Shu, X, Zhang, L, Xu, A, Yang, J, Jing, Y, et al.. Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: hs-cTnI (CLI) assay. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024;62:353–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0529.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Lippi, G, Pighi, L, Paviati, E, Demonte, D, De Nitto, S, Gelati, M, et al.. Analytical evaluation of the novel Mindray high sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay on CL-1200i. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024;62:1433–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1448.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. EP17A2 evaluation of detection capability for clinical laboratory measurement procedures [Internet]. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. https://clsi.org/standards/products/method-evaluation/documents/ep17/ [Accessed 30 Aug 2023].Search in Google Scholar

16. EP15A3 user verification of precision and bias estimation for clinical laboratory measurement procedures [Internet]. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. https://clsi.org/standards/products/method-evaluation/documents/ep15/ [Accessed 1 Sep 2023].Search in Google Scholar

17. EP06 evaluation of linearity of quantitative measurement procedures for clinical laboratory measurement procedures [Internet]. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. https://clsi.org/standards/products/methodevaluation/documents/ep06/ [Accessed 1 Sep 2023].Search in Google Scholar

18. EP07 interference testing in clinical chemistry [Internet]. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute. https://clsi.org/standards/products/method-evaluation/documents/ep07/ [Accessed 1 Sep 2023].Search in Google Scholar

19. Aakre, KM, Saenger, AK, Body, R, Collinson, P, Hammarsten, O, Jaffe, AS, et al.. Analytical considerations in deriving 99th percentile upper reference limits for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays: educational recommendations from the IFCC Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Bio-Markers. Clin Chem 2022;68:1022–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvac092.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Fabre-Estremera, B, Smith, SW, Sandoval, Y, Schulz, K, Okeson, B, Cullen, L, et al.. Rapid rule out of myocardial infarction using a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement strategy at presentation to the emergency department: the SAFETY study. Clin Chem 2023;69:627–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvad033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Apple, FS, Smith, SW, Greenslade, JH, Sandoval, Y, Parsonage, W, Ranasinghe, I, et al.. Single high-sensitivity point of care whole blood cardiac troponin I measurement to rule out acute myocardial infarction at low risk. Circulation 2022;46:1918–29. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.122.061148.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Aakre, KM, Apple, FS, Mills, NL, Meex, SJR, Collinson, PO, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (IFCC C-CB). Lower limits for reporting high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and impact of analytical performance on patient misclassification. Clin Chem 2023;70:497–505.10.1093/clinchem/hvad185Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. du Fay de Lavallaz, J, Prepoudis, A, Wendebourg, MJ, Kesenheimer, E, Kyburz, D, Daikeler, T, et al.. Skeletal muscle disorders: a noncardiac source of cardiac troponin T. Circulation 2022;145:1764–79. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.121.058489.Search in Google Scholar

24. Harley, K, Bissonnette, S, Inzitari, R, Schulz, K, Apple, FS, Kavsak, PA, et al.. Independent and combined effects of biotin and hemolysis on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:1431–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0124.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0352).


Received: 2024-03-17
Accepted: 2024-05-13
Published Online: 2024-05-28
Published in Print: 2024-11-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. External quality assurance (EQA): navigating between quality and sustainability
  4. Reviews
  5. Molecular allergology: a clinical laboratory tool for precision diagnosis, stratification and follow-up of allergic patients
  6. Nitrous oxide abuse direct measurement for diagnosis and follow-up: update on kinetics and impact on metabolic pathways
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. A vision to the future: value-based laboratory medicine
  9. Point-of-care testing, near-patient testing and patient self-testing: warning points
  10. Navigating the path of reproducibility in microRNA-based biomarker research with ring trials
  11. Point/Counterpoint
  12. Six Sigma – is it time to re-evaluate its value in laboratory medicine?
  13. The value of Sigma-metrics in laboratory medicine
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Analytical validation of the amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction-capillary electrophoresis assay to diagnose spinal muscular atrophy
  16. Can we identify patients carrying targeted deleterious DPYD variants with plasma uracil and dihydrouracil? A GPCO-RNPGx retrospective analysis
  17. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  18. Comparison of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Le Chat with physician interpretations of medical laboratory questions from an online health forum
  19. External quality assessment performance in ten countries: an IFCC global laboratory quality project
  20. Multivariate anomaly detection models enhance identification of errors in routine clinical chemistry testing
  21. Enhanced patient-based real-time quality control using the graph-based anomaly detection
  22. Performance evaluation and user experience of BT-50 transportation unit with automated and scheduled quality control measurements
  23. Stability of steroid hormones in dried blood spots (DBS)
  24. Quantification of C1 inhibitor activity using a chromogenic automated assay: analytical and clinical performances
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. Time-dependent characteristics of analytical measurands
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. Expert-level detection of M-proteins in serum protein electrophoresis using machine learning
  29. An automated workflow based on data independent acquisition for practical and high-throughput personalized assay development and minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma patients
  30. Cardiovascular Diseases
  31. Analytical validation of the Mindray CL1200i analyzer high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: MERITnI study
  32. Diabetes
  33. Limitations of glycated albumin standardization when applied to the assessment of diabetes patients
  34. Patient result monitoring of HbA1c shows small seasonal variations and steady decrease over more than 10 years
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Inaccurate definition of Bence Jones proteinuria in the EFLM Urinalysis Guideline 2023
  37. Use of the term “Bence-Jones proteinuria” in the EFLM European Urinalysis Guideline 2023
  38. Is uracil enough for effective pre-emptive DPD testing?
  39. Reply to: “Is uracil enough for effective pre-emptive DPD testing?”
  40. Accurate predictory role of monocyte distribution width on short-term outcome in sepsis patients
  41. Reply to: “Accurate predictory role of monocyte distribution width on short-term outcome in sepsis patients”
  42. Spurious parathyroid hormone (PTH) elevation caused by macro-PTH
  43. Setting analytical performance specifications for copeptin-based testing
  44. Serum vitamin B12 levels during chemotherapy against diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature
  45. Evolution of acquired haemoglobin H disease monitored by capillary electrophoresis: a case of a myelofibrotic patient with a novel ATRX mutation
Downloaded on 20.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2024-0352/html
Scroll to top button