Home An LC–MS/MS method for serum cystatin C quantification and its comparison with two commercial immunoassays
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An LC–MS/MS method for serum cystatin C quantification and its comparison with two commercial immunoassays

  • Li Zhang , Xiaerbanu Nizhamuding , Hao Zheng , Jie Zeng , Xinyi Yuan , Zijia Ma , Weiyan Zhou ORCID logo , Chao Zhang , Tianjiao Zhang EMAIL logo and Chuanbao Zhang ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 23, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

The standardization of cystatin C (CysC) measurement has received increasing attention in recent years due to its importance in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Mass spectrometry-based assays have the potential to provide an accuracy base for CysC measurement. However, a precise, accurate and sustainable LC–MS/MS method for CysC is still lacking.

Methods

The developed LC–MS/MS method quantified CysC by detecting signature peptide (T3) obtained from tryptic digestion. Stable isotope labeled T3 peptide (SIL-T3) was spiked to control matrix effects and errors caused by liquid handling. The protein denaturation, reduction and alkylation procedures were combined into a single step with incubation time of 1 h, and the digestion lasted for 3.5 h. In the method validation, digestion time-course, imprecision, accuracy, matrix effect, interference, limit of quantification (LOQ), carryover, linearity, and the comparability to two routine immunoassays were evaluated.

Results

No significant matrix effect or interference was observed with the CysC measurement. The LOQ was 0.21 mg/L; the within-run and total imprecision were 1.33–2.05 % and 2.18–3.90 % for three serum pools (1.18–5.34 mg/L). The LC–MS/MS method was calibrated by ERM-DA471/IFCC and showed good correlation with two immunoassays traceable to ERM-DA471/IFCC. However, significant bias was observed for immunoassays against the LC–MS/MS method.

Conclusions

The developed LC–MS/MS method is robust and simpler and holds the promise to provide an accuracy base for routine immunoassays, which will promote the standardization of CysC measurement.


Corresponding authors: Tianjiao Zhang and Chuanbao Zhang, National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, P.R. China; and National Center of Gerontology, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing, P.R. China, Phone: +86 010 58115059, Fax: +86 010 65132968, E-mail: (T. Zhang), (C. Zhang)

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2022YFC3602301

Funding source: Beijing Natural Science Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: L234058

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the technical support of engineers from Roche and DiaSys.

  1. Research ethics: The Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital approved this study (2022BJYYEC-369-01).

  2. Informed consent: The Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital exempted the need for obtaining informed consent (2022BJYYEC-369-01).

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Li Zhang conceived the study, designed and implemented the experiment, performed data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. Xiaerbanu Nizhamuding, Hao Zheng and Jie Zeng reviewed the literature, participated in experiment design and provided critical revisions. Xinyi Yuan and Zijia Ma conducted the statistical analysis and contributed to the experimental design. Weiyan Zhou and Chao Zhang contributed to experimental design and interpretation of the results. Tianjiao Zhang and Chuanbao Zhang administrated the project, acquired funding and provided final approval of the manuscript for submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  5. Research funding: National Key Research and Development Program of China: No. 2022YFC3602301. Beijing Natural Science Foundation: No. L234058.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Shlipak, MG, Tummalapalli, SL, Boulware, LE, Grams, ME, Ix, JH, Jha, V, et al.. The case for early identification and intervention of chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int 2021;99:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013;3:1–150.Search in Google Scholar

3. Xu, X, Nie, S, Xu, H, Liu, B, Weng, J, Chen, C, et al.. Detecting Neonatal AKI by serum cystatin C. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023;34:1253–63. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000000000125.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Frazee, EN, Rule, AD, Herrmann, SM, Kashani, KB, Leung, N, Virk, A, et al.. Serum cystatin C predicts vancomycin trough levels better than serum creatinine in hospitalized patients: a cohort study. Crit Care 2014;18:R110. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13899.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Tolomeo, P, Butt, JH, Kondo, T, Campo, G, Desai, AS, Jhund, PS, et al.. Importance of cystatin C in estimating glomerular filtration rate: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur Heart J 2023;44:2202–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad210.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Levey, AS, Coresh, J, Tighiouart, H, Greene, T, Inker, LA. Measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020;16:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0191-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Markos, JR, Schaepe, KS, Teaford, HR, Rule, AD, Kashani, KB, Lieske, JC, et al.. Clinician perspectives on inpatient cystatin C utilization: a qualitative case study at Mayo Clinic. PLoS One 2020;15:e0243618. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243618.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Zeng, J, Zhang, L, Zhang, J, Zhou, W, Zhang, T, Wang, J, et al.. Imprecision remains to be improved in the measurement of serum cystatin C with heterogeneous systems. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1455–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1299.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Björk, J, Bäck, SE, Ebert, N, Evans, M, Grubb, A, Hansson, M, et al.. GFR estimation based on standardized creatinine and cystatin C: a European multicenter analysis in older adults. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:422–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-0563.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Lees, JS, Welsh, CE, Celis-Morales, CA, Mackay, D, Lewsey, J, Gray, SR, et al.. Glomerular filtration rate by differing measures, albuminuria and prediction of cardiovascular disease, mortality and end-stage kidney disease. Nat Med 2019;25:1753–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0627-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Delgado, C, Baweja, M, Crews, DC, Eneanya, ND, Gadegbeku, CA, Inker, LA, et al.. A unifying approach for GFR estimation: recommendations of the NKF-ASN task force on reassessing the inclusion of race in diagnosing kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021;32:2994–3015. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2021070988.Search in Google Scholar

12. Pottel, H, Bjork, J, Rule, AD, Ebert, N, Eriksen, BO, Dubourg, L, et al.. Cystatin C-based equation to estimate GFR without the inclusion of race and sex. N Engl J Med 2023;388:333–43. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2203769.Search in Google Scholar

13. Grubb, A, Blirup-Jensen, S, Lindström, V, Schmidt, C, Althaus, H, Zegers, I. First certified reference material for cystatin C in human serum ERM-DA471/IFCC. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1619–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2010.318.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ebert, N, Delanaye, P, Shlipak, M, Jakob, O, Martus, P, Bartel, J, et al.. Cystatin C standardization decreases assay variation and improves assessment of glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chim Acta 2016;456:115–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.03.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Karger, AB, Long, T, Inker, LA, Eckfeldt, JH. College of American pathologists accuracy based C, Chemistry resource C. Improved performance in measurement of serum cystatin C by laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists 2019 CYS Survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022;146:1218–23. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0306-cp.Search in Google Scholar

16. Nordin, G. Cystatin C-incremental improvement in measurement and understanding of results. Clin Chem 2017;63:802–3. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.270017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Lee, HS, Bae, GE, Lee, JE, Park, HD. Effect of two cystatin C reagents and four equations on glomerular filtration rate estimations after standardization. Ann Lab Med 2023;43:565–73.10.3343/alm.2023.43.6.565Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Bargnoux, AS, Piéroni, L, Cristol, JP, Kuster, N, Delanaye, P, Carlier, MC, et al.. Multicenter evaluation of cystatin C measurement after assay standardization. Clin Chem 2017;63:833–41. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.264325.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. Commutability of reference and control materials: an essential factor for assuring the quality of measurements in Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:967–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0154.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Bargnoux, AS, Kuster, N, Delatour, V, Delanaye, P, González-Antuña, A, Cristol, JP, et al.. Reference method and reference material are necessary tools to reveal the variability of cystatin C assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:117–8. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2015-0198-le.Search in Google Scholar

21. CLSI. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods. In: CLSI guideline C62, 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.Search in Google Scholar

22. Hoofnagle, AN, Wener, MH. The fundamental flaws of immunoassays and potential solutions using tandem mass spectrometry. J Immunol Methods 2009;347:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2009.06.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Marcovina, SM, Clouet-Foraison, N, Koschinsky, ML, Lowenthal, MS, Orquillas, A, Boffa, MB, et al.. Development of an LC–MS/MS proposed candidate reference method for the standardization of analytical methods to measure lipoprotein(a). Clin Chem 2021;67:490–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa324.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Cobbaert, CM, Althaus, H, Begcevic Brkovic, I, Ceglarek, U, Coassin, S, Delatour, V, et al.. Towards an SI-traceable reference measurement system for seven serum apolipoproteins using bottom-up quantitative proteomics: conceptual approach enabled by cross-disciplinary/cross-sector collaboration. Clin Chem 2021;67:478–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa239.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Mussap, M, Plebani, M. Biochemistry and clinical role of human cystatin C. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2004;41:467–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408360490504934.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. González-Antuña, A, Rodríguez-González, P, Ohlendorf, R, Henrion, A, Delatour, V, García Alonso JI. Determination of Cystatin C in human serum by isotope dilution mass spectrometry using mass overlapping peptides. J Proteonomics 2015;112:141–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Ji, H, Wang, J, Ju, S, Cong, H, Wang, X, Su, J, et al.. Quantification of cystatin-C in human serum by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 2017;1059:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.04.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. CLSI. Quantitative measurement of proteins and peptides by mass spectrometry. In: CLSI guideline C64, 1st ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

29. Aarsand, AK, Fernandez-Calle, P, Webster, C, Coskun, A, Gonzales-Lao, E, Diaz-Garzon, J, et al.. The EFLM biological variation database. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/ [Accessed Dec 2023].Search in Google Scholar

30. Farré-Segura, J, Le Goff, C, Lukas, P, Cobraiville, G, Fillet, M, Servais, A-C, et al.. Validation of an LC–MS/MS method using solid-phase extraction for the quantification of 1-84 parathyroid hormone: toward a candidate reference measurement procedure. Clin Chem 2022;68:1399–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvac135.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Inker, LA, Schmid, CH, Tighiouart, H, Eckfeldt, JH, Feldman, HI, Greene, T, et al.. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med 2012;367:20–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1114248.Search in Google Scholar

32. Paulovich, AG, Zhang, H, Zhang, Z, Smith, RD, Rodriguez, H, Rodland, KD, et al.. Recommendations for the generation, quantification, storage, and handling of peptides used for mass spectrometry–based assays. Clin Chem 2016;62:48–69. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.250563.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Hoofnagle, AN, Becker, JO, Oda, MN, Cavigiolio, G, Mayer, P, Vaisar, T. Multiple-reaction monitoring-mass spectrometric assays can accurately measure the relative protein abundance in complex mixtures. Clin Chem 2012;58:777–81. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.173856.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Wang, M, Chen, J, Turko, IV. 15N-Labeled full-length apolipoprotein E4 as an internal standard for mass spectrometry quantification of apolipoprotein E isoforms. Anal Chem 2012;84:8340–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3018873.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Bronsema, KJ, Bischoff, R, van de Merbel, NC. High-sensitivity LC–MS/MS quantification of peptides and proteins in complex biological samples: the impact of enzymatic digestion and internal standard selection on method performance. Anal Chem 2013;85:9528–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4015116.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0821).


Received: 2023-08-01
Accepted: 2024-01-08
Published Online: 2024-01-23
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. SARS-CoV-2 is here to stay: do not lower our guard
  4. Reviews
  5. SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA: formation process and rapid molecular diagnostic methods
  6. Prognostic value of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a systematic review
  7. Presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID symptoms: a systematic review of the literature
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
  10. Blood-based biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease – moving towards a new era of diagnostics
  11. A comprehensive review on PFAS including survey results from the EFLM Member Societies
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. Report from the HarmoSter study: different LC-MS/MS androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone methods compare well; however, unifying calibration is a double-edged sword
  14. An LC–MS/MS method for serum cystatin C quantification and its comparison with two commercial immunoassays
  15. CX3CL1/Fractalkine as a biomarker for early pregnancy prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes
  16. Elevated S100B urine levels predict seizures in infants complicated by perinatal asphyxia and undergoing therapeutic hypothermia
  17. The correlation of urea and creatinine concentrations in sweat and saliva with plasma during hemodialysis: an observational cohort study
  18. Tubular phosphate transport: a comparison between different methods of urine sample collection in FGF23-dependent hypophosphatemic syndromes
  19. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  20. Monocyte distribution width (MDW): study of reference values in blood donors
  21. Data mining of reference intervals for serum creatinine: an improvement in glomerular filtration rate estimating equations based on Q-values
  22. Hematology and Coagulation
  23. MALDI-MS in first-line screening of newborns for sickle cell disease: results from a prospective study in comparison to HPLC
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. To rule-in, or not to falsely rule-out, that is the question: evaluation of hs-cTnT EQA performance in light of the ESC-2020 guideline
  26. Temporal biomarker concentration patterns during the early course of acute coronary syndrome
  27. Diabetes
  28. Proteomic analysis of diabetic retinopathy identifies potential plasma-protein biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis
  29. Infectious Diseases
  30. Serum biomarkers of inflammation and vascular damage upon SARS-Cov-2 mRNA vaccine in patients with thymic epithelial tumors
  31. A high throughput immuno-affinity mass spectrometry method for detection and quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein in human saliva and its comparison with RT-PCR, RT-LAMP, and lateral flow rapid antigen test
  32. Evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers and vitamins in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-COVID syndrome
  33. The CoLab score is associated with SARS-CoV-2 viral load during admission in individuals admitted to the intensive care unit: the CoLaIC cohort study
  34. Development and evaluation of a CRISPR-Cas13a system-based diagnostic for hepatitis E virus
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Crioplast® is a reliable device to ensure pre-analytical stability of adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH)
  37. Falsely decreased Abbott Alinity-c gamma-glutamyl transferase-2 result from paraprotein and heparin interference: case report and subsequent laboratory experiments
  38. Impact of hemolysis on uracilemia in the context of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency testing
  39. Value of plasma neurofilament light chain for monitoring efficacy in children with later-onset spinal muscular atrophy under nusinersen treatment
  40. Analytical evaluation of the Snibe β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX-I) automated method
  41. Acute myeloid leukemia with blue-green neutrophilic inclusions have different outcomes: two cases and review of the literature
  42. Congress Abstracts
  43. The 10+1 Santorini Conference
  44. 14th National Congress of the Portuguese Society of Clinical Chemistry, Genetics and Laboratory Medicine
  45. 15th National Congress of the Portuguese Society of Clinical Chemistry, Genetics and Laboratory Medicine
  46. ISMD2024 Thirteenth International Symposium on Molecular Diagnostics
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0821/html
Scroll to top button