Home Reference intervals of 24 trace elements in blood, plasma and erythrocytes for the Slovenian adult population
Article Open Access

Reference intervals of 24 trace elements in blood, plasma and erythrocytes for the Slovenian adult population

  • Alenka France Štiglic ORCID logo , Ingrid Falnoga , Alenka Sešek Briški , Marko Žavbi , Joško Osredkar ORCID logo , Milan Skitek and Janja Marc EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 28, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to establish the population- and laboratory-specific reference intervals (RIs) for the Slovenian adult population for 24 trace elements (TEs) in blood, plasma and erythrocytes and to evaluate the impact of gender, age, seafood consumption, smoking habits and amalgam fillings on TEs levels.

Methods

TEs (Mn, Co, Cu, Zn, Se and Mo, Li, Be, V, Cr, Ni, Ga, As, Rb, Sr, Ag, Cd, Sn, Cs, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb and U) were determined in 192 a priori selected blood donors (107 women and 85 men, aged 18–65 years), using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with the Octopole Reaction System. Participants filled out a questionnaire, and RIs were established according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for TEs.

Results

Uniform RIs for non-essential and gender-specific for essential TEs in blood, plasma and erythrocytes were established. In our population, higher blood and plasma Cu, and erythrocyte Mn levels in women were found. In men, blood Zn, plasma Zn, Mn and Se, and erythrocyte Cu levels were higher. Zn levels were higher in 30–39 years age group. Pb and Sr increased with age. Smoking positively affected Cd, Pb, Cs and Rb; seafood consumption increased As, Hg and Zn; and amalgam increased Hg, Ag and Cu levels.

Conclusions

Essential TEs were inside recommended levels, and the non-essential ones were far below critical levels. Established RIs will provide an important foundation for clinical diagnostics, safety erythrocyte transfusions assessment, toxicology and epidemiological studies.

Introduction

Trace elements (TEs) in the human body are of exogenous origin and are therefore highly dependent on diet and environmental exposure from natural and anthropogenic sources. Their levels in the human body also depend on personal characteristics (gender, age, lifestyle habits, genetic variability, etc.) and various other factors. Generally, for a group of essential elements, their biochemical functions are well known. Still, the functions of most of the presumably non-essential TEs in the human body are poorly known and understood.

As there are complex interactions between essential and non-essential TEs, it is important to monitor the presence of both non-essential and essential TEs to assess their levels and impact on biological systems [1, 2]. Consequently, regardless of the TEs’ essentiality or non-essentiality, laboratories must set the reference intervals (Ris) for TEs to make a reliable medical diagnosis, therapeutic management decision or other physiological assessment [3].

The concept of reference values was developed in 1986 [4] and was followed by a Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) document in 2008 [3]. The CLSI recommends that laboratories should establish their own RIs for their own population and their own methods. This is especially reasonable, because of variability in diet and environmental exposure, in the case of TEs and, therefore transferring of RIs between different laboratories is questionable. In the process of establishing RIs, it is necessary to precisely address, among many other steps, selection/exclusion criteria and the number of reference individuals, possible partitioning factors (e.g., gender and age), appropriate collection, handling and analysing the biological samples, data inspection and outliers finding [3].

Our study aimed to establish RIs for 24 TEs (six essential and 18 non-essential) in blood, plasma and erythrocytes in the adult Slovenian population (192 blood donors aged 18–65 years) to enable reliable clinical interpretations of results. Also, the data will be useful for human TEs exposure biomonitoring assessments. In addition, where appropriate, separate RIs for women and men were established, and the impact of selected variables from the questionnaire (age, seafood consumption, smoking and the presence of amalgam fillings) was evaluated.

Materials and methods

Study population

Study subjects (n=192; 107 women and 85 men) were blood donors (84.9 % from Central Slovenia, within 30 km from Ljubljana) who were included in the study on a voluntary basis by the Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia (BTC) between September and December 2014 through a priori selection. Non-fasting morning venous blood was collected from the participants, who had, following the BTC protocol, doctor’s consent to be eligible for blood donation. Of the participants, 59.9 % were from urban environments (population size >2,500) and 40.1 % were from rural environments (population size <2,500). According to the national environmental data on selected TEs collected and evaluated in a study of Snoj-Tratnik et al. [5], none of the study’s participants was from an historically metal(loid)-contaminated environment. Inclusion criteria for participants were that must be aged between 18 and 65 years and be in a healthy condition. Participants were equally included in four subgroups created according to participant age to ensure even distribution over the entire age frame: 18–29 years; (19 women, 22 men), 30–39 years (23 women, 22 men), 40–49 years (36 women, 19 men) and 50–65 years (28 women, 22 men). All participants signed their written consent and filled out the questionnaire with information about their age, gender, living environment, eating habits (seafood intake, vegetarian/mixed diet, local/imported food consumption), smoking habits, and whether they took food supplements or/and medications. Thirty-seven (19.3 %) participants were on medication, mostly for cardiovascular, thyroid diseases and/or analgetics, and three were taking oestrogen hormones; however, their status was under control, and they were eligible for blood donation. Lipemia and haemolysis were exclusion criteria. Only one participant reported possible occupational exposure (as a dentist). No questions on social status and body mass index were included in the questionnaire. The National Medical Ethics Committee (KME 83/04/08 and 109/02/13) approved the study.

Samples

Well-trained and experienced phlebotomists collected 192 blood samples in 6 mL K2EDTA BD Vacutainer® tubes for TEs. Tubes were tested for TEs content according to the laboratory’s own protocol and CLSI recommendations [6].

Blood samples were divided into two aliquots. One of the aliquots was centrifuged at 2,000×g for 10 min to obtain plasma and erythrocytes within 2 h after blood collection. Erythrocytes were washed three times with saline solution and the erythrocytes’ haematocrit in washed packed cells was measured [7]. Blood haematocrit was not obtained. All blood, plasma and washed erythrocyte samples were stored at −20 °C until analysis.

Determination of TEs in blood, plasma and erythrocyte samples

TEs (Mn, Co, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo, Li, Be, V, Cr, Ni, Ga, As, Rb, Sr, Ag, Cd, Sn, Cs, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb and U) were determined in blood, plasma and erythrocytes at the Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University Medical Centre, Ljubljana. All samples were thawed and brought to room temperature before analysis. Measurements of prepared samples, calibrators and control samples were made on an ICP-MS with Octopole Reaction System (7700x, Agilent Technologies, Japan) as previously described, with minor changes in standard concentration solutions [8]. An aliquot of every blood, plasma, washed erythrocyte sample, calibrator or control sample was mixed with an ammonium hydroxide solution containing Triton X-100, 1-butanol, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dehydrate and an internal standard solution containing Bi, Ge, In, 6Li, Lu, Rh, Sc and Tb. The reagents were TEs grade. Fourteen points calibration for blood and plasma and 18 points calibration for erythrocyte samples were performed. The reference material (RM) Seronorm Trace Elements Whole Blood L-1 and L-2 and Serum L-1 (Sero) were used to check the accuracy of the results.

Erythrocyte TEs values in every sample were normalised by washed erythrocytes’ haematocrit to overcome methodological errors.

Limits of blank (LoB), limits of detection (LoD) and limits of quantification (LoQ) for all trace elements for our method were determined according to CLSI recommendations, with a classical approach [9] using RM Seronorm Trace Elements Urine L-1 and L-2 (Sero) in different dilutions to obtain minimally positive samples.

RMs were analysed according to the protocol for internal quality control at the beginning and at the end of the run and between runs on every 15–20 samples. The values found were in good agreement with the manufacturer–assigned RM values. Our laboratory has also successfully participated in the INSTAND External Quality Assessment Scheme with validated ICP-MS methods for over 8 years.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed as recommended by IFCC/CLSI guidelines [3, 4] using IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0.1.0 (IBM Corporation) and MedCalc 11.4.2.0 (MedCalc Software Ltd). For statistical calculations, the LoD/2 for values below LoD were assigned. For each TE, distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Outliers were excluded using Tukey’s method [10] but only after visual inspection. Gender differences were analysed by t-test for independent samples or by Mann-Whitney U test. An Independent-Samples Kruskal Wallis test and a one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction for multiple tests for differences between age subgroups were used. A Spearman’s rank-order correlation was run to determine the relationship between blood, plasma and erythrocyte TEs levels and age, seafood consumption, smoking status, number of cigarettes smoked per day or number of amalgam fillings.

Results

Descriptive statistics

Our group consisted of 192 individuals, 107 women (55.7 %) and 85 men (44.3 %), with no significant differences in the number of participants between gender groups (χ2 (1)=2.521, p=0.112) and no age differences between genders (p=0.239) (Table 1).

Table 1:

Age profile of study group.

n (%) Median age, years Mean age, years SD Min–max
All 192 42.6 41.2 11.2 19.7–65.9
W 107 (56 %) 44.3 42.0 11.0 19.7–63.6
M 85 (44 %) 39.8 41.0 11.5 20.1–65.9
  1. All, whole group; W, women; M, men.

Four age subgroups were equal in terms of the number of participants (p=0.453) and gender, except for the subgroup of age 40–49 years, where the number of women was significantly higher (p=0.016) (see Supplementary Material, Figure S1).

According to self-reported data, there were 125 (65.1 %) non-smokers, 22 (11.5 %) ex-smokers, 14 (7.3 %) passive-smokers and 29 (15.1 %) smokers, with mean cigarette consumption of 10.68 (SD=6.2, min=2, max=20) cigarettes per day and no significant difference between genders (p=0.175). In the smoker group, there were 19 light smokers, 10 moderate smokers and no heavy smokers (≤10; 11–24; ≥25 cigarettes per day) (see Supplementary Material, Figure S2).

Participants consumed seafood up to 3.5 times a week, with a median value for both genders of 1.0 (IQR 1.0–1.0) and with the majority consumption once per week (70.1 % women and 63.5 % men) (see Supplementary Material, Figure S3).

On average, our group had 3.69 (n=148, SD=3.7, min=1, max=17) amalgam fillings, with no significant difference between genders (p=0.713). In regard to amalgam fillings, 22.9 % of participants had none, 37.5 % had 1–5, 25.0 % had 5–10, and a minority (4.1 %) had above 10 amalgam fillings. For the rest of the participants, the data was missing (see Supplementary Material, Figure S4).

Establishing the essential and non-essential trace elements RIs

For all essential TEs, we set lower reference limits (LRL) at the 2.5th percentile and upper reference limits (URL) at the 97.5th percentile according to CLSI recommendations after outlier exclusion was set [3]. Calculated LRL and URL values with their 90 % confidential intervals (CIs), medians and Interquartile Ranges (IQRs) along percentage of samples with values under LoD are presented in Table 2. For all non-essential TEs, only URL at the 97.5th percentile was defined, and calculated URL values with their 90 % CI, medians, and IQRs with the percentage of samples with values under LoD can be found in Table 3.

Table 2:

Established reference intervals for six essential TEs in blood, plasma and erythrocytes.

Reference interval
LoD, µg/L <LoD, % Median (IQR), µg/L P2.5 (90 % CI), µg/L P97.5 (90 % CI), µg/L p-Valuee LRL, µg/L URL, µg/L
Blood

Mnc All 0.403 0 7.62 (6.34–9.93) 4.23 (3.86–4.59) 16.0 (14.2–22.8) 4.0 16.0
W 0 7.97 (6.36–10.40) 4.33 (3.88–4.86) 18.23 (14.5–23.1) 0.093 4.0 19.0
M 0 7.31 (6.21–9.52) 3.83 (3.32–4.61) 15.6 (12.4–17.7) 3.5 16.0
Cob,c All 0.044 19.8 0.099 (0.053–0.156) <LoD 0.534 (0.448–0.658) a 0.55
W 18.7 0.106 (0.055–0.197) <LoD 0.586 (0.421–0.685) 0.242 a 0.60
M 21.2 0.093 (0.049–0.151) <LoD 0.483 (0.310–0.498) a 0.50
Cu All 1.32 0 690 (636–772) 508 (399–565) 1,307 (1,081–1,531) 510 1,300
W 0 736 (665–880) 539 (381–590) 1,457 (1,202–1,541) 0.000 550 1,450
M 0 649 (605–705) 489 (399–542) 818 (782–855) 500 850
Zn All 35.4 0 5,937 (5,391–6,599) 4,273 (3,987–4,620) 7,612 (7,243–8,006) 4,300 7,600
W 0 5,670 (5,165–6,333) 3,996 (3,718–4,355) 6,974 (6,850–8,010) 0.000 4,000 7,000
M 0 6,260 (5,573–6,950) 4,663 (4,374–4,885) 7,920 (7,444–8,268) 4,700 8,000
Sec All 0.092 0 109 (107–111) 83.8 (77.0–85.9) 169 (152–171) 80 170
W 0 108 (105–110) 84.1 (55.5–86.2) 163 (139–172) 0.192 d d
M 0 111 (108–119) 82.3 (77.0–87.8) 170 (157–177) d d
Moc All 0.188 3.1 0.500 (0.400–0.695) <LoD 1.45 (1.03–1.58) a 1.50
W 5.6 0.499 (0.384–0.699) <LoD 1.32 (1.01–1.49) 0.844 a 1.30
M 0 0.520 (0.414–0.665) <LoD 1.56 (0.992–1.98) a 1.60

Plasma

Mnb,d All 0.403 26.7 0.493 (<LoD–0.592) <LoD 0.941 (0.804–1.005) a 1.00
W 31.8 0.460 (<LoD–0.569) <LoD 0.852 (0.744–1.03) 0.004 a d
M 20.2 0.530 (0.454–0.626) <LoD 0.965 (0.883–1.01) a d
Cod All 0.044 0 0.221 (0.207–0.234) 0.129 (0.101–0.140) 0.948 (0.692–0.993) 0.10 1.00
W 0 0.225 (0.209–0.255) 0.138 (0.101–0.148) 0.994 (0.733–1.10) 0.216 0.10 1.00
M 0 0.219 (0.195–0.234) 0.104 (0.083–0.137) 0.707 (0.564–0.966) 0.08 0.80
Cu All 1.32 0 837 (747–927) 586 (436–618) 1,730 (1,454–1,912) 580 1750
W 0 883 (785–1,023) 605 (436–651) 1,893 (1,642–2,011) 0.000 600 1900
M 0 797 (712–872) 500 (384–619) 1,049 (989–1,072) 500 1,050
Zn All 35.4 0 825 (733–944) 610 (568–637) 1,420 (1,351–1,474) 600 1,450
W 0 784 (706–851) 582 (536–634) 1,313 (1,023–1,415) 0.000 580 1,350
M 0 902 (821–1,082) 635 (614–679) 1,518 (1,425–1,782) 650 1,550
Se All 0.092 0 86.8 (85.0–89.1) 63.7 (62.2–66.7) 119 (114–124) 63 120
W 0 84.7 (82.5–86.8) 62.5 (60.8–67.9) 112 (101–116) 0.007 62 115
M 0 89.7 (87.2–92.0) 64.1 (63.5–67.8) 124 (118–129) 64 125
Mod All 0.188 0 0.873 (0.834–0.916) 0.456 (0.411–0.508) 2.06 (1.74–2.63) 0.45 2.00
W 0 0.873 (0.800–0.946) 0.458 (0.411–0.527) 2.06 (1.75–2.63) 0.932 d d
M 0 0.863 (0.809–0.954) 0.415 (0.249–0.494) 2.12 (1.45–2.33) d d

Erythrocytes f

Mn All 0.403 0 16.1 (12.5–20.1) 8.38 (7.82–9.11) 32.3 (28.4–35.7) 8.3 32.0
W 0 16.6 (13.3–20.6) 8.48 (7.82–9.76) 34.8 (29.7–35.9) 0.010 8.4 35.0
M 0 14.6 (11.9–18.9) 8.30 (7.80–9.24) 29.7 (23.5–32.4) 8.3 30.0
Cob,d All 0.044 36.1 0.073 (0.063–0.079) <LoD 0.281 (0.245–0.315) a 0.30
W 39.3 0.068 (0.056–0.081) <LoD 0.291 (0.257–0.337) 0.737 a d
M 31.8 0.076 (0.679–0.084) <LoD 0.278 (0.176–0.315) a d
Cud All 1.32 0 565 (556–574) 388 (379–433) 693 (671–696) 380 700
W 0 558 (541–565) 384 (374–430) 693 (674–732) 0.027 d d
M 0 582 (540–619) 397 (332–460) 692 (651–696) d d
Zn All 35.4 0 11,017 (9,877–11,940) 7,615 (7,399–8,047) 13,427 (13,125–14,041) 7,600 13,500
W 0 10,788 (9,867–11,673) 7,853 (7,399–8,443) 13,445 (13,068–14,041) 0.217 7,800 13,500
M 0 11,088 (9,879–12,135) 7,518 (5,925–8,086) 13,615 (13,106–14,217) 7,500 13,500
Sed All 0.092 0 143 (137–145) 98 (83–105) 222 (214–225) 100 220
W 0 142 (135–145) 103 (83–109) 222 (205–229) 0.868 d d
M 0 144 (132–150) 96 (71–103) 222 (213–225) d d
Mob,c All 0.188 67.0 <LoD (<LoD–0.276) <LoD 0.567 (0.491–0.633) a 0.60
W 68.2 <LoD (<LoD–0.251) <LoD 0.500 (0.436–0.596) 0.443 a 0.50
M 64.7 <LoD (<LoD–0.295) <LoD 0.700 (0.515–0.798) a 0.70
  1. LoD, limit of detection; IQR, interquartile interval; LRL, low reference limit; URL, upper reference limit; CI, confidence interval; W, women; M, men; P2.5, 2.5th percentile; P97.5, 97.5th percentile. aLRL under LoD. bData should be considered with caution due to the low frequency of element detection. cBecause of high gender differences in the 2.5th and/or 97.5th percentile, different RIs proposed for women and men although there were no statistically significant differences between both groups. dThere were no gender differences in the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile and the established LRL and URL for both, the women and men group, are the same. eSignificant difference between genders under 0.05. Erythrocyte TEs values in every sample were normalised by washed erythrocytes’ haematocrit to overcome methodological errors.

Table 3:

Established reference intervals for 18 non-essential TEs in blood, plasma and erythrocytes.

LoD, µg/L <LoD, % Median (IQR), µg/L P2.5 (90 % CI), µg/L P95 (90 % CI), µg/L P97.5 (90 % CI), µg/L URL, µg/L
Blood

Lib 4.55 76.6 <LoD (<LoD–5.21) <LoD 25.5 (19.1–28.5) 29.5 (26.0–35.5) 30.0
Beb 0.036 55.7 <LoD (<LoD–0.062) <LoD 0.238 (0.178–0.280) 0.288 (0.240–0.335) 0.300
V 0.060 15.6 0.080 (0.066–0.095) <LoD 0.305 (0.141–0.409) 0.427 (0.311–0.507) 0.430
Crb 0.490 24.5 0.568 (0.498–0.648) <LoD 0.852 (0.796–0.906) 0.932 (0.855–1.060) 1.00
Nib 0.661 33.3 0.737 (0.331–1.10) <LoD 1.73 (1.64–1.92) 1.99 (1.75–2.40) 2.00
Gab 0.056 75.0 <LoD (–a) <LoD 0.180 (0.115–0.262) 0.298 (0.188–0.457) 0.400
As 0.061 0 0.478 (0.253–0.977) 0.120 (0.089–0.139) 2.51 (1.71–3.17) 3.41 (2.49–4.44) 3.5
Rb 0.784 0 2,304 (2,088–2,572) 1,597 (1,567–1,759) 3,200 (2,948–3,377) 3,529 (3,204–3,823) 3,500
Sr 3.47 0 10.6 (8.58–13.3) 6.53 (5.95–6.82) 21.1 (19.4–22.8) 24.0 (21.4–25.8) 24.0
Agb 0.037 29.7 0.070 (<LoD–0.126) <LoD 0.344 (0.253–0.494) 0.575 (0.369–0.810) 0.600
Cd (all)c 0.140 16.1 0.331 (0.170–0.648) <LoD 2.04 (1.50–3.24) 3.41 (2.06–4.43) 3.5
Sn 0.138 0.5 0.597 (0.514–0.677) 0.335 (0.277–0.382) 0.886 (0.845–0.943) 0.956 (0.888–0.975) 0.95
Cs 0.043 0 3.22 (2.58–4.01) 1.73 (1.59–1.92) 5.95 (5.42–6.29) 6.56 (6.00–7.06) 6.5
Aub 0.017 96.4 <LoD (–a) <LoD <LoD <LoD <0.017
Hg 0.059 0 1.35 (0.800–2.23) 0.286 (0.219–0.356) 4.57 (3.92–5.00) 5.17 (4.64–6.26) 5.2
Tlb 0.013 35.9 0.017 (<LoD–0.023) <LoD 0.032 (0.030–0.035) 0.035 (0.033–0.040) 0.04
Pb 0.244 0 15.1 (11.0–20.9) 5.21 (4.42–6.20) 31.0 (29.4–35.8) 40.3 (31.3–45.3) 40.0
Ub 0.006 80.7 <LoD (–a) <LoD 0.019 (0.014–0.023) 0.026 (0.019–0.035) 0.03

Plasma

Lib 4.55 61.3 <LoD (<LoD–6.43) <LoD 11.1 (9.55–13.3) 14.2 (11.1–17.0) 15.0
Beb 0.036 78.1 <LoD (–a) <LoD 0.078 (0.059–0.107) 0.114 (0.079–0.129) 0.10
V 0.060 1.6 0.104 (0.083–0.119) 0.061 (<LoD–0.062) 0.148 (0.142–0.155) 0.160 (0.148–0.180) 0.16
Crb 0.490 66.0 <LoD (<LoD–0.555) <LoD 0.776 (0.737–0.832) 0.873 (0.781–1.27) 1.0
Nib 0.661 70.2 <LoD (<LoD–0.733) <LoD 2.18 (1.22–2.89) 2.92 (2.16–4.00) 3.0
Gab 0.056 91.2 <LoD (–a) <LoD 0.062 (<LoD–0.075) 0.079 (0.064–0.098) 0.08
Asb 0.061 17.8 0.172 (0.078–0.383) <LoD 1.16 (1.04–1.33) 1.38 (1.17–1.61) 1.4
Rb 0.784 0 350 (314–384) 260 (224–276) 442 (427–464) 471 (444–490) 480
Sr 3.47 0 20.2 (17.2–20.2) 12.5 (12.0–13.1) 39.8 (34.9–42.6) 45.9 (40.0–49.9) 46.0
Agb 0.037 36.6 0.060 (<LoD–0.130) <LoD 0.330 (0.251–0.409) 0.430 (0.324–0.683) 0.40
Cd (all)b, c 0.140 92.7 <LoD (–a) <LoD 0.247 (<LoD–0.475) 0.623 (0.269–0.875) 0.70
Sn 0.138 5.8 0.450 (0.285–0.644) <LoD 0.916 (0.843–1.02) 1.10 (0.933–1.22) 1.1
Cs 0.043 0 0.837 (0.673–1.03) 0.366 (0.342–0.461) 1.41 (1.31–1.59) 1.66 (1.42–1.83) 1.7
Aub 0.017 94.8 <LoD (–a) <LoD <LoD <LoD <0.017
Hg 0.059 6.8 0.304 (0.130–0.615) <LoD 2.57 (1.36–3.73) 3.98 (2.56–4.34) 4.0
Tl 0.013 0.5 0.039 (0.030–0.047) 0.019 (0.015–0.021) 0.063 (0.060–0.072) 0.073 (0.064–0.079) 0.07
Pbb 0.244 81.7 <LoD (–a) <LoD 0.644 (0.433–0.816) 0.834 (0.640–0.880) 0.85
Ub 0.006 81.7 <LoD (–a) <LoD 0.009 (0.008–0.01) 0.010 (0.009–0.012) 0.01

Erythrocytes

Lib 4.55 56.8 <LoD (<LoD–8.20) <LoD 18.1 (14.8–20.7) 20.9 (18.6–22.5) 21.0
Beb 0.036 55.2 <LoD (<LoD–0.061) <LoD 0.120 (0.105–0.137) 0.157 (0.132–0.182) 0.16
Vb 0.060 63.0 <LoD (<LoD–0.092) <LoD 0.161 (0.144–0.167) 0.173 (0.161–0.183) 0.17
Crb 0.490 56.3 <LoD (<LoD–0.931) <LoD 1.62 (1.30–1.75) 1.76 (1.64–1.96) 1.80
Nib 0.661 73.4 <LoD (<LoD–0.680) <LoD 1.43 (1.20–1.55) 1.59 (1.43–1.79) 1.60
Gab 0.056 21.4 0.077 (<LoD–0.121) <LoD 0.201 (0.177–0.233) 0.240 (0.203–0.273) 0.25
As 0.061 0 0.765 (0.483–1.44) 0.253 (0.173–0.286) 3.27 (2.73–4.29) 4.30 (3.38–5.21) 4.3
Rb 0.784 0 4,366 (3,906–4,854) 3,040 (2,962–3,131) 5,775 (5,558–5,991) 6,012 (5,805–6,221) 6,000
Srb 3.47 100 <LoD (–a) <LoD <LoD <LoD <3.47
Cd (all)c 0.140 2.6 0.80 (0.549–1.29) <LoD 3.35 (2.85–3.75) 4.03 (3.33–5.49) 4.0
Sn 0.138 3.6 0.515 (0.376–0.696) <LoD 1.02 (0.929–1.11) 1.14 (1.03–1.29) 1.1
Cs 0.043 0 5.34 (4.44–6.58) 3.07 (2.84–3.26) 9.64 (8.52–10.1) 10.25 (9.66–10.79) 10.0
Aub 0.017 97.9 <LoD (–a) <LoD <LoD <LoD <0.017
Hg 0.059 0 1.87 (1.00–3.21) 0.204 (0.119–0.372) 5.75 (5.40–7.39) 7.84 (5.80–9.09) 7.8
Tlb 0.013 99.5 <LoD (–a) <LoD <LoD <LoD <0.013
Pb 0.244 0 31.7 (22.9–43.3) 13.3 (11.8–14.3) 67.7 (58.2–72.7) 73.4 (68.1–83.5) 75.0
Ub 0.006 96.9 <LoD (–a) <LoD <LoD <LoD <0.006
  1. LoD, limit of detection; IQR, interquartile interval; URL, upper reference limit; CI, confidence interval; P95, 95th percentile; P2.5, 2.5th percentile; P97.5, 97.5th percentile. aBoth, the lower and upper limit of interquartile interval under LoD. bData should be considered with caution due to the low frequency of element detection. cIncluded Cd values for all participants (smokers, non-smokers, ex-smokers and passive smokers). Erythrocyte TEs values in every sample were normalised by washed erythrocytes’ haematocrit to overcome methodological errors.

All TE values were also verified according to available common influencing factors (gender, age, smoking, seafood consumption and the presence of amalgam fillings) to evaluate their possible impact.

Gender

Gender-specific LRL and URL values were introduced for essential TEs in the case of high gender differences at the 2.5th and/or 97.5th percentile, even though there were no statistically significant differences between both groups. Gender-specific RIs were defined by using the bootstrapping method (Table 2). Women had significantly higher blood and plasma Cu and higher erythrocyte Mn levels. Men had significantly higher blood and plasma Zn, plasma Mn and Se, and erythrocyte Cu levels (Table 2, see Supplementary Material, Figure S5). For the non-essential elements, we set common RIs for both genders. However, gender stratification for all TEs, including non-essential TEs, is presented in the Supplement (see Supplementary Material, Table S1).

Age

For Zn, we also found an age-dependent relationship. There were significantly different plasma (p=0.016) and blood (p=0.007) Zn levels between all age subgroups, with significantly lower levels in the 30–39 year age group (see Supplementary Material, Table S2).

It was found that blood and plasma Sr increase with age (Table 4). Besides significant differences between age subgroups for blood Pb (p<0.001) and erythrocyte Pb (p<0.001), positive correlations with age in women and men can also be seen (Table 4).

Table 4:

Spearman’s correlation coefficients between TEs, age, seafood consumption and number of amalgam fillings.

Age Seafood Amalgan, number
B-Sr 0.284
P-Sr 0.269
B-Pb 0.397
Ery-Pb 0.341
B-As 0.320
Ery-As 0.337
P-As 0.388
B-Zn 0.171a
P-Zn 0.223b
B-Se 0.162a
P-Se 0.222b
Ery-Hg 0.287
B-Hg 0.177a 0.191a
P-Hg 0.270
B-Ag 0.369
P-Ag 0.407
B-Cu 0.257
P-Cu 0.161
  1. P, plasma; B, blood; Ery, erythrocytes; significance: a<0.05; b<0.01; all others <0.001.

Smoking, seafood and amalgam fillings

As expected, we found a statistically significant positive correlation between blood (p<0.001) and erythrocyte (p<0.001) Cd with smoking status and blood (p=0.036) and erythrocyte (p=0.044) Cd with the number of smoked cigarettes per day. Significant differences in blood (p<0.001) and erythrocyte (p<0.001) Cd in subgroups according to smoking status were also seen (Figure 1A, B).

Figure 1: 
Blood (A) and erythrocyte (B) Cd distribution according to smoking status. Boxes represent the median, 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers mark the minimum and maximum values excluding outliers. Dots represent potential outliers and high extreme values are labelled with an asterisk.
Figure 1:

Blood (A) and erythrocyte (B) Cd distribution according to smoking status. Boxes represent the median, 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers mark the minimum and maximum values excluding outliers. Dots represent potential outliers and high extreme values are labelled with an asterisk.

Arsenic, mercury, zinc and selenium levels were affected by and positively correlated with seafood consumption (Table 4). Positive correlations between the number of amalgam fillings and Hg, Ag and Cu were found (Table 4).

Discussion

The conducted study provides insight into the levels and RIs of six essential and 18 presumably non-essential TEs measured in the adult Slovenian population (Mn, Co, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo, Li, Be, V, Cr, Ni, Ga, As, Rb, Sr, Ag, Cd, Sn, Cs, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb and U). We established RIs for an extended number of TEs in whole blood and plasma combined with erythrocytes from the aliquots prepared from the same sample for each participant. Measurements for all three matrices from the same set of individuals represent the added value and advantage for obtained RIs.

Gender, age and self-reported information on food consumption, smoking status, amalgam fillings, living environment, food supplements and medications were taken into consideration later in case the factor had significantly influenced a particular TE.

Establishing RIs and values under LoD

For essential TEs in blood, plasma and erythrocytes RIs were determined with LRL (set near the 2.5th percentile) and URL (set near the 97.5th percentile). If the value at the 2.5th percentile was under LoD, as in the case of blood Co and Mo and plasma Mn, only a URL near the 97.5th percentile was proposed. For non-essential TEs, only the URL near the 97.5th percentile was placed. Although, the ICP-MS methodology, due to high sensitivity and low LoDs, enabled us to measure elements of very low levels, in some cases, the majority of values were under LoD, mostly from a group of non-essential TEs [Table 3], and only a few were from the group of essential TEs, namely blood Co, plasma Mn, erythrocyte Co and erythrocyte Mo (Table 2). Considering the Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for analysing data with values below LoDs [11, 12] we suggest that RIs with over 15 % of values under LoD should be considered with caution.

Data comparison

As Nisse et al. stated [13], regardless of similarities in TEs levels found between different published data, it is difficult to compare results between different studies, because of environmental exposure and intrinsic population differences. The complexity of comparison is attributed to differences in the studied population sampling protocols and analytical methods, data and results processing and outlier detection methods [13], [14], [15], which can result in differences in RIs between studies [16]. Also, published data overview from several authors [5, 13, 14, 16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28] reveals a variety of approaches in presented data: from different percentiles to means, medians, setting limits on different percentiles, censoring data and differences in selected populations. Nevertheless, we performed a vague comparison of our data with published levels to get at least a rough estimation of similarities or differences.

Comparisons of our established RIs in the general Slovenian population with RIs for other world populations [5, 13, 14, 16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29] show that we are in the European average, which is to be expected, as Slovenia is geologically, industrially and in terms of food consumption similar to other European countries (see Supplementary Material, Tables S3 and S4). Similarities are expected, as this is a general adult population with no extremes in potential physical activity, chronic diseases and occupational or environmental exposure [18, 22, 29]. Still, for some TEs our values fall outside the average, confirming the importance of using laboratory- and population-specific values when evaluating disease states and the status of TEs in the body, as sometimes minimal differences can play an important role in diagnosis.

Essential TEs

Levels of essential TEs in the human body are generally well regulated but can differ between cohorts due to their characteristic, geographical diversity in food consumption and different technologies used. Compared to previously published human biomonitoring data on the men’s population from Central Slovenia by Snoj Tratnik et al. [5], our population’s men blood Cu values were slightly lower (500–850 μg/L vs. 608–965 μg/L). These differences can also be attributed to derogations in selected population age, smoking and/or type of recruitment area. In contrast, our RIs for blood Cu values along with other essential TEs (Mn, Co, Cu, Zn and Se) in blood and plasma were in great accordance with a recently published paper on the adult Belgian population [14], as similar inclusion criteria were used in both studies, as well as in some other European countries [13, 21, 23], [24], [25, 28, 30] and worldwide [18, 22, 29]. For example, in 2021, Heitland and Köster [17] published 73 TEs levels in blood, plasma and erythrocyte measured in 68 women and 38 men from northern Germany. Despite differences in selected populations (gender-distribution, smoker proportion), our values at the 5th and 95th percentiles were similar for blood and plasma Mn, Co, Se, and Mo, but their blood and plasma Zn values were slightly lower, and their Cu values in blood and plasma were higher (see Supplementary Material, Tables S3 and S4).

Non-essential TEs

In general, the levels of non-essential TEs in our population were low, far below critical values and similar to those previously reported for the European population [5, 13, 14, 17] (see Supplementary Material, Tables S3 and S4). This shows that, on average, central Slovenia is not highly polluted and that the selection of participants did not include those from industrially contaminated areas. Some elements, such as Cd, Hg, As and Pb, are well known for their negative influence on human and there is much published data on their presence in the human body. Unfortunately, the health effects of the other presumably non-essential elements are poorly understood and there is scarce data published on their levels in the human body, especially in erythrocytes. Our blood and plasma V, Ga, As, Rb, Ag, Cd, Cs, Hg, Tl and U values were comparable to north German population levels [16, 17]. Blood Ni, Ga, Rb, Au and Tl were comparable with the Norwegian population [28], and blood and plasma Cr, Hg, Ag, Tl and Ni levels were similar to levels in the French population [13, 31].

TEs in erythrocytes

Although plasma and blood are the most used samples for assessing the status of essential and non-essential TEs, there are advantages in assessing their levels in erythrocytes. Erythrocyte TEs concentrations are useful for assessing TEs intracellular concentrations and their general homeostasis and long-term exposure and in certain pathological conditions such as inflammatory response or anaemia [32, 33]. For instance, red blood cell (RBC) concentrates are the major blood component transfused worldwide to treat severe anaemia [34].

However, the published data on various TEs erythrocyte levels is rare [17, 35]. Heitland and Köster’s [17] TEs levels in erythrocytes have been determined indirectly by calculation, using blood and plasma concentrations and blood haematocrit. However, we found the determination of TEs directly from washed erythrocytes better and more reliable for clinical purposes, so we measured an extended number of TE levels in washed erythrocytes normalised by washed erythrocyte haematocrits. Essential TE levels in the erythrocytes in the non-exposed northern German population [17] were comparable with our population for Mn, Co, Se and Mo, while our levels of Zn and Cu were lower (see Supplementary Material, Table S5).

Gender and age

Gender-specific LRLs and/or URLs were established for most essential TEs in blood, plasma and erythrocytes [Table 2]. Our blood and plasma Zn levels, but not erythrocyte Zn levels, were gender- and age-dependent and this agrees with other authors [36], [37], [38], [39].

We found significantly lower blood Zn levels in age subgroup 30–39 years in both genders (Figure 2A, B). The lower Zn levels in the group under 40 years were also described by some other authors [20, 29]. In men, there was also a negative trend in plasma Mo levels with age (Figure 2C, D). Women had higher blood and erythrocyte Mn, and this is in accordance with several other authors [13, 14, 18, 19]. Consistent with other studies [31, 40], we also found that women had significantly higher plasma Cu levels and significantly lower plasma Zn and Se levels than men (see Supplementary Material, Figure S5). Women also had significantly lower plasma Mn and Zn, blood Zn, and erythrocyte Cu levels. The differences can be attributed to gender-specific physiology and its changes occurred within a broad age range of the subjects included in our study. In our population, women had lower blood and erythrocyte Pb levels, and a positive trend according to age in both genders was seen (Figure 3A, B). This data is also supported by some other authors [13, 14, 19, 31, 41], which is expected, as the skeleton acts as a storage depot for absorbed Pb, and approximately 40–70 % of blood Pb can come from the skeleton in environmentally exposed adults [42], and this fraction can be on the higher end, particularly during lactation, menopause, osteoporosis and old age [43, 44]. Blood and plasma Sr levels in women and men, increase with age (Figure 3C, D). It is known that absorbed Sr is primarily distributed to the bone [45, 46]. So presumably, in conditions with larger bone turnover, Sr blood levels would also be higher [47]. However, to confirm age- and gender-related differences and determine age-specific RIs, further investigations on more data (and multiple regression modelling) are needed.

Figure 2: 
Blood Zn (A, B) and plasma Mo (C, D) distribution according to age subgroup and gender. Boxes represent the median, 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers mark the minimum and maximum values excluding outliers. Dots represent potential outliers and high extreme values are labelled with an asterisk.
Figure 2:

Blood Zn (A, B) and plasma Mo (C, D) distribution according to age subgroup and gender. Boxes represent the median, 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers mark the minimum and maximum values excluding outliers. Dots represent potential outliers and high extreme values are labelled with an asterisk.

Figure 3: 
Blood (A) and erythrocyte (B) Pb, blood (C) and plasma (D) Sr distribution according to age and gender. Boxes represent the median, 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers mark the minimum and maximum values excluding outliers. Dots represent potential outliers and high extreme values are labelled with an asterisk.
Figure 3:

Blood (A) and erythrocyte (B) Pb, blood (C) and plasma (D) Sr distribution according to age and gender. Boxes represent the median, 25th and 75th percentile, whiskers mark the minimum and maximum values excluding outliers. Dots represent potential outliers and high extreme values are labelled with an asterisk.

Smoking, seafood consumption and amalgam fillings

As expected, and in accordance with other authors [13, 14, 24, 30, 31, 48], significantly higher Cd blood and erythrocyte levels in smokers compared to non-smokers were found. And, in line with previously published papers [13, 27], a significant positive correlation of blood Cd and erythrocyte Cd, Pb, Cs, and Rb with the number of smoked cigarettes per day and negative correlation for blood and erythrocyte Se was found. As expected [24, 49, 50], our population blood As, Hg, Zn and Se levels were positively affected by seafood consumption and were higher in those consuming seafood more than once per week. Also, levels in erythrocytes and plasma were higher, except for plasma Hg.

A number of amalgam fillings had positive correlations with blood and plasma Hg, Ag and Cu. This association was previously described [51, 52]; moreover, their levels in plasma and erythrocytes decreased after amalgam removal [53].

Strengths and limitations

Establishing RIs for an extended number of TEs, particularly non-essential ones, and simultaneous measurement of TEs in whole blood, plasma and erythrocytes from the same sample of each participant and with equal participants’ distribution over a wide age range is one of the main strengths of our study. RIs for TEs established in our study are the first for the Slovene adult general population; loose inclusion criteria enabled us to get a wider and, in some respects, more reliable insight.

Although the small number of participants is within the range of sufficient numbers, it represents a weakness of our study, because the results obtained on a larger sample set would be more robust.

Moreover, for some elements (such as blood and erythrocyte Co), we hit a limit with our method. As we are aware of the possible contamination pathways and follow specific protocols to prevent contamination, another analytical and sample preparation technique would likely have to be used to evaluate these TEs.

Conclusions

There is a need for medical laboratories to establish laboratory- and population-specific TEs RIs because TE levels can be highly dependent on methodological, analytical, personal (lifestyle, diet) and environmental issues. In our complex study, the RIs for the Slovenian adult general population for 24 different TEs in blood, plasma and erythrocytes from the same sample for each participant, following the CLSI guidelines, were established. Essential TEs were inside recommended values, and the non-essential ones were far below the critical levels. For essential TEs, separate gender-specific RIs were created. The influence of some specific factors on the levels of some TEs (such as age, fish consumption, smoking and amalgam fillings) were confirmed.

Established erythrocyte RIs will enable clinical assessment of TEs intracellular concentrations in certain pathological conditions, as well as the assessment of their general homeostasis and long-term exposure. Erythrocyte RI values could also be useful in the evaluation of the safety profile of RBC concentrates for blood transfusion.

We believe that our data, especially for some uncommon non-essential TEs, could be a valuable and reliable base for environmental studies, human biological monitoring, health risk assessment and toxicological studies.


Corresponding author: Janja Marc, Clinical Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Njegoševa 4, Ljubljana, Slovenia; and Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Phone: +38614769600, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank to Žan Pušnik, Helena Miklavc, Tjaša Mikerevič and Ajla Hajrlahović for their preanalytical and analytical work. The authors would also like to thank the blood donors and the staff of the Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia for their help with sample collection.

  1. Research ethics: The authors declare that the study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Study was approved by National Medical Ethics Committee (Komisija Republike Slovenije za medicinsko etiko) (KME 83/04/08 and 109/02/13).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Maret, W. An appraisal of the field of metallomics and the roles of metal ions in biochemistry and cell signaling. Appl Sci 2021;11:10846–58. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112210846.Search in Google Scholar

2. Maret, W. The metals in the biological periodic system of the elements: concepts and conjectures. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:66–73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17010066.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. CLSI. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline, 3rd ed. CLSI document EP28-A3c. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

4. Solberg, HE. Approved recommendation (1986) on the theory of reference values. Part 1. The concept of reference values. Clin Chim Acta 1987;167:111–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(87)90224-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Snoj Tratnik, J, Falnoga, I, Mazej, D, Kocman, D, Fajon, V, Jagodic, M, et al.. Results of the first national human biomonitoring in Slovenia: trace elements in men and lactating women, predictors of exposure and reference values. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2019;222:563–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.02.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. CLSI. Control of preanalytical variation in trace element determinations; approved guideline. CLSI document C38-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

7. Hinks, LJ, Clayton, BE, Lloyd, RS. Zinc and copper concentrations in leucocytes and erythrocytes in healthy adults and the effect of oral contraceptives. J Clin Pathol 1983;36:1016–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.36.9.1016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Stajnko, A, Šlejkovec, Z, Mazej, D, France-Štiglic, A, Briški, AS, Prpić, I, et al.. Arsenic metabolites; selenium; and AS3MT, MTHFR, AQP4, AQP9, SELENOP, INMT, and MT2A polymorphisms in Croatian-Slovenian population from PHIME-CROME study. Environ Res 2019;170:301–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.045.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. CLSI. Evaluation of detection capability for clinical laboratory measurement procedures; approved guideline, 2nd ed. CLSI document EP17-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

10. Tukey, JW. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977.Search in Google Scholar

11. EPA. US Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance for data quality assessment. Practical methods for data analysis (EPA QA/G-9). EPA/600/R-96/84. Washington: Office of Environmental Information; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

12. Wood, MD, Beresford, NA, Copplestone, D. Limit of detection values in data analysis: do they matter? Radioprotection 2011;46(6 Suppl):S85–90. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/20116728s.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nisse, C, Tagne-Fotso, R, Howsam, M, Richeval, C, Labat, L, Leroyer, A. Blood and urinary levels of metals and metalloids in the general adult population of Northern France: the IMEPOGE study, 2008–2010. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2017;220:341–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.09.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Hoet, P, Jacquerye, C, Deumer, G, Lison, D, Haufroid, V. Reference values of trace elements in blood and/or plasma in adults living in Belgium. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;59:729–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Toro-Román, V, Siquier-Coll, J, Bartolomé, I, Grijota, FJ, Muñoz, D, Maynar-Mariño, M. Copper concentration in erythrocytes, platelets, plasma, serum and urine: influence of physical training. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2021;18:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-021-00426-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Heitland, P, Köster, HD. Biomonitoring of 37 trace elements in blood samples from inhabitants of northern Germany by ICP-MS. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2006;20:253–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2006.08.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Heitland, P, Köster, HD. Human biomonitoring of 73 elements in blood, serum, erythrocytes and urine. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2021;64:126706–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126706.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Saravanabhavan, G, Werry, K, Walker, M, Haines, D, Malowany, M, Khoury, C. Human biomonitoring reference values for metals and trace elements in blood and urine derived from the Canadian Health Measures Survey 2007–2013. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2017;220:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.10.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Zhang, LL, Lu, L, Pan, YJ, Ding, CG, Xu, DY, Huang, CF, et al.. Baseline blood levels of manganese, lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in residents of Beijing suburb. Environ Res 2015;140:10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.03.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Stojsavljević, A, Jagodić, J, Vujotić, L, Borković-Mitić, S, Rašić-Milutinović, Z, Jovanović, D, et al.. Reference values for trace essential elements in the whole blood and serum samples of the adult Serbian population: significance of selenium deficiency. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020;27:1397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06936-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Goullé, JP, Mahieu, L, Castermant, J, Neveu, N, Bonneau, L, Lainé, G, et al.. Metal and metalloid multi-elementary ICP-MS validation in whole blood, plasma, urine and hair. Reference values. Forensic Sci Int 2005;153:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.04.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Yedomon, B, Menudier, A, Etangs, FLD, Anani, L, Fayomi, B, Druet-Cabanac, M, et al.. Biomonitoring of 29 trace elements in whole blood from inhabitants of Cotonou (Benin) by ICP-MS. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2017;43:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.11.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Baeyens, W, Vrijens, J, Gao, Y, Croes, K, Schoeters, G, Den Hond, E, et al.. Trace metals in blood and urine of newborn/mother pairs, adolescents and adults of the Flemish population (2007–2011). Int J Hyg Environ Health 2014;217:878–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.06.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Birgisdottir, BE, Knutsen, HK, Haugen, M, Gjelstad, IM, Jenssen, MT, Ellingsen, DG, et al.. Essential and toxic element concentrations in blood and urine and their associations with diet: results from a Norwegian population study including high-consumers of seafood and game. Sci Total Environ 2013;463:836–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.078.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Bárány, E, Bergdahl, IA, Bratteby, LE, Lundh, T, Samuelson, G, Schütz, A, et al.. Trace elements in blood and serum of Swedish adolescents: relation to gender, age, residential area, and socioeconomic status. Environ Res 2002;89:72–84. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4351.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Syversen, T, Evje, L, Wolf, S, Flaten, TP, Lierhagen, S, Simic, A. Trace elements in the large population-based HUNT3 survey. Biol Trace Elem Res 2021;199:2467–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02376-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Meltzer, HM, Alexander, J, Brantsæter, AL, Borch-Iohnsen, B, Ellingsen, DG, Thomassen, Y, et al.. The impact of iron status and smoking on blood divalent metal concentrations in Norwegian women in the HUNT2 Study. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2016;38:165–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.04.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Simić, A, Hansen, AF, Syversen, T, Lierhagen, S, Ciesielski, TM, Romundstad, PR, et al.. Trace elements in whole blood in the general population in Trøndelag County, Norway: the HUNT3 survey. Sci Total Environ 2022;806:150875–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150875.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Komarova, T, McKeating, D, Perkins, AV, Tinggi, U. Trace element analysis in whole blood and plasma for reference levels in a selected Queensland population, Australia. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18:2652–66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052652.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Jørgensen, LH, Sindahl, CH, Pedersen, L, Nielsen, F, Jensen, TK, Tolstrup, J, et al.. Reference intervals for trace elements in the general Danish population and their dependence on serum proteins. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2021;81:523–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2021.1959050.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Cesbron, A, Saussereau, E, Mahieu, L, Couland, I, Guerbet, M, Goullé, JP. Metallic profile of whole blood and plasma in a series of 106 healthy volunteers. J Anal Toxicol 2013;37:401–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkt046.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Oakes, EJ, Lyon, TD, Duncan, A, Gray, A, Talwar, D, O’Reilly, DS. Acute inflammatory response does not affect erythrocyte concentrations of copper, zinc and selenium. Clin Nutr 2008;27:115–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Lukanova, A, Toniolo, P, Zhitkovich, A, Nikolova, V, Panev, T, Popov, T, et al.. Occupational exposure to Cr(VI): comparison between chromium levels in lymphocytes, erythrocytes, and urine. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1996;69:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02630737.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Danehpash, S, Shirkhanloo, H, Azami, K, Deyhim, MR. Evaluation of lipid peroxidation, antioxidant status and trace elements in red blood cell concentrates during storage. Iran J Blood Cancer 2021;13:85–91.Search in Google Scholar

35. Pokorska-Niewiada, K, Brodowska, A, Brodowski, J, Szczuko, M. Levels of trace elements in erythrocytes as endocrine disruptors in obese and nonobese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2022;19:976–87. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020976.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Hodkinson, CF, Kelly, M, Coudray, C, Gilmore, WS, Hannigan, BM, O’Connor, JM, et al.. Zinc status and age-related changes in peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations in healthy men and women aged 55–70 y: the ZENITH study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59(2 Suppl):S63–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602301.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Muñiz, CS, Fernández-Martin, JL, Marchante-Gayón, JM, García Alonso, JI, Cannata-Andía, JB, Sanz-Medel, A. Reference values for trace and ultratrace elements in human serum determined by double-focusing ICP-MS. Biol Trace Elem Res 2001;82:259–72. https://doi.org/10.1385/bter:82:1-3:259.10.1385/BTER:82:1-3:259Search in Google Scholar

38. Hennigar, SR, Lieberman, HR, Fulgoni, VL3rd, McClung, JP. Serum zinc concentrations in the US population are related to sex, age, and time of blood draw but not dietary or supplemental zinc. J Nutr 2018;148:1341–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxy105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Barman, N, Salwa, M, Ghosh, D, Rahman, MW, Uddin, MN, Haque, MA. Reference value for serum zinc level of adult population in Bangladesh. EJIFCC 2020;31:117–24.Search in Google Scholar

40. Coşkun, A, Carobene, A, Aarsand, AK, Aksungar, FB, Serteser, M, Sandberg, S, et al.. European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Biological Variation and Task Group for the Biological Variation Database. Within- and between-subject biological variation data for serum zinc, copper and selenium obtained from 68 apparently healthy Turkish subjects. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;60:533–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0886.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Choi, W, Kim, S, Baek, YW, Choi, K, Lee, K, Kim, S, et al.. Exposure to environmental chemicals among Korean adults-updates from the second Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2012–2014). Int J Hyg Environ Health 2017;220:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.10.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Smith, DR, Osterloh, JD, Flegal, AR. Use of endogenous, stable lead isotopes to determine release of lead from the skeleton. Environ Health Perspect 1996;104:60–6. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9610460.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Korrick, SA, Schwartz, J, Tsaih, SW, Hunter, DJ, Aro, A, Rosner, B, et al.. Correlates of bone and blood lead levels among middle-aged and elderly women. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:335–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Tsaih, SW, Korrick, S, Schwartz, J, Lee, ML, Amarasiriwardena, C, Aro, A, et al.. Influence of bone resorption on the mobilization of lead from bone among middle-aged and elderly men: the normative aging study. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109:995–9. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109995.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological profile for strontium. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; 2004:157 p.Search in Google Scholar

46. Tolstykh, EI, Kozheurov, VP, Vyushkova, OV, Degteva, MO. Analysis of strontium metabolism in humans on the basis of the Techa river data. Radiat Environ Biophys 1997;36:25–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110050051.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Melo, DR, Lipsztein, JL, Oliveira, CA, Lundgren, DL, Muggenburg, BA, Guilmette, RA. A biokinetic model for 137Cs. Health Phys 1997;73:320–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199708000-00004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Wilhelm, M, Ewers, U, Schulz, C. Revised and new reference values for some trace elements in blood and urine for human biomonitoring in environmental medicine. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2004;207:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00260.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Brantsaeter, AL, Haugen, M, Thomassen, Y, Ellingsen, DG, Ydersbond, TA, Hagve, TA, et al.. Exploration of biomarkers for total fish intake in pregnant Norwegian women. Publ Health Nutr 2010;13:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980009005904.Search in Google Scholar

50. Cerná, M, Krsková, A, Cejchanová, M, Spěváčková, V. Human biomonitoring in the Czech Republic: an overview. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012;215:109–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.09.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Mohammadi, S, Shafiee, M, Faraji, SN, Rezaeian, M, Ghaffarian-Bahraman, A. Contamination of breast milk with lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biometals 2022;35:711–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-022-00395-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Vogel, N, Murawski, A, Schmied-Tobies, MIH, Rucic, E, Doyle, U, Kämpfe, A, et al.. Lead, cadmium, mercury, and chromium in urine and blood of children and adolescents in Germany – human biomonitoring results of the German Environmental Survey 2014–2017 (GerES V). Int J Hyg Environ Health 2021;237:113822–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113822.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

53. Frisk, P, Lindvall, A, Hudecek, R, Lindh, U. Decrease of trace elements in erythrocytes and plasma after removal of dental amalgam and other metal alloys. Biol Trace Elem Res 2006;113:247–59. https://doi.org/10.1385/bter:113:3:247.10.1385/BTER:113:3:247Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0731).


Received: 2023-07-12
Accepted: 2023-11-14
Published Online: 2023-11-28
Published in Print: 2024-04-25

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP): from conception to implementation
  4. Review
  5. Machine learning-based clinical decision support using laboratory data
  6. Mini Review
  7. Standardisation and harmonisation of thyroid-stimulating hormone measurements: historical, current, and future perspectives
  8. Opinion Papers
  9. Adopting the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) classification for reporting: the experience of Italian clinical laboratories
  10. Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process
  11. Biological variation of inflammatory and iron metabolism markers in high-endurance recreational athletes; are these markers useful for athlete monitoring?
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. A model for managing quality control for a network of clinical chemistry instruments measuring the same analyte
  14. Impact of Academia-Government Collaboration on Laboratory Medicine Standardization in South Korea: analysis of eight years creatinine proficiency testing experience
  15. Measurement uncertainty estimation of free drug concentrations in clinical laboratories using equilibrium dialysis
  16. Use of dried blood spots for monitoring inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers in the elderly
  17. S100B vs. “GFAP and UCH-L1” assays in the management of mTBI patients
  18. Evaluation of five multisteroid LC‒MS/MS methods used for routine clinical analysis: comparable performance was obtained for nine analytes
  19. Ensuring quality in 17OHP mass spectrometry measurement: an international study assessing isomeric steroid interference
  20. A novel LC-MS/MS-based assay for the simultaneous quantification of aldosterone-related steroids in human urine
  21. Clinical specificity of two assays for immunoglobulin kappa and lambda free light chains
  22. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  23. Estimation of the reference values and decision limits for growth hormone in newborns using dried blood spots
  24. Reference intervals of 24 trace elements in blood, plasma and erythrocytes for the Slovenian adult population
  25. Hematology and Coagulation
  26. Detection of blasts using flags and cell population data rules on Beckman Coulter DxH 900 hematology analyzer in patients with hematologic diseases
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. Drainage fluid LDH and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as biomarkers for early detecting anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing colorectal surgery
  29. Cardiovascular Diseases
  30. Performance evaluation of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay: analytical and clinical perspectives
  31. Diabetes
  32. Ferric particle-assisted LDI-MS platform for metabolic fingerprinting of diabetic retinopathy
  33. Infectious Diseases
  34. Thrombopoietin levels in sepsis and septic shock – a systematic review and meta-analysis
  35. Effect of temperature on presepsin pre-analytical stability in biological fluids of preterm and term newborns
  36. Letters to the Editor
  37. Pseudohyperglycemia due to glucometer interference in galactosemia
  38. What could cause a false increase in serum C-reactive protein concentration?
  39. Discriminating signal from noise: the biological variation of circulating calprotectin in serum and plasma
  40. Diagnostic accuracy of adenosine deaminase for tuberculous pleural effusion: age does matter
  41. The role of the Brazilian proficiency testing/External Quality Assessment Program in the improvement of glycated hemoglobin measurement
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0731/html
Scroll to top button