Home Comparison of iohexol plasma clearance formulas vs. inulin urinary clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparison of iohexol plasma clearance formulas vs. inulin urinary clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate

  • Laurence Dubourg , Sandrine Lemoine , Brune Joannard , Laurence Chardon , Vandréa de Souza , Pierre Cochat , Jean Iwaz , Muriel Rabilloud and Luciano Selistre ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 19, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

The one-compartment iohexol plasma clearance has been proposed as a reliable alternative to renal inulin clearance. However, this method’s performance depends on the formula used to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study reports on performance comparisons between various mathematical formulas proposed for iohexol plasma clearance vs. inulin urinary clearance.

Methods

GFR was simultaneously determined by inulin and iohexol clearance in 144 participants (age: 10–84 years; glomerular filtration rate: 15–169 mL/min/1.73 m2). A retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the performance of four formulas proposed to calculate plasma iohexol clearance (Brøchner–Mortensen, Fleming et al., Jødal–Brøchner–Mortensen, and Ng–Schwartz–Munoz). The performance of each formula was assessed using bias, precision (standard deviation of the bias), accuracy (percentage iohexol within 5, 10, and 15%), root mean square error, and concordance correlation coefficient vs. renal inulin clearance as reference.

Results

Regarding accuracy, there was no difference in root mean square error (RMSE), P5, P10, or P15 between the four formulas. The four concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) between the value from each formula and in-GFR were high and not significantly different. At in-GFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2, Ng–Schwartz–Munoz formula performed slightly better than other formulas regarding median bias (−0.5; 95% CI [−3.0 to 2.0] and accuracy P15 (95.0; 95% CI [88.0–100.0]).

Conclusions

The studied formulas were found equivalent in terms of precision and accuracy, but the Ng–Schwartz–Munoz formula improved the accuracy at higher levels of in-GFR.


Corresponding author: Luciano da Silva Selistre, MD, PhD, Néphrologie, Dialyse, Hypertension et Exploration Fonctionnelle Rénale, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Universidade de Caxias do Sul,Rua Francisco Getúlio Vargas, 1130, ZIP 95070-560, Caxias do Sul, Brazil; CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia, Brazil; and Hospital Geral de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Brasil, Phone: (+33) 472119117, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 88881.156638/2017-01

  1. Research funding: The study had no specific public or private financial support. During the period of analysis and publication, author Luciano Selistre benefited from a grant from the Brazilian government (CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, grant number: 88881.156638/2017-01). CAPES Foundation had no roles in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

  2. Author contributions: LS and LD had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: LS, VS, SL, MR, and LD. Acquisition of data: LS, LD, BJ, LD, SL, and PC. Analysis and interpretation of data: LS, MR, LD, and VS. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: LS, VS, JI, MR, and LD. Administrative, technical, or material support: LS and LD. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability: Authors Luciano Selistre and Laurence Dubourg had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. The data may be accessed through: dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/SKSPSY.

  5. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  6. Ethical approval: All procedures were carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution, the 2013 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments, or with comparable ethical standards.

References

1. Group KDIGOKCW. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. 2013;3:1–150.Search in Google Scholar

2. Soveri, I, Berg, UB, Bjork, J, Elinder, CG, Grubb, A, Mejare, I, et al. Measuring GFR: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64:411–24, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Delanaye, P, Ebert, N, Melsom, T, Gaspari, F, Mariat, C, Cavalier, E, et al. Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice and research: a review. Part 1: how to measure glomerular filtration rate with iohexol?. Clin Kidney J 2016;9:682–99, https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Blake, GM, Barnfield, MC, Burniston, MT, Fleming, JS, Cosgriff, PS, Siddique, M. Correction of the slope-intercept method for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate. Nucl Med Commun 2014;35:1277–83, https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000000192.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Brochner-Mortensen, J. A simple method for the determination of glomerular filtration rate. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1972;30:271–4, https://doi.org/10.3109/00365517209084290.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Fleming, JS, Persaud, L, Zivanovic, MA. A general equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate from a single plasma sample. Nucl Med Commun 2005;26:743–8, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mnm.0000171783.18650.80.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Brochner-Mortensen, J, Jodal, L. Reassessment of a classical single injection 51Cr-EDTA clearance method for determination of renal function in children and adults. Part II: empirically determined relationships between total and one-pool clearance. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2009;69:314–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510802653680.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Ng, DK, Schwartz, GJ, Jacobson, LP, Palella, FJ, Margolick, JB, Warady, BA, et al. Universal GFR determination based on two time points during plasma iohexol disappearance. Kidney Int 2011;80:423–30, https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.155.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Berg, UB, Back, R, Celsi, G, Halling, SE, Homberg, I, Krmar, RT, et al. Comparison of plasma clearance of iohexol and urinary clearance of inulin for measurement of GFR in children. Am J Kidney Dis 2011;57:55–61, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Sterner, G, Frennby, B, Mansson, S, Nyman, U, Van Westen, D, Almen, T. Determining ’true’ glomerular filtration rate in healthy adults using infusion of inulin and comparing it with values obtained using other clearance techniques or prediction equations. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008;42:278–85, https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590701701806.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Gaspari, F, Perico, N, Ruggenenti, P, Mosconi, L, Amuchastegui, CS, Guerini, E, et al. Plasma clearance of nonradioactive iohexol as a measure of glomerular filtration rate. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995;6:257–63.10.1681/ASN.V62257Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Erley, CM, Bader, BD, Berger, ED, Vochazer, A, Jorzik, JJ, Dietz, K, et al. Plasma clearance of iodine contrast media as a measure of glomerular filtration rate in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1544–50, https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200108000-00008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Cachat, F, Combescure, C, Cauderay, M, Girardin, E, Chehade, H. A systematic review of glomerular hyperfiltration assessment and definition in the medical literature. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10:382–9, https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.03080314.Search in Google Scholar

14. Dubourg, L, Hadj-Aissa, A, Ferrier, B. Adaptation of an enzymatic polyfructosan assay to clinical practice. Anal Biochem 2010;405:266–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2010.06.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Cavalier, E, Rozet, E, Dubois, N, Charlier, C, Hubert, P, Chapelle, JP, et al. Performance of iohexol determination in serum and urine by HPLC: validation, risk and uncertainty assessment. Clin Chim Acta 2008;396:80–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2008.07.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Delanaye, P, Melsom, T, Ebert, N, Back, SE, Mariat, C, Cavalier, E, et al. Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice and research: a review. Part 2: why to measure glomerular filtration rate with iohexol?. Clin Kidney J 2016;9:700–4, https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfw071.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Nordin, G, Ekvall, S, Kristoffersson, C, Jonsson, AS, Back, SE, Rollborn, N, et al. Accuracy of determination of the glomerular filtration marker iohexol by European laboratories as monitored by external quality assessment. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:1006–11, https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1175.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Tondel, C, Salvador, CL, Hufthammer, KO, Bolann, B, Brackman, D, Bjerre, A, et al. Iohexol plasma clearance in children: validation of multiple formulas and single-point sampling times. Pediatr Nephrol 2018;33:683–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-017-3841-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Fleming, JS, Zivanovic, MA, Blake, GM, Burniston, M, Cosgriff, PS. British Nuclear Medicine S. Guidelines for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate using plasma sampling. Nucl Med Commun 2004;25:759–69, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mnm.0000136715.71820.4a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Tondel, C, Bolann, B, Salvador, CL, Brackman, D, Bjerre, A, Svarstad, E, et al.. Iohexol plasma clearance in children: validation of multiple formulas and two-point sampling times. Pediatr Nephrol 2017;32:311–20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3436-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Schwartz, GJ, Abraham, AG, Furth, SL, Warady, BA, Munoz, A. Optimizing iohexol plasma disappearance curves to measure the glomerular filtration rate in children with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2010;77:65–71, https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.398.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Fleming, JS. An improved equation for correcting slope-intercept measurements of glomerular filtration rate for the single exponential approximation. Nucl Med Commun 2007;28:315–20, https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0b013e328014a14a.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-22
Accepted: 2020-09-28
Published Online: 2020-10-19
Published in Print: 2021-02-23

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Complex analytical procedures in diagnostic laboratories and the IVDR
  4. Review
  5. Re-examining ferritin-bound iron: current and developing clinical tools
  6. Opinion Papers
  7. Designing a diagnostic Total Testing Process as a base for supporting diagnostic stewardship
  8. The end of the laboratory developed test as we know it? Recommendations from a national multidisciplinary taskforce of laboratory specialists on the interpretation of the IVDR and its complications
  9. EFLM Papers
  10. The Academy of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and the European Register of Specialists in Laboratory Medicine: guide to the Academy and the Register, version 4 – 2020
  11. A proposed Common Training Framework for Specialists in Laboratory Medicine under EU Directive 2013/55/EC (The Recognition of Professional Qualifications)
  12. Guidelines and Recommendations
  13. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T methods for the early detection of myocardial injury in patients on chemotherapy
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Measurement of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone using isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry candidate reference method and evaluation of the performance for three routine methods
  16. Evaluation of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin measurements on the V8 capillary electrophoresis system and comparison with the IFCC approved HPLC reference method and N-Latex immunonephelometric assay
  17. The clinical relevance of anti-dsDNA antibodies determined by the Elia™ dsDNA assay in patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence on the HEp-2 cell
  18. A hierarchical bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy to provide direct comparisons of immunoassays vs. indirect immunofluorescence for initial screening of connective tissue diseases
  19. Individual uromodulin serum concentration is independent of glomerular filtration rate in healthy kidney donors
  20. Comparison of iohexol plasma clearance formulas vs. inulin urinary clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate
  21. Overweight-obesity is associated with decreased vitamin K2 levels in hemodialysis patients
  22. Cardiovascular Diseases
  23. Evaluating the performance of an updated high-sensitivity troponin T assay with increased tolerance to biotin
  24. Infectious Diseases
  25. The anti-inflammatory cytokine response characterized by elevated interleukin-10 is a stronger predictor of severe disease and poor outcomes than the pro-inflammatory cytokine response in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
  26. Quantification of the HIV-1 total reservoir in the peripheral blood of naïve and treated patients by a standardised method derived from a commercial HIV-1 RNA quantification assay
  27. Comparison of the reliability of Gram-negative and Gram-positive flags of the Sysmex UF-5000 with manual Gram stain and urine culture results
  28. Evaluation of a turbidimetric C-reactive protein assay to monitor early-onset neonatal sepsis in South Kivu (Democratic Republic of the Congo)
  29. Corrigendum
  30. Corrigendum to: Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic stewardship in Asia-Pacific countries: adaptation based on an expert consensus meeting
  31. Letters to the Editor
  32. Decision-making based on sFlt-1/PlGF ratios: are immunoassay results interchangeable for diagnosis or prognosis of preeclampsia?
  33. Inter-center agreement in the interpretation of oligoclonal bands
  34. A new founder BRCA1 haplotype identified in the Puglia region is associated with a specific age-related cancer onset in three unrelated families
  35. Predictive values of D-dimer for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study
  36. A very uncommon haemoglobin value resulting from a severe acute malnutrition in a 16-month-old child in Ethiopia
  37. Ionized calcium measurements during continuous renal replacement therapy with regional citrate anticoagulation
  38. The hairy cell leukaemia oxymoron: monocytotic monocytopenia
  39. Perchlorate interference with electrolyte analysis
  40. False decrease in serum triglyceride and cholesterol due to massive ascorbate in a bowel preparation solution
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-0770/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button