Home Applying the concept of uncertainty to the sFlt-1/PlGF cut-offs for diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Applying the concept of uncertainty to the sFlt-1/PlGF cut-offs for diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia

  • Pacifique Lévy , Safouane Hamdi , Jean Guiboudenche , Marie Clothilde Haguet , Sophie Bailleul and Guillaume Lefèvre EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 23, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

Placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) assays and the corresponding ratios (sFlt-1/PlGF) have been proposed to aid in the diagnosis by exclusion and/or prognosis of preeclampsia (PE). A method for evaluating ratio uncertainties (RUs), based on the theory of error propagation, was applied to the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio.

Methods

RUs were calculated using data derived from sFlt-1 and PlGF Internal Quality Control (IQC) results collected from four centers using Elecsys (Roche) or Kryptor (Thermo Fisher) sFlt-1 and PlGF assays. The corresponding ratio uncertainties were defined for each ratio value.

Results

The RUs increased linearly with the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio values. The Elecsys RUs were lower than the Kryptor RUs. Although RUs cannot eliminate differences in ratio values observed among various immunoassays, it can affect interpretation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, especially when results are within the range of predefined PE diagnosis or prognosis cut-offs.

Conclusions

Since RUs are only a function of PlGF and sFlt-1 precision, they can be calculated for each assay from each laboratory to adjust the interpretation of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio results in the context of PE.


Corresponding author: Guillaume Lefèvre, Hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, – Biochimie et Hormonologie4 rue de la Chine Paris, 75020, France. Phone: 33 1 56 01 62 49, Fax: 33 1 56 01 10 17, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

1. Redman, CW, Sargent, IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science 2005;308:1592–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111726.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Powe, CE, Levine, RJ, Karumanchi, SA. Preeclampsia, a disease of the maternal endothelium: the role of antiangiogenic factors and implications for later cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011;123:2856–69. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.853127.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Maynard, SE, Min, JY, Merchan, J, Lim, KH, Li, J, Mondal, S, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003;111:649–58. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci17189.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Zeisler, H, Llurba, E, Chantraine, F, Vatish, M, Staff, AC, Sennström, M, et al. Predictive value of the sFlt-1: PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016;374:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1414838.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ceriotti, F. Deriving proper measurement uncertainty from internal auality control data: an impossible mission?. Clin Biochem 2018;57:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Coskun, A, Oosterhuis, WP. Statistical distributions commonly used in measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine. Biochem Med 2020;30:010101. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2020.010101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Stepan, H, Hund, M, Dilba, P, Sillman, J, Schlembach, D. Elecsys® and Kryptor immunoassays for the measurement of sFlt-1 and PlGF to aid preeclampsia diagnosis: are they comparable?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:1339–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1228.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Shackleford, DM, Jamsen, KM. Quantifying uncertainty in the ratio of two measured variables: a recap and example. J Pharm Sci 2016;105:3462–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.07.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Burnett, D, ISO 15189. A practical Guide to ISO15189 in laboratory medicine. London: ACB Venture Publications; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

11. Plebani, M, Padoan, A, Sciacovelli, L. Measurement uncertainty: light in the shadows. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1381–3. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0134.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Braga, F, Panteghini, M. The utility of measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1407–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1336.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Lefèvre, G, Hertig, A, Guibourdenche, J, Lévy, P, Bailleul, S, Drouin, D, et al. Decision-making based on sFlt-1/PlGF ratios: are immunoassay results interchangeable for diagnosis or prognosis of preeclampsia?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;59:e87–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Verlohren, S, Galindo, A, Schlembach, D, Zeisler, H, Herraiz, I, Moertl, MG, et al. An automated method for the determination of the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio in the assessment of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:1.61.e1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.09.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Verlohren, S, Herraiz, I, Lapaire, O, Schlembach, D, Zeisler, H, Calda, P, et al. New gestational phase-specific cutoff values for the use of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio as a diagnostic test for preeclampsia. Hypertension 2014;63:346–52. https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.113.01787.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Stepan, H, Herraiz, I, Schlembach, D, Verlohren, S, Brennecke, S, Chantraine, F, et al. Implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for prediction and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia in singleton pregnancy: implications for clinical practice. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:241–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14799.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. NICE guidelines: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). PlGF-based testing to help diagnose suspected pre-eclampsia (Triage PlGF test, Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, DELFIA Xpress PlGF 1-2-3 test, and BRAHMS sFlt-1 Kryptor/BRAHMS PlGF plus Kryptor PE ratio). London: NICE; 2016.Search in Google Scholar

18. Verlohren, S, Herraiz, I, Lapaire, O, Schlembach, D, Moertl, M, Zeisler, H, et al. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in different types of hypertensive pregnancy disorders and its prognostic potential in preeclamptic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:58–8.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.037.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Gómez-Arriaga, PI, Herraiz, I, López-Jiménez, EA, Escribano, D, Denk, B, Galindo, A. Uterine artery Doppler and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio: prognostic value in early-onset pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:525–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13224.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. van Helden, J, Weiskirchen, R. Analytical evaluation of the novel soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and placental growth factor assays for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Clin Biochem 2015;48:1113–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.06.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Andersen, LB, Frederiksen-Møller, B, Work Havelund, K, Dechend, R, Jørgensen, JS, Jensen, BL, et al. Diagnosis of preeclampsia with soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1/placental growth factor ratio: an inter-assay comparison. J Am Soc Hypertens 2015;9:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2014.11.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Cheng, YKY, Poon, LCY, Shennan, A, Leung, TY, Sahota, DS. Inter-manufacturer comparison of automated immunoassays for the measurement of soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placental growth factor. Pregnancy Hypertens 2019;17:165–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2019.06.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Simón, E, Herraiz, I, Villalaín, C, Gómez-Arriaga, PI, Quezada, MS, López-Jiménez, EA, et al. Correlation of Kryptor and Elecsys® immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio on early diagnosis of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: a case-control study. Pregnancy Hypertens 2020;20:44–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2020.03.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Dröge, LA, Höller, A, Ehrlich, L, Verlohren, S, Henrich, W, Perschel, FH. Diagnosis of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction with the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio: diagnostic accuracy of the automated immunoassay Kryptor®. Pregnancy Hypertens 2017;8:31–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2017.02.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. German Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (DGGG), OEGG and SGGG. Guidelines for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Diagnosis and therapy. Updated; 2019. Available from: https://clicktime.symantec.com/3E3VRHmo3gLeRzmJjaNSKzm6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.awmf.org%2Fleitlinien%2Fdetail%2Fll%2F015-018.html [Accessed 16 September 2020].Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0477).


Received: 2020-04-09
Accepted: 2020-10-18
Published Online: 2021-02-23
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Perspectives in developments of mass spectrometry for improving diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders
  4. Cytokine “storm”, cytokine “breeze”, or both in COVID-19?
  5. Review
  6. Clinical relevance of biological variation of cardiac troponins
  7. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  8. Development of novel methods for non-canonical myeloma protein analysis with an innovative adaptation of immunofixation electrophoresis, native top-down mass spectrometry, and middle-down de novo sequencing
  9. Falsely markedly elevated 25-hydroxyvitamin D in patients with monoclonal gammopathies
  10. Development of a pregnancy-specific reference material for thyroid biomarkers, vitamin D, and nutritional trace elements in serum
  11. Applying the concept of uncertainty to the sFlt-1/PlGF cut-offs for diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia
  12. Reducing sample rejection in Durban, South Africa
  13. Quality benchmarking of smartphone laboratory medicine applications: comparison of laboratory medicine specialists’ and non-laboratory medicine professionals’ evaluation
  14. Urine soluble CD163 (sCD163) as biomarker in glomerulonephritis: stability, reference interval and diagnostic performance
  15. Measurement of urine albumin by liquid chromatography-isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry and its application to value assignment of external quality assessment samples and certification of reference materials
  16. Choice of faecal immunochemical test matters: comparison of OC-Sensor and HM-JACKarc, in the assessment of patients at high risk of colorectal cancer
  17. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  18. Reference values of trace elements in blood and/or plasma in adults living in Belgium
  19. Cancer Diagnostics
  20. Clinical performance of calcitonin and procalcitonin Elecsys® immunoassays in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma
  21. Cardiovascular Diseases
  22. Analytical assessment of ortho clinical diagnostics high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay
  23. Evaluation of the 0 h/1 h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T algorithm in diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in Han population
  24. Diabetes
  25. Are hemoglobin A1c point-of-care analyzers fit for purpose? The story continues
  26. Infectious Diseases
  27. Diagnostic and prognostic role of presepsin in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infection
  28. Hemocytometric characteristics of COVID-19 patients with and without cytokine storm syndrome on the sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Letter in reply to the letter to the editor of Geerts N and Schanhorst V with the title “Roche Troponin T hs-STAT meets all expert opinion analytical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome”
  31. Improving measurement uncertainty of plasma electrolytes: a complex but not impossible task
  32. Truncation limits of patient-based real-time quality control: a new model derived from between-subject biological variations
  33. Plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity change over 12 months independently associated with change in serum uric acid level: MedCity21 health examination registry
  34. Exogenous triglycerides interfere with a point of care CRP assay: a pre-analytical caveat
  35. Monoclonal components in alpha-2 region should not be neglected in capillary electrophoresis
  36. Do not measure an extra high value monoclonal IgM by immunoturbidity: a case report
  37. Reference values for plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) in healthy Chinese
  38. Diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency: combined indicator of B12-status should be interpreted with caution in the case of renal impairment
  39. Could the UKNEQAS program “Manual Differential Blood Count” be performed by the use of an automated digital morphology analyzer (Sysmex DI-60)? A feasibility study
  40. Low-dose oral methotrexate-induced crystalluria
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-0477/html
Scroll to top button