Home Vedolizumab quantitation using high-resolution accurate mass-mass spectrometry middle-up protein subunit: method validation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Vedolizumab quantitation using high-resolution accurate mass-mass spectrometry middle-up protein subunit: method validation

  • Kendall W. Cradic , Paula M. Ladwig , Ann L. Rivard , Waddah Katrangi , Karl Florian Wintgens and Maria A.V. Willrich EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 22, 2019

Abstract

Background

While quantitation methods for small-molecule and tryptic peptide bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS) have been well defined, quantitation methods for top-down or middle-up MS approaches have not been as well defined. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) are a group of proteins that can be used to both demonstrate the advantages of top-down or middle-up detection methods over classic tryptic peptide bottom-up along with the growing need for robust quantitation strategies/software for these top-down or middle-up methods. Bottom-up proteolytic digest methods for the t-mAbs tend to suffer from challenges such as limited peptide selection due to potential interference from the polyclonal immunoglobulin background, complicated workflows, and inadequate sensitivity and specificity without laborious purification steps, and therefore have prompted the search for new detection and quantitation methods. Time-of-flight along with Orbitrap MS have recently evolved from the research and/or pharmaceutical setting into the clinical laboratory. With their superior mass measurement accuracy, resolution and scanning speeds, these are ideal platforms for top-down or middle-up characterization and quantitation.

Methods

We demonstrate a validated, robust, middle-up protein subunit detection and quantitation method for the IgG1 t-mAb, vedolizumab (VEDO), which takes advantage of the high resolution of the Orbitrap MS detection and quantitation software to increase specificity.

Results

Validated performance characteristics met pre-defined acceptance criteria with simple workflows and rapid turnaround times: characteristics necessary for implementation into a high-volume clinical MS laboratory.

Conclusions

While the extraction method can easily be used with other IgG1 t-mAbs, the detection and quantitation method may become an option for measurement of other proteins.


Corresponding author: Maria A.V. Willrich, PhD, Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA, Phone: +507-284-2511
aKendall W. Cradic and Paula M. Ladwig contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jody L. Frinack, MT (ASCP), development technologist at the Immunology Laboratory at Mayo Clinic, for managing the sample cohort and shipping of samples for method comparisons.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. American Gastroenterological Association. Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical decision support tool. Gastroenterology 2017;153:858–9.10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Silva-Ferreira F, Afonso J, Pinto-Lopes P, Magro F. A systematic review on infliximab and adalimumab drug monitoring: levels, clinical outcomes and assays. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016;22:2289–301.10.1097/MIB.0000000000000855Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Vande Casteele N, Buurman DJ, Sturkenboom MG, Kleibeuker JH, Vermeire S, Rispens T, et al. Detection of infliximab levels and anti-infliximab antibodies: a comparison of three different assays. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;36:765–71.10.1111/apt.12030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Wang SL, Hauenstein S, Ohrmund L, Shringarpure R, Salbato J, Reddy R, et al. Monitoring of adalimumab and antibodies-to-adalimumab levels in patient serum by the homogeneous mobility shift assay. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2013;78–79:39–44.10.1016/j.jpba.2013.01.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Wang SL, Ohrmund L, Hauenstein S, Salbato J, Reddy R, Monk P, et al. Development and validation of a homogeneous mobility shift assay for the measurement of infliximab and antibodies-to-infliximab levels in patient serum. J Immunol Methods 2012;382:177–88.10.1016/j.jim.2012.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Lallemand C, Kavrochorianou N, Steenholdt C, Bendtzen K, Ainsworth MA, Meritet JF, et al. Reporter gene assay for thequantification of the activity and neutralizing antibody response to TNFalpha antagonists. J Immunol Methods 2011;373:229–39.10.1016/j.jim.2011.08.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Lazar-Molnar E, Delgado JC. Immunogenicity assessment of tumor necrosis factor antagonists in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem 2016;62:1186–98.10.1373/clinchem.2015.242875Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Pavlov IY, Carper J, Lazar-Molnar E, Delgado JC. Clinical laboratory application of a reporter-gene assay for measurement of functional activity and neutralizing antibody response to infliximab. Clin Chim Acta 2016;453:147–53.10.1016/j.cca.2015.12.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Willrich MA, Murray DL, Barnidge DR, Ladwig PM, Snyder MR. Quantitation of infliximab using clonotypic peptides and selective reaction monitoring by LC-MS/MS. Int Immunopharmacol 2015;28:513–20.10.1016/j.intimp.2015.07.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Ladwig PM, Barnidge DR, Willrich MA. Quantification of the IgG2/4 kappa monoclonal therapeutic eculizumab from serum using isotype specific affinity purification and microflow LC-ESI-Q-TOF mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2017;28:811–7.10.1007/s13361-016-1566-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Ladwig PM, Barnidge DR, Willrich MA. Mass spectrometry approaches for identification and quantitation of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in the clinical laboratory. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2017;24. pii: e00545–16.10.1128/CVI.00545-16Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Barnidge DR, Dasari S, Botz CM, Murray DH, Snyder MR, Katzmann JA, et al. Using mass spectrometry to monitor monoclonal immunoglobulins in patients with a monoclonal gammopathy. J Proteome Res 2014;13:1419–27.10.1021/pr400985kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, Sands BE, Hanauer S, Colombel J-F, Sandborn WJ, et al. Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2013;369:699–710.10.1056/NEJMoa1215734Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ward MG, Sparrow MP, Roblin X. Therapeutic drug monitoring of vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease: current data and future directions. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018;11:1756284818772786.10.1177/1756284818772786Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Al-Bawardy B, Ramos GP, Willrich MA, Jenkins SM, Park SH, Aniwan S, et al. Vedolizumab drug level correlation with clinical remission, biomarker normalization, and mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019;25:580–6.10.1093/ibd/izy272Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Williet N, Boschetti G, Fovet M, Di Bernado T, Claudez P, Del Tedesco E, et al. Association between low trough levels of vedolizumab during induction therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases and need for additional doses within 6 months. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;15:1750–7 e3.10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. CLSI. Preparation and testing of reagent water in the clinical laboratory; Approved Guideline, 4th ed. CLSI document GP40-A4-AMD. 2006. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

18. CLSI. A framework for using CLSI documents to evaluate clinical laboratory measurement procedures, 2nd ed. CLSI report EP 19. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

19. Ungar B, Kopylov U, Yavzori M, Fudim E, Picard O, Lahat A, et al. Association of vedolizumab level, anti-drug antibodies, and alpha4beta7 occupancy with response in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:697–705 e7.10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.050Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0862).


Received: 2019-08-14
Accepted: 2019-10-21
Published Online: 2019-11-22
Published in Print: 2020-06-25

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Advancements in mass spectrometry as a tool for clinical analysis: part II
  4. Quantitative protein assessment
  5. Complexity, cost, and content – three important factors for translation of clinical protein mass spectrometry tests, and the case for apolipoprotein C-III proteoform testing
  6. Vedolizumab quantitation using high-resolution accurate mass-mass spectrometry middle-up protein subunit: method validation
  7. Development and evaluation of an element-tagged immunoassay coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection: can we apply the new assay in the clinical laboratory?
  8. MALDI-MS for the clinic
  9. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI) mass spectrometry (MS): basics and clinical applications
  10. Clinical use of mass spectrometry (imaging) for hard tissue analysis in abnormal fracture healing
  11. Cellular resolution in clinical MALDI mass spectrometry imaging: the latest advancements and current challenges
  12. Bacterial identification by lipid profiling using liquid atmospheric pressure matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry
  13. Clinical application of ’omics technologies
  14. Individualized metabolomics: opportunities and challenges
  15. Diagnostic amyloid proteomics: experience of the UK National Amyloidosis Centre
  16. The “olfactory fingerprint”: can diagnostics be improved by combining canine and digital noses?
  17. Peptidomic and proteomic analysis of stool for diagnosing IBD and deciphering disease pathogenesis
  18. The influence of hypoxia on the prostate cancer proteome
  19. Laboratory automation and kit-based approaches
  20. Mass spectrometry and total laboratory automation: opportunities and drawbacks
  21. The pathway through LC-MS method development: in-house or ready-to-use kit-based methods?
  22. Evaluation of the 25-hydroxy vitamin D assay on a fully automated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry system, the Thermo Scientific Cascadion SM Clinical Analyzer with the Cascadion 25-hydroxy vitamin D assay in a routine clinical laboratory
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0862/html
Scroll to top button