Home Establishment of an international autoantibody reference standard for human anti-DFS70 antibodies: proof-of-concept study for a novel Megapool strategy by pooling individual specific sera
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Establishment of an international autoantibody reference standard for human anti-DFS70 antibodies: proof-of-concept study for a novel Megapool strategy by pooling individual specific sera

  • Alessandra Dellavance , Danielle C. Baldo , Bing Zheng , Rodrigo A. Mora , Marvin J. Fritzler , Falk Hiepe , Johan Rönnelid , Minoru Satoh , Ignacio Garcia-De La Torre , Mark H. Wener , Edward K.L. Chan and Luis E.C. Andrade ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 22, 2019

Abstract

Background

International autoantibody standards, traditionally based on material obtained from plasmapheresis of single subjects, represent individual immune response and may not comprehend the heterogeneity of the general population. The anti-DFS70 autoantibody yields a characteristic dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear pattern on indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) and speaks against autoimmunity. We propose a novel strategy for developing autoantibody reference standards, based on stepwise pooling of serum samples from hundreds of individuals with anti-DFS70 antibodies.

Methods

Within a 2-year period, serum samples were selected from routine HEp-2 IFA according to the following criteria: DFS HEp-2 IFA pattern at titer ≥1:640; anti-DFS70 reactivity in three analyte-specific tests (Western blot [WB], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and chemiluminescent immunoassay [CLIA]). Aliquots of individual samples were combined into progressively larger pools with stepwise validation of intermediary pools as for individual samples. Validated intermediary pools were merged into a final pool for lyophilization.

Results

A total of 741 validated samples yielded a 750 mL final pool that was lyophilized into thousands of 200 μL-aliquots. Reconstituted aliquots yielded the expected anti-DFS70 reactivity in ELISA, CLIA and WB, as well as high-titer DFS HEp-2 IFA pattern. The appropriate anti-DFS70 reactivity of the lyophilized pool was confirmed by seven international expert centers, using HEp-2 IFA, ELISA, WB and immunoprecipitation.

Conclusions

This proof-of-concept study provides an innovative and efficient strategy to build serum reference standards for autoantibody testing. The anti-DFS70 standard will integrate the panel of standards of Autoantibody Standardization Committee (ASC, www.autoab.org), contributing to education for proper assay validation and interpretation of the DFS pattern and other HEp-2 IFA patterns.


Corresponding author: Luis E.C. Andrade, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Division, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu 740 3° andar, 04023-062 São Paulo, Brazil; and Immunology Division, Fleury Medicine and Health Laboratory, São Paulo, Brazil

Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply indebted to Vitor Anselmo Sakihara and Paulo Ho, from Butantan Institute, São Paulo, Brazil for lyophilizing the preliminary serum pools; Inova Diagnostics, Inc, San Diego, CA, and Euroimmun Medical Laboratory Diagnostics AG, Lübeck, Germany, for providing the anti-DFS70 ELISA and CLIA kits, respectively; Trinity Biotech, Jamestown, NY, for providing the HEp-2 ELITE slides; Kathryn Kohl, at the Plasma Service Group, for preparing the lyophilized aliquots of the Megapool; Kari B. Basso at the University of Florida Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center supported by NIH S10 OD021758-01A1; Tomoko Hasegawa and Shin Tanaka from the Department of Clinical Nursing, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: Fleury Medicine and Health Laboratory provided the material support for the selection and testing of all samples (NP-084). Luis Eduardo C. Andrade receives a research grant (#232711/2014-3) from the Brazilian Research Agency CNPq.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication. MJF is a consultant or received honoraria form Inova Diagnostics, Euroimmun GmbH and Alexion Canada.

References

1. Chan EK, Damoiseaux J, Carballo OG, Conrad K, Cruvinel WM, Francescantonio PL, et al. Report of the first international consensus on standardized nomenclature of antinuclear antibody HEp-2 cell patterns 2014–2015. Frontiers Immunol 2015;6:1–13.10.3389/fimmu.2015.00412Search in Google Scholar

2. Andrade LE, Klotz W, Herold M, Conrad K, Rönnelid J, Fritzler MJ, et al. International consensus on antinuclear antibody patterns: definition of the AC-29 pattern associated with antibodies to DNA topoisomerase I. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;10:1783–8.10.1515/cclm-2018-0188Search in Google Scholar

3. Herold M, Klotz W, Andrade LE, Conrad K, Cruvinel WM, Damoiseaux J, et al. International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody Patterns: defining negative results and reporting unidentified patterns. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;10:1799–802.10.1515/cclm-2018-0052Search in Google Scholar

4. Chan EK, Damoiseaux J, de Melo Cruvinel W, Carballo OG, Conrad K, Francescantonio PL, et al. Report on the second International Consensus on dense fine speckled Pattern (ICAP) workshop in Dresden 2015. Lupus 2016;25:797–804.10.1177/0961203316640920Search in Google Scholar

5. Damoiseaux J, Andrade LE, Carballo OG, Conrad K, Francescantonio PL, Fritzler MJ, et al. Clinical relevance of HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescent patterns: the International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP) perspective. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; pii: annrheumdis-2018-214436. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214436.10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214436Search in Google Scholar

6. Cozzani E, Drosera M, Gasparini G, Parodi A. Serology of lupus erythematosus: correlation between immunopathological features and clinical aspects. Autoimmune Dis 2014;2014:321359.10.1155/2014/321359Search in Google Scholar

7. Dellavance A, Gallindo C, Soares MG, Silva NP, Mortara RA, Andrade LE. Redefining the Scl-70 indirect immunofluorescence pattern: autoantibodies to DNA topoisomerase I yield a specific immunofluorescence pattern. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:632–8.10.1093/rheumatology/kep070Search in Google Scholar

8. Douvas AS, Achten M, Tan EM. Identification of a nuclear protein (Scl-70) as a unique target of human antinuclear antibodies in scleroderma. J Biol Chem 1979;254:10514–22.10.1016/S0021-9258(19)86738-8Search in Google Scholar

9. Shero JH, Bordwell B, Rothfield NF, Earnshaw WC. High titers of autoantibodies to topoisomerase I (Scl-70) in sera from scleroderma patients. Science 1986;231:737–40.10.1126/science.3003910Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Dellavance A, Viana VS, Leon EP, Bonfa ES, Andrade LE, Leser PG. The clinical spectrum of antinuclear antibodies associated with the nuclear dense fine speckled immunofluorescence pattern. J Rheumatol 2005;32:2144–9.Search in Google Scholar

11. Mariz HA, Sato EI, Barbosa SH, Rodrigues SH, Dellavance A, Andrade LE. ANA HEp-2 pattern is a critical parameter for discriminating ANA-positive healthy individuals and patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:191–200.10.1002/art.30084Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Ochs RL, Stein TW Jr, Peebles CL, Gittes RF, Tan EM. Autoantibodies in interstitial cystitis. J Urol 1994;3:587–92.10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35023-1Search in Google Scholar

13. Ochs RL, Muro Y, Si Y, Ge H, Chan EK, Tan EM. Autoantibodies to DFS 70 kd/transcription coactivator p75 in atopic dermatitis and other conditions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:1211–20.10.1067/mai.2000.107039Search in Google Scholar

14. Ochs RL, Mahler M, Basu A, Rios-Colon L, Sanchez TW, Andrade LE, et al. The significance of autoantibodies to DFS70/LEDGFp75 in health and disease: integrating basic science with clinical understanding. Clin Exp Med 2016;16:27393.10.1007/s10238-015-0367-0Search in Google Scholar

15. Yamada K, Senju S, Shinohara T, Nakatsura T, Murata Y, Ishihara M, et al. Humoral immune response directed against LEDGF in patients with VKH. Immunol Lett 2001;78:161–8.10.1016/S0165-2478(01)00243-7Search in Google Scholar

16. Ayaki M, Ohoguro N, Azuma N, Majima Y, Yata K, Ibaraki N, et al. Detection of cytotoxic anti-LEDGF autoantibodies in atopic dermatitis. Autoimmunity 2002;35:319–27.10.1080/0891693021000003198Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Okamoto M, Ogawa Y, Watanabe A, Sugiura K, Shimomura Y, Aoki N, et al. Autoantibodies to DFS70/LEDGF are increased in alopecia areata patients. J Autoimmun 2004;23:257–66.10.1016/j.jaut.2004.07.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Watanabe K, Muro Y, Sugiura K, Tomita Y. IgE and IgG (4) autoantibodies against DFS70/LEDGF in atopic dermatitis. Autoimmunity 2011;44:511–9.10.3109/08916934.2010.549157Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Watanabe A, Kodera M, Sugiura K, Usuda T, Tan EM, Takasaki Y, et al. Anti-DFS70 antibodies in 597 healthy hospital workers. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:892–900.10.1002/art.20096Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Mahler M, Parker T, Peebles CL, Andrade LE, Swart A, Carbone Y, et al. Anti-DFS70/LEDGF antibodies are more prevalent in healthy individuals compared to patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol 2012;39:2104–10.10.3899/jrheum.120598Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Mahler M, Hanly JG, Fritzler MJ. Importance of the dense fine speckled pattern on HEp-2 cells and anti-DFS70 antibodies for the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev 2011;11:642–45.10.1016/j.autrev.2011.11.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Egner W. The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:424–32.10.1136/jcp.53.6.424Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Damoiseaux JG, Tervaert JW. From ANA to ENA: how to proceed? Autoimmun Rev 2006;5:10–7.10.1016/j.autrev.2005.05.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Fritzler MJ, Rattner JB, Luft LM, Edworthy SM, Casiano CA, Peebles C, et al. Historical perspectives on the discovery and elucidation of autoantibodies to centromere proteins (CENP) and the emerging importance of antibodies to CENP-F. Autoimmun Rev 2011;4:194–200.10.1016/j.autrev.2010.09.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Bentow C, Fritzler MJ, Mummert E, Mahler M. Recognition of the dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern remains challenging: results from an international internet-based survey. Autoimmun Highlights 2016;7:8.10.1007/s13317-016-0081-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Sheldon J, Dellavance A. Strategies for building reference standards for autoantibodies. Front Immunol 2015;6:194.10.3389/fimmu.2015.00194Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Chan EK, Fritzler MJ, Wiik A, Andrade LE, Reeves WH, Tincani A, et al. Autoantibody Standardization Committee in 2006. Autoimmun Rev 2007;6:577–80.10.1016/j.autrev.2007.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Jacobs JF, Bossuyt X. Standardization and harmonization of autoimmune diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1563–7.10.1515/cclm-2018-0807Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Bizzaro N, Pesente F, Cucchiaro F, Infantino M, Tampoia M, Villalta D, et al. Anti-DFS70 antibodies detected by immunoblot methods: a reliable tool to confirm the dense fine speckles ANA pattern. J Immunol Methods 2016;436:50–3.10.1016/j.jim.2016.06.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Bonroy C, Schouwers S, Berth M, Stubbe M, Piette Y, Hoffman I, et al. The importance of detecting anti-DFS70 in routine clinical practice: comparison of different care settings. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1090–9.10.1515/cclm-2017-0541Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Shovman O, Gilburd B, Chayat C, Amital H, Langevitz P, WatadA, et al. Prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in patients with and without systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2017;36:121–6.Search in Google Scholar

32. Shoenfeld Y, Cervera R, Haass M, Kallenberg C, KhamashtaM, Meroni P, et al. EASI – the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative: a new initiative that can contribute to agreed diagnostic models of diagnosing autoimmune disorders throughout Europe. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1109:138–44.10.1196/annals.1398.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Agmon-Levin N, Damoiseaux J, Kallenberg C, Sack U, Witte T, Herold M, et al. International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as antinuclear antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:17–23.10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203863Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Meroni PL, Biggioggero M, Pierangeli SS, Sheldon J, Zegers I, Borghi MO. Standardization of autoantibody testing: a paradigm for serology in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2014;10:35–43.10.1038/nrrheum.2013.180Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Seeling M, Bruckner C, Nimmerjahn F. Differential antibody glycosylation in autoimmunity: sweet biomarker or modulator of disease activity? Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017;13:621–30.10.1038/nrrheum.2017.146Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Merlini G, Blirup-Jensen S, Johnson AM, Sheldon J, Zegers I. IFCC Committee on Plasma Proteins (C-PP). Standardizing plasma protein measurements worldwide: a challenging enterprise. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1567–75.10.1515/CCLM.2010.314Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Infantino M, Shovman O, Pérez D, Grossi V, Manfredi M, Benucci M, et al. A better definition of the anti-DFS70 antibody screening by IIF methods. J Immunol Methods 2018;461:110–6.10.1016/j.jim.2018.07.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Pena SD, Bastos-Rodrigues L, Pimenta JR, Bydlowski SP. DNA tests probe the genomic ancestry of Brazilians. Braz J Med Biol Res 2009;42:870–6.10.1590/S0100-879X2009005000026Search in Google Scholar

39. Parra FC, Amado RC, Lambertucci JR, Rocha J, Antunes CM, Pena SD. Color and genomic ancestry in Brazilians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:177–82.10.1073/pnas.0126614100Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2019-01-25
Accepted: 2019-03-14
Published Online: 2019-04-22
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Identification and management of spurious hemolysis: controversies, concerns and criticisms
  4. Reviews
  5. CYP24A1 and SLC34A1 genetic defects associated with idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia: from genotype to phenotype
  6. Meta-analysis: compared with anti-CCP and rheumatoid factor, could anti-MCV be the next biomarker in the rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria?
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Collection, transport and storage procedures for blood culture specimens in adult patients: recommendations from a board of Italian experts
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. Using the hemoglobin-binding Staphylococcus aureus protein IsdH to enable plasma analysis of hemolyzed blood samples
  11. Handling of hemolyzed serum samples in clinical chemistry laboratories: the Nordic hemolysis project
  12. Clinical biomarker innovation: when is it worthwhile?
  13. Impact of total automation consolidating first-line laboratory tests on diagnostic blood loss
  14. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the D-dimer test in emergency department patients: secondary analysis of an observational study
  15. Screening of chemical libraries in pursuit of kallikrein-5 specific inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses
  16. Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment
  17. Establishment of an international autoantibody reference standard for human anti-DFS70 antibodies: proof-of-concept study for a novel Megapool strategy by pooling individual specific sera
  18. Only monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies aid in the exclusion of antinuclear antibody associated rheumatic diseases: an Italian experience
  19. Performance evaluation of an Indoxyl Sulfate Assay Kit “NIPRO”
  20. Variable and inaccurate serum IgG4 levels resulting from lack of standardization in IgG subclass assay calibration
  21. Hematology and Coagulation
  22. Influence of hypertriglyceridemia, hyperbilirubinemia and hemolysis on thrombin generation in human plasma
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Reference intervals for serum total vitamin B12 and holotranscobalamin concentrations and their change points with methylmalonic acid concentration to assess vitamin B12 status during early and mid-pregnancy
  25. Cardiovascular Diseases
  26. Serum concentrations of free fatty acids are associated with 3-month mortality in acute heart failure patients
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Management of potassium results in haemolysed plasma samples at the emergency department laboratory
  29. Unexpected analytical interference in isavuconazole UV determination in a child in therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor for cystic fibrosis
  30. Total laboratory automation has the potential to be the field of application of artificial intelligence: the cyber-physical system and “Automation 4.0”
  31. 99th percentile upper reference limit of AccuTnI+3 in a Korean reference population: a multicenter study using fresh serum
  32. Roche Troponin T hs-STAT meets all expert opinion analytical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome
  33. A comparison of biotin interference in routine immunoassays on the Roche Cobas 8000, Beckman Coulter DXi and Siemens Advia Centaur XPT immunoassay platforms
  34. The importance of the methodology and sample matrix when interpreting chromogranin A results
  35. The sudden death of the combined first trimester aneuploidy screening, a single centre experience in Belgium
  36. Reply to Luksic et al. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56(4):574–581
Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0087/html
Scroll to top button