Home Using the hemoglobin-binding Staphylococcus aureus protein IsdH to enable plasma analysis of hemolyzed blood samples
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Using the hemoglobin-binding Staphylococcus aureus protein IsdH to enable plasma analysis of hemolyzed blood samples

  • Kirstine Lindhardt Sæderup , Jesper Revsholm , Patrick Bjork Richardt , Stig Hill Christiansen , Dorle Hennig , Søren Kragh Moestrup and Jonas Heilskov Graversen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 22, 2019

Abstract

Background

Intravascular hemolysis and in vitro hemolysis are prevalent contributors to failed blood sample analysis in the routine hospital laboratory. Interferences by hemoglobin in spectrophotometric and certain enzyme activity assays is the major causative factor.

Methods

By exploiting the hemoglobin-binding properties of the iron-regulated surface determinant H (IsdH) protein from Staphylococcus aureus we have developed a new method to instantly remove hemoglobin and hemoglobin-haptoglobin complexes from plasma in vitro thereby enabling the measurement of hemoglobin-sensitive analytes in hemolyzed plasma. In the present study we used an engineered IsdH mutant form conjugated to Sepharose for the efficient removal of plasma hemoglobin in concentrations up to 15 mg/mL. The high abundance of haptoglobin, which forms a tight complex with hemoglobin in plasma, did not affect the hemoglobin removal by IsdH Sepharose.

Results

Applying the method on plasma samples that beforehand were spiked with blood hemolysate re-enabled measurement of the hemolysis sensitive parameters: alkaline phosphatase, conjugated bilirubin, iron, ferritin, γ-glutamyltransferase, total thyroxine and troponin T. IsdH Sepharose-mediated hemoglobin removal also enabled measurement of hemolysis sensitive parameters in hemolyzed samples from anonymized patients.

Conclusions

In conclusion, IsdH Sepharose is a simple cost-effective pretreatment of hemolyzed samples correcting and enabling the measurement of several important hemoglobin-sensitive parameters in a way compatible with standard procedures in routine laboratories.

Funding source: Det Frie Forskningsråd

Award Identifier / Grant number: 7017-00126B

Funding source: Lundbeckfonden

Award Identifier / Grant number: R180-2014-3649

Award Identifier / Grant number: NNF14OC0011537

Funding statement: Det Frie Forskningsråd, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004836, Grant Number: 7017-00126B. Lundbeckfonden, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003554, Grant Number: R180-2014-3649. Novo Nordisk UK Research Foundation, Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000329, Grant Number: NNF14OC0011537.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank laboratory technician Malene Bille Jørgensen and laboratory technician specialist Anette Bergstedt for their excellent technical assistance.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  3. Honorarium: None declared.

  4. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:750–9.10.1515/CCLM.2006.123Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Burns ER, Yoshikawa N. Hemolysis in serum samples drawn by emergency department personnel versus laboratory phlebotomists. Lab Med 2002;33:378–80.10.1309/PGM4-4F8L-2P1M-LKPBSearch in Google Scholar

3. Carraro P, Servidio G, Plebani M. Hemolyzed specimens: a reason for rejection or a clinical challenge? Clin Chem 2000;46:306–7.10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306Search in Google Scholar

4. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, et al. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:764–72.10.1515/CCLM.2008.170Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Bais R. The effect of sample hemolysis on cardiac troponin I and T assays. Clin Chem 2010;56:1357–9.10.1373/clinchem.2010.144139Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Lippi G, Cervellin G, Favaloro EJ, Plebani M. Prevalence of hemolyzed specimens in clinical laboratories. In: Sonntag O, Plebani M, editors. In vitro and in vivo hemolysis. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012:9–13.10.1515/9783110246148Search in Google Scholar

7. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Favaloro EJ, Guidi GC. Survey on the prevalence of hemolytic specimens in an academic hospital according to collection facility: opportunities for quality improvement. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:616–8.10.1515/CCLM.2009.132Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Lippi G, Cervellin G, Favaloro EJ, Plebani M. Effects of in vitro hemolysis on laboratory testing. In: Sonntag O, Plebani M, editors. In vitro and in vivo hemolysis. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2012:39–53.10.1515/9783110246148Search in Google Scholar

9. Dimeski G. Interference testing. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29(Suppl 1):S43–8.Search in Google Scholar

10. Braun RK, Ferrick DA, Sterner-Kock A, Hyde DM, Giri SN. Comparison of two models of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mouse on the level of leucocytes and T cell subpopulations in bronchoalveolar lavage. Comp Haematol Int 1996;6:141–8.10.1007/BF00368457Search in Google Scholar

11. Cadamuro J, Wiedemann H, Mrazek C, Felder TK, Oberkofler H, Fiedler GM, et al. The economic burden of hemolysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:e285–8.10.1515/cclm-2015-0363Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Polonovski M, Jayle MF. Existence dans le plasma sanguin d’une substance activant l’action peroxydasique de l’hemoglobine. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 1938;129:457–60.Search in Google Scholar

13. Andersen CB, Stødkilde K, Sæderup KL, Kuhlee A, Raunser S, Graversen JH, et al. Haptoglobin. Antioxid Redox Signal 2017;26:814–31.10.1089/ars.2016.6793Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Kristiansen M, Graversen JH, Jacobsen C, Sonne O, Hoffman HJ, Law SK, et al. Identification of the haemoglobin scavenger receptor. Nature 2001;409:198–201.10.1038/35051594Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Dryla A, Gelbmann D, von Gabain A, Nagy E. Identification of a novel iron regulated staphylococcal surface protein with haptoglobin-haemoglobin binding activity. Mol Microbiol 2003;49:37–53.10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03542.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Saederup KL, Stodkilde K, Graversen JH, Dickson CF, Etzerodt A, Hansen SW, et al. The Staphylococcus aureus protein IsdH inhibits host hemoglobin scavenging to promote heme acquisition by the pathogen. J Biol Chem 2016;291:23989–98.10.1074/jbc.M116.755934Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Dickson CF, Kumar KK, Jacques DA, Malmirchegini GR, Spirig T, Mackay JP, et al. Structure of the hemoglobin-IsdH complex reveals the molecular basis of iron capture by Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem 2014;289:6728–38.10.1074/jbc.M113.545566Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Spirig T, Malmirchegini GR, Zhang J, Robson SA, Sjodt M, Liu M, et al. Staphylococcus aureus uses a novel multidomain receptor to break apart human hemoglobin and steal its heme. J Biol Chem 2013;288:1065–78.10.1074/jbc.M112.419119Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Sheldon JR, Heinrichs DE. Recent developments in understanding the iron acquisition strategies of gram positive pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015;39:592–630.10.1093/femsre/fuv009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Sjodt M, Macdonald R, Spirig T, Chan AH, Dickson CF, Fabian M, et al. The PRE-derived NMR model of the 38.8-kDa tri-domain IsdH protein from Staphylococcus aureus suggests that it adaptively recognizes human hemoglobin. J Mol Biol 2016;428:1107–29.10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Lippi G. Systematic assessment of the hemolysis index: pros and cons. Adv Clin Chem 2015;71:157–70.10.1016/bs.acc.2015.05.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. CLSI. Interference testing in clinical chemistry, in approved guideline – third edition 2018. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Search in Google Scholar

23. Biotech Support Group LLC. http://www.biotechsupportgroup.com/v/vspfiles/templates/257/pdf/HemogloBindProductSheet020717MK.pdf. HemogloBind™ Hemoglobin Removal and Capture. Available at: http://www.biotechsupportgroup.com/v/vspfiles/templates/257/pdf/HemogloBindProductSheet020717MK.pdf. Accessed: 2017.Search in Google Scholar

24. Balion CM, Champagne PA, Ali AC. Evaluation of HemogloBind for removal of o-raffinose cross-linked hemoglobin (Hemolink) from serum. Clin Chem 1997;43:1796–7.10.1093/clinchem/43.9.1796Search in Google Scholar

25. Hvidberg V, Maniecki MB, Jacobsen C, Højrup P, Møller HJ, Moestrup SK. Identification of the receptor scavenging hemopexin-heme complexes. Blood 2005;106:2572–9.10.1182/blood-2005-03-1185Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0381).


Received: 2019-04-08
Accepted: 2019-05-26
Published Online: 2019-06-22
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Identification and management of spurious hemolysis: controversies, concerns and criticisms
  4. Reviews
  5. CYP24A1 and SLC34A1 genetic defects associated with idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia: from genotype to phenotype
  6. Meta-analysis: compared with anti-CCP and rheumatoid factor, could anti-MCV be the next biomarker in the rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria?
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Collection, transport and storage procedures for blood culture specimens in adult patients: recommendations from a board of Italian experts
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. Using the hemoglobin-binding Staphylococcus aureus protein IsdH to enable plasma analysis of hemolyzed blood samples
  11. Handling of hemolyzed serum samples in clinical chemistry laboratories: the Nordic hemolysis project
  12. Clinical biomarker innovation: when is it worthwhile?
  13. Impact of total automation consolidating first-line laboratory tests on diagnostic blood loss
  14. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the D-dimer test in emergency department patients: secondary analysis of an observational study
  15. Screening of chemical libraries in pursuit of kallikrein-5 specific inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses
  16. Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment
  17. Establishment of an international autoantibody reference standard for human anti-DFS70 antibodies: proof-of-concept study for a novel Megapool strategy by pooling individual specific sera
  18. Only monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies aid in the exclusion of antinuclear antibody associated rheumatic diseases: an Italian experience
  19. Performance evaluation of an Indoxyl Sulfate Assay Kit “NIPRO”
  20. Variable and inaccurate serum IgG4 levels resulting from lack of standardization in IgG subclass assay calibration
  21. Hematology and Coagulation
  22. Influence of hypertriglyceridemia, hyperbilirubinemia and hemolysis on thrombin generation in human plasma
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Reference intervals for serum total vitamin B12 and holotranscobalamin concentrations and their change points with methylmalonic acid concentration to assess vitamin B12 status during early and mid-pregnancy
  25. Cardiovascular Diseases
  26. Serum concentrations of free fatty acids are associated with 3-month mortality in acute heart failure patients
  27. Letters to the Editor
  28. Management of potassium results in haemolysed plasma samples at the emergency department laboratory
  29. Unexpected analytical interference in isavuconazole UV determination in a child in therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor for cystic fibrosis
  30. Total laboratory automation has the potential to be the field of application of artificial intelligence: the cyber-physical system and “Automation 4.0”
  31. 99th percentile upper reference limit of AccuTnI+3 in a Korean reference population: a multicenter study using fresh serum
  32. Roche Troponin T hs-STAT meets all expert opinion analytical laboratory practice recommendations for the use of the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome
  33. A comparison of biotin interference in routine immunoassays on the Roche Cobas 8000, Beckman Coulter DXi and Siemens Advia Centaur XPT immunoassay platforms
  34. The importance of the methodology and sample matrix when interpreting chromogranin A results
  35. The sudden death of the combined first trimester aneuploidy screening, a single centre experience in Belgium
  36. Reply to Luksic et al. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56(4):574–581
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0381/html
Scroll to top button