Home Preanalytical stability of [-2]proPSA in whole blood stored at room temperature before separation of serum and plasma: implications to Phi determination
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Preanalytical stability of [-2]proPSA in whole blood stored at room temperature before separation of serum and plasma: implications to Phi determination

  • Ruggero Dittadi , Aline S.C. Fabricio ORCID logo , Giulia Rainato , Edoardo Peroni , Fulvio Di Tonno , Beatrice Vezzù , Chiara Mazzariol , Elisa Squarcina , Laura Tammone and Massimo Gion ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 15, 2018

Abstract

Background

[-2]proPSA seems to outperform free/total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio in prostate cancer diagnosis. However, [-2]proPSA stability remains an underestimated issue. We examined [-2]proPSA stability over time in whole blood before separation of serum and plasma and its implications for prostate health index (Phi) determination. Total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) stabilities were also assessed.

Methods

Blood was drawn from 26 patients and separated in two tubes for plasma (K2EDTA and K2EDTA plus protease inhibitors – P100) and one for serum (clot activator plus gel separator). Tubes were stored at room temperature before centrifugation 1, 3 and 5 h for serum and EDTA plasma or 1 and 5 h for P100 plasma. To investigate the influence of gel separator on markers’ stability, blood was collected from 10 patients in three types of tubes to obtain serum: tubes with clot activator plus gel separator, with silica particles or glass tubes. Biomarkers were assayed with chemiluminescent immunoassays.

Results

[-2]proPSA and Phi levels significantly and progressively increased over time in serum (+4.81% and +8.2% at 3 h; +12.03% and +14.91% at 5 h, respectively, vs. 1 h; p<0.001). Conversely, [-2]proPSA levels did not change in plasma (EDTA or P100). tPSA levels did not change over time in serum or plasma, whereas fPSA decreased in serum. All markers were higher in plasma than in serum at any time point. This difference did not seem to be attributable to the use of gel for serum preparation.

Conclusions

EDTA prevented spurious in vitro modifications in PSA-related isoforms, confirming that a stabilized blood sample is a prerequisite for [-2]proPSA measurement and Phi determination.


Corresponding author: Dr. Massimo Gion, MD, Centro Regionale Biomarcatori, AULSS3 Serenissima, Department of Clinical Pathology and Transfusion Medicine, SS Giovanni e Paolo Regional Hospital, Campo SS Giovanni e Paolo 6777, Ospedale Civile, 30122 Venezia, Italy, Phone: +390415294260, Fax: +390415294910

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Prof. Ulf-Håkan Stenman (Helsinki University, Finland) for helpful discussion of results and valuable advice. We would like to thank Dr. Matelda Zancan for her support in preparing the study protocol; nurses of Endoscopy Ward for the collection of blood samples; Dr. Susanna Ferrarese and technicians of Laboratory Analysis Unit for the processing of blood samples. We are also grateful to Beckman Coulter (Brea, USA) for their kind unconditioned donation of assay kits of tPSA, fPSA and [-2]proPSA used in this study and to BD Diagnostics Preanalytical Systems – PAS (Milan, Italy) for their kind unconditioned donation of P100 tubes. We thank Dr. Antonette Leon for her contribution in editing the manuscript and Mrs. Ornella Scattolin for administrative assistance.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This study was supported by Veneto Region (Italy) through the “Programma Regionale per I Biomarcatori Diagnostici, Prognostici e Predittivi” assigned to Azienda AULSS3 Serenissima; partially supported by the Italian Association for Research on Cancer Grant Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology, 5×1000 (no. 12214) to M.G.; and also partially supported by Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV – IRCCS, Padova, Italy and AVAPO Venezia Onlus, Venice, Italy.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Zhang WM, Finne P, Leinonen J, Vesalainen S, Nordling S, Rannikko S, et al. Characterization and immunological determination of the complex between prostate-specific antigen and alpha2-macroglobulin. Clin Chem 1998;44:2471–9.10.1093/clinchem/44.12.2471Search in Google Scholar

2. Christensson A, Laurell CB, Lilja H. Enzymatic activity of prostate specific antigen and its reactions with extracellular serine proteinase inhibitors. Eur J Biochem 1990;194:755–63.10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19466.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Leinonen J, Zhang WM, Stenman UH. Complex formation between PSA isoenzymes and protease inhibitors. J Urol 1996;155:1099–103.10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66399-7Search in Google Scholar

4. Pettersson K, Piironen T, Seppälä M, Liukkonen L, Christensson A, Matikainen MT, et al. Free and complexed prostate-specific antigen (PSA): in vitro stability, epitope map, and development of immunofluorometric assays for specific and sensitive detection of free PSA and PSA-alpha 1-antichymotrypsin complex. Clin Chem 1995;41:1480–8.10.1093/clinchem/41.10.1480Search in Google Scholar

5. Gion M, Trevisiol C, Rutjes AW, Rainato G, Fabricio AS. Circulating tumor markers: a guide to their appropriate clinical use. Comparative summary of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (Part 2). Int J Biol Markers 2017;32:e1–52.10.5301/ijbm.5000272Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Mikolajczyk SD, Rittenhouse HG. Pro PSA: a more cancer specific form of prostate specific antigen for the early detection of prostate cancer. Keio J Med 2003;52:86–91.10.2302/kjm.52.86Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Sokoll LJ, Wang Y, Feng Z, Kagan J, Partin AW, Sanda MG, et al. [-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection: a national cancer institute early detection research network validation study. J Urol 2008;180:539–43.10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Jansen FH, van Schaik RH, Kurstjens J, Horninger W, Klocker H, Bektic J, et al. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection. Eur Urol 2010;57:921–7.10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lazzeri M, Haese A, de la Taille A, Palou Redorta J, McNicholas T, Lughezzani G, et al. Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol 2013;63:986–94.10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yee CH, Chan ES, Hou SM, et al. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10–20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination. Investig Clin Urol 2016;57:336–42.10.4111/icu.2016.57.5.336Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Gnanapragasam VJ, Burling K, George A, Stearn S, Warren A, Barrett T, et al. The Prostate Health Index adds predictive value to multi-parametric MRI in detecting significant prostate cancers in a repeat biopsy population. Sci Rep 2016;6:35364.10.1038/srep35364Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Loeb S, Shin SS, Broyles DL, Wei JT, Sanda M, Klee G, et al. Prostate health index improves multivariable risk prediction of aggressive prostate cancer. BJU Int 2017;120:61–8.10.1111/bju.13676Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Wang W, Wang M, Wang L, Adams TS, Tian Y, Xu J. Diagnostic ability of %p2PSA and prostate health index for aggressive prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2014;4:5012.10.1038/srep05012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Pecoraro V, Roli L, Plebani M, Trenti T. Clinical utility of the (-2)proPSA and evaluation of the evidence: a systematic review. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1123–32.10.1515/cclm-2015-0876Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Cartledge JJ, Thompson D, Verril H, Clarkson P, Eardley I. The stability of free and bound prostate-specific antigen. BJU Int 1999;84:810–4.10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00311.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Jung K, Lein M, Brux B, Sinha P, Schnorr D, Loening SA. Different stability of free and complexed prostate-specific antigen in serum in relation to specimen handling and storage conditions. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000;38:1271–5.10.1515/CCLM.2000.200Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Piironen T, Pettersson K, Suonpää M, Stenman UH, Oesterling JE, Lövgren T, et al. In vitro stability of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) complexed to alpha 1-antichymotrypsin in blood samples. Urology 1996;48:81–7.10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00616-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Woodrum D, French C, Shamel LB. Stability of free prostate-specific antigen in serum samples under a variety of sample collection and sample storage conditions. Urology 1996;48:33–9.10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00607-3Search in Google Scholar

19. Sokoll LJ, Bruzek DJ, Dua R, Dunn W, Mohr P, Wallerson G, et al. Short-term stability of the molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen and effect on percent complexed prostate-specific antigen and percent free prostate-specific antigen. Urology 2002;60:24–30.10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01723-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Semjonow A, Köpke T, Eltze E, Pepping-Schefers B, Bürgel H, Darte C. Pre-analytical in-vitro stability of [-2]proPSA in blood and serum. Clin Biochem 2010;43:926–8.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.04.062Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Igawa T, Takehara K, Onita T, Ito K, Sakai H. Stability of [-2]Pro-PSA in whole blood and serum: analysis for optimal measurement conditions. J Clin Lab Anal 2014;28:315–9.10.1002/jcla.21687Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. O’Neal WK, Anderson W, Basta PV, Carretta EE, Doerschuk CM, Barr RG, et al. Comparison of serum, EDTA plasma and P100 plasma for luminex-based biomarker multiplex assays in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the SPIROMICS study. J Transl Med 2014;12:9.10.1186/1479-5876-12-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Petersen PH, Stöckl D, Blaabjerg O, Pedersen B, Birkemose E, Thienpont L, et al. Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with reference method by use of difference plots. Clin Chem 1997;43:2039–46.10.1093/clinchem/43.11.2039Search in Google Scholar

24. Takayama TK, Fujikawa K, Davie EW. Characterization of the precursor of prostate-specific antigen. Activation by trypsin and by human glandular kallikrein. J Biol Chem 1997;272:21582–8.10.1074/jbc.272.34.21582Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Mikolajczyk SD, Catalona WJ, Evans CL, Linton HJ, Millar LS, Marker KM, et al. Proenzyme forms of prostate-specific antigen in serum improve the detection of prostate cancer. Clin Chem 2004;50:1017–25.10.1373/clinchem.2003.026823Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. España F, Royo M, Martínez M, Enguídanos MJ, Vera CD, Estellés A, et al. Free and complexed prostate specific antigen in the differentiation of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: studies in serum and plasma samples. J Urol 1998;160:2081–8.10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62248-1Search in Google Scholar

27. Ulmert D, Becker C, Nilsson JA, Piironen T, Björk T, Hugosson J, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements of free and total prostate-specific antigen in serum vs. plasma after long-term storage at -20 degrees C. Clin Chem 2006;52:235–9.10.1373/clinchem.2005.050641Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Steuer C, Huber AR, Bernasconi L. Where clinical chemistry meets medicinal chemistry. Systematic analysis of physico-chemical properties predicts stability of common used drugs in gel separator serum tubes. Clin Chim Acta 2016;462:23–7.10.1016/j.cca.2016.08.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. LeBeau AM, Banerjee SR, Pomper MG, Mease RC, Denmeade SR. Optimization of peptide-based inhibitors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as targeted imaging agents for prostate cancer. Bioorg Med Chem 2009;17:4888–93.10.1016/j.bmc.2009.06.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Hsieh MC, Cooperman BS. Inhibition of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) by alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin: salt-dependent activation mediated by a conformational change. Biochemistry 2002;41:2990–7.10.1021/bi0117450Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Barrett AJ, Brown MA, Sayers CA. The electrophoretically ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ forms of the alpha 2-macroglobulin molecule. Biochem J 1979;181:401–18.10.1042/bj1810401Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Otto A, Bär J, Birkenmeier G. Prostate-specific antigen forms complexes with human alpha 2-macroglobulin and binds to the alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor/LDL receptor-related protein. J Urol 1998;159:297–303.10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64085-0Search in Google Scholar

33. Heeb MJ, Gruber A, Griffin JH. Identification of divalent metal ion-dependent inhibition of activated protein C by alpha 2-macroglobulin and alpha 2-antiplasmin in blood and comparisons to inhibition of factor Xa, thrombin, and plasmin. J Biol Chem 1991;266:17606–12.10.1016/S0021-9258(19)47415-2Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0596).


Received: 2018-06-08
Accepted: 2018-08-11
Published Online: 2018-09-15
Published in Print: 2019-03-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Can Grail find the trail to early cancer detection?
  4. Reviews
  5. Aberrant glycosylation and cancer biomarker discovery: a promising and thorny journey
  6. Application of NMR metabolomics to search for human disease biomarkers in blood
  7. Mini Review
  8. Host-response biomarkers for the diagnosis of bacterial respiratory tract infections
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. Diabetes alert dogs: a narrative critical overview
  11. EFLM Paper
  12. Documenting metrological traceability as intended by ISO 15189:2012: A consensus statement about the practice of the implementation and auditing of this norm element
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Commutability of external quality assessment materials for serum sodium and potassium measurements
  15. Standardization of measurement procedures for serum uric acid: 8-year experience from Category 1 EQA program results in China
  16. Next-generation rapid serum tube technology using prothrombin activator coagulant: fast, high-quality serum from normal samples
  17. Cannabinoids determination in bronchoalveolar lavages of cannabis smokers with lung disease
  18. A new method for the determination of ammonium in the vitreous humour based on capillary electrophoresis and its preliminary application in thanatochemistry
  19. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  20. Defining reference intervals for a serum growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) assay in a Caucasian population and its potential utility in diabetic kidney disease (DKD)
  21. Cancer Diagnostics
  22. Preanalytical stability of [-2]proPSA in whole blood stored at room temperature before separation of serum and plasma: implications to Phi determination
  23. Cardiovascular Diseases
  24. A de novo mutation of SMYD1 (p.F272L) is responsible for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a Chinese patient
  25. Infectious Diseases
  26. Analyzing the capability of PSP, PCT and sCD25 to support the diagnosis of infection in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia
  27. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin predicts poor outcome in non-selected patients admitted to an intensive care unit
  28. Validation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis real-time polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis using cerebrospinal fluid samples: a pilot study
  29. Letters to the Editor
  30. Methodological issues are important in cannabinoids determination in bronchoalveolar lavage
  31. Clarifying methodological issues in cannabinoids determination in bronchoalveolar lavages
  32. Letter to the Editor relating to Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56(7):1090–1099
  33. Authors’ reply to the Letter by Infantino et al. commenting on Bonroy et al.: Anti-DFS70 in different settings, CCLM 2018;56:1090–9
  34. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I analytical imprecisions evaluated by internal quality control or imprecision profile
  35. Procalcitonin as guide to therapy in endovascular infections: caveat emptor!
  36. A new suggested approach in screening for Bence Jones protein and potential kidney damage
  37. Establishing assay-specific 97.5th percentile upper reference limit for serum D-2-hydroxyglutarate for the management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia
  38. Parallel algorithm for myeloproliferative neoplasms testing: the frequency of double mutations is found in the JAK2/MPL genes more often than the JAK2/CALR genes, but is there a clinical benefit?
  39. CGH array for the identification of a compound heterozygous mutation in the CYP1B1 gene in a patient with bilateral anterior segment dysgenesis
  40. A very rare interference with the valproate method on the Beckman DxC 800 general chemistry analyser
  41. Congress Abstracts
  42. 5th EFLM Conference on Preanalytical Phase Zagreb (HR), 22-23 March 2019
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0596/html
Scroll to top button