Home Medicine Measurement uncertainty and metrological traceability of whole blood cyclosporin A mass concentration results obtained by UHPLC-MS/MS
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Measurement uncertainty and metrological traceability of whole blood cyclosporin A mass concentration results obtained by UHPLC-MS/MS

  • Raül Rigo-Bonnin EMAIL logo , Pedro Alía and Francesca Canalias
Published/Copyright: April 24, 2018

Abstract

Background:

Traceable and accurate results of cyclosporine A (CsA) mass concentrations in whole blood are required to ensure the monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients. Metrological traceability and measurement uncertainty can allow ensuring reliability and comparability of these results over time and space. In this study, we provide a practical and detailed example of how the traceability and uncertainty of mass concentration of CsA results, obtained using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) procedure, can be described and estimated.

Methods:

Traceability was described mainly according to ISO 17511 and information obtained from certificates facilitated with the manufacturer’s calibrators. Uncertainty estimation was performed using the bottom-up and top-down approaches. For the bottom-up approach, the most relevant sources of uncertainty were identified and later used to estimate the standard, combined and expanded uncertainties. For the top-down approach, expanded uncertainty was estimated directly using intralab quality control data mainly.

Results:

Mass concentration of CsA results was traceable to the manufacturer’s product calibrators used to calibrate the UHPLC-MS/MS procedure. The expanded uncertainties estimated by the bottom-up and top-down approaches were 7.4% and 7.2%, respectively.

Conclusions:

After performing the bottom-up and top-down approaches, we observed that their results were quite similar. This fact would confirm that the top-down approach could be sufficient for estimating uncertainty of CsA mass concentrations in whole blood results in clinical laboratories. Finally, we hope that this study can help and motivate clinical laboratories to describe metrological traceability and to perform measurement uncertainty studies based on the simpler top-down approach.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Zhang Y, Zhang R. Recent advances in analytical methods for the therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs. Drug Test Anal 2018;10:81–94.10.1002/dta.2290Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. McShane AJ, Bunch DR, Wang S. Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta 2016;454:1–5.10.1016/j.cca.2015.12.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Freudenberger K, Hilbig U, Gauglitz G. Recent advances in therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs. TrAC 2016;79:257–68.10.1016/j.trac.2015.11.016Search in Google Scholar

4. International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories. Requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

5. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. International vocabulary of metrology. Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd ed. JCGM 200:2012. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html?. Accessed: Jan 11, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

6. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic medical devices. Measurement of quantities in biological samples. Metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials. ISO 17511. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

7. International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic medical devices. Measurement of quantities in samples of biological origin. Requirements for content and presentation of reference measurement procedures. ISO 15193. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

8. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). JCGM 100:2008. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/#gum?. Accessed: Jan 11, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

9. EURACHEM/CITAC. Guide CG4: Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 3rd ed. Eurachem, 2012. https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam?. Accessed: Jan 11, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine; approved guideline. CLSI EP29-A. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

11. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/jc/jcgm/?. Accessed: Jan 11, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

12. Rigo-Bonnin R, Arbiol Roca A, González de Aledo-Castillo JM, Alía P. Simultaneous measurement of cyclosporine A, everolimus, sirolimus and tacrolimus concentrations in human blood by UPLC–MS/MS. Chromatographia 2015;78:1459–74.10.1007/s10337-015-2981-0Search in Google Scholar

13. De Bièvre P, Dybkaer R, Fajgelj A, Hibbert DB. Metrological traceability of measurement results in chemistry: concepts and implementation (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 2011;83:1873–935.10.1351/PAC-REP-07-09-39Search in Google Scholar

14. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Properties and units in the laboratory sciences. Part X. Properties and units in general clinical chemistry. Pure Appl Chem 2000;72:747–972.10.1351/pac200072050747Search in Google Scholar

15. Kim JY, Kwon W, Kim HS, Suh S, In MK. Estimation of measurement uncertainty for the quantification of 11-Nor-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid and its glucuronide in urine using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 2014;38:164–70.10.1093/jat/bku008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Mansilha C, Melo A, Rebelo H, Ferreira IM, Pinho O, Domingues V, et al. Quantification of endocrine disruptors and pesticides in water by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Method validation using weighted linear regression schemes. J Chromatogr A 2010;1217:6681–91.10.1016/j.chroma.2010.05.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Waters Corporation. MassLynx 4.1: Peak Integration and quantitation algorithm guide–71500122009/Revision A. Milford, MA, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

18. Farrance I, Frenkel R. Uncertainty of measurement: a review of rules for calculating uncertainty components through functional relationships. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:49–75.Search in Google Scholar

19. International Organization for Standardization. Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty evaluation. ISO 21748. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

20. International Organization for Standardization. Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. ISO 13528. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

21. Oosterhuis WP, Bayat H, Armbruster D, Coskun A, Freeman KP, Kallner A, et al. The use of error and uncertainty methods in the medical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56: 209–19.10.1515/cclm-2017-0341Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Kallner A. Estimation of uncertainty in measurements in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:2249–51.10.1515/cclm-2013-0749Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Comite Europeen de Normalisation. Health Informatics. Expression of results of measurements in health sciences. ENV 12435. Brussels: CEN, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

24. Kessler A. Mass spectrometry. A key technique for traceability in clinical chemistry. Trends Analyt Chem 2016;84:74–9.10.1016/j.trac.2016.03.017Search in Google Scholar

25. Vesper HW, Thienpont LM. Traceability in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2009;55:1067–75.10.1373/clinchem.2008.107052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Rami L, Canalias F. An approach to establish the uncertainty budget of catalytic activity concentration measurements in a reference laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:743–51.10.1515/cclm-2014-0579Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Lee JH, Choi JH, Youn JS, Cha YJ, Song W, Park AJ. Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1025–32.10.1515/cclm-2014-0801Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Grote-Koska D, Czajkowski S, Klauke R, Panten E, Brand K, Schumann G. A candidate reference measurement procedure for cyclosporine A in whole blood. Accred Qual Assur 2014;19:147–57.10.1007/s00769-014-1048-5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-12-21
Accepted: 2018-02-21
Published Online: 2018-04-24
Published in Print: 2018-08-28

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine continues to shine brightly in the constellation of laboratory medicine
  4. The Theranos saga and the consequences
  5. Innovative approaches in diabetes diagnosis and monitoring: less invasive, less expensive… but less, equally or more efficient?
  6. Reviews
  7. Exploring the microbiota to better understand gastrointestinal cancers physiology
  8. Linking type 2 diabetes and gynecological cancer: an introductory overview
  9. Mini Reviews
  10. MicroRNAs as predictive biomarkers of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
  11. Salivary biomarkers and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review
  12. Opinion Paper
  13. The meteoric rise and dramatic fall of Theranos: lessons learned for the diagnostic industry
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Uncertainty evaluation in clinical chemistry, immunoassay, hematology and coagulation analytes using only external quality assessment data
  16. Measurement uncertainty and metrological traceability of whole blood cyclosporin A mass concentration results obtained by UHPLC-MS/MS
  17. Computer-assisted interventions in the clinical laboratory process improve the diagnosis and treatment of severe vitamin B12 deficiency
  18. Trueness, precision and stability of the LIAISON 1-84 parathyroid hormone (PTH) third-generation assay: comparison to existing intact PTH assays
  19. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and renal function among young and healthy individuals
  20. Optimizing charge state distribution is a prerequisite for accurate protein biomarker quantification with LC-MS/MS, as illustrated by hepcidin measurement
  21. Quantification of human complement C2 protein using an automated turbidimetric immunoassay
  22. EE score: an index for simple differentiation of homozygous hemoglobin E and hemoglobin E-β0-thalassemia
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Algorithm on age partitioning for estimation of reference intervals using clinical laboratory database exemplified with plasma creatinine
  25. A simple transformation independent method for outlier definition
  26. Cancer Diagnostics
  27. Quantification of vanillylmandelic acid, homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in urine using a dilute-and-shoot and ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method
  28. Cardiovascular Diseases
  29. Sialylated isoforms of apolipoprotein C-III and plasma lipids in subjects with coronary artery disease
  30. Diabetes
  31. Analysis of protein glycation in human fingernail clippings with near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy as an alternative technique for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  32. Letter to the Editor
  33. Preanalytical errors before and after implementation of an automatic blood tube labeling system in two outpatient phlebotomy centers
  34. Hemolysis interference studies: freeze method should be used in the preparation of hemolyzed samples
  35. The curious case of postprandial glucose less than fasting glucose: little things that matter much
  36. Finding best practice in internal quality control procedures using external quality assurance performance
  37. Evaluation of the analytical performance of a new ADVIA immunoassay using the Centaur XPT platform system for the measurement of cardiac troponin I
  38. Reference ranges of the Sebia free light chain ratio in patients with chronic kidney disease
  39. Antigen excess detection by automated assays for free light chains
  40. Multiple myeloma and macro creatine kinase type 1: the first case report
  41. Comparison of five cell-free DNA isolation methods to detect the EGFR T790M mutation in plasma samples of patients with lung cancer
  42. Can we use a point-of-care blood gas analyzer to measure the lactate concentration in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with suspected meningitis?
  43. Unstable haemoglobin variant Hb Leiden is detected on Sysmex XN-Series analysers
  44. Congress Abstracts
  45. 59th National Congress of the Hungarian Society of Laboratory Medicine
Downloaded on 22.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0120/html
Scroll to top button