Home Laboratory performance of sweat conductivity for the screening of cystic fibrosis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Laboratory performance of sweat conductivity for the screening of cystic fibrosis

  • Ronda F. Greaves EMAIL logo , Lisa Jolly , John Massie , Sue Scott , Veronica C. Wiley , Michael P. Metz , Richard J. Mackay and on behalf of the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists Sweat Test Working Party in association with the Royal Australasian College of Pathologists Quality Assurance Programs
Published/Copyright: October 9, 2017

Abstract

Background:

There are several complementary English-language guidelines for the performance of the sweat chloride test. These guidelines also incorporate information for the collection of conductivity samples. However, recommendations for the measurement and reporting of sweat conductivity are less clear than for sweat chloride. The aim of the study was to develop an understanding of the testing and reporting practices of sweat conductivity in Australasian laboratories.

Methods:

A survey specifically directed at conductivity testing was sent to the 12 laboratories registered with the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs.

Results:

Nine (75%) laboratories participated in the survey, seven of whom used Wescor Macroduct® for collecting sweat and the Wescor SWEAT·CHEK™ for conductivity testing, and the remaining two used the Wescor Nanoduct®. There was considerable variation in frequency and staffing for this test. Likewise, criteria about which patients it was inappropriate to test, definitions of adequate collection sweat rate, cutoffs and actions recommended on the basis of the result showed variations between laboratories.

Conclusions:

Variations in sweat conductivity testing and reporting reflect many of the same issues that were revealed in sweat chloride test audits and have the potential to lead to uncertainty about the result and the proper action in response to the result. We recommend that sweat testing guidelines should include clearer statements about the use of sweat conductivity.


Corresponding author: Dr. Ronda F. Greaves, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Mr Peter Graham and Ms Samantha Shepherd for their assistance in reviewing the data in this manuscript.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Gibson LE, Cooke RE. A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilising pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics 1959;23:546–9.10.1542/peds.23.3.545Search in Google Scholar

2. Sweat Testing: Sample Collection and Quantitative Chloride Analysis; Approved Guideline – 3rd ed. CLSI document C34-A3. Wayne: PA. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

3. Guidelines for the Performance of the Sweat Test for the Investigation of Cystic Fibrosis in the UK, v2 2014. See http://www.acb.org.uk/docs/default-source/committees/scientific/guidelines/acb/sweat-guideline-v2-1.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2017.Search in Google Scholar

4. Coakley J, Scott S, Doery J, Greaves R, Talsma P, Whitham E, et al. Australian guidelines for the performance of the sweat test for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Clin Biochem Rev 2006;27(Suppl i):S1–7.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mackay R, George P, Kirk J. Sweat testing for cystic fibrosis: a review of New Zealand Laboratories. J Paediatr Child Health 2006;42:160–4.10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00822.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Barben J, Casaulta C, Spinar R, Schoni M, Swiss Working Group for Cystic Fibrosis (SWGCF). Sweat testing in Swiss hospitals. Swiss Med Wkly 2007;137:192–8.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cirilli N, Padoan R, Raia V, ICFS Sweat Test Working Group. Audit of sweat testing: a first report from Italian Cystic Fibrosis Centres. J Cystic Fibrosis 2008;7:415–22.10.1016/j.jcf.2008.03.005Search in Google Scholar

8. ELITechGroup Biomedical Systems (Formerly Wescor). See https://www.elitechgroup.com/. Accessed 12 Jun 2017.Search in Google Scholar

9. Hammond KB, Turcias NL, Gibson LE. Clinical evaluation of the Macroduct sweat collection system and conductivity analyser in the diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis. J Pediatr 1994;124:255–60.10.1016/S0022-3476(94)70314-0Search in Google Scholar

10. Kirk JM. Inconsistencies in sweat testing in UK laboratories. Arch Dis Child 2000;82:425–7.10.1136/adc.82.5.425Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Coakley J, Scott S, Mackay R, Greaves R, Jolly L, Massie J, et al. Sweat testing for cystic fibrosis: standards of performance in Australasia. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:332–7.10.1258/acb.2009.009023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. SWEAT·CHEK™ Sweat conductivity analyser. Model 3120 Instruction/Service Manual M2672-2A 2005. See www.wescor.com/translations/Translations?2672-2A.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2017.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nanoduct®. Neonatal Sweat Analysis System. Instruction/Service Manual 57-0003-01A 2006. See www.wescor.com/translations/Translations/57-0003-01A.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2017.Search in Google Scholar

14. Macroduct® Sweat Collection System instruction/service manual. Model 3700 SYS. M 2551-7 rev A 2004. See www.wescor.com/translations/Translations/M2551-7A-EN.pdf. Accessed 12 Jun 2017.Search in Google Scholar

15. International Standard. ISO 15189:2012. Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-6-16
Accepted: 2017-8-27
Published Online: 2017-10-9
Published in Print: 2018-3-28

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Visual assessment of sample quality: quo usque tandem?
  4. Reviews
  5. Machine learning in laboratory medicine: waiting for the flood?
  6. Is irisin the new player in exercise-induced adaptations or not? A 2017 update
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Can a combination of average of normals and “real time” External Quality Assurance replace Internal Quality Control?
  9. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  10. The UGT1A1*28 gene variant predicts long-term mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Laboratory performance of sweat conductivity for the screening of cystic fibrosis
  13. Making sense of a haemolysis monitoring and reporting system: a nationwide longitudinal multimethod study of 68 Australian laboratory participant organisations
  14. Visual assessment of hemolysis affects patient safety
  15. Strong impact on plasma protein profiles by precentrifugation delay but not by repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as analyzed using multiplex proximity extension assays
  16. Validation of the Six Sigma Z-score for the quality assessment of clinical laboratory timeliness
  17. Proficiency testing program for hemoglobin E, A2 and F analysis in Thailand using lyophilized hemoglobin control materials
  18. Application of κ free light chains in cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: development of a diagnosis algorithm
  19. Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as potential diagnostic markers and risk predictors of venous thrombosis and obstetric complications in antiphospholipid syndrome
  20. An evaluation of the SENTiFIT 270 analyser for quantitation of faecal haemoglobin in the investigation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer
  21. Evaluation of the Aptima HBV Quant assay vs. the COBAS TaqMan HBV test using the high pure system for the quantitation of HBV DNA in plasma and serum samples
  22. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  23. Reference intervals for stone risk factors in 24-h urine among healthy adults of the Han population in China
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. Rule-out of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction by five point of care cardiac troponin assays according to the 0 h/3 h algorithm of the European Society of Cardiology
  26. Infectious Diseases
  27. Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin vs. established biomarkers in critically ill patients with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome
  28. Association of adrenal hormone metabolites and mortality over a 6-year follow-up in COPD patients with acute exacerbation
  29. Corrigendum
  30. Corrigendum to: Validation of a pneumatic tube system to transport surgical pathology biopsy samples
  31. Letters to the Editor
  32. A transnational collaborative network dedicated to the study and applications of the vascular endothelial growth factor-A in medical practice: the VEGF Consortium
  33. Detection and a functional characterization of the novel FBN1 intronic mutation underlying Marfan syndrome: case presentation
  34. Effect of haemolysis on the determination of CCL17/thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and CCL22/macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC)
  35. Evaluation of long-term stability of cannabinoids in standardized preparations of cannabis flowering tops and cannabis oil by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
  36. Impact of citrated blood collection tubes on red cell morphology: implications for the measurement of plasma glucose
  37. Validation of a pneumatic tube system to transport surgical pathology biopsy samples
  38. Antioxidant capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary investigation on gender-specific differences in an Italian population
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-0530/html
Scroll to top button