Home Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?

  • Ian Farrance EMAIL logo , Tony Badrick and Kenneth A. Sikaris
Published/Copyright: May 26, 2016

Abstract

There appears to be a growing debate with regard to the use of “Westgard style” total error and “GUM style” uncertainty in measurement. Some may argue that the two approaches are irreconcilable. The recent appearance of an article “Quality goals at the crossroads: growing, going, or gone” on the well-regarded Westgard Internet site requires some comment. In particular, a number of assertions which relate to ISO 15189 and uncertainty in measurement appear misleading. An alternate view of the key issues raised by Westergard may serve to guide and enlighten others who may accept such statements at face value.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

1. Panteghini M, Sandberg S. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: the match continues. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:195–6.10.1515/cclm-2015-1036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Westgard JO. Useful measures and models for analytical quality management in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:223–33.10.1515/cclm-2015-0710Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Westgard S. Quality requirements and standards – quality goals at the crossroads: growing, going or gone? Available at: http://www.westgard.com/gone-goals-gone.htm. Accessed: March 2016.Search in Google Scholar

4. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189:2012, Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=56115. Accessed: March 2016.Search in Google Scholar

5. Bureau International des Pois et Mesures. JCGM 200:2012, International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). Available at: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html. Accessed: March 2016.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bureau International des Pois et Mesures. JCGM 100:2008, Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). Available at: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html. Accessed: March 2016.Search in Google Scholar

7. Tate JR, Johnson R, Barth JH, Panteghini M. Harmonization of laboratory testing – A global activity. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:1–3.10.1016/j.cca.2014.02.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Koerbin G, Sikaris KA, Jones GR, Ryan J, Reed M, Tate J, et al. Evidence-based approach to harmonized reference intervals. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:99–107.10.1016/j.cca.2013.10.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Tate JR, Sikaris KA, Jones GR, Yen T, Koerbin G, Ryan J, et al. Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in Australia and New Zealand: An evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes. Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:213–35.Search in Google Scholar

10. Koerbin G, Tate J, Ryan J, Jones GR, Sikaris KA, Kanowski D, et al. Bias assessment of general chemistry analytes using commutable samples. Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:203–11.Search in Google Scholar

11. Fraser CG. Quality specifications. In: Fraser CG, editor. Biological variation: from principles to practice. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2001:29–66.Search in Google Scholar

12. Linnet KL, Boyd JC. Selection and analytical evaluation of methods – with statistical techniques. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Burns DE, editors. Tietz, Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry. St Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier, 2008:201–28.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-4-14
Accepted: 2016-4-15
Published Online: 2016-5-26
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Laboratory analytical quality – the process continues
  4. Measurement uncertainty – a revised understanding of its calculation and use
  5. Review
  6. Substrate-zymography: a still worthwhile method for gelatinases analysis in biological samples
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Is the combination of trueness and precision in one expression meaningful? On the use of total error and uncertainty in clinical chemistry
  9. The problem with total error models in establishing performance specifications and a simple remedy
  10. Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept
  11. Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. Using the hazard ratio to evaluate allowable total error in predictive measurands
  14. Performance of electrolyte measurements assessed by a trueness verification program
  15. Analytical interference by monoclonal immunoglobulins on the direct bilirubin AU Beckman Coulter assay: the benefit of unsuspected diagnosis from spurious results
  16. Preliminary probe of quality indicators and quality specification in total testing process in 5753 laboratories in China
  17. Analytical and clinical evaluation of the new Fujirebio Lumipulse®G non-competitive assay for 25(OH)-vitamin D and three immunoassays for 25(OH)D in healthy subjects, osteoporotic patients, third trimester pregnant women, healthy African subjects, hemodialyzed and intensive care patients
  18. Patient-performed extraction of faecal calprotectin
  19. Comparison of the clinical utility of the Elia CTD Screen to indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Sex-related differences in the association of ghrelin levels with obesity in adolescents
  22. Gestation specific reference intervals for thyroid function tests in pregnancy
  23. Cancer Diagnostics
  24. SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma circulating tumor DNA of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
  25. Dopamine concentration in blood platelets is elevated in patients with head and neck paragangliomas
  26. Letters to the Editor
  27. Cancer dynamics and the success of cancer screening programs
  28. Mother’s instinct – a rare case of multiple test interferences due to heterophile antibodies
  29. Sigma metric or defects per million opportunities (DPMO): the performance of clinical laboratories should be evaluated by the Sigma metrics at decimal level with DPMOs
  30. A national survey of preanalytical handling of oral glucose tolerance tests in pregnancy
  31. Updating pregnancy diabetes guidelines: is (y)our laboratory ready?
  32. Low serum bilirubin values are associated with pulmonary embolism in a case-control study
  33. Effect of Hb H on HbA1c measurements as measured by IFCC reference method and affinity HPLC
  34. Adipocytes in venipunctures cause falsely elevated S-100B serum values
  35. Earlier detection of sepsis by Candida parapsilosis using three-dimensional cytographic anomalies on the Mindray BC-6800 hematological analyzer
  36. Theranos phenomenon – part 4: Theranos at an International Conference
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0314/pdf
Scroll to top button