Home Performance of two commercially available BCR-ABL1 quantification assays that use an international reporting scale
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performance of two commercially available BCR-ABL1 quantification assays that use an international reporting scale

  • Soo Hyun Seo , Seung Jun Lee ORCID logo , Seungman Park , Min Jin Kim , Ji Yoon Song , Eun Kyung Ra , Sung Im Cho , Hyun Kyung Kim , Man Gil Yang , Ji Yeon Kim , Sung Sup Park and Moon-Woo Seong EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 20, 2015

Abstract

Background: Quantifying the BCR-ABL1 rearrangement is important for monitoring chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). To standardize BCR-ABL1 quantification, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the first international genetic reference panel. Here, we compared the BCR-ABL1 levels determined using international scale (IS)-based commercially available assays.

Methods: BCR-ABL1 transcripts were quantified using two IS-based assays. 10–1, 10–2, 10–3, 10–4, 10–5 and 10–6 dilutions of the b3a2 positive RNA were used for evaluating linearity, precision, and limit of detection. Correlation of the assay was evaluated by using DNA obtained from CML patients carrying the BCR-ABL1 b3a2 and b2a2 types.

Results: Both Ipsogen and Asuragen assays showed fine linearity with reasonable %CV. LOD of each assay was calculated as 0.003% for Ipsogen, and 0.005% for Asuragen. By comparing the results that were lower than 10% by either one of the assay, Ipsogen and Asuragen results showed an overall good linear correlation with a tendency for the Ipsogen assay to show slightly higher levels than the Asuragen assay for b3a2 transcript. For b2a2, the tendency was opposite, with Asuragen showing higher values than the Ipsogen.

Conclusions: Two commercially available IS-based BCR-ABL1 assays showed an overall good quantitative correlation. It should be taken into consideration that each assay tended to produce higher values than the other, depending on the BCR-ABL1 subtypes, suggesting that a separate conversion factor for each subtype can be more helpful when BCR-ABL1 transcript levels are converted into IS.


Corresponding author: Moon-Woo Seong, Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea, Phone: +82-2-2072-4180, Fax: +82-2-747-0359, E-mail:

References

1. Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, Hochhaus A, Simonsson B, Appelbaum F, et al. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2006;108:1809–20.10.1182/blood-2006-02-005686Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, Rudzki Z, Hochhaus A, Hensley ML, et al. Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1423–32.10.1056/NEJMoa030513Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Hughes T, Deininger M, Hochhaus A, Branford S, Radich J, Kaeda J, et al. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood 2006;108:28–37.10.1182/blood-2006-01-0092Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Zhang T, Grenier S, Nwachukwu B, Wei C, Lipton JH, Kamel-Reid S. Inter-laboratory comparison of chronic myeloid leukemia minimal residual disease monitoring: summary and recommendations. J Mol Diagn 2007;9:421–30.10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060134Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Branford S, Cross NC, Hochhaus A, Radich J, Saglio G, Kaeda J, et al. Rationale for the recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia 2006;20:1925–30.10.1038/sj.leu.2404388Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Branford S, Fletcher L, Cross NC, Muller MC, Hochhaus A, Kim DW, et al. Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials. Blood 2008;112:3330–8.10.1182/blood-2008-04-150680Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Muller MC, Saglio G, Lin F, Pfeifer H, Press RD, Tubbs RR, et al. An international study to standardize the detection and quantitation of BCR-ABL transcripts from stabilized peripheral blood preparations by quantitative RT-PCR. Haematologica 2007;92:970–3.10.3324/haematol.11172Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. White HE, Hedges J, Bendit I, Branford S, Colomer D, Hochhaus A, et al. Establishment and validation of analytical reference panels for the standardization of quantitative BCR-ABL1 measurements on the international scale. Clin Chem 2013;59:938–48.10.1373/clinchem.2012.196477Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Foroni L, Wilson G, Gerrard G, Mason J, Grimwade D, White HE, et al. Guidelines for the measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2011;153:179–90.10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08603.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Marin D, Ibrahim AR, Lucas C, Gerrard G, Wang L, Szydlo RM, et al. Assessment of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 months is the only requirement for predicting outcome for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:232–8.10.1200/JCO.2011.38.6565Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Branford S, Yeung DT, Prime JA, Choi SY, Bang JH, Park JE, et al. BCR-ABL1 doubling times more reliably assess the dynamics of CML relapse compared with the BCR-ABL1 fold rise: implications for monitoring and management. Blood 2012;119:4264–71.10.1182/blood-2011-11-393041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-6-29
Accepted: 2015-10-17
Published Online: 2015-11-20
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In Memoriam: Gérard Siest (1936–2016)
  3. Editorials
  4. Improving diagnosis and reducing diagnostic errors: the next frontier of laboratory medicine
  5. The quality indicator paradox
  6. Review
  7. Clinical utility of the (-2)proPSA and evaluation of the evidence: a systematic review
  8. Mini Review
  9. Why are clinical practice guidelines not followed?
  10. EFLM Position Paper
  11. Patient identification and tube labelling – a call for harmonisation
  12. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  13. A fast and simple method for detecting and quantifying donor-derived cell-free DNA in sera of solid organ transplant recipients as a biomarker for graft function
  14. Performance of two commercially available BCR-ABL1 quantification assays that use an international reporting scale
  15. HAND1 loss-of-function mutation associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. Performance criteria and quality indicators for the post-analytical phase
  18. Assessing the commutability of reference material formats for the harmonization of amyloid-β measurements
  19. Quantitative determination of four immunosuppressants by high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)
  20. Measurement of plasma vitamin K1 (phylloquinone) and K2 (menaquinones-4 and -7) using HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry
  21. Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab: performance evaluation of three commercial ELISA kits
  22. High level of oxysterols in neonatal cholestasis: a pitfall in analysis of biochemical markers for Niemann-Pick type C disease
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. Reference intervals of plasma homoarginine from the German Gutenberg Health Study
  25. TSH and fT4 during pregnancy: an observational study and a review of the literature
  26. Cancer Diagnostics
  27. Mean corpuscular volume levels and all-cause and liver cancer mortality
  28. Cardiovascular Diseases
  29. Circulating endothelial-derived apoptotic microparticles and insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with chronic heart failure
  30. Hematology and Coagulation
  31. Platelet aggregation in response to ADP is highly variable in normal donors and patients on anti-platelet medication
  32. Letters to the Editor
  33. EQA-derived metrics to assess overall instrument performance
  34. Misidentification in laboratory medicine and diagnostic process: a neglected problem calling for action
  35. Impact of the routine implementation of automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis: 1 year of experience
  36. The importance of angiogenic markers in the differential diagnosis of HELLP syndrome vs. non-HELLP thrombocytopenia
  37. Bisalbuminemia accompanying bisalbuminuria detected in capillary electrophoresis, not in gel electrophoresis
  38. Prognostic value of red blood cell distribution width in acute pancreatitis patients admitted to intensive care units: an analysis of a publicly accessible clinical database MIMIC II
  39. Differences in analytical and biological results between older and newer lots of a widely used irisin immunoassay question the validity of previous studies
  40. A diagnostic algorithm for the detection of inhibitors against coagulation Factor V
  41. Interference of anticoagulants on coagulation testing
  42. Congress Abstracts
  43. Swiss MedLab 2016 and 74th Annual Meeting of the Swiss Society of Microbiology SSM, Bern, 13–16 June 2016
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0611/html
Scroll to top button