Home Revival of physostigmine – a novel HPLC assay for simultaneous determination of physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline designed for a pharmacokinetic study of septic patients
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Revival of physostigmine – a novel HPLC assay for simultaneous determination of physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline designed for a pharmacokinetic study of septic patients

  • Nadine Pinder EMAIL logo , Johannes B. Zimmermann , Stefan Hofer , Thorsten Brenner , Markus A. Weigand , Ute Gubbe , Torsten Hoppe-Tichy and Stefanie Swoboda
Published/Copyright: January 7, 2015

Abstract

Background: Physostigmine, commonly used as an antidote in anticholinergic poisoning, is reported to have additional pharmacological effects, such as activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in sepsis models. Due to the narrow therapeutic range of physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline, however, the plasma concentrations of these substances need to be determined so as to understand their effect and ensure safety in the treatment of septic patients.

Methods: To determine physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline, a rapid and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method has been developed and validated. Spiked plasma samples were cleaned up and concentrated using a simple liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) procedure with N-methylphysostigmine as internal standard. Separation was achieved using reversed-phase HPLC on a Kinetex C18 column with gradient elution and fluorescence detection (254 nm excitation/355 nm emission).

Results: LLE produced clean extracts and a mean recovery of 80.3% for eseroline and 84.9% for physostigmine. The HPLC assay revealed a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.025 ng/mL and a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.05 ng/mL for both analytes. Linearity was observed at 0.05–10.0 ng/mL (r2>0.999). Intra- and inter-day precision ranged from 0.7% to 6.6%, and intra- and inter-day accuracy 97.5%–110.0%.

Conclusions: The presented method is useful for human drug level monitoring of physostigmine and eseroline in accordance with current guidelines. Remarkably low plasma concentrations can be quantified after LLE with gradient elution and fluorescence detection, making this a suitable method for pharmacokinetic studies in a clinical setting.


Corresponding author: Nadine Pinder, Pharmacy Department, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 670, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany, Phone: +49 6221 5634960, Fax: +49 6221 5633836, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jürgen Burhenne, Heidelberg, and Prof. Frieder Kees, Regensburg, for kindly sharing their expertise in HPLC and liquid-liquid extraction procedures.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Financial support: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Triggle DJ, Mitchell JM, Filler R. The pharmacology of physostigmine. CNS Drug Rev 1998;4:87–136.10.1111/j.1527-3458.1998.tb00059.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Somani SM, Dube SN. Physostigmine – an overview as pretreatment drug for organophosphate intoxication. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1989;27:367–87.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zhao B, Moochhala SM, Tham SY. Biologically active components of Physostigma venenosum. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2004;812:183–92.10.1016/S1570-0232(04)00677-4Search in Google Scholar

4. Asthana S, Greig NH, Hegedus L, Holloway HH, Raffaele KC, Schapiro MB, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of physostigmine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995;58:299–309.10.1016/0009-9236(95)90246-5Search in Google Scholar

5. Furey ML, Pietrini P, Alexander GE, Mentis MJ, Szczepanik J, Shetty U, et al. Time course of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of physostigmine assessed by functional brain imaging in humans. Pharm Biochem Behav 2000;66:475–81.10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00186-6Search in Google Scholar

6. ISRCTN registry. Peri-operative physostigmine prophylaxis for liver resection patients at risk for delirium and post-operative cognitive dysfunction. ISRCTN18978802. Available at: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18978802. Accessed on December 10, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

7. Borovikova LV, Ivanova S, Zhang M, Yang H, Botchkina GI, Watkins LR, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature 2000;405:458–62.10.1038/35013070Search in Google Scholar

8. Hofer S, Eisenbach C, Lukic IK, Schneider L, Bode K, Brueckmann M, et al. Pharmacologic cholinesterase inhibition improves survival in experimental sepsis. Crit Care Med 2008;36:404–8.10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E31816208B3Search in Google Scholar

9. Bartolini A, Di Cesare Mannelli L, Ghelardini C. Analgesic and antineuropathic drugs acting through central cholinergic mechanisms. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov 2011;6:119–40.10.2174/157488911795933901Search in Google Scholar

10. Somani SM, Kutty RK, Krishna G. Eseroline, a metabolite of physostigmine, induces neuronal cell death. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1990;106:28–37.10.1016/0041-008X(90)90102-ZSearch in Google Scholar

11. Whelpton R, Moore T. Sensitive liquid chromatographic method for physostigmine in biological fluids using dual-electrode electrochemical detection. J Chromatogr 1985;341:361–71.10.1016/S0378-4347(00)84049-9Search in Google Scholar

12. Azevedo Marques L, Giera M, Lingeman H, Niessen WM. Analysis of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: bioanalysis, degradation and metabolism. Biomed Chromatogr 2011;25:278–99.10.1002/bmc.1573Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Lawrence GD, Yatim N. Extraction of physostigmine from biologic fluids and analysis by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. J Pharmacol Methods 1990;24: 137–43.10.1016/0160-5402(90)90024-FSearch in Google Scholar

14. Wu YQ, Reinecke E. High performance liquid chromatographic method for detection of physostigmine and eseroline in plasma using a silica gel column and a perchloric acid mobile phase. J Liq Chromatogr 1990;13:275–90.10.1080/01483919008049543Search in Google Scholar

15. Zhao B, Moochhala SM, Chaw CS, Yang YY. Simple liquid chromatographic method for the determination of physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline in rat plasma: application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2003;784:323–9.10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00817-6Search in Google Scholar

16. FDA – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FaDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM). Guidance for Industry – Bioanalytical Method Validation. 2001.Search in Google Scholar

17. Rubnov S, Levy D, Schneider H. Liquid chromatographic analysis of physostigmine salicylate and its degradation products. J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 1999;18:939–45.10.1016/S0731-7085(98)00099-5Search in Google Scholar

18. Walter K, Muller M, Barkworth MF, Nieciecki AV, Stanislaus F. Pharmacokinetics of physostigmine in man following a single application of a transdermal system. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995;39:59–63.10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04410.xSearch in Google Scholar

19. Brodie RR, Chasseaud LF, Robbins AD. Determination of physostigmine in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 1987;415:423–31.10.1016/S0378-4347(00)83238-7Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-8-19
Accepted: 2014-11-25
Published Online: 2015-1-7
Published in Print: 2015-7-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Once upon a time: a tale of ISO 15189 accreditation
  4. A new integrated tool for assessing and monitoring test comparability and stability
  5. Liver-FibroSTARD checklist and glossary: tools for standardized design and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of liver fibrosis tests
  6. Reviews
  7. Thromboembolic risk in hematological malignancies
  8. A review of the cut-off points for the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency in the general population
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. Permissible limits for uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine
  11. EFLM Position Paper
  12. Flexible scope for ISO 15189 accreditation: a guidance prepared by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO)
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Evaluation of a low-cost procedure for sampling, long-term storage, and extraction of RNA from blood for qPCR analyses
  15. Application of real-time PCR of sex-independent insertion-deletion polymorphisms to determine fetal sex using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. The Empower project – a new way of assessing and monitoring test comparability and stability
  18. Comparison of four automated serum vitamin B12 assays
  19. Combined indicator of vitamin B12 status: modification for missing biomarkers and folate status and recommendations for revised cut-points
  20. INR vs. thrombin generation assays for guiding VKA reversal: a retrospective comparison
  21. Determination of dabigatran in plasma, serum, and urine samples: comparison of six methods
  22. Simple high-throughput analytical method using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry to quantify total 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol in urine
  23. Revival of physostigmine – a novel HPLC assay for simultaneous determination of physostigmine and its metabolite eseroline designed for a pharmacokinetic study of septic patients
  24. Relationship between antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin and conventional antiphospholipid antibodies in primary antiphospholipid syndrome
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. Relevance of EDTA carryover during blood collection
  27. Reference intervals for renal injury biomarkers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and kidney injury molecule-1 in young infants
  28. Cardiovascular Diseases
  29. NT-proBNP levels and their relationship with systemic ventricular impairment in adult patients with transposition of the great arteries long after Mustard or Senning procedure
  30. Letters to the Editors
  31. Troponin T measured with highly sensitive assay (hsTnT) on admission does not reflect infarct size in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention
  32. Analytical challenges related to the use of biomarker ratios for the biological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
  33. Serum brain injury biomarkers as predictors of mortality after severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: preliminary results
  34. Tumor markers assay by the Lumipulse G
  35. Real-world costs of laboratory tests for non-small cell lung cancer
  36. Impact of stopping vitamin K antagonist therapy on concentrations of dephospho-uncarboxylated Matrix Gla protein
  37. Practicability of fetal scalp blood sampling during labor using microtubes and a point-of-care (POC) lactate testing device: difficulty assessment, sampling time and failure rates
  38. Establishing objective analytical quality requirements in the IgE specific assay: a message in a bottle
  39. Bacteria on a peripheral blood smear as presenting sign of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection in a patient with secondary acute myeloid leukemia
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0834/html
Scroll to top button