Home Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty

  • Jun Hyung Lee , Jee-Hye Choi , Jae Saeng Youn , Young Joo Cha , Woonheung Song and Ae Ja Park EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 24, 2014

Abstract

Background: Measurement uncertainty is a metrological concept to quantify the variability of measurement results. There are two approaches to estimate measurement uncertainty. In this study, we sought to provide practical and detailed examples of the two approaches and compare the bottom-up and top-down approaches to estimating measurement uncertainty.

Methods: We estimated measurement uncertainty of the concentration of glucose according to CLSI EP29-A guideline. Two different approaches were used. First, we performed a bottom-up approach. We identified the sources of uncertainty and made an uncertainty budget and assessed the measurement functions. We determined the uncertainties of each element and combined them. Second, we performed a top-down approach using internal quality control (IQC) data for 6 months. Then, we estimated and corrected systematic bias using certified reference material of glucose (NIST SRM 965b).

Results: The expanded uncertainties at the low glucose concentration (5.57 mmol/L) by the bottom-up approach and top-down approaches were ±0.18 mmol/L and ±0.17 mmol/L, respectively (all k=2). Those at the high glucose concentration (12.77 mmol/L) by the bottom-up and top-down approaches were ±0.34 mmol/L and ±0.36 mmol/L, respectively (all k=2).

Conclusions: We presented practical and detailed examples for estimating measurement uncertainty by the two approaches. The uncertainties by the bottom-up approach were quite similar to those by the top-down approach. Thus, we demonstrated that the two approaches were approximately equivalent and interchangeable and concluded that clinical laboratories could determine measurement uncertainty by the simpler top-down approach.


Corresponding author: Ae Ja Park, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Heukseok-ro 102, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-755, Korea, Phone: +82 2 6299 2717, Fax: +82 2 6263 6410, E-mail:

References

1. CLSI. Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine; approved guideline. CLSI document EP29-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

2. The International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. ISO/TC 212/SC. International Standard ISO 15189. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chen H, Zhang L, Bi X, Deng X. Two evaluation budgets for the measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry. Korean J Lab Med 2011;31:167–71.10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.167Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Bercik Inal B, Koldas M, Inal H, Coskun C, Gumus A, Doventas Y. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1100:223–6.10.1196/annals.1395.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Ellison SL, Williams A, editors. Eurachem/CITAC guide: quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 3rd ed. 2012. Available from: http://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam. Accessed 5 October, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

6. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, IUPAC, IUPAP, ISO, OIML (2012). International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd ed. JCGM 200:2012. Available from: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/vim.html. Accessed 5 November, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

7. CLSI. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods; approved guideline, 2nd ed. Document EP5-A2. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

8. Sadler WA. Variance function program (version 11.0). Available from: http://www.aacb.asn.au/professionaldevelopment/useful-tools/variance-function-program-version-110. Accessed 25 August, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

9. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, IUPAC, IUPAP, ISO, OIML (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008. Available from: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html. Accessed 5 November, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

10. CLSI. Statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: principles and definitions; approved guideline, 3rd ed. CLSI document C24-A3. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2006.Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0801) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.


Received: 2014-8-6
Accepted: 2014-11-10
Published Online: 2014-12-24
Published in Print: 2015-6-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Personalized medicine: moving from simple theory to daily practice
  4. Evaluating and using innovative technologies: a lesson from Theranos?
  5. Review
  6. Emerging biomarkers in the detection and prognosis of prostate cancer
  7. Mini Review
  8. Could molecular assessment of calcium metabolism be a useful tool to early screen patients at risk for pre-eclampsia complicated pregnancy? Proposal and rationale
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. Is laboratory medicine ready for the era of personalized medicine? A survey addressed to laboratory directors of hospitals/academic schools of medicine in Europe
  11. Theranos phenomenon: promises and fallacies
  12. Clinical laboratories: production industry or medical services?
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Role of JAK2 V617F mutation and aberrant expression of microRNA-143 in myeloproliferative neoplasms
  15. Direct identification of Gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants from blood cultures using a microarray-based nucleic acid assay: in-depth analysis of microarray data for undetermined results
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty
  18. Role of vitamin D and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the development of early- and late-onset preeclampsia
  19. Adenosine deaminase, dipeptidyl peptidase-IV activities and lipid peroxidation are increased in the saliva of obese young adult
  20. PON-1 and ferroxidase activities in older patients with mild cognitive impairment, late onset Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia
  21. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000
  22. Dacryocytes are a common morphologic feature of autoimmune and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia
  23. Performance characteristics of a new automated method for measurement of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide
  24. The clinical performance of a chemiluminescent immunoassay in detecting anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies. A comparison with a homemade ELISA method
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. Reference interval for immature platelet fraction on Sysmex XN hematology analyzer: a comparison study with Sysmex XE-2100
  27. Development of the first urinary reproductive hormone ranges referenced to independently determined ovulation day
  28. Cancer Diagnostics
  29. Urinary miR-183 and miR-205 do not surpass PCA3 in urine as predictive markers for prostate biopsy outcome despite their highly dysregulated expression in prostate cancer tissue
  30. Cardiovascular Diseases
  31. Elevated circulating levels of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in obese children
  32. Letters to the Editors
  33. Reporting of hemolysis index (HI) with laboratory results should be obligatory in newborns and infants
  34. Unmeasurably high chloride: a surrogate marker of thiocyanate poisoning identification
  35. Association between red cell distribution width and myocardial infarction in rheumatoid arthritis
  36. Plasmatic and urinary glycosaminoglycan profile in a patient affected by multiple sulfatase deficiency
  37. Rapid diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis by Türk staining
  38. A high selectivity and sensitivity analytical method for the analysis of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in the urine of Alzheimer’s disease patients
  39. S100B protein concentration measurement according to two different immunoassays
Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0801/html
Scroll to top button